Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Hum Mol Genet ; 23(10): 2752-68, 2014 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24381304

RESUMEN

Rare copy number variants (CNVs) disrupting ASTN2 or both ASTN2 and TRIM32 have been reported at 9q33.1 by genome-wide studies in a few individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The vertebrate-specific astrotactins, ASTN2 and its paralog ASTN1, have key roles in glial-guided neuronal migration during brain development. To determine the prevalence of astrotactin mutations and delineate their associated phenotypic spectrum, we screened ASTN2/TRIM32 and ASTN1 (1q25.2) for exonic CNVs in clinical microarray data from 89 985 individuals across 10 sites, including 64 114 NDD subjects. In this clinical dataset, we identified 46 deletions and 12 duplications affecting ASTN2. Deletions of ASTN1 were much rarer. Deletions near the 3' terminus of ASTN2, which would disrupt all transcript isoforms (a subset of these deletions also included TRIM32), were significantly enriched in the NDD subjects (P = 0.002) compared with 44 085 population-based controls. Frequent phenotypes observed in individuals with such deletions include autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), speech delay, anxiety and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). The 3'-terminal ASTN2 deletions were significantly enriched compared with controls in males with NDDs, but not in females. Upon quantifying ASTN2 human brain RNA, we observed shorter isoforms expressed from an alternative transcription start site of recent evolutionary origin near the 3' end. Spatiotemporal expression profiling in the human brain revealed consistently high ASTN1 expression while ASTN2 expression peaked in the early embryonic neocortex and postnatal cerebellar cortex. Our findings shed new light on the role of the astrotactins in psychopathology and their interplay in human neurodevelopment.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/genética , Trastornos Generalizados del Desarrollo Infantil/genética , Glicoproteínas/genética , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/genética , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Cromosomas Humanos Par 9 , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Exones , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/metabolismo , Especificidad de Órganos , Fenotipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Receptores de Superficie Celular/genética , Receptores de Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Eliminación de Secuencia , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Sitio de Iniciación de la Transcripción , Proteínas de Motivos Tripartitos , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas , Adulto Joven
2.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 33(2): 101-37, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17276603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized excess resistance factor ("active resistance") gives a dose--response curve (DRC) shoulder, deficiency of a factor required for drug sensitivity ("saturable passive resistance") gives a DRC terminal plateau, and alteration of a factor gives decreased DRC slope. METHOD: We used response rates from published non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical studies to estimate mean percent tumor cell kill in each study (assuming cell kill is proportional to tumor volume change) and performed regression and meta-regression analyses of percent cell survival and patient survival vs planned dose-intensity. RESULTS: As single agents, cell kill approached that of combinations only at highest doses. While DRC shape varied between single agents, DRCs for all combinations tested flattened at higher doses. Patient median survival times also failed to vary significantly with dose for any combination. CONCLUSIONS: DRC flattening at higher doses suggests therapy efficacy is limited by deficiency/saturation of factors required for cell killing. Based on this and other clinical observations, we hypothesize: (1) active resistance may modulate cell killing at lower doses, but ability to overcome this by increasing doses is limited by saturable passive resistance (e.g. by non-cycling cells). (2) Cells surviving initial chemotherapy may upregulate active resistance mechanisms (permitting growth despite therapy). (3) If active resistance mechanisms are insufficient for growth/survival, cells may survive until therapy cessation by downregulating metabolism/cycling, becoming temporarily quiescent. This could help explain broad cross-resistance between agents and would imply that improved targeting of non-cycling cells will be required for major improvement in therapy efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , Vinorelbina , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA