Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 69
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg ; 277(6): 952-957, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35185128

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between SAO workforce and mortality from emergent surgical and obstetric conditions within US HR Rs. BACKGROUND: SAO workforce per capita has been identified as a core metric of surgical capacity by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, but its utility has not been assessed at the subnational level for a high-income country. METHODS: The number of practicing surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians per capita was estimated for all HRRs using the US Health Resources & Services Administration Area Health Resource File Database. Deaths due to emergent general surgical and obstetric conditions were determined from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database. We utilized B-spline quantile regression to model the relationship between SAO workforce and emergent surgical mortality at different quantiles of mortality and calculated the expected change in mortality associated with increases in SAO workforce. RESULTS: The median SAO workforce across all HRRs was 74.2 per 100,000 population (interquartile range 33.3-241.0). All HRRs met the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery lower target of 20 SAO per 100,000, and 97.7% met the upper target of 40 per 100,000. Nearly 2.8 million Americans lived in HRRs with fewer than 40 SAO per 100,000. Increases in SAO workforce were associated with decreases in surgical mortality in HRRs with high mortality, with minimal additional decreases in mortality above 60 to 80 SAO per 100,000. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing SAO workforce capacity may reduce emergent surgical and obstetric mortality in regions with high surgical mortality but diminishing returns may be seen above 60 to 80 SAO per 100,000. Trial Registration: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Cirujanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Recursos Humanos , Anestesiólogos
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 34(3): 527-537, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36577845

RESUMEN

Incidence of pelvic and acetabular fracture is increasing in Europe. From 2007 to 2014 in the USA, this study found an age-adjusted incidence of 198 and 40 fractures/100,000/year, respectively, much higher than what has been described before. Incidence remained steady over that period and only a small increase in incidence of pelvic fracture in men was identified. PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures in the USA over the period 2007-2014 and to examine trends over time. METHODS: Retrospective population-based observational study using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), a 20% stratified all-payer sample of US hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). All patients seen in the ED and diagnosed with pelvic/acetabular fracture from 2007 to 2014 were included. The primary outcome was age-adjusted incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures per 100,000 persons/years. Secondary outcomes included incidence stratified by age and sex, patient- and hospital-related characteristics, and ED procedures. Tests for linear trends were used to determine if there were statistically significant differences by sex and age groups over time. RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture was 198 fractures/100,000/year, 323 in women and 114 in men. The age-adjusted incidence of acetabular fracture was 40 fractures/100,000/year, 36 in women and 51 in men. A small increase in the age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture in men was the only significant trend observed during the study time (p = 0.03). Over that period, the mean age of patients at presentation increased, as well as their number of comorbidities and associated fragility fractures, and they were more often sent home or to nursing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: When considering all patients coming to the ED, not only those admitted to the hospital, adjusted incidence of pelvic and acetabular fracture is much higher than what has been described before. Contrarily to the global increase seen in other countries, incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures dropped in the USA from 2007 to 2014 and only a small increase in age-adjusted incidence of pelvic fracture in men was identified.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas de Cadera , Huesos Pélvicos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acetábulo/lesiones , Acetábulo/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones
3.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 47: e39, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36909811

RESUMEN

Objective: To calculate the economic impact of violence across Mexico in 2021 and project costs for 2021-2030. Methods: Incidence data was obtained from the Executive Secretariat of the National Public Security System, (SESNSP), National Population Council (CONAPO), National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), and the National Survey of Victimization and Perception of Public Safety (ENVIPE). Our model incorporates incidence estimates of the costs of events associated with violence (e.g., homicides, hospitalizations, rapes, extortions, robbery, etc). Results: The economic impact of crime and violence in Mexico for the year 2021 has been estimated at about $192 billion US dollars, which corresponds to 14.6% of the national GDP. By reducing violence 50% by 2030, we estimate savings of at least US$110 billion dollars. This represents a saving of US$1 376 372 for each company and more than US$66 771 for each Mexican. Conclusion: Violence and homicides have become one of the most pressing public health and economic concerns for their effect on health, development, and economic growth. Due to low cost and high impact, prevention is the most efficient way to respond to crime and violence while also being an essential component of sustainable strategies aimed at improving citizen security.

