Impact of digestive-surgical cross-disciplinary management in patients with esophageal atresia. / Impacto del manejo multidisciplinar digestivo-quirúrgico en los pacientes con atresia de esófago.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze whether patients undergoing esophageal atresia (EA) surgery benefit from a cross-disciplinary follow-up program, based on current clinical guidelines, implemented in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, analytical, retrospective study of patients undergoing EA surgery from 2012 to 2022 was carried out. The results of a joint pediatric surgery and gastroenterology consultation program -which was implemented in 2018 and applies a protocol based on the new ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN guidelines- were analyzed. Patients were divided according to whether they had been treated before or after 2018. Quantitative variables -follow-up losses, anti-reflux treatment initiation and duration, and enteral nutrition initiation- and qualitative variables -prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux, anti-reflux surgery, respiratory infections, anastomotic stenosis, re-fistulizations, dysphagia, impaction episodes, need for gastrostomy, and endoscopic results- were compared. RESULTS: 38 patients were included. 63.2% had gastroesophageal reflux. 97.4% received anti-reflux treatment in the first year of life, with treatment being subsequently discontinued in 47.4%. Discontinuation time decreased by a mean of 24 months following program implementation (p< 0.05). A 4.6-fold increase in the frequency of pH-metries was noted following program implementation. The protocol standardized endoscopies in asymptomatic patients when they turn 5 and 10 years old. 25 endoscopies with biopsy were carried out after 2018, with histological disorders being detected in 28% of them. The number of follow-up losses significantly decreased following protocol implementation (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Digestive-surgical cross-disciplinary follow-up of EA patients has a positive impact on patient progression. Applying the guidelines helps optimize treatment and early diagnosis of complications.

OBJETIVOS: El objetivo de este estudio es analizar si los pacientes intervenidos de atresia de esófago (AE) se benefician de un programa de seguimiento multidisciplinar, basado en las guías clínicas actuales, implantado en nuestro centro. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional y analítico incluyendo los pacientes intervenidos de AE entre 2012 y 2022. Se analizaron los resultados de la implantación en 2018 de un programa de consultas conjuntas de gastroenterología y cirugía pediátrica aplicando un protocolo basado en las nuevas guías ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN. Se dividieron a los pacientes tratados antes y después de 2018 y se compararon las variables cuantitativas: pérdidas de seguimiento, inicio y duración del tratamiento antirreflujo e inicio de nutrición enteral, y cualitativas: prevalencia de reflujo gastroesfoágico, realización de cirugía antirreflujo, infecciones respiratorias, estenosis de la anastomosis, refistulizaciones, disfagia, episodios de impactación, necesidad de gastrostomía y resultados de las endoscopias. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 38 pacientes. Un 63,2% presentaron reflujo gastroesofágico. El 97,4% tomaron tratamiento antirreflujo el primer año de vida que posteriormente se retiró en el 47,4%. El tiempo de retirada se redujo una media de 24 meses tras la aplicación del programa (p< 0,05). Se realizaron 4,6 veces más pHmetrías tras la implantación del programa. El protocolo estandarizó la realización de endoscopias en pacientes asintomáticos al cumplir 5 y 10 años. Se realizaron 25 endoscopias con tomas de biopsia después de 2018, detectando alteraciones histológicas en un 28%. El número de pérdidas de seguimiento se redujo de forma significativa tras la implantación del protocolo (p< 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: El seguimiento multidisciplinar digestivo-quirúrgico de los pacientes con AE genera un impacto positivo en su evolución. La aplicación de las guías facilita la optimización del tratamiento y el diagnóstico precoz de las complicaciones.

Is Hydrogen Breath Test with Lactulose Feasible for Measuring Gastrocecal Transit in Critically Ill Children? Pilot Study about Modification of the Technique.

Introduction. Gastrocecal transit time (GCTT) can be measured by exhaled hydrogen after lactulose intake (lactulose-eH2 test). The objectives were to assess whether it is possible to carry out this test in critically ill children with and without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to analyze whether the results are consistent with clinical findings. Methods. Patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) for more than 3 days were included. Those with gastrointestinal disease prior to admission were excluded. A modified technique to obtain eH2 from the ventilator tubes was performed. Results. Sixteen patients (37.5% boys) with a median age of 19 (5-86.5) months were included. Five patients (31.2%) were breathing spontaneously but lactulose-eH2 test could not be performed while it could be performed successfully in the 11 patients with MV. Seven patients (63.3%) did not show an eH2 peak. The other 4 showed a median time of 130 min (78.7-278.7 min) from lactulose intake to a 10 ppm eH2 peak. Children with an eH2 peak had intestinal movements earlier [6.5 (1.5-38.5) versus 44 (24-72) hours p = 0.545]. Conclusion. Although the designed adaption is useful for collecting breath samples, lactulose-eH2 test may not be useful for measuring GCTT in critically ill children.