Examining Associations Between Strangulation and Depressive Symptoms in Women With Intimate Partner Violence Histories.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with poor mental health outcomes among women. Studies on IPV and mental health show that experiencing more than one type of IPV often enhances women's depression or depressive symptoms. However, most of these studies conceptualize IPV as physical, psychological, or sexual violence. Little is known about specific experiences of severe IPV, such as strangulation, that put victims at greater risk of lethality and serious injury and their association with women's depression. This study examined associations between IPV, strangulation, and depression among women using secondary data collected for a randomized clinical trial testing an integrated HIV-IPV prevention intervention for abused women. Women were recruited from healthcare service delivery organizations, Department of Health and Human Services, and family court. Women (n = 175) completed assessments on IPV, strangulation, mental health, social support, and self-esteem. The majority reported strangulation (n = 103) and depressive symptoms (n = 101). Women who experienced strangulation also reported more severe physical (p < .001), sexual (p < .001), and psychological (p < .001) abuse. However, in multivariate logistic regression with sociodemographics, violence variables, and strangulation, none of these variables were associated with a higher risk for depressive symptoms. Social support had a protective effect on depressive symptoms. Findings suggest strangulation is prevalent among abused women seeking services, warranting screening, assessment, and referral in these settings.

Mental health therapists' perceived barriers to addressing intimate partner violence and suicide.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and suicide are pressing public health issues, yet their intersection in mental health care settings is understudied. We conducted a qualitative study to characterize mental health therapists' personal and system barriers in preparation for an upcoming training curriculum seeking to help patients address these interconnected issues. METHOD: We partnered with an urban community mental health center in New York to facilitate focus groups grounded in community-based participatory research principles. Twenty-three therapists formed 3 focus groups. Participant responses were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using Bronfenbrenner's socioecological model. We performed a primary qualitative framework analysis, coding for therapist barriers in addressing the intersection of IPV-suicide at individual, relational, community, and societal levels. RESULTS: Therapists perceived numerous barriers in all 4 domains. Individually, some struggled with feelings of helplessness and a lack of appropriate training. At the relational level, therapists expressed apprehension about harming the therapeutic relationship by discussing IPV and suicide at length. From a community perspective, therapists voiced concerns for clients' limited local access to support systems and financial resources. Societal barriers included policy-related limitations such as length of appointment times. DISCUSSION: Community mental health center therapists face considerable barriers working with patients affected by IPV and suicide. The socioecological model is a fitting framework for understanding multisystem barriers at individual, relational, community, and societal levels. A better understanding of these challenges is critical for advancing therapist education, enhancing patient outcomes, and improving health systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Intimate Partner Violence, Suicide, and Their Overlapping Risk in Women Veterans: A Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) and intimate partner violence (IPV) are both serious and prevalent problems in the Veteran population that often occur in tandem, particularly among women Veterans. Women Veterans, the fastest growing segment of the Veteran population, may have unique overlapping risks that are worth exploring. Although the intersection of IPV and STB is well documented in the civilian population, it has not been thoroughly explored in women Veterans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, we conducted a systematic review of the STB and IPV literature specifically related to women Veterans. We only included articles that sampled women Veterans, rather than active duty/reservist/National Guard women; due to the small volume of STB research using samples of only women Veterans, we included studies that used mixed-gender samples. We extracted risk factors for STB and/or IPV involvement from 56 selected articles and placed them into tables for comparison to determine commonalities. RESULTS: Common risk factors fell into three categories: socio-demographic risk factors (young age, unemployment, and sexual minority status) were significant across both bodies of literature; mental health risk factors (general psychopathology, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, sleep disturbance, and substance use/abuse) also had significant overlap; and military service-related risk factors (military sexual trauma (MST) and deployment factors) were also relevant across both bodies of literature. Mental health risk factors, particularly PTSD, were the most common. CONCLUSION: Frequently, the risk factors for IPV and STB are shared and it is important to consider how research, screening and intervention efforts for these serious problems might be integrated. Our exploration of the literature may be used as a basis for future research with women Veterans on the intersection of STB and IPV. Further, Veterans Health Administration clinicians should be aware of these intersecting risk factors to enhance care and improve screening for both issues in women Veteran clients.

Development of an Innovative Treatment Paradigm for Intimate Partner Violence Victims With Depression and Pain Using Community-Based Participatory Research.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health issue with complex physical health, mental health and social consequences that can exacerbate survivors' barriers to health care engagement and support. Furthermore, health care professionals are often unaware of or feel ill-equipped to address survivors' complex needs. Depression and chronic pain are particularly prevalent co-occurring problems for survivors and can impede engagement and outcomes in traditional health care. This study's purpose was to understand what interventions might be more responsive to survivors' myriad needs, particularlly those with depression and pain. Survivors were involved with the design, execution, analysis, and interpretation of results, based on community-based participatory research principles. Intervention development happened in two phases: the first consisted of focus groups with survivors to inform the intervention and the second included intervention design, informed by a community advisory board (CAB). Thirty-one survivors participated in Phase 1, and they reported preferring a range of support including formal help-seeking, informal coping strategies, and spirituality. In Phase 2, the CAB (comprised of survivors, health care professionals, and researchers) identified three distinct aspects of a comprehensive IPV intervention: (a) education regarding both the complex health issues and available local resources; (b) an integrated consultation service for providers to seek recommendations for responding to the full spectrum of survivors' needs; and (c) a trauma-informed, accessible clinic. Academic medical centers could not have designed this intervention in isolation; survivors and providers played an integral part of this process, and continue to inform our current work.