RESUMEN
This study examined the accessibility of community resources (e.g., welfare programs and afterschool programs) for underserved youth and families with mental health needs. Mental health professionals (n = 52) from a large community mental health and welfare agency serving predominantly low-income, Latinx families completed a semistructured interview that asked about the accessibility of community resources. Participant responses were coded using an inductive thematic analysis. Results showed that 71% of participants endorsed availability barriers (e.g., limited local programs), 37% endorsed logistical barriers (e.g., waitlists), 27% endorsed attitudinal barriers (e.g., stigmatized beliefs about help-seeking), and 23% endorsed knowledge barriers (e.g., lacking awareness about local programs). Professionals' perceived availability barriers were mostly consistent with the actual availability of community resources. Findings highlight the compounding challenges that underserved communities face and point to opportunities for promoting enhanced well-being and functioning for youth and families with mental health needs.
Asunto(s)
Recursos Comunitarios , Servicios de Salud Mental , Adolescente , Humanos , Salud Mental , Pobreza , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) from diverse and marginalized backgrounds with type 1 diabetes (T1D) generally have higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and less frequent continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use than AYA from more privileged backgrounds. Further, scant data address the impact of virtual peer groups (VPG) on health-related outcomes for ethnically and racially diverse AYA with T1D. Methods: CoYoT1 to California was a 15-month randomized controlled trial for AYA aged 16-25 years. In this study, AYA were randomized to receive standard care (n = 28), or CoYoT1 care (n = 40), which consisted of person-centered provider visits and bimonthly VPG. VPG were AYA-driven discussions. AYA completed the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), and Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF) scales at baseline and all study visits. Results: Participants were 50% Latinx and 75% publicly insured. Among CoYoT1 care participants, 19 attended at least 1 VPG session (VPG attendees) and 21 did not attend any VPG sessions. VPG attendees participated in 4.1 VPG sessions on average. VPG attendees had a relative reduction in HbA1C (treatment effect -1.08%, effect sizes values [ES] = -0.49, P = 0.04) and increase in CGM use (treatment effect +47%, ES = 1.00, P = 0.02) compared to standard care. VPG participation was not associated with statistically significant changes in DDS, CES-D, and DES-SF scores. Conclusions: In a 15-month randomized controlled trial, AYA with T1D who participated in VPG reported significant improvements in HbA1c and CGM use. Peer interactions may support unmet needs of AYA with T1D from diverse and marginalized backgrounds. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03793673.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa SanguíneaRESUMEN
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are indicated in type 2 diabetes and obesity for their high efficacy in controlling glycaemia and inducing body weight loss, respectively. Patients may develop gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs), namely nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or constipation. To minimize their severity and duration, healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients must be aware of appropriate measures to follow while undergoing treatment. An expert panel comprising endocrinologists, nephrologists, primary care physicians, cardiologists, internists and diabetes nurse educators convened across virtual meetings to reach a consensus regarding these compelling recommendations. Firstly, specific guidelines are provided about how to reach the maintenance dose and how to proceed if GI AEs develop during dose-escalation. Secondly, specific directions are set about how to avoid/minimize nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation symptoms. Clinical scenarios representing common situations in daily practice, and infographics useful to guide both HCPs and patients, are included. These recommendations may prevent people with T2D and/or obesity from withdrawing from GLP-1 RAs treatment, thus benefitting from their superior effect on glycaemic control and weight loss.
RESUMEN
The relationship between glycaemia, arrhythmia and changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) has been addressed showing mixed results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in ECG, evaluated by Holter monitoring, induced by clinical hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), aged 50 or older, with high cardiovascular risk. Five-lead Holter monitoring (BL-900 Braemar, Inc, Norav Medical NH301-2.4.5 software), and blinded interstitial continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (Dexcom G4-Platinum, range 40-400 mg/dl) was performed with time synchronization. In the Holter registry, in patients with hypoglycemic episodes, mean QTc during hypoglycaemia was longer compared to mean QTc in total group (+4.6â¯ms, pâ¯=â¯0.037) and T1DM patients (+5.5â¯ms, pâ¯=â¯0.048) but not in T2DM patients (+3 ms, pâ¯=â¯0.459). During hypoglycaemia, non-clinical significant disturbances in heart rhythm were observed. In conclusion, we observed a prolongation in QTc during hypoglycemia, mainly in T1DM. However, our study does not show a relationship between episodes of hypoglycaemia and clinical arrhythmias, at least in T1DM and T2DM patients with high cardiovascular risk.