Creation of a Novel Classification System (PTNM) for Peyronie's Disease and Penile Curvature Using Evidence-Based Criteria.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to identify new Peyronie's disease (PD) subtypes, non-PD penile curvature classifications, and define active (acute) vs stable (chronic) phases of disease using evidence-based analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 1098 men who presented with penile deformity, including subjective standardized and nonstandardized questionnaires and objective measures. A second cohort of 719 men who were sent a mailed survey was also utilized for the relapsing/remitting subtype. Statistical analyses were performed to identify clusters of disease characteristics representative of distinct PD and non-PD categorizations, including sensitivity/specificity analyses and subtype comparisons. RESULTS: Comparative analyses identified 4 distinct subtypes of PD: (1) classical and nonclassical, (2) calcifying-moderate/severe calcification, (3) progressive-subjective worsening following disease onset, and (4) relapsing/remitting-reactivation following ≥ 6 months of stability. Additional, non-PD categorizations included congenital (lifelong), maturational (developed around puberty), and trauma induced. Statistical analyses demonstrated unique profiles among each category. Penile pain was not found to be a reliable predictor for disease progression or stability. Stable phase disease (historically "chronic") was variably defined by subtype: classical (≥3 months); progressive, calcifying, or trauma induced (≥12 months + ≥3 months stable OR ≥6 months stable). Similarly, PD subtypes may be assigned at ≥ 3 months following disease onset. A PTNM staging system is proposed to help communicate disease states, in which P = PD component (Ca-calcifying, Cl-classical, P-progressive, R-relapsing/remitting, U-undifferentiated), T = trauma component (0-absent, 1-present), N = non-PD component (C-congenital, M-maturational, U-undifferentiated), and M = mode (0-stable, 1-active); for example, PClT1N0M0 = stable classical PD with prior trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides an evidence-based proposal for the establishment of new PD subtypes and non-PD curvature categorizations as well as a standardized definition for active vs stable phases of disease.

Outcomes of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in men with ventral curvatures: an updated series.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) have been demonstrated in the treatment of men with Peyronie's disease (PD); however, the pivotal clinical trials excluded men with ventral penile curvature. AIM: The study sought to evaluate outcomes of CCH treatment in men with ventral curvatures secondary to PD. METHODS: Men with PD treated with CCH were identified from a prospective database. Patients received up to 4 series of CCH injections using a progressively modified protocol over time. Results were compared between those with baseline ventral vs nonventral penile curvatures. OUTCOMES: Changes in penile curvature, Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire scores, International Index of Erectile Function scores, nonstandardized assessments, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 560 men with PD (85 ventral curvature, 475 nonventral curvature) were included in the analysis. Baseline median curvature was 60.0° (interquartile range, 48.8°-75.0°) in the ventral cohort and 65.0° (interquartile range, 45.0°-80.0°) in the nonventral cohort. Median change from baseline penile curvature was -25.0° in the ventral cohort vs -24.0° in the nonventral cohort (P = .08, between-group comparison), which corresponded to curvature reductions of 44.7% and 33.6%, respectively (P = .03). In the subset of patients who completed CCH treatment (ie, received 8 injections or discontinued early because of patient satisfaction with curvature reduction), median change from baseline was -35.0° in the ventral cohort vs -25.0° in the nonventral cohort (P < .05); median percent improvement was 48.3% and 37.5%, respectively (P = .11). Median change from baseline in Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire and International Index of Erectile Function domain scores and adverse events were similar between cohorts, with the exception of possibly higher hematoma rates in the nonventral group (50% vs 37%; P = .05). No urethral injuries were sustained in either cohort. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Data support the use of CCH for the treatment of ventral as well as nonventral penile curvatures in men with PD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Study strengths are the inclusion of a general clinical population of men with PD, the prospective design, and the relatively large series of men with ventral curvature. Limitations include the single-center and observational nature of the study. CONCLUSION: CCH was safe and effective in the treatment of both ventral and nonventral penile curvatures in men with PD.

Lessons learned from the Sexual Medicine Society of North America fellowship bootcamp.

