Outcomes of atypical lobular hyperplasia managed by active surveillance or immediate surgery.

BACKGROUND: Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is typically diagnosed via needle core biopsy (NCB) and is commonly removed surgically in light of upgrade to malignancy rates of 1%-5%. As studies on radiographic outcomes of ALH managed by active surveillance (AS) are limited, we investigated the upgrade rates of surgically excised ALH as well as radiographic progression during AS. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 125 patients with 127 ALH lesions diagnosed via NCB at Weill Cornell Medicine from 2015 to 2021 were included. The upgrade rate to cancer was determined for patients who had surgical management ≤6 months after biopsy. Among patients with ALH managed by AS, we investigated radiographic progression on 6-month interval imaging. RESULTS: Of 127 ALH lesions, 75% (n = 95) were immediately excised and 25% (n = 32) were observed under AS. The upgrade rate of immediately excised ALH was 2.1% (n = 2; invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC], T1N0 and IDC, and T1Nx). In the AS cohort, no ALH lesions progressed radiographically during the follow-up period of 22.5 months (median), with all remaining stable (50%, n = 16), resolving (47%, n = 15), or decreasing in size (3%, n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, NCB-diagnosed ALH had a low upgrade to malignancy rate (2.1%), and no ALH lesions managed by AS progressed radiographically during the follow-up period of 22.5 months. These results support AS as the favorable option for patients with pure ALH on biopsy, with surgical excision for lesions that progress on surveillance.

Evaluation of dual p16/Ki-67 immunostaining on anal cytology specimens.

INTRODUCTION: Dual immunostaining for p16/Ki67 is FDA-approved for use on liquid-based cervical cytology specimens; however, the utility of dual staining in anal cytology especially for ASCUS risk stratification is not well established. METHODS: We investigated dual staining performance on anal cytology specimens and correlated with subsequent cytologic interpretation, high-risk HPV status, and anal biopsy results. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 was performed on all liquid-based anal cytology specimens from December 2021 to June 2022 (n = 43). RESULTS: Three patients had high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/AIN2-3) on biopsy; dual staining was positive in all three cases. All HR-HPV negative cases were negative for dual staining. Among the 12 ASCUS samples with subsequent anal biopsy results all also had HR-HPV testing. Due to small sample size of cases with squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) diagnosed on biopsy, the sensitivity and positive predictive value was not calculated. However, the specificity and negative predictive value of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 1 (95% CI: 0.66-1) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.65-0.97) respectively, whereas the specificity and negative predictive value of HR-HPV testing for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 0.44 (95% CI: 0.14-0.79) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.41-0.96) respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual p16/Ki-67 staining indicates transforming HPV infection and could help serve as an ancillary test for risk stratification for atypical anal cytology specimens. Among ASCUS samples, dual staining was specific for SIL of any grade with a high negative predictive value and therefore could be useful in clinical practices with limited availability for follow-up care.

Cytologic testing for mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability and NTRK gene fusion is not routinely indicated in primary pancreaticobiliary carcinoma cell block material.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreaticobiliary carcinomas rarely harbor targetable genetic alterations, including microsatellite instability (MSI) or neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions. As these malignancies are typically present at an advanced stage and have suboptimal response to chemotherapy, the discovery of an actionable genomic alteration provides an additional avenue of treatment for chemotherapy-refractory cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we evaluate 319 cases of pancreaticobiliary carcinoma diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration biopsy or biliary brushing for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency and pan-TRK overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and compare these results to MSI and NTRK gene fusion molecular testing. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Although we find a high concordance between MMR protein IHC and MSI molecular testing in the evaluation of MMR deficiency and between pan-TRK IHC and NTRK fusion testing by next-generation sequencing, the low prevalence of either of these genetic alterations in our cohort casts doubt on the value of screening cases of pancreaticobiliary carcinoma for MMR protein deficiency and NTRK fusions.

