CD30 as a therapeutic target in adult haematological malignancies: Where are we now?

CD30 is a transmembrane protein from the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily. It is expressed on a small subset of activated T and B lymphocytes, and various lymphoid neoplasms. CD30 is a particularly interesting treatment target because its levels are high in tumours but low in healthy tissues. Several therapeutic strategies targeting CD30 have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, conjugated antibodies (combination of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy or immunotherapy), bispecific antibodies and cell and gene therapies, such as anti-CD30 CAR-T cells in particular. We briefly review the biology of CD30 which makes it a good therapeutic target, and we describe all of the anti-CD30 therapies that have emerged to date.

Prevalence and clinical impact of minority resistant variants in patients failing an integrase inhibitor-based regimen by ultra-deep sequencing.

Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are recommended by international guidelines as first-line therapy in antiretroviral-naive and -experienced HIV-1-infected patients. Objectives: This study aimed at evaluating the prevalence at failure of INSTI-resistant variants and the impact of baseline minority resistant variants (MiRVs) on the virological response to an INSTI-based regimen. Methods: Samples at failure of 134 patients failing a raltegravir-containing (n = 65), an elvitegravir-containing (n = 20) or a dolutegravir-containing (n = 49) regimen were sequenced by Sanger sequencing and ultra-deep sequencing (UDS). Baseline samples of patients with virological failure (VF) (n = 34) and of those with virological success (VS) (n = 31) under INSTI treatment were sequenced by UDS. Data were analysed using the SmartGene platform, and resistance was interpreted according to the ANRS algorithm version 27. Results: At failure, the prevalence of at least one INSTI-resistant variant was 39.6% by Sanger sequencing and 57.5% by UDS, changing the interpretation of resistance in 17/134 (13%) patients. Among 53 patients harbouring at least one resistance mutation detected by both techniques, the most dominant INSTI resistance mutations were N155H (45%), Q148H/K/R (23%), T97A (19%) and Y143C (11%). There was no difference in prevalence of baseline MiRVs between patients with VF and those with VS. MiRVs found at baseline in patients with VF were not detected at failure either in majority or minority mutations. Conclusions: UDS is more sensitive than Sanger sequencing at detecting INSTI MiRVs at treatment failure. The presence of MiRVs at failure could be important to the decision to switch to other INSTIs. However, there was no association between the presence of baseline MiRVs and the response to INSTI-based therapies in our study.

Disparities in HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance detected by ultradeep sequencing between men who have sex with men and heterosexual populations.

OBJECTIVES: Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) can impair the response to first-line antiretroviral therapy. In treatment-naïve patients chronically infected with HIV type 1 (HIV-1), it was previously shown through Sanger sequencing that TDR was more common in men who have sex with men (MSM) than in other transmission risk groups. We aimed to compare two HIV-1 transmission groups in terms of the presence of TDR mutations. METHODS: We investigated, through Sanger sequencing and ultradeep sequencing (UDS), the presence of resistance mutations, both in majority (> 20%) and in minority (1-20%) proportions, in 70 treatment-naïve MSM and 70 treatment-naïve heterosexual patients who recently screened positive for HIV-1. RESULTS: The global prevalence of TDR was not significantly different between the two groups, either by Sanger or by UDS. Nevertheless, a higher frequency of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor TDR was observed among heterosexual patients (P = 0.04). There was also a trend for a higher frequency of TDR among MSM infected with HIV-1 subtype B compared with MSM infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Ultradeep sequencing UDS allowed sensitive monitoring of TDR, and highlighted some disparities between transmission groups.

A case series of intermittent nucleoside analogue-based (NA) regimen to maintain HBV virological suppression in coinfected HBV/HIV patients with suppressed viremia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy of intermittent nucleoside analogue-based (NA) regimen to maintain HBV virological suppression in HBV/HIV-1 patients. METHODS: Conducted between 2014 and 2023, this observational retrospective study included all HBV (positive AgHbs)/HIV-1 coinfected patients with HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL and HBV DNA ≤ 25 UI/mL who were switched to an intermittent (<7/7 days(D)) TDF or TAF-containing antiretroviral (ART) regimen. The primary outcome was the HBV virological success rate (SR) (proportion of patients with HBV pVL < 25 UI/mL) at W48. RESULTS: Among 501 HBV/HIV-1 patients, 19(3.7 %) had switched to an intermittent NA-containing regimen that included TDF/FTC or TDF/3TC or TAF/FTC or TDF alone administered 5D-a-week(n = 7), 4D-a-week(n = 7) or 3D-a-week(n = 5). HBV virological success rates were 100 % [95 %CI 82.3-100] and 100 %[95 %CI 80.5-100] at W48 and W96(n = 17), respectively; with no viral HBV or HIV rebound (61.8 months (32.4-70.3) of follow-up). CONCLUSION: This case series shows the potential for intermittent NA-containing regimens to maintain long-term control of HBV replication among suppressed HBV/HIV-1 patients.

Low immune response rate of HIV-infected patients to a single injection of hepatitis A vaccine.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the immune response of HIV-1 positive patients to a single injection of HAV vaccine in a context of vaccine shortage during the 2017 European outbreak. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled all HIV-1 positive patients vaccinated by a single injection of HAV vaccine Vaqta 50®. HAV serology was performed before and>30 days after the vaccine injection. RESULTS: Among the 73 patients, HIV-1 viral load was≤50 copies/mL in 93.2% of the cases. Medians of CD4 and median ratio of T CD4/CD8 cells were 658/mm3 and 0.9, respectively. A low immune response rate (59.7%) was observed among the patients. Responders had a significantly higher CD4/CD8 cell ratio than non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: A serologic control should be recommended in this population in the event of a single injection vaccination schedule. During routine follow-up, and prior to any untoward event, physicians should assess the vaccination coverage of HIV-infected patients.