BACKGROUND: Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) fellowships offer variable experience in sexual health domains: erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease, male infertility, male hypogonadism (low testosterone), reconstruction (including male incontinence), benign prostatic hyperplasia, gender affirmation surgery, sexual mental health, and female sexual dysfunction. AIM: To evaluate baseline and postbootcamp understanding and trust in these domains. METHODS: In 2023, 28 of 31 urologists currently enrolled in SMSNA-endorsed fellowships participated in a 3.5-day training bootcamp in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Participants were asked to complete pre- and postbootcamp surveys. The bootcamp curriculum offered American Urological Association guidelines and case-based lectures, hands-on clinical training with cadavers (penile surgery) and models (collagenase training), and interaction with industry. OUTCOMES: Changes in knowledge, independence, and trust in performing the procedures, as well as billing issues and feedback for future bootcamps. RESULTS: Prebootcamp surveys revealed vastly varied residency experience. Reported time with an expert faculty member was greatest for benign prostatic hyperplasia and least for female sexual dysfunction, gender affirmation surgery, and low testosterone. The lowest prebootcamp confidence in performing surgery independently was for penile grafting procedures and elevating the neurovascular bundle. Postbootcamp results revealed several areas of significant improvement in confidence (P ≤ .03): intralesional injections for Peyronie's disease, manual modeling, penile plication, penile grafting procedures, and elevating the neurovascular bundle. There was a trend for improved confidence with the insertion of inflatable (P = .05) and semirigid (P = .08) penile prostheses. Nonsignificant improvement occurred in artificial urinary sphincter surgery (P = .12). Participants graded the bootcamp very highly and requested that next year's bootcamp have more content on female sexual dysfunction, male incontinence, and low testosterone, as well as more hands-on skills sessions and case-based lecture formats. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Offering a bootcamp with hands-on instruction could significantly improve urologists' knowledge and confidence. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: As the main strength, this study was the first specialized bootcamp for urologists in the subject of men's health, taking into account hands-on and cadaver laboratories, as well as highlighting industrial and pharmaceutical products. The small sample size was the major limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Current SMSNA fellows present with varied levels of experience and confidence across sexual health domains. Notable confidence improvements were seen with topics that combined didactic lectures with hands-on trainings.

Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement.

BACKGROUND: Penile cosmetic enhancement procedures have been performed for many years with varying success. However, they have historically been relegated to niche areas of sexual medicine, with limited data, and have not achieved mainstream adoption. More recently, the topic has been increasingly discussed within academic congresses due to availability of novel techniques, therapies, and procedures. Given their distinctive nature, the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) felt that it was pertinent to develop formal position statements to help guide both patients and sexual medicine providers on the current state of the scientific literature and to give recommendations for future research. AIM: The study sought to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for injection and surgical procedures designed to lengthen, augment, or otherwise cosmetically enhance the penis. METHODS: A review was performed of all scientific literature listed in PubMed from inception through December 2023 relating to penile cosmetic enhancement procedures. Only invasive (injection/surgery) therapies were included due to their distinct risk-benefit profile compared with more conservative treatments (eg, vacuum erection devices, penile traction devices). Similar therapies were categorized, with pertinent data summarized and used to help create relevant position statements. All statements were expert opinion only and were based on analyses of the potential risks and benefits of the specific therapies. OUTCOMES: A total of 6 position statements were issued relating to 5 distinct sexual medicine cosmetic enhancement procedures. RESULTS: A consensus opinion was reached by SMSNA leadership on the state of injection/surgical penile cosmetic enhancement procedures as of 2024. Key topic areas addressed included injectable soft tissue fillers, suspensory ligament division, graft-and-flap procedures, silicone sleeve implants, and sliding/slicing techniques. Distinct recommendations were tailored to each therapy and were based solely on the current state of the literature. It is anticipated that future studies will further inform position statements and will lead to ongoing modifications. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current position statements provide both patients and clinicians evidence-based, expert recommendations on best practices relating to penile cosmetic enhancement procedures. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the use of an expert panel of sexual medicine clinicians, consensus design, and summary of existing literature. Limitations include expert opinion and limited research on the topic. CONCLUSION: The current SMSNA position statements provide evidence-based, consensus opinions on the appropriate role for penile augmentation and cosmetic procedures in 2024.