4.
Ann Surg ; 276(5): e584-e590, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33065654

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the needs based assessment of trauma systems (NBATS) tool estimates of trauma center need to the existing trauma infrastructure using observed national trauma volume. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Robust trauma systems have improved outcomes for severely injured patients. The NBATS tool was created by the American College of Surgeons to align trauma resource allocation with regional needs. METHODS: Data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, the Trauma Information Exchange Program, and US Census was used to calculate an NBATS score for each trauma service area (TSA) as defined by the Pittsburgh Atlas. This score was used to estimate the number of trauma centers allocated to each TSA and compared to the number of existing trauma centers. RESULTS: NBATS predicts the need for 117 additional trauma centers across the United States to provide adequate access to trauma care nationwide. At least 1 additional trauma center is needed in 49% of TSAs. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the NBATS tool nationally shows the need for additional trauma infrastructure across a large segment of the United States. We identified some limitations of the NBATS tool, including preferential weighting based on current infrastructure. The NBATS tool provides a good framework to begin the national discussion around investing in the expansion of trauma systems nationally, however, in many instances lacks the granularity to drive change at the local level.


Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de Necesidades , Centros Traumatológicos , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía
5.
Ann Surg ; 276(1): 22-29, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703455

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) as a predictor of long-term outcomes after injury. BACKGROUND: The SVI is a measure used in emergency preparedness to identify need for resources in the event of a disaster or hazardous event, ranking each census tract on 15 demographic/social factors. METHODS: Moderate-severely injured adult patients treated at 1 of 3 level-1 trauma centers were prospectively followed 6 to 14 months post-injury. These data were matched at the census tract level with overall SVI percentile rankings. Patients were stratified based on SVI quartiles, with the lowest quartile designated as low SVI, the middle 2 quartiles as average SVI, and the highest quartile as high SVI. Multivariable adjusted regression models were used to assess whether SVI was associated with long-term outcomes after injury. RESULTS: A total of 3153 patients were included [54% male, mean age 61.6 (SD = 21.6)]. The median overall SVI percentile rank was 35th (IQR: 16th-65th). compared to low SVI patients, high SVI patients were more likely to have new functional limitations [odds ratio (OR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.92), to not have returned to work (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.40-2.89), and to screen positive for post-traumatic stress disorder (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.17). Similar results were obtained when comparing average with low SVI patients, with average SVI patients having significantly worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The SVI has potential utility in predicting individuals at higher risk for adverse long-term outcomes after injury. This measure may be a useful needs assessment tool for clinicians and researchers in identifying communities that may benefit most from targeted prevention and intervention efforts.


Asunto(s)
Vulnerabilidad Social , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Centros Traumatológicos
6.
J Surg Res ; 257: 486-492, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are well-documented disparities in outcomes for injured Black and Hispanic patients in the United States. However, patient level characteristics cannot fully explain the differences in outcomes and system-level factors, including the trauma center designation of the hospital to which a patient presents, may contribute to their worse outcomes. We aim to determine if Black and Hispanic patients are more likely to be undertriaged, compared with white patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, population-based study that uses data from the 2014 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. We included data from all states with available State Inpatient Databases data that included both race and hospital characteristics needed for analysis (n = 18). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of severely injured (Injury Severity Score ≥16) patients being brought to a trauma center. RESULTS: We identified 70,970 severely injured trauma patients with complete data. Non-Hispanic White represented 74.1% of the study population, 9.8% were non-Hispanic Black, and 9.7% were Hispanic. After adjustment for other demographic and injury characteristics, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be undertriaged, compared with white patients (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.29 and odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.48, respectively). Male sex and older age were associated with higher odds of undertriage, whereas urban residence, high injury severity, and penetrating injury were associated with lower odds of undertriage. CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured Black and Hispanic trauma patients are more likely to be undertriaged than otherwise similar white patients. The factors that contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in receiving trauma center care need to be identified and addressed to provide equitable trauma care.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
J Surg Res ; 268: 643-649, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34474213

