Does the combination of four OGTT values enhance the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes? Insights from a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To explore the correlation between a singular value of additive OGTT scores and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. We postulated that a higher additive OGTT score would predict poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from all women with a documented complete OGTT result and subsequent diagnosis of GDM. The additive OGTT score was calculated by adding each individual hourly glucose measurement. Maternal demographics, pregnancy and labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the lower-sum and higher-sum OGTT groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify confounders associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: In this study, a total of 1497 patients were assessed. The group with higher-sum OGTT scores was characterized by increased rates of GDMA2 (p = 0.008), higher insulin doses (p = 0.009), and higher rates of composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes (p = 0.021 and p = 0.030, respectively) compared to the lower-sum OGTT group. CONCLUSION: The additive OGTT score may aid in predicting the need for insulin treatment, labor course, and neonatal outcomes in GDM patients.

The effect of watching an informational video prior amniocentesis on maternal anxiety: a randomized controlled trail.

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to ascertain the effect of a pre-procedure informational video on anxiety, pain perception, and satisfaction levels in patients undergoing amniocentesis. METHODS: Patients were randomized into two groups: a video group who watched an informational video prior to the procedure, and a control group who received standard care. Anxiety was gauged both pre- and post-procedure via the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score. Post-procedure, patients' perceived pain, anxiety, and satisfaction levels were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale questionnaire (VAS). RESULTS: Of 110 randomized patients, 100 completed the study and were included in the final analysis. No significant difference was noted in overall anxiety levels between the study and control groups. However, in-procedure anxiety was significantly lower in the video group compared to the control group (p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing amniocentesis for the first time, the subgroup analysis revealed reduced levels of anxiety during the procedure and diminished pain 10 min after the procedure in the video group compared to the control group. (p = 0.041 and p = 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION: A pre-procedural informational video could help in alleviating anxiety and mitigating pain during amniocentesis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at 27.3.2022 in clinical-trials.gov (identifier NCT05463549).

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing PCI of Ostial Coronary Lesions: A Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: Ostial coronary lesions are a subset of proximal coronary lesions, which are relatively more difficult to treat and were associated with worse clinical outcomes in the early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Data regarding the outcomes of ostial lesions' PCI in the contemporary era are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) between July 2016 and February 2018. Included in the present analysis were only patients treated for proximal lesions. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus proximal nonostial lesions. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 334 (84.7% male, 67.3 ± 10.7 years) patients were included, of which 91 patients were treated for ostial lesions and 243 were treated for proximal nonostial lesions. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 months, TVR and TLR were numerically higher among patients undergoing PCI of ostial versus nonostial lesions without reaching statistical significance (5.5% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.35 and 4.4% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.47, respectively). The rate of MACE was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI with the use of contemporary DES, clinical outcomes were similar among patients treated for ostial compared to proximal nonostial lesions. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the performance of contemporary DES in this subset of lesions.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Patients.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and cost-effective marker of inflammation. This marker has been shown to predict cardiac arrhythmias, progression of valvular heart disease, congestive heart failure decompensation, acute kidney injury, and mortality in cardiovascular patients. The pathologic process of aortic stenosis includes chronic inflammation of the valve and therefore biomarkers of inflammation might offer additive prognostic value. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate NLR and its association with long term mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients. METHODS: We evaluated data of 1152 consecutive patient from the Tel Aviv Medical Center TAVI registry who underwent TAVI. Data included baseline clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic findings; procedural complications; and post-procedure mortality. Patients were compared by using the median NLR value (4.1) and evaluated for long-term mortality. RESULTS: Patients with NLR above the median had higher mortality rates (26.4% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.001) at 3 years post-procedure. A multivariable analysis found NLR to be an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.99, P = 0.013). In addition, high NLR was linked to complicationsduring and after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is an independent prognostic marker among TAVI patients. This marker may represent an increased inflammatory response and should be added to previous known prognostic factors.

