Assessment of pharmacist gender bias: Egalitarianism of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

For the past 2 decades, the earnings gap between genders has narrowed for pharmacists, making it 1 of the smallest for a high-wage profession. Gender bias is reflected in 2 main areas, pay and opportunity. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the largest integrated health care system in the country, and the authors performed an analysis to see if there was any evidence of gender bias within its pharmacist workforce. The distribution of pharmacists by gender, age, and years of service was examined and whether part-time employment had any impact was also studied. Overall, there is a high degree of gender egalitarianism in terms of pay and opportunity for pharmacists at the VA. The level of step achievement, and thus, pay for men and women, was not associated with gender but rather years of service.

Complexity of patients with mental healthcare needs cared for by mental health clinical pharmacist practitioners in Veterans Affairs.

PURPOSE: The complexity of patients with mental healthcare needs cared for by clinical pharmacists is not well delineated. We evaluated the complexity of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder (MDD) in Veterans Affairs (VA) cared for by mental health clinical pharmacist practitioners (MH CPPs). METHODS: Patients at 42 VA sites with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or MDD in 2016 through 2019 were classified by MH CPP visits into those with 2 or more visits ("ongoing MH CPP care"), those with 1 visit ("consultative MH CPP care"), and those with no visits ("no MH CPP care"). Patient complexity for each condition was defined by medication regimen and service utilization. RESULTS: For schizophrenia, more patients in ongoing MH CPP care were complex than those with no MH CPP care, based on all measures examined: the number of primary medications (15.3% vs 8.1%), inpatient (13.7% vs 9.1%) and outpatient (42.6% vs 29.7%) utilization, and receipt of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (36.7% vs 25.8%) and clozapine (20.5% vs 9.5%). For bipolar disorder, more patients receiving ongoing or consultative MH CPP care were complex than those with no MH CPP care based on the number of primary medications (27.9% vs 30.5% vs 17.7%) and overlapping mood stabilizers (10.1% vs 11.6% vs 6.2%). For MDD, more patients receiving ongoing or consultative MH CPP care were complex based on the number of primary medications (36.8% vs 35.5% vs 29.2%) and augmentation of antidepressants (56.1% vs 54.4% vs 47.0%) than patients without MH CPP care. All comparisons were significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MH CPPs provide care for complex patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and MDD in VA.

Introducing clinical pharmacy specialists into interprofessional primary care teams: Assessing pharmacists' team integration and access to care for rural patients.

ABSTRACT: Clinical pharmacy specialists (CPS) were deployed nationally to improve care access and relieve provider burden in primary care.The aim of this study was to assess CPS integration in primary care and the Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Rural Veteran Access (CRVA) initiative's effectiveness in improving access.Concurrent embedded mixed-methods evaluation of participating CRVA CPS and their clinical team members (primary care providers, others).Health care providers on primary care teams in Veterans Health Administration (VHA).Perceived CPS integration in comprehensive medication management assessed using the MUPM and semi-structured interviews, and access measured with patient encounter data.There were 496,323 medical encounters with CPS in primary care over a 3-year period. One hundred twenty-four CPS and 1177 other clinical team members responded to a self-administered web-based questionnaire, with semi-structured interviews completed by 22 CPS and clinicians. Survey results indicated that all clinical provider groups rank CPS as making major contributions to CMM. CPS ranked themselves as contributing more to CMM than did their physician team members. CPS reported higher job satisfaction, less burn out, and better role fit; but CPS gave lower scores for communication and decision making as clinic organizational attributes. Themes in provider interviews focused on value of CPS in teams, relieving provider burden, facilitators to integration, and team communication issues.This evaluation indicates good integration of CPS on primary care teams as perceived by other team members despite some communication and role clarification challenges. CPS may play an important role in improving access to primary care.

