The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effects on Mental Health-A before, during, and after Comparison Using the U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey.

BACKGROUND: Although significantly increased mental health concerns were noted globally during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, much less is known about the mental health trends during the COVID-19 recovery period. We aimed to compare current anxiety or depression rates to those before and during the first year of the pandemic and to evaluate demographic differences. METHODS: We analyzed Household Pulse Survey data prospectively collected from a representative U.S. population sample. We compared the anxiety or depression rates from the first pandemic year (04/2020-05/2021) and recovery period (06/2023-03/2024) from the national cohort and demographic subgroups using two-sided paired t-tests and regression analyses and compared these to pre-pandemic (01/2019-12/2019) rates using one-sided t-tests. RESULTS: The national estimates for anxiety or depression improved during the recent COVID-19 recovery period as compared to the first year (29.5 ± 5.5 vs. 37.6 ± 3.1; p < 0.0001) but did not return to the pre-pandemic benchmark (29.5% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001). Higher rates were noted in younger individuals aged 18-29 years (p < 0.0001), in individuals with less than a high school diploma (p < 0.0001), or with disabilities (p < 0.0001). Non-Hispanic Asians reported the lowest rates (p < 0.0001), and no significant gender differences were noted. CONCLUSION: The U.S. population's mental health concerns have improved since the first year of the pandemic but remain above pre-pandemic benchmarks. Certain demographic subgroups are at higher risk, indicating the need for targeted health care and economic policy interventions to address these disparities.

Pediatric Palliative Epilepsy Surgery: A Report From the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery is an underutilized resource for children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Palliative and definitive surgical options can reduce seizure burden and improve quality of life. Palliative epilepsy surgery is often seen as a "last resort" compared to definitive surgical options. We compare patient characteristics between palliative and definitive epilepsy surgical patients and present palliative surgical outcomes from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium surgical database. METHODS: The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Surgery database is a prospective registry of patients aged 0-18 years undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery at 20 pediatric epilepsy centers. We included all children with completed surgical therapy characterized as definitive or palliative. Demographics, epilepsy type, age of onset, age at referral, etiology of epilepsy, treatment history, time-to-referral/evaluation, number of failed anti-seizure medications (ASMs), imaging results, type of surgery, and postoperative outcome were acquired. RESULTS: Six hundred forty patients undergoing epilepsy surgery were identified. Patients undergoing palliative procedures were younger at seizure onset (median: 2.1 vs 4 years, P= 0.0008), failed more ASM trials before referral for presurgical evaluation (P=<0.0001), and had longer duration of epilepsy before referral for surgery (P=<0.0001). During presurgical evaluation, patients undergoing palliative surgery had shorter median duration of video-EEG data collected (P=0.007) but number of cases where ictal data were acquired was similar between groups. The most commonly performed palliative procedure was corpus callosotmy (31%), followed by lobectomy (21%) and neuromodulation (82% responsive neurostimulation vs 18% deep brain stimulation). Palliative patients were further categorized into traditionally palliative procedures vs traditionally definitive procedures. The majority of palliative patients had 50% reduction or better in seizure burden. Seizure free outcomes were significantly higher among those with traditional definitive surgeries, 41% (95% confidence interval: 26% to 57%) compared with traditional palliative surgeries and 9% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 17%). Rate of seizure freedom was 46% at 24 months or greater of follow-up in the traditional definitive group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving palliative epilepsy surgery trialed more ASMs, were referred later after becoming drug resistant, and had longer gaps between drug resistance and epilepsy surgery compared with patients undergoing definitive epilepsy surgery. The extent of surgical evaluation is impacted if surgery is thought to be palliative. A majority of palliative surgery patients achieved >50% seizure reduction at follow-up, both in groups that received traditionally palliative and traditionally definitive surgical procedures. Palliative surgical patients can achieve greater seizure control and should be referred to an epilepsy surgery center promptly after failing two appropriate anti-seizure medications.

Responsive Neurostimulation in Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy: Findings From the Epilepsy Surgery Subgroup of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop intracranial electrical stimulation system, is a palliative surgical option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). RNS is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients aged ≥18 years with pharmacoresistant partial seizures. The published experience of RNS in children is limited. METHODS: This is a combined prospective and retrospective study of patients aged ≤18 years undergoing RNS placement. Patients were identified from the multicenter Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery Registry from January 2018 to December 2021, and additional data relevant to this study were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients received RNS during the study period. The mean age at implantation was 14.9 years; the mean duration of epilepsy, 8.1 years; and the mean number of previously trialed antiseizure medications, 4.2. Five patients (9%) previously trialed dietary therapy, and 19 patients (34%) underwent prior surgery. Most patients (70%) underwent invasive electroencephalography evaluation before RNS implantation. Complications occurred in three patients (5.3%) including malpositioned leads or transient weakness. Follow-up (mean 11.7 months) was available for 55 patients (one lost), and four were seizure-free with RNS off. Outcome analysis of stimulation efficacy was available for 51 patients: 33 patients (65%) were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), including five patients (10%) who were seizure free at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For young patients with focal DRE who are not candidates for surgical resection, neuromodulation should be considered. Although RNS is off-label for patients aged <18 years, this multicenter study suggests that it is a safe and effective palliative option for children with focal DRE.