Comparison of Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum to Surgery for the Management of Peyronie's Disease: A Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Since Food and Drug Administration approval of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie's disease, there has been significant debate regarding its role and comparable efficacy to surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was performed of Peyronie's disease men treated with either collagenase C histolyticum + RestoreX penile traction therapy + sildenafil or penile surgery + RestoreX penile traction therapy + sildenafil, with 3-month data presented. Primary objectives were overall satisfaction, subjective changes in erectile function, penile sensation, penile length, and changes in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain score. Secondary outcomes included objective changes in length, curve, adverse events, and other standardized and nonstandardized questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 40 men were enrolled, with 38 (collagenase C histolyticum group = 19, surgery group = 19) completing treatment and having 3-month data available. All demographic and clinicopathological variables were similar between groups. Following treatment, 50% of men in the collagenase C histolyticum group reported being very satisfied (vs 21% in the surgery group, P = .08) and noted better subjective erectile function (100% vs 68%, P = .03) and penile length (88% vs 16%, P < .0001), lesser impacts on penile sensation (75% vs 11% no change, P < .001), and similar International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain changes (+1.5 vs +2.5, P = .91). Objectively, men in the surgery group had greater curve improvements (84% vs 54%, P < .01) and higher rates of adverse events (50 vs 13 events, P < .001) but decreased penile length (-0.5 cm vs +1.0 cm, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 months posttreatment, collagenase C histolyticum + RestoreX penile traction therapy + sildenafil results in lesser curve improvements but greater penile length and fewer adverse events, including impacts on subjective erectile function and sensation, than men treated with surgery.

Efficacy of RestoreX after prostatectomy: open-label phase of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To report open-label phase data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), after previous data from that study showed improved penile length and erectile function among post-prostatectomy men treated with Restorex penile traction therapy (RxPTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An RCT (NCT05244486) was performed to evaluate RxPTT vs no treatment (Tx) for 5 months, which was followed by a 3-month open-label phase. Men were stratified based on as-treated data: Group 1 = No Tx; Group 2 = No Tx → Tx; Group 3 = Tx → No Tx; Group 4 = Tx. Assessments included stretched penile length and standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) and non-standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 82 men were enrolled (mean age 58.6 years) with 9-month data available in 45 of the men. Baseline characteristics were similar among the cohorts. Comparing Group 1 and Group 4 (respectively), notable differences included: IIEF Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score (-8 vs -0.5; P = 0.16), penile length (-0.1 vs +1.7 cm; P < 0.01), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 14%; P < 0.01), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 (50% vs 100%; P < 0.01), SEP Question 3 (33% vs 100%; P < 0.01). Men who crossed over to Tx (Group 2) failed to achieve equivalent improvements in length (+0.5 cm) or sexual function (IIEF-EF score -6) compared to men treated early (Groups 3 and 4). Those who crossed over to no treatment after initial treatment (Group 3) experienced preserved length (+1.8 cm), and erectile function (IIEF-EF score +0) despite therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of RxPTT beginning 1 month post-prostatectomy results in improved penile length and erectile function, with benefits maintained after discontinuing therapy. If confirmed, these results represent the first postoperative therapy shown in a RCT to improve erectile function post-prostatectomy. External validation is warranted.

Efficacy of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in men with congenital penile curvature.

