RESUMEN
A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the prevalences and loads of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in farm and processing plant samples collected from 55 commercial broiler chicken flocks. Environmental samples were collected from broiler houses within 48 h before slaughter, and carcass rinses were performed on birds from the same flocks at 4 different stages of processing. Salmonella was detected in farm samples of 50 (90.9%) flocks and in processing samples of 52 (94.5%) flocks. Campylobacter was detected in farm samples of 35 (63.6%) flocks and in processing samples of 48 (87.3%) flocks. There was a significant positive relationship between environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses with respect to both Salmonella and Campylobacter prevalences and loads. Campylobacter loads were significantly higher than Salmonella loads, and the correlations between samples collected from the same flocks were higher for Campylobacter than they were for Salmonella. Boot socks were the most sensitive sample type for detection of Salmonella on the farm, whereas litter samples had the strongest association with Salmonella loads in pre- and postchill carcass rinses. Boot socks, drag swabs, and fecal samples all had similar sensitivities for detecting Campylobacter on the farm, and all were more strongly associated with Campylobacter loads in carcass rinses than were litter samples. Farm samples explained a greater proportion of the variability in carcass rinse prevalences and loads for Campylobacter than they did for Salmonella. Salmonella and Campylobacter prevalences and loads both decreased significantly as birds progressed through the processing plant.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Pollos , Microbiología Ambiental , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Animales , Infecciones por Campylobacter/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Heces/microbiología , Georgia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Especificidad de la EspecieRESUMEN
We investigated the feasibility of using Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) filter cards for the storage of allantoic fluid containing an infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), such as Arkansas-DPI, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, and for their identification by reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and characterization by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or nucleotide sequencing. FTA paper is a cotton-based cellulose membrane containing lyophilized chemicals that lyses many types of bacteria and viruses. IBV was inactivated upon contact with the FTA, as shown by the inability of the virus to be propagated in embryonating chicken eggs. RT-PCR of the S1 gene showed that viral RNA in allantoic fluid remained stable after storage on FTA filter cards and that the stability was time and temperature sensitive for the large (1700 base pair [bp]) but not the small (383 bp) PCR products. Analysis of the amplified products showed that molecular characterization is feasible in allantoic fluid stored on FTA under nonfavorable environmental conditions (41 C) for at least 15 days. The use of FTA cards for the collection, transport, and storage of IBV-containing samples is safe, inexpensive, and adequate for molecular diagnosis. We propose that specimens coming from overseas on FTA cards would be first analyzed by RT-PCR with primers yielding a 1700-bp product followed by RFLP of the positive cases. Negative cases would be analyzed with primers yielding a 383-bp product (to exdude detrimental effect of the storage conditions) followed by nucleotide sequencing of the positive cases.
Asunto(s)
Pollos/virología , Líquido Extracelular/virología , Virus de la Bronquitis Infecciosa/genética , Manejo de Especímenes/veterinaria , Alantoides/química , Animales , Biología Computacional , Cartilla de ADN , Filtración/instrumentación , Papel , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/veterinaria , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/veterinaria , Manejo de Especímenes/instrumentación , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Inactivación de VirusRESUMEN
We evaluated the feasibility of using Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) filter paper for the inactivation and storage of mycoplasma DNA templates and their detection by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). FTA paper is a cotton-based cellulose membrane containing lyophilized chemicals that lyses most types of bacteria and viruses. Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) cultures were spotted at various volumes on the filter paper and stored at different temperatures for various periods of time before performing PCR. MG and MS were readily detected at all time frames (1-60 days) independent of the volume applied (1-100 microl) or storage temperature (4 C-41 C). Sensitivity and specificity of the FTA-PCR were comparable to the standard diagnostic PCR, allowing the detection of MG/MS in field samples without interference by nontargeted mycoplasma. Analysis of 193 field samples by both methods showed nearly 100% agreement with serology and culture results. The long-term DNA stability at a wide range of temperatures makes the FTA cards a good alternative for collecting and simultaneously inactivating mycoplasma. It also offers the convenience of storage and transport of DNA in a cost-effective manner for further molecular analysis, such as restriction enzyme length polymorphism and nucleotide sequencing.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/instrumentación , ADN Bacteriano/química , Filtración/instrumentación , Mycoplasma/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/veterinaria , Papel , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Polimorfismo de Longitud del Fragmento de Restricción , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
Food poisoning by Staphylococcus aureus affects hundreds of thousands of people each year. Staphylococcus aureus also causes invasive diseases such as arthritis (in poultry) and septicemia (in poultry and humans). Foodborne disease is caused by the ingestion of a staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE). Enterotoxin has also been associated with other S. aureus illnesses in humans and domestic animals. In this study, polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE, in S. aureus isolates associated with invasive disease in poultry and humans. In the 34 poultry isolates, only one isolate was found to contain a SE gene, sec. In the 41 human isolates, over 51% tested positive for an SE gene with 12.2% positive for the gene for SEA, 2.4% for SEB, 22% for SEC, 24.4% for SED, and 0 for SEE. The disparity between the rates for SE gene(s) in poultry and human isolates suggests a lesser role for the enterotoxins in invasive poultry disease than in human disease.
Asunto(s)
ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Enterotoxinas/genética , Carne/microbiología , Intoxicación Alimentaria Estafilocócica/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Animales , Secuencia de Bases , Pollos , Cartilla de ADN , ADN Bacteriano/clasificación , Microbiología de Alimentos , Humanos , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/veterinaria , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidadRESUMEN
Staphylococcus aureus is an important opportunist that can cause superficial to life-threatening illnesses in a variety of animal species. In poultry, this organism has been implicated in osteomyelitis, synovitis, and cellulitis. Whereas most infections can be treated with antibiotics, because of the organism's propensity to acquire antimicrobial resistance, it is important to continually monitor antibiotic susceptibilities of clinical isolates. We surveyed 77 clinical poultry S. aureus isolates, collected from 1998 to 2000, for susceptibilities to a panel of 18 antimicrobial agents. Thirty-six percent of isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics. Forty-three and 16% of avian S. aureus were resistant to one and two antibiotics respectively. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were commonly resistant to tetracycline (40%; minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC]90 > 32 microg/ml), lincomycin (19%; MIC90 > 32 microg/ml), erythromycin (12%; MIC90 > 8 microg/ml), and kanamycin (8%; MIC90 < 128 microg/ml). All S. aureus isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, streptomycin, nitrofurantion, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, vancomycin, and the production antimicrobials virginiamycin, salinomycin, and flavomycin. A periodic assessment of antimicrobial susceptibilities of important avian pathogens like S. aureus will be important in helping the clinician's choice of antibiotic to control infection.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pollos/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Georgia , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Fenotipo , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Eight-wk-old layer cockerels and pullets were presented to the diagnostic lab with a history of increased mortality, ruffled feathers, lameness, and recent vaccination. At necropsy, the birds had large multifocal granulomas in multiple tissues. Only light bacterial growth was seen on culture. On histopathology, a mixed population of fungi was seen within the granulomas including zygomycetes and Aspergillus, with the zygomycetes being the predominant organism. Because of the coinfection with Aspergillus and Penicillium, obtaining the zygomycetes in pure culture was unsuccessful. The source of the zygomycete fungi remains unknown; however, zygomycetes are known to be ubiquitous. Serology was performed to evaluate the flock's immune status. There was no evidence of immunosuppression caused by chicken anemia virus or bursal disease infections. No flock treatment was initiated.