Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography on a Detector-Based Spectral Computed Tomography Platform: Evaluation of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System Score of 3 and Higher.

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography performed on a detector-based spectral scanner helps more closely approximate severity of stenosis with nuclear medicine and cardiac catheterization tests compared with single-energy CT (SECT) in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher. METHODS: This retrospective trial was conducted between January 2017 and December 2019 and included 52 patients with a CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher. Two reading sessions were performed 6 weeks apart. The first reading session was performed using only conventional images and the second reading session was performed using spectral results. Detector-based spectral CT CAD-RADS scores were compared with cardiac stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results for final characterization of stenosis in 41 segments from 32 patients. The mean CAD-RADS score was calculated for both the conventional images and spectral images. RESULTS: The CAD-RADS score for SECT and the score for spectral CT for the 41 segments were compared. Available associated stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results were also compared with CAD-RADS scores. In 51% (21/41), a diagnosis concordant with best practices results was achieved with the help of spectral CT results. A mean CAD-RADS score of 3.56 was obtained using spectral results, compared with 3.93 using conventional images. A 2-tailed paired t test determined the difference to be significant with a P value of 0.007. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography coronary angiography is feasible on a detector-based spectral CT scanner and can improve diagnostic confidence over SECT angiography in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher.

Variations in the Anterolateral Thigh Flap's Vascular Anatomy in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: Variations in anterolateral thigh (ALT) arterial anatomy are well documented. Ethnicity is a known risk factor for vascular variation in several organ systems, but its impact on ALT anatomy has not been studied. Anecdotally, we observed frequent ALT arterial variation in African American (AA) patients. We thus hypothesized that AA patients have higher rates of anomalous branching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 277 computed tomography angiograms (513 lower extremities) captured between May 1, 2013 and May 31, 2015 at a tertiary academic medical center were retrospectively analyzed to determine ALT arterial branching. Patient records were examined to ascertain demographics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Males comprised 84.5%. Ethnic distribution was 55.2% AA and 36.5% Caucasian. The descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (dLCFA) originated from non-LCFA arteries (deep femoral, common femoral, or superficial femoral arteries) in 18.9% of Caucasian versus 9.1% of AA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-3.93, p < 0.01). An oblique branch was identified in 41.1% of Caucasian versus 51.9% of AA (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.08-2.24, p = 0.02). Ethnicity was the only driving factor of dLCFA and oblique branch of the LCFA (oLCFA) anatomy (Wald chi-square: 14 and 11, p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity significantly affects ALT arterial anatomy. AA are more likely to have classical dLCFA branching with a fourth oLCFA branch. A flap with an unrecognized oLCFA-dominant supply places patients at a higher risk for flap failure and loss. We recommend preoperative imaging before undertaking an ALT flap reconstruction.

Photon counting CT clinical adoption, integration, and workflow.

Photon counting CT was recently introduced into clinical practice [Rajendran K, Petersilka M, Henning A, Shanblatt ER, Schmidt B, Flohr TG, Ferrero A, Baffour F, Diehn FE, Yu L, Rajiah P, Fletcher JG, Leng S, McCollough CH. First Clinical Photon-counting Detector CT System: Technical Evaluation. Radiology 2022;303(1):130-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212579 ]. Photon counting detectors (PCD) afford better spatial resolution, radiation dose efficiency, and iodine contrast-to-noise than EID-CT [Leng S, Bruesewitz M, Tao S, Rajendran K, Halaweish AF, Campeau NG, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Photon-counting Detector CT: System Design and Clinical Applications of an Emerging Technology. Radiographics 2019;39(3):729-743. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180115 ); (Leng S, Rajendran K, Gong H, Zhou W, Halaweish AF, Henning A, Kappler S, Baer M, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. 150-mum Spatial Resolution Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Technology: Technical Performance and First Patient Images. Invest Radiol 2018;53(11):655-662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000488 )(Booij R, van der Werf NR, Dijkshoorn ML, van der Lugt A, van Straten M. Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061467 ); (Sawall S, Klein L, Amato C, Wehrse E, Dorn S, Maier J, Heinze S, Schlemmer HP, Ziener CH, Uhrig M, Kachelriess M. Iodine contrast-to-noise ratio improvement at unit dose and contrast media volume reduction in whole-body photon-counting CT. Eur J Radiol 2020;126:108909. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108909 ] while also maintaining multienergy CT (MECT) capabilities[Flohr T, Petersilka M, Henning A, Ulzheimer S, Ferda J, Schmidt B. Photon-counting CT review. Phys Med 2020;79:126-136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.030 ]. This article will review the clinical adoption of PCD-CT including protocol development, clinical applications, clinical integration and workflow considerations. Protocol development is institution specific and involves collaborative decision-making among radiologists, physicists, and technologists. Key PCD clinical applications include radiation exposure reduction, intravenous contrast volume reduction, and improved lesion conspicuity. Patients who would most benefit from these improvements may preferentially be scanned with PCD CT. With numerous available reconstructions, radiologists should be strategic in the series sent to PACS for interpretation and routinely sending spectral series to PACS can facilitate integration with clinical workflow. The Society of Abdominal Radiology PCD Emerging Technology Commission endorsed this article.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Integration Into Clinical Practice and Cost Considerations.