BACKGROUND: Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has been proven effective in multiple subpopulations of PD men; however, no studies have evaluated its role with congenital penile curvature (CPC). AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CCH in men with CPC. METHODS: A prospective registry was queried of men undergoing CCH injections at our institution. Beginning in 2016, CCH was administered to CPC men using a similar protocol to PD. A comparative analysis was performed between cohorts to evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapy. OUTCOMES: Objective measures included penile length and curvature, while subjective outcomes included standardized (International Index of Erectile Function and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire) and non-standardized assessments. Curvature outcomes were categorized as follows: 1 - included all men, with the most recent assessment considered final, and 2 - only men who had completed eight CCH injections or stopped early due to satisfaction. RESULTS: From 2014 to Oct 2021, a total of 453 men (408 PD, 45 CPC) underwent one or more CCH injections. In comparing cohorts, CPC men were younger (33 vs 58 years, p<0.0001), had lesser baseline curvatures (52.5 vs 65°, p<0.01), more ventral curves (25.7 vs 9.2%, p<0.01), and longer penile lengths (12.5 vs 12.0 cm, p=0.04). Following treatment, both cohorts experienced similar curvature improvements. Specifically, PD men experienced 20-25° or 33-35% improvements depending on definition compared to 25-30° or 40-50% in CPC men (all p-values >0.05). CPC and PD men also demonstrated similar changes on standardized questionnaires, with the exception of the Psychological and Physical subdomain, which was more improved in CPC men (-11 vs -4, p<0.01). Baseline curvature was positively correlated with greater absolute (degree) and relative (percent) improvements. Adverse events were similar between groups after controlling for confounders. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CCH may be safely and effectively administered in men with CPC. These data provide the first evidence for the efficacy of a non-surgical therapeutic option in this cohort. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths - large, prospective series with standardized assessments; Limitations - non-randomized study, short-term follow-up, and lack of standardized method to differentiate CPC from PD. CONCLUSIONS: CCH may be safely and effectively administered to men with CPC, with similar success rates compared to PD. Increasing curvature was associated with greater absolute (degree) and relative (percent) improvements, supporting the role for CCH in men with mild, moderate, or severe curvatures. External validation is warranted prior to routine implementation.

The Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Ischemic Priapism, Priapism in Sickle Cell Patients, and Non-Ischemic Priapism: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline.

PURPOSE: Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues hours beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation and results in a prolonged and uncontrolled erection. Given its time-dependent and progressive nature, priapism is a situation that both urologists and emergency medicine practitioners must be familiar with and comfortable managing. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive search of the literature on acute ischemic priapism and non-ischemic priapism (NIP) was performed by Emergency Care Research Institute for articles published between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2020. A search of the literature on NIP, recurrent priapism, prolonged erection following intracavernosal vasoactive medication, and priapism in patients with sickle cell disease was conducted by Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center for articles published between 1946 and February 19, 2021. Searches identified 4117 potentially relevant articles, and 3437 of these were excluded at the title or abstract level for not meeting inclusion criteria. Full texts for the remaining 680 articles were ordered, and ultimately 203 unique articles were included in the report. RESULTS: This Guideline provides a clinical framework for the treatment (non-surgical and surgical) of NIP, recurrent ischemic priapism, and priapism in patients with sickle cell disease. The treatment of patients with a prolonged erection following intracavernosal vasoactive medication is also included. The AUA guideline on the diagnosis of priapism and the treatment of acute ischemic priapism was published in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with priapism should be evaluated emergently to identify the sub-type of priapism (acute ischemic versus non-ischemic) and those with an acute ischemic event should be provided early intervention when indicated. NIP is not an emergency and treatment must be based on patient objectives, available resources, and clinician experience. Management of recurrent ischemic priapism requires treatment of acute episodes and a focus on future prevention of an acute ischemic event. Sickle cell disease patients presenting with an acute ischemic priapism event should initially be managed with a focus on urologic relief of the erection; standard sickle cell assessment and interventions should be considered concurrent with urologic intervention. Treatment protocols for a prolonged, iatrogenic erection must be differentiated from protocols for true priapism.

Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel.