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Language barriers can limit access to care for patients with a non-English primary language (NEPL). The objective of this study was to define the association between primary language and emergency versus elective surgery among diverticulitis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients from the 2009-2014 New Jersey State Inpatient Database. Patients were included if they had primary language data and underwent a partial colon resection for diverticulitis. Primary language was dichotomized into NEPL versus English primary language (EPL). The primary outcome was surgical admission type - urgent/emergent (referred to as "emergency") versus elective. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 9,453 patients underwent surgery for diverticulitis, of which 592 (6.3%) had NEPL. Among NEPL patients, 300 (51%) had Spanish as primary language and 292 (49%) had another non-Spanish primary language. Patients with NEPL and EPL were similar in age (median age 58 versus 59 years; P = 0.54) and sex (52% versus 53% female; P = 0.45). Patients with NEPL were less likely to have commercial insurance (45% versus 59%; P <0.001). On multivariable analysis, compared to patients with EPL, NEPL was associated with increased odds of emergency surgery for diverticulitis (OR 1.35; 95% Confidence Interval 1.13-1.62; P = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Patients with NEPL have higher odds of emergency versus elective surgery for diverticulitis compared to patients with EPL. Further research is needed to examine differences in referral pathways, patient-provider communication, and health literacy that may hinder access to elective surgery in patients with diverticulitis.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis , Lenguaje , Adulto , Colectomía , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
World J Surg ; 45(6): 1663-1671, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33616710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long travel times to reach essential surgical care in Chiapas, Mexico's poorest state, can delay lifesaving procedures and contribute to adverse outcomes. Geographical access to surgical facilities is 1 of the 6 indicators of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and has been measured extensively worldwide. Our objective is to determine the population with 2-h geographical access to facilities capable of performing the Bellwether procedures (laparotomy, cesarean delivery, and open fracture repair). This is the first study in Mexico to assess access to surgical facilities, including both the fragmented public sector and the private sector. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, conducted from June 2019 to January 2020, Bellwether capable surgical facilities from all health systems in Chiapas were geocoded and assessed through on-site data collection, Ministry of Health databases, and verified via telephone. Geospatial analyses were performed on Redivis. RESULTS: We identified 59 Bellwether capable hospitals, with 17.5% (n = 954,460) of the state residing more than 2 h from surgical care in public and private health systems. Of those, 22 facilities had confirmed 24/7 Bellwether capability, and 23% (n = 1,178,383) of the affiliated population resided more than 2 h from these hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the Ministry of Health and employment-based health coverage could provide timely access to essential surgical care for the majority of the population. However, the fragmentation of the healthcare system leaves a gap that contributes to delays in care and unmet emergency surgical needs.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía , México , Embarazo
9.
Ann Surg ; 272(6): 1149-1157, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601262

