A high performance liquid chromatography method for vinorelbine and 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine: a decade of routine analysis in human blood.

A sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of vinorelbine and its active metabolite, 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine, in human biological fluids. These two compounds together with vinblastine, used as internal standard, were extracted from blood and urine by a liquid-liquid process using diethyl ether, and followed by a back-extraction in acidic conditions. Then, they were analysed through a cyano column and detected in ultraviolet at 268 nm. The assay linearity was validated up to 2000 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification was set at 2.5 ng/ml. The between-run precision and accuracy were always higher than 94%. Biological samples were stable when stored at -80 degrees C over 2 years. The long-term reproducibility and the suitability of this analytical method were demonstrated within the last decade through the analysis of about 7000 samples during the clinical development of i.v. and oral formulations of vinorelbine. Because vinorelbine binds mainly to platelets and blood cells and because this binding is rapidly reversible and highly influenced by environmental conditions, drug concentration in plasma may be highly influenced by the sampling conditions and the centrifugation process used to separate blood cells from plasma. Therefore, this method was developed in blood and then used for sample analyses in routine. The major benefit was that it was easy for nurses to directly collect blood instead of plasma and that reduced volume of sampling could be withdrawn from frail patients. Furthermore, the analysis in blood enabled to quantify vinorelbine and 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine concentrations for a longer period of time, which resulted in a more accurate evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Which bioequivalence study for a racemic drug? Application to milnacipran.

Milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, is a racemic mixture (F2207) composed of two enantiomers: F2695 and F2696, both demonstrated to be active. A randomized open label, single-dose latin square study was undertaken in 24 healthy volunteers to compare, based on racemate data, the relative bioavailability of two new formulations to that of a reference formulation. Later on, as suggested by actual regulatory trend, analysis was carried out on enantiomer data, although in a supportive way. Bioequivalence was assessed on calculation of 90% confidence intervals for log-transformed Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) and on Wilcoxon test for Tmax with a 5% level of significance. Based on racemate data, both test formulations were demonstrated to be equivalent to the reference capsule in terms of Cmax and AUC-(0-infinity). Differences in Tmax reached statistical significance, although their mean magnitude was small, and probably not relevant when related to antidepressant long-term therapy. When considering the test capsule - reference capsule comparison, the equivalence demonstrated for the racemate reflect that of each enantiomer. On the contrary, equivalence between the test tablet and the reference capsule demonstrated for the racemate, is not supported by both enantiomers as Cmax of F2696 fails to reach bioequivalence criteria, making more uncertain the conclusion of bioequivalence. From this experience, it seems than when equivalence is demonstrated close to the limits for the racemate, it is difficult, especially for a low variability drug such as milnacipran, to comply with equivalence criteria for both enantiomers.

Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg dose of milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, were compared in 8 chronic renal failure subjects (Clc(reat) between 9 to 84.5 ml.min(-1)) and in 6 healthy volunteers. Concentrations of unchanged (F2207 racemate and F2695 and F2696, enantiomers) and glucuroconjugated drug (main metabolite) were measured using HPLC and GC-MS. As for drugs mainly eliminated via renal route, the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran were markedly affected by impaired renal function with the elimination half-life of severely impaired subject being approximately three times that of the control group. Milnacipran apparent total clearance and renal clearance were positively correlated with glomerular filtration rate, while non-renal clearance and apparent volume of distribution were unaffected by renal impairment. Plasma concentrations of the glucuroconjugate were gradually increased in plasma, while its total urine excretion remained unchanged. As for the racemate, pharmacokinetics of each enantiomer were modified by renal failure, although, as predictable from its higher renal clearance value, it was more marked for F2696 than for F2695. Considering that modifications were shown to be proportional to the degree of renal impairment and that milnacipran presents low variability, the necessary dose adjustment is therefore easy to predict.

Quantitative analysis of S3341 in human plasma and urine by combined gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry: 15 month inter-day precision and accuracy validation.

A new quantitative assay for the determination of S3341, an alpha-2 agonist antihypertensive drug, has been developed using combined gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. The [M]-. ions from TFA derivatives of S3341 (m/z 276) and the internal standard (2H4)S3341 (m/z 280) are monitored simultaneously by selected ion monitoring. For S3341 concentrations ranging from the limit of detection (0.2 ng ml-1 using 1 ml of plasma) to 5 ng ml-1, the average assay precision (CV) is approximately 7% while the average assay accuracy (percentage of error) is 4%. Validation of the day-to-day precision and accuracy was realized after analysing control plasma samples (n = 295) concurrently with the biological samples collected during the pharmacokinetic studies conducted over 15 months. The average day-to-day precision (CV) and accuracy (percentage of error) are 10% and 6% respectively, thus indicating that this assay procedure routinely provides reliable analytical data.