BACKGROUND: Patients with prostate cancer suffer significant sexual dysfunction after treatment which negatively affects them and their partners psychologically, and strain their relationships. AIM: We convened an international panel with the aim of developing guidelines that will inform clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies (PCT) on patients' and partners' sexual health, their relationships, and about biopsychosocial rehabilitation in prostate cancer (PC) survivorship. METHODS: The guidelines panel included international expert researchers and clinicians, and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995-2022) according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each statement was assigned an evidence strength (A-C) and a recommendation level (strong, moderate, conditional) based on benefit/risk assessment, according to the nomenclature of the American Urological Association (AUA). Data synthesis included meta-analyses of studies deemed of sufficient quality (3), using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). OUTCOMES: Guidelines for sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer were developed, based on available evidence and the expertise of the international panel. RESULTS: The guidelines account for patients' cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity. They attend to the unique needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The guidelines are based on literature review, a theoretical model of sexual recovery after PCT, and 6 principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. Forty-seven statements address the psychosexual, relationship, and functional domains in addition to statements on lifestyle modification, assessment, provider education, and systemic challenges to providing sexual health care in PC survivorship. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The guidelines provide clinicians with a comprehensive approach to sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The strength of the study is the comprehensive evaluation of existing evidence on sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation in prostate cancer that can, along with available expert knowledge, best undergird clinical practice. Limitation is the variation in the evidence supporting interventions and the lack of research on issues facing patients with prostate cancer in low and middle-income countries. CONCLUSION: The guidelines document the distressing sexual sequelae of PCT, provide evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation and outline areas for future research. Wittmann D, Mehta A, McCaughan E, et al. Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel. J Sex Med 2022;19:1655-1669.

Efficacy of a Novel Penile Traction Device in Improving Penile Length and Erectile Function Post Prostatectomy: Results from a Single-Center Randomized, Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: RestoreX is a novel penile traction therapy device, with randomized, controlled data demonstrating improvements in penile length and erectile function after 30 to 90 minutes of daily use in men with Peyronie's disease. We sought to determine if similar improvements could be achieved post prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men post prostatectomy were randomly assigned to control or one of 2 penile traction therapy protocols for 6 months, followed by a 3-month open-label phase. The current study presents data from the randomized phase. The primary outcome was changes in stretched penile length; secondary outcomes were changes in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores, adverse events, satisfaction and subjective measures. RESULTS: In all, 82 men (mean age 58.6 years) were randomized, with 6-month data available in 25 controls and 30 penile traction therapy cases. At 6 months, penile traction therapy achieved greater improvements/preservation of penile length (+1.6 vs +0.3 cm, p <0.01), erectile function (IIEF-Erectile Function +0 vs -6.5, p=0.03), intercourse satisfaction (IIEF-Intercourse Satisfaction +1 vs -3.5, p <0.01) and overall sexual satisfaction (IIEF-Overall Sexual Satisfaction 0 vs -3, p <0.01). Erectogenic therapy use was lower in penile traction therapy men (phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors 86% vs 94%, p=0.44; intracavernosal injections 19% vs 50%, p <0.05). More penile traction therapy men reported satisfaction or improvement in penile length than controls. Adverse events were transient and mild; 87% would choose to repeat therapy, and 93% would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a novel penile traction therapy device results in significant improvements in objective and subjective penile length post prostatectomy and measures of erectile function, intercourse satisfaction and overall sexual satisfaction. External validation is warranted.

Acute Ischemic Priapism: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline.

PURPOSE: Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues hours beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation and results in a prolonged and uncontrolled erection. Given its time-dependent and progressive nature, priapism is a situation that both urologists and emergency medicine practitioners must be familiar with and comfortable managing. Acute ischemic priapism, characterized by little or no cavernous blood flow and abnormal cavernous blood gases (ie, hypoxic, hypercarbic, acidotic) represents a medical emergency and may lead to cavernosal fibrosis and subsequent erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed by Emergency Care Research Institute for articles published between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2020. Searches identified 2948 potentially relevant articles, and 2516 of these were excluded at the title or abstract level for not meeting inclusion criteria for any key question. Full texts for the remaining 432 articles were reviewed, and ultimately 137 unique articles were included in the report. RESULTS: This Guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper diagnosis and surgical and non-surgical treatment of patients with acute ischemic priapism. This Guideline addresses the role of imaging, adjunctive laboratory testing, early involvement of urologists when presenting to the emergency room, discussion of conservative therapies, enhanced data for patient counseling on risks of erectile dysfunction and surgical complications, specific recommendations on intracavernosal phenylephrine with or without irrigation, the inclusion of novel surgical techniques (eg, tunneling), and early penile prosthesis placement. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with priapism should be evaluated emergently to identify the sub-type of priapism (acute ischemic versus non-ischemic) and those with an acute ischemic event should be provided early intervention. Treatment of the acute ischemic patient must be based on patient objectives, available resources, and clinician experience. As such, a single pathway for managing the condition is oversimplified and no longer appropriate. Using a diversified approach, some men may be treated with intracavernosal injections of phenylephrine alone, others with aspiration/irrigation or distal shunting, and some may undergo non-emergent placement of a penile prosthesis.