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe variability in and consequences of opioid prescriptions following pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative opioid prescribing patterns may contribute to persistent opioid use in both adults and children. METHODS: We included children <18 years enrolled as dependents in the Military Health System Data Repository who underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy (2006-2014). For the primary outcome of days of opioids prescribed, we evaluated associations with discharging service, standardized to the distribution of baseline covariates. Secondary outcomes included refill, Emergency Department (ED) visit for constipation, and ED visit for pain. RESULTS: Among 6732 children, 68% were prescribed opioids (range = 1-65 d, median = 4 d, IQR = 3-5 d). Patients discharged by general surgery services were prescribed 1.23 (95% CI = 1.06-1.42) excess days of opioids, compared with those discharged by pediatric surgery services. Risk of ED visit for constipation (n = 61, 1%) was increased with opioid prescription [1-3 d, risk ratio (RR) = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.31-5.78; 4-6 d, RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.83-4.67; 7-14 d, RR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.38-9.44; >14 d, RR = 6.27, 95% CI = 1.23-19.68], compared with no opioid prescription. There was similar or increased risk of ED visit for pain (n = 319, 5%) with opioid prescription [1-3 d, RR = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74-1.32; 4-6 d, RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.99-1.73; 7-14 d, RR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.00-2.18], compared with no opioid prescription. Likewise, need for refill (n = 157, 3%) was not associated with initial days of opioid prescribed (reference 1-3 d; 4-6 d, RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.68-1.35; 7-14 d, RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49-1.46; and >14 d, RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.59-2.07). CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial variation in opioid prescribing patterns. Opioid prescription duration increased risk of ED visits for constipation, but not for pain or refill.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/métodos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
10.
J Surg Res ; 247: 364-371, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator has been shown to differ between emergency and elective surgery. Benchmarking methods of clinical performance require accurate risk estimation, and current methods rarely account for admission source; therefore, our goal was to assess whether the ACS-NSQIP predicts mortality comparably between transferred and nontransferred emergency general surgery (EGS) cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2014including all inpatients who underwent one of seven previously described EGS procedures. The admission source was classified as directly admitted versus transferred from an outside emergency room or an acute care facility. We compared the accuracy of ACS-NSQIP-predicted mortality probabilities using the observed-to-expected (O:E) ratio and Brier score. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare accuracy of high-risk and low-risk procedures. RESULTS: A total of 206,103 EGS admissions were identified, of which 6.97% were transfers. Overall mortality was 3.26% for the entire cohort and 10.24% within the transfer group. The O:E ratios generated by ACS-NSQIP models differed between transferred patients (O:E = 1.0, 95% confidence interval = 0.97-1.02) and nontransferred patients (O:E = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 1.09-1.14). The Brier score for transferred patients was greater than that for nontransferred patients (0.063 versus 0.018, respectively) showing higher accuracy for nontransferred patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS-NSQIP risk estimates used for benchmarking differ between transferred and nontransferred EGS cases. Analyses of the Brier score by the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator demonstrated inferior prediction for transferred patients. This increased burden on accepting institutions will have an impact on quality metrics and should be considered for benchmarking of clinical performance.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Benchmarking/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Surg Res ; 255: 612-618, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: United States state-level firearm legislation is linked to rates of firearm-related suicides, pediatric injuries, nonfatal injuries, hospital discharges, and mortality. Our objective was to evaluate the burden of firearm-related injuries requiring surgery for states with strict as opposed to nonstrict firearm legislation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database was utilized to extract data for all available 28 states and the District of Columbia. States were dichotomized into strict and nonstrict legislative categories using the 2014 Brady and Gifford's scores (15 strict, 14 nonstrict). Patients with a firearm injury requiring surgery were identified and the incidence of surgery aggregated to the county level. Negative binomial regression with an offset for county-level residential population was used to estimate the incident rate ratio for surgical volume comparing counties in strict and nonstrict states. Models were stratified by injury intent and adjusted for county population characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 11,939 patients were hospitalized with firearm-related injuries, with 65% (n = 7759) undergoing an operative procedure. The adjusted incidence rate of firearm-related surgery per 100,000 people was 1.29 (95% confidence interval; 1.13-1.46, P < 0.001) times higher and the adjusted cost of hospitalization per 100,000 people was $6028.69 ($3744.61-$8312.78, P = 0.001) greater for counties in nonstrict states than those for counties in strict states. The burden of health care for these injuries is invariably shifted to state- and county-level finances. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of firearm-related surgical intervention was higher for states with nonstrict firearm legislation than that for states with strict legislation. States should reevaluate their firearm legislation to potentially reduce the burden of firearm-related surgery and health care costs.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
12.
J Surg Res ; 245: 629-635, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31522036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) accounts for more than 2 million U.S. hospital admissions annually. Low-income EGS patients have higher rates of postoperative adverse events (AEs) than high-income patients. This may be related to health care segregation (a disparity in access to high-quality centers). The emergent nature of EGS conditions and the limited number of EGS providers in rural areas may result in less health care segregation and thereby less variability in EGS outcomes in rural areas. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of income on AEs for both rural and urban EGS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (2007-2014) was queried for patients receiving one of 10 common EGS procedures. Multivariate regression models stratified by income quartiles in urban and rural cohorts adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and other hospital-based factors were used to determine the rates of surgical AEs (mortality, complications, and failure to rescue [FTR]). RESULTS: 1,687,088 EGS patients were identified; 16.60% (n = 280,034) of them were rural. In the urban cohort, lower income quartiles were associated with higher odds of AEs (mortality OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.27], complications, 1.07 [1.06-1.09]; FTR, 1.17 [1.10-1.24] P < 0.001). In the rural context, income quartiles were not associated with the higher odds of AE (mortality OR, 1.14 [0.83-1.55], P = 0.42; complications, 1.06 [0.97-1,16], P = 1.17; FTR, 1.12 [0.79-1.59], P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Lower income is associated with higher postoperative AEs in the urban setting but not in a rural environment. This socioeconomic disparity in EGS outcomes in urban settings may reflect health care segregation, a differential access to high-quality health care for low-income patients.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/efectos adversos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracaso de Rescate en Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
13.
Ann Emerg Med ; 75(2): 125-135, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732372

