Positioning of Bristol Stool Form Scale type 3 in constipation treatment satisfaction: A multicenter study in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Many patients are not satisfied with chronic constipation (CC) treatments. The aim of this study was to identify factors linked to CC treatment satisfaction or dissatisfaction. METHODS: Our study population included patients who received CC treatment at a clinic or hospital. CC was diagnosed by a physician based on the patient's complaint. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the 28th question of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS: We conducted this study at 28 facilities. We included 167 patients (mean age 66.7 ± 15.2 years, male:female ratio is 1:3.07). Sixty-eight (40.7%) of patients were satisfied with their constipation treatment. Treatment dissatisfaction of CC was significantly associated with frequency of bowel movement <3/week (odds ratio [OR] = 0.376, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.156-0.904, P = 0.029) or Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) type 3 (OR = 0.401, 95% CI: 0.170-0.946, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that CC patients with BSFS type3 were not satisfied with constipation treatment. In general, BSFS types 3-5 are defined as normal stools. Therefore, BSFS type 3 may be set as a treatment goal even though the patient is not satisfied. The pathophysiology of CC differs by region and patient background. Therefore, parameters used to define successful treatment will be different by patient or region. We should reconsider the positioning of BSFS type 3 to improve treatment satisfaction for CC.

Factors associated with poor therapeutic response in outpatients with irritable bowel syndrome: a multicenter study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) show poor response to treatment. However, risk factors associated with poor therapeutic response have not been determined. METHODS: This multicenter trial evaluated consecutive outpatients with IBS undergoing treatment for more than 1 month. Mental health status and physical function were evaluated using the Japanese version of the SF-8. Therapeutic response was evaluated using the IBS severity index-Japanese version (IBS-SIJ). Patients with IBS-SIJ scores ≥175 were defined as poor responders to treatment, whereas those with IBS-SIJ scores <175 were defined as good responders. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these two groups, along with medications, were compared. RESULTS: The study enrolled 131 participants, 75 with IBS-SIJ scores ≥175-56 with IBS-SIJ scores <175. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.67, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.19-5.97, p = 0.0167] and mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-8 <40 (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 1.12-5.97, p = 0.0263) were independent risk factors for poor therapeutic response in patients with IBS. CONCLUSIONS: Lower MCS and female sex were risk factors for poor therapeutic response in patients with IBS. Ascertaining the mechanisms by which lower MCS and female sex are associated with poor therapeutic response in IBS may help design better treatments (Trial registration number: UMIN000016804).

Glycemic control after addition of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes showing inadequate response to thrice-a-day treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of addition of alogliptin, while continuing the α-glucosidase inhibitor (αGI) administration at the same or reduced dose, or discontinuing the drug, on the glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients showing inadequate response to αGI treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter interventional study trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with alogliptin alone (Intake 0 group), or alogliptin in addition to an αGI administered once-/twice-/thrice-daily (Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in glycemic control were measured. RESULTS: The HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels at 1 and 3 months were significantly lower than the values at the baseline in the Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups, but not the Intake 0 group. The body weight at 3 months was significantly lower than that at the baseline in the Intake 3 group. There were no significant differences in the degree of satisfaction or participating volition recorded, before and after the start of the study treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of alogliptin to once-/twice-daily administration of an αGI may be effective for obtaining improved glycemic control, without lowering the treatment satisfaction level, in type 2 diabetic patients.

Pravastatin potentiates increases in serum adiponectin concentration in dyslipidemic patients receiving thiazolidinedione: the DOLPHIN study.

AIM: A reduced risk of type 2 diabetes has been reported following treatment with pravastatin. Adiponectin is an adipocyte-derived protein that has an antidiabetic property. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pravastatin on serum adiponectin concentration and other influencing factors. METHODS: This study was a multicenter observational study: Dyslipidemia Open-labeled observational study by Lipid-lowering therapy with Pravastatin of the effect on High-molecular weight adiponectin in Nippon Yokohama (DOLPHIN). The protocol was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry as UMIN000000791. All patients received pravastatin 10 mg/day for 6 months and the change in concentration of total and high molecular weight adiponectin was assessed before and after follow-up. The difference in the change in total adiponectin concentration by patient characteristics was analyzed by an unpaired t-test. Influences of continuous variable factors on the change in total adiponectin concentration were estimated by simple linear regression analyses. Finally, in order to estimate the influences of factors that potentially affect the change in total adiponectin concentration induced by pravastatin, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted. RESULTS: After 6 months, total adiponectin concentration was increased significantly by 23.2% from 11.7±6.4 to 13.7±8.6 µg/mL (p=0.002). The use of thiazolidinedione as a concomitant medication was the only significant influencing factor (ß=0.580, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pravastatin increased the serum adiponectin concentration in Japanese dyslipidemic patients without previous coronary artery disease. Interestingly, this effect was seen synergistically in combination with thiazolidinedione.