Continuing Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injections Among Initial Nonresponders Results in Significant Curvature Improvements in the Majority of Peyronie's Disease Men.

BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear if men with Peyronie's Disease (PD) who achieve minimal benefits with the first 2 series of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injections should continue with additional injections. AIM: To analyze curvature improvements from the final two series of CCH injections based on amount of improvement during the first 2 series. METHODS: A prospective registry was analyzed of all men undergoing CCH injections for PD at a single institution. Men were included if they had completed a full 4 series (8 injections) of CCH and had baseline, interval (after 2 series), and/or final (after 4 series) curvature assessments available. Men were stratified into cohorts using baseline-to-interval assessments of ≤10° (or ≤20%) and >10° (or >20%), and improvements were compared using interval-to-final assessments. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was interval-to-final curvature improvements stratified by ≤10°/>10° or ≤20%/>20% improvements achieved during the baseline-to-interval period. Secondary outcomes included analyses of demographic and pathophysiologic variables to determine associations with significant improvements during the final 2 CCH series. RESULTS: A total of 296 PD men were identified as receiving at least one CCH injection, of whom 175 had baseline-to-interval, 84 interval-to-final, and 115 with baseline-to-final measurements. Mean age was 56.6, PD duration 28.6 months, baseline curvature 63.4°, hourglass deformity 36.2%, and calcification 20%. Mean overall curve improvement was -21.5° (33.1%). Among men who experienced ≤20% improvements after 2 series, the mean subsequent curvature change was -24.6% during the final two series (vs +4.3% of those with >20% initial improvement, P< .001), and they were 2.7x more likely to experience >20% subsequent curve improvements. Thirty-one percent of those who achieved >10° during the first 2 series experienced benefits during the final 2 series compared to 70% of men who had ≤10° improvement initially. No demographic or pathophysiological variables predicted likelihood for improvements during the final 2 series of injections. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Men who fail to achieve significant benefits with 2 series of CCH injections may benefit from completing the final 2 series. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths including a relatively large, prospective series. Limitations include a single center, nonrandomization, nonblinded assessments, and restriction to men who completed eight injections. CONCLUSIONS: In the current series, approximately 2/3 of men who fail to achieve >10° or 20% curve improvements with an initial 2 series of CCH injections achieved >10° or 20% improvements with the subsequent 2 series. Alom M, Burgon H, Ziegelmann M, et al. Continuing Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injections Among Initial Nonresponders Results in Significant Curvature Improvements in the Majority of Peyronie's Disease Men. J Sex Med 2021;18:1092-1098.

Discrepancy between Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis Recommendation and Practice Patterns in the Post-2012 American Urological Association Guideline Era.

