Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 132(4): 1112-1119, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is common in older surgical patients and is associated with postoperative delirium. However, cognitive function is inconsistently assessed preoperatively, leading to missed opportunities to recognize vulnerable patients. We designed a prospective cohort study to assess the agreement of the Mini-Cog screening tool administered in the preoperative clinic (clinic-day test) or immediately before surgery (surgery-day test) and to determine whether a positive screening for cognitive dysfunction in the surgery-day test is associated with postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients aged 65-89 years, scheduled for elective, inpatient surgery under general anesthesia between June 20, 2018 and August 3, 2018. Mini-Cog test scores were obtained during a clinic-day test and surgery-day test. The Short Confusion Assessment Method was performed in the PACU. Agreement between Mini-Cog clinic-day and surgery-day test scores was estimated using an ordinally weighted kappa statistic, κ. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether there was an association between a positive screen for cognitive impairment and PACU delirium. Odds ratio analysis was performed to determine whether the Mini-Cog score was associated with PACU delirium. RESULTS: Of 128 patients meeting eligibility criteria, 80 patients were enrolled. Ten had cognitive impairment based on the Mini-Cog clinic-day test score, while 70 did not. Age, sex, race, education level, subjective memory impairment, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status were equivalent in the 2 groups. The mean number of days between the clinic-day score and the surgery-day score was 8.4 days (standard deviation [SD] = 6.9). Mini-Cog clinic-day and surgery-day scores had high agreement (κ = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.87; P < .001), and both scores were highly predictive of PACU delirium. Patients with Mini-Cog surgery-day scores compatible with cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog scores ≤2) had an estimated 12.8 times higher odds of PACU delirium compared to patients with normal cognitive function or Mini-Cog scores >2 (odds ratio [OR] = 12.8; 95% CI, 2.6-63.8, P = .002). Similarly, patients with Mini-Cog clinic-day test scores compatible with cognitive impairment had an estimated 29 times higher odds of PACU delirium compared to patients with normal cognitive function (OR = 29.0; 95% CI, 2.6-63.8, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the approach of using the Mini-Cog on the day of surgery to screen for cognitive impairment in older patients. Importantly, Mini-Cog surgery-day test scores compatible with cognitive impairment (≤2) were strongly associated with PACU delirium.


Asunto(s)
Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Cognición , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Delirio del Despertar/etiología , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Delirio del Despertar/diagnóstico , Delirio del Despertar/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Hosp Med ; 12(4): 277-282, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28411294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalists have long been involved in optimizing perioperative care for medically complex patients. In 2015, the Society of Hospital Medicine organized the Perioperative Care Work Group to summarize this experience and to develop a framework for providing optimal perioperative care. METHODS: The work group, which consisted of perioperative care experts from institutions throughout the United States, reviewed current hospitalist-based perioperative care programs, compiled key issues in each perioperative phase, and developed a framework to highlight essential elements to be considered. The framework was reviewed and approved by the board of the Society of Hospital Medicine. RESULTS: The Perioperative Care Matrix for Inpatient Surgeries was developed. This matrix characterizes perioperative phases, coordination, and metrics of success. Additionally, concerns and potential risks were tabulated. Key questions regarding program effectiveness were drafted, and examples of models of care were provided. CONCLUSIONS: The Perioperative Care Matrix for Inpatient Surgeries provides an essential collaborative framework hospitalists can use to develop and continually improve perioperative care programs. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:277-282.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Medicina Hospitalar/normas , Médicos Hospitalarios/normas , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA