RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various epidemiological studies have demonstrated the association between abortion and risk of breast cancer among nulliparous women; however, results remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis assessed the association based on previous studies. METHODS: PubMed, EMBase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant articles until February 2018. In this meta-analysis, fixed-effects models were used to estimate the combined effect size and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical data were analyzed using STATA 12.0. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles consisting of 6 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies were included in this review. All articles were of high quality, as determined based on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale assessment. The combined risk ratio (RR) indicated no significant association between abortion and breast cancer among nulliparous women (RRâ=â1.023, 95%CIâ=â0.938-1.117; Zâ=â0.51, Pâ=â.607). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant associations between risk of breast cancer and induced abortion or between risk of breast cancer and spontaneous abortion (SA) among nulliparous women (RRâ=â1.008, 95% CIâ=â0.909-1.118 and RRâ=â1.062, 95%CIâ=â0.902-1.250, respectively). Neither 1 nor >2 abortions increased the risk of breast cancer among nulliparous women. Sensitivity analysis showed that our results were reliable and stable. CONCLUSION: Current evidence based on epidemiological studies showed no association between abortion and risk of breast cancer among nulliparous women.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , ParidadRESUMEN
IMPACT STATEMENT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide with the second highest mortality rate. Although multidisciplinary cooperative therapies are helpful for improving the survival of CRC patients, the prognosis remains poor. Therefore, it is imperative to seek new biomarkers for the development of individualized treatment for each CRC patient. Circular RNA, an endogenous transcript with specific covalent closed loop, exhibits higher stability, conservation and expression abundance than the corresponding linear component and thus may be utilized as a promised biomarker. Although the majority of studies have focused on circular RNA expression profiling in various types of cancers, evidence supporting their critical role in the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC is limited. This study aimed to screen and identify novel circular RNA biomarkers of CRC by chip analysis and qPCR verification, and to highlight their potential as targets for CRC prognosis, and therapy.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Ácido Graso Desaturasas/genética , ARN Circular/genética , Anciano , Diferenciación Celular/genética , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/genética , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/genética , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) ranks the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. We aimed to clarify the relevance of genetic variants of IL-11, a hub of various carcinogenic pathways, as well as their interactions with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in the development of GC. METHODS: A case-control study with 880 GC cases and 900 healthy controls was conducted in a Chinese population. Six tagSNPs were detected by Taqman Allelic Discrimination assay, while H. pylori status was detected by Typing Detection Kit for Antibody to H. pylori and serum IL-11 level was measured using ELISA method. RESULTS: We found that rs1126760 (C vs T: OR=1.39, 95% CIs=1.13-1.70, P=0.002) and rs1126757 (C vs T: OR=0.82, 95% CIs=0.72-0.93, P=0.002) were significantly associated with susceptibility of GC. Even adjusted for Bonferroni correction, the results were still significant (P=0.002×6=0.012). IL-11 rs1126760 was significantly associated with higher serum and expression level of IL-11, while rs1126757 was significantly associated with lower serum IL-11 level (P<0.001). Significant interaction with H. pylori infection was identified for rs1126760 (P for interaction =0.005). Higher expression of the IL-11 gene was significant with development and poor prognosis of GC. CONCLUSION: Our study provides strong evidence that genetic variants of the IL-11 gene may interact with H. pylori infection and contribute to the development of GC. Further studies with larger sample size and functional experiments are needed to validate our findings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether the diagnosis value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for intracranial aneurysm is in accordance with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize relevant studies to compare the diagnostic efficacies of the 2 methods. METHODS: Potentially relevant studies were selected through PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, Chongqing VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases by using the core terms "computer tomography angiography" (CTA) and "magnetic resonance angiography" (MRA) and "intracranial aneurysm*" in the titles, abstracts, and keywords of the articles. Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was utilized to evaluate the quality. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were count. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the overall diagnostic performance. Statistical analyses were performed by Stata version 12.0 and MetaDisc 1.4 software. RESULTS: Ten articles were identified in this current paper. For CTA, the pooled estimates of diagnostic parameters for intracranial aneurysm were as follows: sensitivity, 0.84 (95%CIâ=â0.81-0.86); specificity, 0.85 (95%CIâ=â0.79-0.89); PLR, 4.09 (95%CIâ=â2.45-6.81); NLR, 0.18 (95%CIâ=â0.11-0.28); DOR, 23.74 (95%CIâ=â10.49-53.74); AUC, 0.90, respectively. For MRA, the pooled estimates of diagnostic parameters for intracranial aneurysm were as follows: sensitivity, 0.80 (95%CIâ=â0.77-0.83); specificity, 0.87 (95%CIâ=â0.82-0.91); PLR, 3.61 (95%CIâ=â1.72-7.55); NLR; 0.27 (95%CIâ=â0.21-0.35); DOR, 16.77 (95%CIâ=â7.38-38.11); AUC, 0.87, respectively. No significant difference was found the AUC value between CTA and MRA for intracranial aneurysm (Zâ=â0.828, Pâ>â.05). CONCLUSION: This comprehensive meta-analysis demonstrated that the diagnosis value of CTA was in accordance with MRA for intracranial aneurysm. However, considering the limitation of sample size, the results should be treated with caution.