Incidence and determinants of venous thromboembolism over 90 days in hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but there is great variation among reported incidence rates. Most previous studies have focused on hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and only a few reports are from population-based registries. METHODS: We studied the 90-day incidence of VTE, associated risk factors and all-cause mortality in hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide cohort. Data on hospitalizations and outpatient visits were extracted from two national registries with mandatory reporting linked by a unique national identification number carried by all Norwegian residents. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression to determine risk factors for VTE after infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Our study included 30,495 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction with a mean (SD) age of 41.9 (17.3) years, and 53% were males. Only 2081 (6.8%) were hospitalized. The 90-day incidence of VTE was 0.3% (95% CI: 0.21-0.33) overall and 2.9% (95% CI: 2.3-3.7) in hospitalized patients. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28 per decade, 95% CI: 1.11-1.48, p < 0.05), history of previous VTE (HR 4.69, 95% CI: 2.34-9.40, p < 0.05), and hospitalization for COVID-19 (HR 23.83, 95% CI: 13.48-42.13, p < 0.05) were associated with risk of VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The 90-day incidence of VTE in hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 was in the lower end compared with previous reports, with considerably higher rates in hospitalized than nonhospitalized patients. Risk factors for VTE were consistent with previously reported studies.

Evaluation of the Effects of Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine on Viral Clearance in COVID-19 : A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: New treatment modalities are urgently needed for patients with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) Solidarity trial showed no effect of remdesivir or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on mortality, but the antiviral effects of these drugs are not known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of remdesivir and HCQ on all-cause, in-hospital mortality; the degree of respiratory failure and inflammation; and viral clearance in the oropharynx. DESIGN: NOR-Solidarity is an independent, add-on, randomized controlled trial to the WHO Solidarity trial that included biobanking and 3 months of clinical follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04321616). SETTING: 23 hospitals in Norway. PATIENTS: Eligible patients were adults hospitalized with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERVENTION: Between 28 March and 4 October 2020, a total of 185 patients were randomly assigned and 181 were included in the full analysis set. Patients received remdesivir (n = 42), HCQ (n = 52), or standard of care (SoC) (n = 87). MEASUREMENTS: In addition to the primary end point of WHO Solidarity, study-specific outcomes were viral clearance in oropharyngeal specimens, the degree of respiratory failure, and inflammatory variables. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in mortality during hospitalization. There was a marked decrease in SARS-CoV-2 load in the oropharynx during the first week overall, with similar decreases and 10-day viral loads among the remdesivir, HCQ, and SoC groups. Remdesivir and HCQ did not affect the degree of respiratory failure or inflammatory variables in plasma or serum. The lack of antiviral effect was not associated with symptom duration, level of viral load, degree of inflammation, or presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at hospital admittance. LIMITATION: The trial had no placebo group. CONCLUSION: Neither remdesivir nor HCQ affected viral clearance in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Clinical Therapy Research in the Specialist Health Services, Norway.

Incidence of thrombotic complications in hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients after COVID-19 diagnosis.

Infection with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) may predispose for venous thromboembolism (VTE). There is wide variation in reported incidence rates of VTE in COVID-19, ranging from 3% to 85%. Therefore, the true incidence of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 is uncertain. Here we present data on the incidence of VTE in both hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients from two ongoing prospective cohort studies. The incidence of VTE after diagnosis of COVID-19 was 3·9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2·1-7·2] during hospitalisation, 0·9% (95% CI: 0·2-3·1) in the three months after discharge and 0·2% (95% CI: 0·00-1·25) in non-hospitalised patients, suggesting an incidence rate at the lower end of that in previous reports.

A man in his 70s with neurological symptoms and progressive pain during cancer therapy. / En mann i 70-årene med nevrologiske symptomer og progredierende smerter under kreftbehandling.

BACKGROUND: Bing-Neel syndrome is a rare neurological manifestation of Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia that can occur both before and after the diagnosis is set. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his seventies with Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia under treatment with ibrutinib contacted the outpatient clinic due to bilateral pain distal to the knees. We initially suspected it was a side effect of ibrutinib and discontinued the drug. A few days later, he returned with reduced general condition, fever, shivers and a limping gait, and was hospitalised. Clinical examination revealed only pulmonary crackles. With stable low IgM, CRP > 200 mg/L and fever we suspected a serious infection and started broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. Microbiological tests were negative, and he developed no focal symptoms of infection, but the pain increased. The symptoms had commenced with paraesthesias, and neurological examination revealed ataxia, intentional tremor, decreased sensation distal to the knees and dysdiadochokinesia. Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia was present in the central nervous system, consistent with Bing-Neel syndrome. Brain MRI illustrated pathologically thickened and enhanced meninges and thickened, wavy cauda equine roots. Lumbar puncture showed monoclonal B-cells consistent with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Two weeks after admission IgM had increased from 3.21 g/L to 17.2 g/L. We restarted ibrutinib at a higher dosage, and shortly after his neurological symptoms regressed and IgM normalised. INTERPRETATION: The literature consists mainly of retrospective case reports, and there is no true consensus regarding diagnostic criteria or guidelines for treatment. We suspect Bing-Neel syndrome might be underdiagnosed and consider it important to bring awareness of the disease to clinicians.