PURPOSE: In 2012 the American Urological Association published vasectomy guidelines to promote best practices, including when to obtain post-vasectomy semen analyses. In this study we assessed practice patterns of post-vasectomy semen analysis since this guideline publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a database of men who underwent post-vasectomy semen analysis between 2013 and 2017. Vasectomies were performed by urologist and nonurologist providers in academic and community settings. RESULTS: A total of 4,827 men underwent post-vasectomy semen analysis with 22.3% undergoing 1 or more repeat analyses. On initial analysis 58.2% were azoospermic, 28.3% had less than 100,000/ml rare nonmotile sperm, 8.7% had greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm and 4.8% had motile sperm. The rate of repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis decreased from 30.7% in 2013 to 18.6% in 2016. Overall 72% of repeat post-vasectomy semen analyses were performed for patients with azoospermia or rare nonmotile sperm on initial post-vasectomy semen analysis. Of the 421 men with greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm, 61.3% did not obtain a repeat analysis. Among cases of repeat analysis after initially having greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm, 67.5% were downgraded to rare nonmotile sperm or azoospermia, 32.5% had a persistent count greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm and none developed motile sperm. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis is decreasing, likely highlighting a decrease in unnecessary testing. However, there is ongoing discordance between vasectomy guidelines and practice patterns, with 72% of repeat post-vasectomy semen analyses obtained unnecessarily based on guideline recommendations. Interestingly, no men with greater than 100,000/ml nonmotile sperm went on to have motile sperm on repeat post-vasectomy semen analysis. Further provider education is warranted and subsequent studies may allow for guideline modification wherein all nonmotile sperm are characterized similarly.

Peyronie's Disease Intervention Studies: An Exploration of Modern-Era Challenges in Study Design and Evaluating Treatment Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease (PD) is characterized by pain, deformity, sexual dysfunction, and psychological bother. Several treatments are available with varying levels of efficacy, and significant limitations exist with the currently available literature. AIM: To explore modern-era methodological challenges inherent to PD research as they pertain to intervention studies. METHODS: We performed a critical review of the PD intervention literature to identify common methodological challenges with emphasis on aspects of patient assessment and treatment outcomes, study design, and statistical analysis. The key objective was to provide an impetus on which to build future research protocols, rather than focus on weaknesses with any individual studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion was used to summarize limitations with commonly reported objective outcomes such as penile curvature, girth, and length along with imaging modalities and objective questionnaires. Appropriate study design and statistical analysis were also reviewed to discuss common pitfalls in the PD literature. RESULTS: There are multiple shortcomings inherent to studying objective PD outcomes such as penile curvature, girth, and length. These include lack of standardized protocols for preintervention and postintervention assessment, interobserver and intraobserver variability, and lack of consistent definitions for what defines an objective outcome as clinically "meaningful" for patients. Similarly, imaging studies including penile ultrasound are subject to marked variation, thereby limiting their utility to measure predefined primary or secondary study outcomes including cavernosal artery hemodynamics and penile plaque size. Objective and validated questionnaires such as the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire and International Index of Erectile Function require that patients have recently engaged in sexual activity, which is challenging for many patients as a result of penile deformity with PD. Finally, careful study design and statistical analysis (including appropriate study power) are imperative to ensure reliable results. Current shortcomings in the majority of studies contribute to the low level of evidence available for most PD interventions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future PD intervention studies should focus on optimizing study design and statistical analysis. Furthermore, authors must incorporate standardized protocols for assessing preintervention and postintervention outcomes. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The current analysis and recommendations for future study are based on the expertise and opinion of the manuscript authors. CONCLUSION: Multiple areas of weakness in study design, statistical analysis, and patient outcomes assessment limit the reliability of data derived from PD intervention studies in the modern era. The global themes identified herein should serve as a basis upon which to build future research protocols. Ziegelmann MJ, Trost LW, Russo GI, et al. Peyronie's Disease Intervention Studies: An Exploration of Modern-Era Challenges in Study Design and Evaluating Treatment Outcomes. J Sex Med 2020;17:364-377.