Active Surveillance of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: When needle core biopsy (NCB) of the breast yields atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), excision is typically recommended. The natural history of ADH undergoing active surveillance (AS) is not well described. We investigate the rates of upgrade to malignancy of excised ADH and the rates of radiographic progression under AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 220 cases of ADH on NCB. Of patients who had surgery within 6 months of NCB, we examined the malignancy upgrade rate. In the AS cohort, we examined rates of radiographic progression on interval imaging. RESULTS: The malignancy upgrade rate among patients who underwent immediate excision (n = 185) was 15.7%: 14.1% (n = 26) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 1.6% (n = 3) invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Upgrade to malignancy was less common in lesions <4 mm in size (0%) or with focal ADH (5%), and more common among lesions presenting with a radiographic mass (26%). Among the 35 patients who underwent AS, median follow-up was 20 months. Two lesions progressed on imaging (incidence 3.8% at 2 years). One patient without radiographic progression was found to have IDC at delayed surgery. The remaining lesions remained stable (46%), decreased in size (11%), or resolved (37%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that AS is a safe approach to managing ADH on NCB for most patients. This could spare many patients with ADH from unnecessary surgery. Given that AS is being investigated for low-risk DCIS in multiple international prospective trials, these results suggest that AS should also be investigated for ADH.

Mucocele-like Lesion of the Breast Diagnosed on Core Biopsy.

CONTEXT.­: Mucocele-like lesion of the breast (MLL) is an uncommon entity, and recent studies show low rates of upgrade from core needle biopsy (CNB) to excision. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate features associated with upgrade of MLLs diagnosed on CNB. DESIGN.­: Seventy-eight MLLs diagnosed on CNB from 1998-2019 and subsequent excisions were reviewed. Histologic parameters evaluated included the presence of atypia, presence and morphology of calcifications, and morphologic variant (classic [C-MLL], duct ectasia-like [DEL-MLL], or cystic mastopathy-like [CML-MLL]). RESULTS.­: Overall, 45 MLLs lacked atypia and 33 were associated with atypia (atypical ductal hyperplasia, 32; atypical lobular hyperplasia, 1). Most were C-MLLs (61) with fewer DEL-MLLs (14) and CML-MLLs (3). Half showed both coarse and fine calcifications, with fewer showing only coarse or fine calcifications, and some showing none. Subsequent excision or clinical follow-up was available for 25 MLLs without atypia-of which 2 (8.0%) were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-and 23 with atypia, of which 4 (17.4%) were upgraded to DCIS. No cases were upgraded to invasive carcinoma. All upgraded cases showed coarse calcifications on CNB, and all upgraded cases were associated with residual calcifications on post-CNB imaging. CONCLUSIONS.­: Most MLLs present as calcifications and nearly half are associated with atypia. Upgrade to DCIS is twice as frequent in MLLs with atypia versus those without. A predominance of coarse calcifications and the presence of residual targeted calcifications following core biopsy may be associated with higher upgrade rates.

Metastatic melanoma in the breast and axilla: A case report.

Metastatic melanoma of the breast is rare, and demonstrates nonspecific imaging findings which may overlap with both benign and malignant pathology.1-3 Immunohistochemical stains are important to confirm the diagnosis, particularly combining S100, a sensitive marker for melanoma, with more specific tumor markers such as Melan-A and HMB-45, and lack of cytokeratin staining.4-7 We present a case of a 64-year-old female who presented for diagnostic imaging of a palpable abnormality in her right breast, with medical history notable for previously excised cutaneous melanoma, recent COVID-19 vaccination, and significant family history of breast cancer. Diagnostic mammogram of the right breast demonstrated a circumscribed mass in the lower inner quadrant corresponding to the area of palpable concern, as well as an additional non-palpable circumscribed mass in the lower inner quadrant. Targeted right breast ultrasound demonstrated corresponding circumscribed cystic versus solid masses as well as a morphologically abnormal right axillary lymph node. Pathologic results after tissue sampling of the two right breast masses and right axillary lymph node all yielded metastatic melanoma.