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of undertriage among older injured Medicare beneficiaries, identify any regions in which undertriage is more likely to occur, and examine additional factors associated with undertriage at a national level. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified older adults (≥65 years) receiving a diagnosis of traumatic injury, and linked claims with trauma center designation records from the American Trauma Society. Undertriage was defined as nontrauma centers treatment with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16, consistent with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma benchmark. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of undertriage by census region, adjusting for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, trauma center proximity, and mode of transportation. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of severely injured patients (n=125,731) were treated at a nontrauma center. Compared with that for patients in the Midwest, adjusted odds of undertriage were 100% higher for patients in Southern states (odds ratio [OR] 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00 to 2.04) and 78% higher in Western states (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.73 to 1.82). Compared with that for patients aged 65 to 69 years, odds of undertriage gradually increased in all age groups, reaching 57% for patients older than 80 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 1.61). Distance to a trauma center was associated with increasing odds of undertriage, with 37% higher odds (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.40) for older adults living more than 30 miles from a trauma center compared with patients living within 15 miles. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of older adult trauma patients are undertriaged; it increases with age and distance to care and is most common in Southern and Western states. Improvements to field triage and trauma center access for older patients are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare , Centros Traumatológicos , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Triaje/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/economía
14.
Bull World Health Organ ; 97(7): 502-512, 2019 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31258219

RESUMEN

Caesarean delivery rates in Mexico are among the highest in the world. Given heightened public and professional awareness of this problem and the updated 2014 national guidelines to reduce the frequency of caesarean delivery, we analysed trends in caesarean delivery by type of facility in Mexico from 2008 to 2017. We obtained birth-certificate data from the Mexican General Directorate for Health Information and grouped the total number of vaginal and caesarean deliveries into five categories of facility: health-ministry hospitals; private hospitals; government employment-based insurance hospitals; military hospitals; and other facilities. Delivery rates were calculated for each category nationally and for each state. On average, 2 114 630 (95% confidence interval, CI: 2 061 487-2 167 773) live births occurred nationally each year between 2008 and 2017. Of these births, 53.5% (1 130 570; 95% CI: 1 108 068-1 153 072) were vaginal deliveries, and 45.3% (957 105; 95% CI: 922 936-991 274) were caesarean deliveries, with little variation over time. During the study period, the number of live births increased by 4.4% (from 1 978 380 to 2 064 507). The vaginal delivery rate decreased from 54.8% (1 083 331/1 978 380) to 52.9% (1 091 958/2 064 507), giving a relative percentage decrease in the rate of 3.5%. The caesarean delivery rate increased from 43.9% (869 018/1 978 380) to 45.5% (940 206/2 064 507), giving a relative percentage increase in the rate of 3.7%. The biggest change in delivery rates was in private-sector hospitals. Since 2014, rates of caesarean delivery have fallen slightly in all sectors, but they remain high at 45.5%. Policies with appropriate interventions are needed to reduce the caesarean delivery rate in Mexico, particularly in private-sector hospitals.