Clinical Pharmacist Integration Into Veterans' Primary Care: Team Members Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: With the restructuring of primary care into patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), researchers have described role transformations that accompany the formation of core primary care teamlets (eg, primary care provider, registered nurse care manager, licensed practical nurse, medical support assistant). However, few studies offer insight into how primary care teamlets, once established, integrate additional extended team members, and the factors that influence the quality of their integration. METHODS: We examine the process of integrating Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPS) into primary care teams in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We conducted semi-structured interviews with CPS (n = 6) and clinical team members (n = 16) and performed a thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS: We characterize 2 ways CPS are integrated into primary care teamlets: in consultative roles and collaborative roles. CPS may be limited to consultative roles by team members' misconceptions about their competencies (ie, if CPS are perceived to handle only medication-related issues like refills) and by primary care providers' opinions about distributing responsibilities for patient care. Over time, teams may correct misconceptions and integrate the CPS in a more collaborative role (ie, CPS helps manage disease states with comprehensive medication management). CONCLUSIONS: CPS integrated into collaborative roles may have more opportunities to optimize their contributions to primary care, underscoring the importance of clarifying roles as part of adequately integrating advanced practitioners in interprofessional teams.

Evaluation of Celecoxib Addition to Pain Protocol After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Stratified by Opioid Tolerance.

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to determine the impact that celecoxib has on patients' postoperative opioid consumption on the basis of whether the patient is opioid naive or opioid tolerant for total hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective study over 1.5 years that encompassed a preperiod and postperiod for adding celecoxib to the pain protocol. Prescriptions for opioids dispensed 6 months before surgery were analyzed to assess for preoperative opioid tolerance. Unadjusted results were presented. Primary outcome measure was change in milligrams of morphine per day associated with celecoxib use as per linear regression analysis. Secondary outcome measures included total opioid dose, average pain score, length of stay, and as-needed opioid doses. RESULTS: Analysis included 142 patients. Unadjusted results showed that opioid-naive patients had greater reductions in opioid dose per day with celecoxib (49.1 vs. 80.8 mg) compared with tolerant patients (86.6 vs. 100.1 mg). Regression results showed similar results, with opioid-naive patients having a 29.9 mg reduction (95% confidence interval, -47.9 to -12.1; P=0.009) in opioid use per day associated with celecoxib use versus 5.5 mg reduction (95% confidence interval, -33.6 to 22.5; P=0.69) for opioid-tolerant group. Opioid-naive patients also had significant reductions in pain scores, as-needed opioid doses, and total opioid dose. Opioid-tolerant patients had significant reductions only in pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Both opioid-tolerant and opioid-naive patients benefited from celecoxib therapy, although in different ways. Opioid-tolerant patients saw benefits other than reductions in opioid use; opioid-naive patients had similar benefits, but also had significant reductions in opioid use.

New start versus continuing users on aripiprazole: implications for policy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate utilization of 90-day-supply prescriptions of aripiprazole. STUDY DESIGN: One year (April 1, 2011, to March 31, 2012) retrospective cohort study from the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. METHODS: The primary outcome was to determine the difference in adherence for new starts versus continuing users on aripiprazole, as determined by medication possession ratio (MPR). Secondary outcomes included odds of adherence and refilling at least once associated with being a new start. Adherence was defined as MPR ≥ 0.8. Separate regression models (linear and logistic) were run for the entire population, as well as a subgroup analysis of 90-day prescription patients only. RESULTS: A total of 749 patients, 328 of whom were new starts, were included in the analysis. Both new starts (41.2%) and continuing users (69.1%) had a large portion who received 90-day supplies. New-start patients had significantly lower MPR than continuing users (-0.13; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.08). Logistic regressions showed that new starts also had lower odds of adherence (odds ratio [OR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.65) and of refilling at least once (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.66) compared with continuing users. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were continuing users of aripiprazole were more likely to be adherent and refill their medication. Overutilization of 90-day supplies of high-cost agents, particularly in new starts, may lead to waste. It is recommended that patients newly started on high-cost agents should initially be provided a 30-day-supply prescription until it is established that effectiveness and tolerance have been achieved.