Cognitive function in non-hospitalized patients 8-13 months after acute COVID-19 infection: A cohort study in Norway.

Studies have reported reduced cognitive function following COVID-19 illness, mostly from hospital settings with short follow-up times. This study recruited non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients from a general population to study prevalence of late cognitive impairment and associations with initial symptoms. We invited patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19. A postal questionnaire addressed basic demographics, initial COVID-19 symptoms and co-morbidity about 4 months after diagnosis. About 7 months later, we conducted cognitive tests using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, comprising four tests for short-term memory, attention and executive function. We present descriptive statistics using z-scores relative to UK population norms and defined impairment as z-score <-1.5. We used multivariable logistic regression with impairment as outcome. Continuous domain scores were analysed by multiple linear regression. Of the initial 458 participants; 305 were invited, and 234 (77%) completed cognitive testing. At median 11 (range 8-13) months after PCR positivity, cognitive scores for short term memory, visuospatial processing, learning and attention were lower than norms (p≤0.001). In each domain, 4-14% were cognitively impaired; 68/232 (29%) were impaired in ≥ 1 of 4 tests. There was no association between initial symptom severity and impairment. Multivariable linear regression showed association between spatial working memory and initial symptom load (6-9 symptoms vs. 0-5, coef. 4.26, 95% CI: 0.65; 7.86). No other dimension scores were associated with symptom load. At median 11 months after out-of-hospital SARS-Cov-2 infection, minor cognitive impairment was seen with little association between COVID-19 symptom severity and outcome.

Thromboembolic complications during and after hospitalization for COVID-19: Incidence, risk factors and thromboprophylaxis.

Introduction: The incidence of thromboembolism during COVID-19 and the use of thromboprophylaxis vary greatly between studies. Only a few studies have investigated the rate of thromboembolism post-discharge. This study determined the 90-day incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic complications, risk factors for venous thromboembolic events and characterized the use of thromboprophylaxis during and after hospitalization. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records for adult patients hospitalized for >24 h for COVID-19 before May 15, 2020, in ten Norwegian hospitals. We extracted data on demographics, thromboembolic complications, thromboembolic risk factors, and the use of thromboprophylaxis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine risk factors for VTE. Results: 550 patients were included. The 90-day incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients was 6.9% (95% CI: 5.1-9.3) overall and 13.8% in the ICU. Male sex (hazard ratio (HR) 7.44, 95% CI 1.73-32.02, p = 0.007) and previous VTE (HR 6.11, 95% CI: 1.74-21.39, p = 0.005) were associated with risk of VTE in multivariable analysis. Thromboprophylaxis was started in 334 patients (61%) with a median duration of 7 days (25th-75th percentile 3-13); in the VTE population 10/23 (43%) started thromboprophylaxis prior to diagnosis. After discharge 20/223 patients received extended thromboprophylaxis and 2/223 (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.3-1.9) had a thromboembolism. Conclusions: The 90-day incidence of thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients was 7%, but <1% after discharge. Risk factors were male sex and previous VTE. Most patients received thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization, but only <10% after discharge.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a patient with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is rapidly evolving. Although it is primarily a respiratory illness, other manifestations, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, immune thrombocytopenia, and immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, have been described. We present a case of a patient with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis secondary to COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab with a marked biochemical improvement. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report we present a Caucasian patient with COVID-19 who developed a marked elevation of inflammatory parameters with ferritin 36,023 µg/L, but also elevated C-reactive protein 334 mg/L and lactate dehydrogenase 1074 U/L, 1 week after admission to the intensive care unit. He met five of eight criteria for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, but he lacked the high fever and cytopenia seen in the majority of cases. He was treated with tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor, and over the next days, a rapid decrease in ferritin and C-reactive protein levels was observed. However, his respiratory failure only improved gradually, and he was weaned off the respirator 11 days later. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 may induce a hyperinflammatory clinical picture and in some cases develop into hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. In our patient's case, therapeutic interleukin-6 blockade abrogated signs of hyperinflammation but did not seem to improve pulmonary function. Measurement of ferritin and C-reactive protein, as well as quantification of interleukin-6 on indication, should be performed in patients with severe COVID-19. Specific treatment in such patients must also be contemplated, preferably in randomized controlled trials.