Les taux d'accouchements par césarienne au Mexique sont parmi les plus élevés au monde. Au vu de la sensibilisation accrue de la population et des professionnels à ce problème et de la mise à jour des directives nationales de 2014 visant à diminuer la fréquence des accouchements par césarienne, nous avons analysé l'évolution des accouchements par césarienne selon le type d'établissement entre 2008 et 2017 au Mexique. Nous avons obtenu des données issues d'actes de naissance auprès de la Direction générale mexicaine des informations sur la santé et regroupé le nombre total d'accouchements par voie basse et par césarienne en cinq catégories d'établissement: hôpitaux relevant du ministère de la Santé, hôpitaux publics, hôpitaux relevant de l'assurance liée à l'emploi public, hôpitaux militaires et autres établissements. Les taux d'accouchements ont été calculés pour chaque catégorie à l'échelle nationale et pour chaque État. En moyenne, 2 114 630 (intervalle de confiance, IC, à 95%: 2 061 487-2 167 773) naissances vivantes ont eu lieu chaque année entre 2008 et 2017 à l'échelle nationale. Parmi ces naissances, 53,5% (1 130 570; IC à 95%: 1 108 068-1 153 072) étaient des accouchements par voie basse, et 45,3% (957 105; IC à 95%: 922 936-991 274) étaient des accouchements par césarienne, avec peu de variations dans le temps. Au cours de la période étudiée, le nombre de naissances vivantes a augmenté de 4,4% (de 1 978 380 à 2 064 507). Le taux d'accouchements par voie basse est passé de 54,8% (1 083 331/1 978 380) à 52,9% (1 091 958/2 064 507), ce qui correspond à une diminution relative du taux de 3,5%. Le taux d'accouchements par césarienne est passé de 43,9% (869 018/1 978 380) à 45,5% (940 206/2 064 507), ce qui correspond à une augmentation relative du taux de 3,7%. Le changement le plus important concernant les taux d'accouchements a été constaté dans les hôpitaux du secteur privé. Depuis 2014, les taux d'accouchements par césarienne ont légèrement diminué dans tous les secteurs, mais demeurent élevés (45,5%). Des politiques et des interventions appropriées sont nécessaires pour réduire le taux d'accouchements par césarienne aux Mexique, en particulier dans les hôpitaux de secteur privé.