Optimization of dual-energy CT (DECT) workflow is critical for successful integration of DECT into practice. Patient selection strategies differ by scanner type and may be based on patient size, exam indication, or both. All stakeholders involved in patient scheduling and scan acquisition should be involved in patient triage to DECT. Automation of DECT postprocessing frees up technologist and radiologist time, but care must be taken to avoid sending unnecessary reconstructions to PACS. DECT use in the Emergency Department aids in incidentaloma characterization and improves reader diagnostic confidence, and results in quantifiable cost savings by eliminating the need for follow-up exams.

Economics of Dual-Energy CT: Workflow, Costs, and Benefits.

Dual-energy CT is an emerging technology which is progressively becoming more available for routine clinical applications. As practices and institutions evaluate the business case for purchase of these high-end scanners, the clinical utility and downstream costs must be determined. This article will provide an overview of the technology and will review direct and indirect costs associated with the implementation of dual-energy CT programs.

Follow-up Recommendation Rates Associated With Spectral Detector Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Retrospective Comparison to Single-Energy CT.

BACKGROUND: Dual-energy CT image sets have many applications in abdominopelvic imaging but no demonstrated clinical effect. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of dual-energy CT iodine maps on abdominopelvic imaging follow-up recommendation rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of abdominopelvic CTs acquired from April 2017 through June 2018. CT reports were analyzed for radiologic follow-up recommendation and follow-up recommendation reason. Follow-up MRI reports were analyzed for benign or nonbenign diagnosis. CT scans with iodine maps (CTIMs) and conventional CT scans (CCTs) subgroups were compared using χ2 testing. RESULTS: In all, 3,221 abdominopelvic CT scans of 2,401 patients (1,326 men, 1,075 women, mean age 54.1 years) were analyzed; 1,423 were CTIMs and 1,798 were CCTs. Follow-up recommendation rates were not significantly different for CTIMs and CCTs (19.5% and 21.4%, respectively, P = .19). Follow-up recommendations because of incomplete diagnosis were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.1%) than in CCTs (11.9%, P = .01). Follow-up recommendations for MRI and PET/CT were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.6%) than CCTs (13.0%, P = .003). Follow-up MRI outcomes (n = 111) were not different between CTIMs (61.2% benign) and CCTs (59.6%, P = .87). CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT iodine maps are associated with decreased follow-up examinations because of incomplete diagnosis and decreased recommendations for follow-up MRI, suggesting that abdominopelvic iodine maps may benefit patient care and decrease institutional cost.

Dual-energy CT in the obese: a preliminary retrospective review to evaluate quality and feasibility of the single-source dual-detector implementation.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of performing dual-energy CT with a single-source spectral detector system in obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, IRB-approved review of 28 patients weighing ≥ 270 lbs (122 kg) who underwent CT of the abdomen on a single-source spectral detector system was performed. Two blinded, independent radiologists rated relative preference between conventional CT images taken at 120 kVp (CCT120) and monoenergetic 70 keV equivalent (MonoE70) as well as iodine map image quality in the spleen, pancreas, kidneys, and liver. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between conventional CT and MonoE70 images and correlated with body habitus markers of weight, height, and abdominal diameter. RESULTS: MonoE70 images were preferred by radiologists 100% of the time (1-sample t test, p < 0.0001) over conventional CCT120 images. Noise was significantly lower; SNR and CNR were significantly higher in MonoE70 images than in CCT120 images (paired t tests, p < 0.0001). Mean iodine map rating (scale 1-5) was 4.54 ± 0.58, denoting near homogenous and complete iodine mapping through the spleen, pancreas, kidneys, and liver for the majority of patients. Body habitus markers were not significantly correlated with image preference score; noise; MonoE70 SNR; MonoE70 CNR; change in noise, SNR, or CNR from CCT120 to MonoE70, or iodine map quality; ordinal and linear regression, p = 0.2547, p = 0.6837, p = 0.1888, p = 0.5489, p = 0.9830, p = 0.8849, p = 0.8741, p = 0.1522, respectively. CONCLUSION: The single-source spectral detector implementation of dual-energy CT provides viable, high-quality imaging for obese patients.