Outcomes of RestoreX Penile Traction Therapy in Men With Peyronie's Disease: Results From Open Label and Follow-up Phases.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of RestoreX traction therapy in men with Peyronie's disease (PD) has been completed, with the 3-month results previously reported. The present study presents outcomes from the open-label and follow-up phases of the original trial. AIM: To report 6-month (open-label phase) and 9-month (follow-up phase) outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial (NCT03389854). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed from 2017 to 2019 in 110 all-comer men with PD. Men were randomized 3:1 to RestoreX (PTT) or no therapy (control) for 3 months, followed by 3-month open-label and follow-up phases. Key outcomes included adverse events (AEs), changes in penile curvature and length, erectile function, and standardized and nonstandardized assessments of PD. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes are safety, penile length, penile curvature, Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire, International Index of Erectile Function, and satisfaction. RESULTS: 6-month (n = 64) and 9-month (n = 63) outcomes were reported, with a mean duration of PTT use of 31.1 minutes. No significant AEs were reported, with temporary erythema and discomfort being most common and resolving within minutes. On intent-to-treat analysis, control-to-PTT men experienced significant length (1.7-2.0 cm) and curvature improvements (18-20%). PTT-to-PTT men also achieved additional length (0.6-0.8 cm) without further curvature improvements. An as-treated analysis of PTT use ≥15 minute/day demonstrated 2.0- to 2.3-cm length gains (largest of any PTT to date) and 18-21% curve improvement. All sexual function domains of the International Index of Erectile Function and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire were significantly improved (except orgasmic domain). 95% of men treated for 6 months experienced length gains (mean 2.0-2.2 cm), and 61% had curve improvements (16.8-21.4° [32.8-35.8%]). RestoreX was preferred 3-4:1 over all other PD treatments, and 100% preferred it over other PTT devices. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of RestoreX 30 minutes daily results in significant length and curve improvements in PD men without significant AEs. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include largest randomized study of PTT, blinded assessments, and inclusion of all-comers with few restrictions; limitations include sample size that precludes comparisons between treatment cohorts and lack of long-duration (>3-9 hours) treatment arm. CONCLUSION: PTT with RestoreX results in significant improvements in length, curve, and subjective and objective measures of sexual function without significant AEs. RestoreX PTT represents a safe, conservative, low-cost option for managing men with PD. Joseph J, Ziegelmann M, Alom M, et al. Outcomes of RestoreX Penile Traction Therapy in Men With Peyronie's Disease: Results From Open Label and Follow-up Phases. J Sex Med 2020;17:2462-2471.

Prevalence and Predictors of Climacturia and Associated Patient/Partner Bother in Patients With History of Definitive Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Climacturia is an under-reported complication of definitive therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) - that is, radical prostatectomy (RP) and/or radiation therapy (RT). AIM: We sought to identify the prevalence and predictors of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with and without prior PCa treatment. METHODS: We analyzed a database of patients who presented to our Men's Health clinic and filled out a questionnaire related to sexual function and pertinent medical histories. The prevalence of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with/without prior RP/RT was calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors associated with climacturia and patient/partner bother. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were the prevalence and predictors of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with/without history of definitive PCa treatment. RESULTS: Among 1,117 patients able to achieve orgasm, 192 patients (17%) had prior history of definitive therapy for PCa (RP alone = 139 [72%]; RT alone = 22 [11%]; RP + RT = 31 [16%]). Climacturia was reported by 39%, 14%, 52%, and 2.4% of patients with history of RP alone, RT alone, RP + RT, and neither RP nor RT, respectively (P < .05 between all groups). 33 to 45 percent of patients with climacturia noted significant patient/partner bother. Factors significantly associated with climacturia were prior RP, prior RT, history of other prostate surgery, and erectile dysfunction, although erectile dysfunction was not significant on multivariable analysis. Significant reduction in climacturia prevalence was noted for patients who were ≥1 year out from RP, compared with patients who were <1 year out. Among patients with prior RP/RT, stress urinary incontinence was associated with increased risk of climacturia, whereas diabetes was associated with decreased risk. No factors were associated with patient/partner bother. Among patients with prior RP, nerve-sparing technique did not predict presence of climacturia but was associated with reduced patient/partner bother. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: Given significant prevalence of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother, patients should be counseled on the risk of climacturia before undergoing RP/RT. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the large study population and the focus on both RP and RT. Limitations include the facts that this is a single-institution study that primarily relies on patients' subjective reporting and that the study population may not represent the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Climacturia affects a significant proportion of patients with history of RP/RT for PCa, and many patients and their partners find this bothersome. Jimbo M, Alom M, Pfeifer ZD, et al. Prevalence and Predictors of Climacturia and Associated Patient/Partner Bother in Patients With History of Definitive Therapy for Prostate Cancer. J Sex Med 2020;17:1126-1132.