Las tasas de parto por cesárea en México están entre las más altas del mundo. Dada la creciente concienciación pública y profesional sobre este problema y las directrices nacionales actualizadas de 2014 para reducir la frecuencia de los partos por cesárea, se analizaron las tendencias de los partos por cesárea según el tipo de establecimiento en México entre 2008 y 2017. Se obtuvieron datos de los certificados de nacimiento de la Dirección General de Información Sanitaria de México y se agrupó el número total de partos vaginales y por cesárea en cinco categorías de establecimientos: hospitales del ministerio de salud pública, hospitales privados, hospitales gubernamentales para asegurados por empleo, hospitales militares y otras instalaciones. Se calcularon los índices de partos para cada categoría a nivel nacional y según cada estado. De media, 2 114 630 (intervalo de confianza, IC, del 95 %: 2 061 487­2 167 773) nacimientos vivos se produjeron a nivel nacional al año entre 2008 y 2017. De estos nacimientos, el 53,5 % (1 130 570; IC del 95 %: 1 108 068­1 153 072) fueron partos vaginales y el 45,3 % (957 105; IC del 95 %: 922 936­991 274) fueron partos por cesárea, con poca variación a lo largo del tiempo. Durante el periodo de estudio, el número de nacidos vivos aumentó un 4,4 % (de 1 978 380 a 2 064 507). La tasa de partos vaginales disminuyó del 54,8 % (1 083 331/1 978 380) al 52,9 % (1 091 958/2 064 507), lo que supone una disminución porcentual relativa de la tasa del 3,5 %. La tasa de partos por cesárea aumentó del 43,9 % (869 018/1 978 380) al 45,5 % (940 206/2 064 507), lo que representa un aumento porcentual relativo de la tasa del 3,7 %. El mayor cambio en las tasas de partos se produjo en los hospitales del sector privado. Desde 2014, las tasas de parto por cesárea se han reducido ligeramente en todos los sectores, pero siguen siendo elevadas (45,5 %). Se necesitan políticas con intervenciones apropiadas para reducir la tasa de partos por cesárea en México, especialmente en los hospitales del sector privado.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/tendencias , Adulto , Certificado de Nacimiento , Femenino , Humanos , México , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo
15.
World J Surg ; 43(6): 1483-1489, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30706104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medicaid expansion has reduced obstacles faced in receiving care. Emergency general surgery (EGS) is a clinical event where delays in appropriate care impact outcomes. Therefore, we assessed the association between non-Medicaid expansion policy and multiple outcomes in homeless patients requiring EGS. METHODS: We used 2014 State Inpatient Database to identify homeless individuals admitted with a primary EGS diagnosis who underwent an EGS procedure. States were divided into those that did and did not implement Medicaid expansion. Multivariable quantile regression was used to examine associations between non-Medicaid expansion states and (1) length of stay and (2) total index hospital charges within the homeless population. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the associations between non-Medicaid expansion and (1) mortality, (2) surgical complications, (3) discharge against medical advice, and (4) home healthcare. RESULTS: A total of 6930 homeless patients were identified. Of these, 435 (6.2%) were in non-expansion states. Non-Medicaid expansion was associated with higher charges (coef: $46,264, 95% CI 40,388-52,139). There were non-significant differences in mortality (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.79-2.62; p = 0.2) or surgical complications (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.7-1.8; p = 0.4). However, homeless individuals living in non-expansion states did have higher odds of being discharged against medical advice (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.08-4.05; p = 0.02), and lower odds of receiving home healthcare (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Homeless patients living in Medicaid expansion states had lower odds of being discharged against medical advice, higher likelihood of receiving home healthcare and overall lower total index hospital charges.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Medicaid , Alta del Paciente , Planes Estatales de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Precios de Hospital , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
17.
J Surg Res ; 223: 102-108, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433860

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Areas of minimal access to surgical care, often called "surgical deserts", are of particular concern when considering the need for urgent surgical and anesthesia care. We hypothesized that California would have an appropriate workforce density but that physicians would be concentrated in urban areas, and surgical deserts would exist in rural counties. METHODS: We used a benchmark of six general surgeons, six orthopedists, and eight anesthesiologists per 100,000 people per county to define a "desert". The number and location of these providers were obtained from the Medical Board of California for 2015. ArcGIS, version 10.3, was used to geocode the data and were analyzed in Redivis. RESULTS: There were a total of 3268 general surgeons, 3188 orthopedists, and 5995 anesthesiologists in California in 2015, yielding a state surgeon-to-population ratio of 7.2, 6.7, and 10.2 per 100,000 people, respectively; however, there was wide geographic variability. Of the 58 counties in California, 18 (31%) have a general surgery desert, 27 (47%) have an orthopedic desert, and 22 (38%) have an anesthesiology desert. These counties account for 15%, 25%, and 13% of the state population, respectively. Five, seven, and nine counties, respectively, have none in the corresponding specialty. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, California has an adequate ratio of surgical and anesthesia providers to population. However, because of their uneven distribution, significant surgical care deserts exist. Limited access to surgical and anesthesia providers may negatively impact patient outcome in these counties.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , California , Humanos
18.
Bull World Health Organ ; 95(6): 437-444, 2017 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28603310

