RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective was to estimate the incidence of asthma in young adults from 13-15 years old to 23-25 years old, and associated factors. METHODS: In 2012, a population-based prospective cohort study was carried out in Castellon from the cohort who had participated in the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood in 1994 and 2002. A telephone survey was undertaken using the same questionnaires. A new case of asthma was defined as a participant free of the disease in 2002 who suffered asthma, was diagnosed with asthma, or took medications against asthma based on self-report from 2002 to 2012. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 24.9±0.6 with a follow-up of 79.1%. Asthma cumulative incidence was 3.4%: 44 new cases occurred among 1280 participants. The incidence was higher in females than males with relative risk (RR)=2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.8). A significant decrease of asthma incidence density was observed (8.2 cases to 3.5 cases per 1000 person/year). Factors associated with the incidence of asthma were allergic rhinitis (RR=4.05; 95% CI 1.7-9.6), bronchitis (RR=2.13; 95% CI 1.0-4.5), mother's age at time of birth (RR=0.87; 95% CI 0.8-0.9) and a pet other than a dog or cat (RR=0.42; 95% CI 0.2-0.9). For gender, some variations in the risk factors were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in the incidence of asthma was observed. Several risk and protective factors were found.
Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Grupos de Población , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of Allergic Rhinitis (AR) in young adults and its risk or protective factors. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study was carried out in 2012. The cohort participated in the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood in Castellon in 1994 and 2002. A telephone survey was conducted using the same questionnaires. A new case of AR was defined as the participants free of the disease in 2002, who self-reported suffering from AR or taking medications for AR in the period 2002-2012. RESULTS: Of the 1805 schoolchildren in the cohort in 2002, 1435 young adults (23-25 years old) participated (follow-up 79.1%) in 2012; 743 were female and 692 male; their mean age was 24.9±0.6 years. Two hundred new cases of AR occurred in 1259 participants free of the disease with an incidence of 17.3 per 1000 person-years, and the incidence increased from 2002 (RR=1.42; 95% CI 1.15-1.75). The risk factors of AR adjusted by age and gender were sinusitis (RR=1.77; 95% CI 1.16-2.68), atopic dermatitis (RR=1.51; 95% CI 1.11-2.06) and constant exposure to truck traffic (RR=1.88; 95% CI 1.12-3.17). For male participants, the risk factors were asthma, sinusitis and atopic dermatitis, and for females bronchitis was a risk factor and presence of older siblings a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in AR incidence was observed. Sinusitis, atopic dermatitis and constant exposure to truck traffic were the risk factors of the AR with some differences by gender.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate use of vancomycin contributes to the development of resistant bacteria and jeopardizes the safety and effectiveness of treatment. The aim of this article was to design and validate an empirical dosing algorithm for vancomycin in premature neonates according to their population-based pharmacokinetic characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 129 serum samples from a cohort of 53 neonates. Homogeneous population groups were identified both from their individual pharmacokinetic parameters and from their biometric characteristics. The design of the dosing algorithm was based on simulation of the serum vancomycin concentration that would be reached with several different doses. The algorithm was validated in another cohort of 30 neonates and 108 serum samples. RESULTS: Introduction of the algorithm significantly increased the percentage initial values obtained with correct minimum and maximum concentrations in the first monitoring round (p<0.05). The mean number of serum samples obtained per patient for treatment monitoring was significantly reduced (3.6+/-2 vs. 4.9+/-3). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of the dosing algorithm for vancomycin in premature neonates increased the efficiency of treatment, reduced monitoring requirements, and optimized serum vancomycin concentrations from the start of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of allergic rhinitis in schoolchildren in Castellón by comparing phases I and III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC), carried out in 1994 and 2002, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort study was performed with 3607 schoolchildren aged 6-7 years old who participated in phase I of the ISAAC study. Of these, 1805 participated in phase III (8 years later) at the age of 14-15 years, with 1627 schoolchildren without allergic rhinitis in phase I. The cumulative incidence of allergic rhinitis was estimated. Two definitions of new cases of allergic rhinitis were used: the first was based on medical diagnosis or treatment of the disease, and the second also included symptoms of allergic rhinitis in the previous 12 months. Relative risks were calculated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Participation was 50.0 %, and 151 new cases of allergic rhinitis according to the first definition (cumulative incidence of 9.3 % and 1.2 % per year) and 339 new cases according to the second definition (cumulative incidence of 20.8 % and 2.6 % per year) were found. No differences in incidence by gender were observed with the first definition (RR = 1.00 95 % CI 0.73-1.38) but with the second definition, the incidence was greater in girls (RR = 1.46 95 % CI 1.18-1.82). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative incidence of allergic rhinitis according to the first definition was in the range of incidence from cohort studies of adolescents.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Domiciliary mechanical ventilation (DMV) use is increasing in children. Few studies have analysed the characteristics of patients using this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, transversal, multicentre study was conducted on patients between 1 month and 16 years of age dependent on domiciliary mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients with a median age of 7.6 years from 17 Spanish hospitals were studied. The main reasons for DMV were neuromuscular disorders. The median age at beginning of DMV was 4.6 years. Almost three-quarters (71.3%) received non-invasive ventilation. Patients depending on invasive ventilation were younger, started DMV at an earlier age, and had more hours of mechanical ventilation per day. The large majority (80.9%) used DMV during sleep time only, and 11.7% during the whole day. Only 3.4% of patients had external health assistance. Just under half (48.2%) were being followed up in specific DMV or multidisciplinary clinics. Almost three-quarters (72.1%) of patients attended school (42.3% with adapted schooling). Only 47.8% of school patients had specific caregivers in their schools. CONCLUSIONS: DMV in children is used in a very heterogeneous group of patients, and in an important number of patients it is started before the third year of life. Despite there being a significant proportion of patients with a high dependency on DMV, few families receive specific support at home or at school, and health care surveillance is variable and poorly coordinated.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Respiración Artificial , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , EspañaRESUMEN
Objectives To describe the causes of neonatal mortality in the Community of Valencia (VC) and to compare two registration systems for causes of death: that of the Spanish Society of Neonatology and that of the Word Health Organization's "Statistical Bulletin of Deaths (SBD)".MethodsData related to death from the SSN's mortality form, which orders all the diagnoses according to their severity, and data from the SBD, which uses sequential criteria (basic, intermediate or immediate cause of death) were obtained. Both systems were joined in a single form. Data from 19 hospitals in the Community of Valencia (1998-99) were collected. Two features were compared: a) "single cause of death" meaning the first diagnosis of the SSN system versus the "basic cause" of the SBD; and b) "multidiagnosis", which compares all the diagnoses mentioned anywhere in either of the two systems.ResultsA total of 206 neonatal deaths were included. When using the "basic cause" criterion the most common causes of death were malformations (31 %), respiratory distress syndrome (20 %) and extreme prematurity (10 %). However, when applying the "first diagnosis" criterion, the most common causes were respiratory distress syndrome (34 %), malformations (33 %) and asphyxia (9 %). These differences were statistically significant. When the causes of death were compared using the "multidiagnosis" criterion the differences were greater.ConclusionsThe two systems differ qualitatively and quantitatively. The SSN form is useful for studying prevalent morbidity among deaths as well as other parameters, but it may fail to identify the causes of death. The SBD uses more explicit criteria for the causes of death. Thus, both systems should be complementary.