The use of virtual reality during extra-amniotic balloon insertion for pain and anxiety relief-a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor with an extra-amniotic balloon catheter is a procedure commonly associated with maternal discomfort, pain, and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the distractive effect of virtual reality technology on pain and anxiety among pregnant patients who underwent induction of labor with an extra-amniotic balloon catheter. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, pregnant patients who were undergoing planned induction of labor using an extra-amniotic balloon catheter at term for various obstetrical indications were recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into 2 groups. Patients in the virtual reality group were exposed to a virtual reality technology clip (using SootheVR All-In-One virtual reality care system for pain and anxiety) during the entire extra-amniotic balloon catheter insertion, whereas patients in the control group received the institutional standard care for extra-amniotic balloon catheter insertion. Pain scores, expressed as visual analog scale scores, and maternal hemodynamic parameters were obtained before, during, and after extra-amniotic balloon catheter insertion. Anxiety was evaluated using the validated State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale before and after the procedure. Maternal satisfaction with the virtual reality technology was also recorded. The primary outcome was the change in visual analog scale score before and during extra-amniotic balloon catheter insertion. Among the secondary outcomes was the change in anxiety levels before and after extra-amniotic balloon catheter insertion. The study was powered to detect a 25% decrease in the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 132 pregnant patients were recruited (66 in each group). There were no differences between groups in terms of age, body mass index, gestational age at enrollment, indication for induction of labor, and preprocedural visual analog scale score and anxiety levels. The change in visual analog scale score (maximal visual analog scale score during the procedure minus the initial visual analog scale score before the procedure, ie, the primary outcome) was significantly lower in the virtual reality group than in the control group (2.78±3.0 vs 4.09±2.99; P=.01). In addition, the virtual reality group experienced a higher rate of anxiety relief, expressed as the difference between the preprocedure and postprocedure State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale scores (-6.46±9.6 vs -2.01±9.11; P=.007). Patients in the virtual reality group reported a very high overall (94%) satisfaction score. CONCLUSION: In this randomized controlled trial, we demonstrated that the use of virtual reality technology among patients who underwent induction of labor using an extra-amniotic balloon catheter was associated with lower visual analog scale scores during the procedure and a significant reduction in anxiety than patients who received standard care. There was also a very high satisfaction rate with the use of virtual reality technology.

Improved neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with coexisting gestational diabetes and preeclampsia in normal birthweight neonates- insights from a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess neonatal and maternal outcomes in appropriate-for-gestational-weight (AGA) neonates of mothers with both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PET). METHODS: Medical records of women diagnosed with GDM or PET were reviewed. Women with AGA neonates were divided into three groups- GDM, PET, and GDM + PET and maternal neonatal and placental outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, including intensive care unit admission (NICU), neurological morbidity, hypoglycemia, ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), phototherapy, sepsis, blood transfusion, and neonatal death. Post-hoc analysis was performed to determine between-group significance. RESULTS: Composite adverse neonatal outcomes are significantly lower in women with multiple morbidities compared to women with confined PET (p = 0.015), and a similar trend is observed when comparing neonatal outcomes between women with GDM to those with GDM + PET, yet these results are underpowered (18.9 % vs. 12.8 % respectively, p = 0.243). Placentas of women with GDM + PET were larger, with a lower rate of placentas below the 10th percentile as compared to placentas of women with isolated PET (p < 0.001), but with similar rates of MVM lesions. DISCUSSION: While maternal and placental outcomes in patients of the GDM + PET group resemble the characteristics of the PET group, surprisingly, the neonatal outcomes in this group are significantly better compared to isolated morbidities. The paradoxical benefit attributed to the coexistence of GDM + PET may be explained by a balance of the opposing trends characterizing these morbidities-the reduced blood and nutrient supply characterizing PET vs. chronic overflow and abundance typical of GDM. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: approval of local ethics committee WOMC-19-0152.

Does the use of polymer-free drug eluting stents improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions?

BACKGROUND: Implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) is the mainstay treatment for patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The polymer coating of DES has been associated with inflammatory response, increased arterial injury and long-term in-stent restenosis and thrombosis. Polymer-free stents (PFS) were designed to overcome limitations of polymer-coated stents (PCS). Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with PFS versus contemporary PCS. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label registry study enrolling consecutive all-comers patients admitted to a single center and undergoing PCI using contemporary DES. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients treated with PFS and PCS. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Subgroup analyses were conducted for diabetic and nondiabetic patients. RESULTS: Overall, 1664 patients were included: 928 (55.8%) of which were treated with PFS and 736 (44.2%) with PCS for 2046 and 1462 lesions, respectively. At 12 months, TLR rates were not significantly different between the groups (1.7% vs. 2.3% for PFS and PCS, respectively, P = 0.48). The use of PFS did not improve clinical outcomes among diabetic patients in comparison with PCS. Target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac events rates were also similar between groups, regardless of diabetes status. CONCLUSION: Newer generation DES offer excellent results in diabetic and nondiabetic patients without significant differences in outcomes between PCS and PFS.

Perinatal outcomes of African refugees after their integration into the Israeli health care system.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether the incorporation of the refugees into the Israeli medical system resulted in improvements in perinatal outcomes, namely a reduction in the number of preterm deliveries and a decrease in NICU admissions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Electronic medical records of all African immigrants who delivered in our tertiary referral center between January 2018 and September 2019 were reviewed. African patients' demographics, maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared to those of native Israeli population. In addition, the results were compared to the cohort from our previous study from 2010. RESULTS: A total of 20,796 deliveries took place at our labor and delivery department during the study period. Of these, 3% of all deliveries were of African refugees. Total rates of preterm deliveries <37 weeks was similar between groups, while rate of premature deliveries <34 week was higher among refugees. Rates of extreme prematurity <28 weeks were also similar between groups. Rate of meconium stained amniotic fluid, neonatal weight <2000 g as well as NICU admissions were significantly higher among refugees. CONCLUSION: Though perinatal results have not substantially improved with the incorporation of a refugee population into a healthcare system, some progression has indeed been achieved in some perinatal parameters.