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistent availability of basic surgical resources at selected facilities in seven countries. METHODS: In 2010-2014, we used a situational analysis tool to collect data at district and regional hospitals in Bangladesh (n = 14), the Plurinational State of Bolivia (n = 18), Ethiopia (n = 19), Guatemala (n = 20), the Lao People's Democratic Republic (n = 12), Liberia (n = 12) and Rwanda (n = 25). Hospital sites were selected by pragmatic sampling. Data were geocoded and then analysed using an online data visualization platform. Each hospital's catchment population was defined as the people who could reach the hospital via a vehicle trip of no more than two hours. A hospital was only considered to show consistent availability of basic surgical resources if clean water, electricity, essential medications including intravenous fluids and at least one anaesthetic, analgesic and antibiotic, a functional pulse oximeter, a functional sterilizer, oxygen and providers accredited to perform surgery and anaesthesia were always available. FINDINGS: Only 41 (34.2%) of the 120 study hospitals met the criteria for the provision of consistent basic surgical services. The combined catchments of the study hospitals in each study country varied between 3.3 million people in Liberia and 151.3 million people in Bangladesh. However, the combined catchments of the study hospitals in each study country that met the criteria for the provision of consistent basic surgical services were substantially smaller and varied between 1.3 million in Liberia and 79.2 million in Bangladesh. CONCLUSION: Many study facilities were deficient in the basic infrastructure necessary for providing basic surgical care on a consistent basis.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Bangladesh , Bolivia , Etiopía , Guatemala , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Laos , Liberia , Rwanda , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Surg Res ; 213: 171-176, 2017 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28601311

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that psychiatric diagnoses would be common in hospitalized trauma patients in the United States and when present, would be associated with worse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS, 2012) was used to determine national estimates for the number of patients admitted with an injury. Psychiatric diagnoses were identified using diagnosis codes according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. RESULTS: A total of 36.5 million patients were admitted to hospitals in the United States in 2012. Of these, 1.3 million (4%) were due to trauma. Psychiatric conditions were more common in patients admitted for trauma versus those admitted for other reasons (44% versus 34%, P < 0.001). Trauma patients who had a psychiatric diagnosis compared to trauma patients without a psychiatric diagnosis were older (mean age: 61 versus 56 y, P < 0.001), more often female (52% versus 50%, P < 0.001), and more often white (73% versus 68%, P < 0.001). For ages 18-64, drug and alcohol abuse predominated (41%), whereas dementia and related disorders (48%) were the most common in adults ≥65 y. Mortality was lower for trauma patients with a psychiatric diagnosis compared to those who did not in both unadjusted and adjusted analysis (1.9% versus 2.8%; odds ratio: 0.56, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric conditions are present in almost half of all hospitalized trauma patients in the United States; however, the types of conditions varied with age. The frequency of psychiatric conditions in the trauma population suggests efforts should be made to address this component of patient health.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología , Adulto Joven
20.
J Surg Res ; 215: 160-166, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28688642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital de la Familia was established to serve the indigent population in the western highlands of Guatemala and has a full-time staff of Guatemalan primary care providers supplemented by short-term missions of surgical specialists. The reasons for patients seeking surgical care in this setting, as opposed to more consistent care from local institutions, are unclear. We sought to better understand motivations of patients seeking mission-based surgical care. METHODS: Patients presenting to the obstetric and gynecologic, plastic, ophthalmologic, general, and pediatric surgical clinics at the Hospital de la Familia from July 27 to August 6, 2015 were surveyed. The surveys assessed patient demographics, surgical diagnosis, location of home, mode of travel, and reasons for seeking care at this facility. RESULTS: Of 252 patients surveyed, 144 (59.3%) were female. Most patients reported no other medical condition (67.9%, n = 169) and no consistent income (83.9%, n = 209). Almost half (44.9%, n = 109) traveled >50 km to receive care. The most common reasons for choosing care at this facility were reputation of high quality (51.8%, n = 130) and affordability (42.6%, n = 102); the least common reason was a lack of other options (6.4%, n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Despite long travel distances and the availability of other options, reputation and affordability were primarily cited as the most common reasons for choosing to receive care at this short-term surgical mission site. Our results highlight that although other surgical options may be closer and more readily available, reputation and cost play a large role in choice of patients seeking care.


Asunto(s)
Misiones Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Guatemala , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Misiones Médicas/economía , Misiones Médicas/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural/economía , Servicios de Salud Rural/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA