Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) and other DICER1-associated high-grade malignancies are morphologically, genetically and epigenetically related - A comparative study of 4 PPBs and 6 sarcomas.

DICER1-related tumors occur hereditary or sporadically, with high-grade malignancies sharing clinicopathological and (epi)genetic features. We compared 4 pleuropulmonary blastomas (PPBs) and 6 sarcomas by mutation analysis, whole transcriptome sequencing and methylation profiling. 9/10 patients were female. PPB patients were 0-4 years. 3/4 were alive; 2 without disease. One patient died of metastatic disease (median follow-up, 16 months). Sarcoma patients were 16-56 years. Locations included: uterine cervix/corpus (3/1), soft tissue back/shoulder (1) and paravertebral (1). 5/6 patients were alive; 2 developed metastases: intracranial (1) and lung and kidney (1) (median follow-up, 17 months). The deceased patient previously had a PPB and a Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor. Histologically, tumors showed atypical primitive-looking cells with incomplete rhabdomyoblastic differentiation and cartilage (n = 5). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated desmin- (n = 9/10), myogenin- (n = 6/10) and keratin positivity (n = 1/1). Eight cases harbored biallelic DICER1 mutations with confirmed germline mutations in 4 cases. Two cases showed a monoallelic mutation. By RNA expression- and methylation profiling, distinct clustering of our cases was seen demonstrating a close relationship on (epi)genetic level and similarities to embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. In conclusion, this study shows overlapping morphological, immunohistochemical and (epi)genetic features of PPBs and DICER1-associated high-grade sarcomas, arguing that these neoplasms form a spectrum with a broad clinicopathological range.

What are the barriers faced by medical oncologists in initiating discussion of palliative care? A qualitative study in Flanders, Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: Before referring patients to a palliative care service, oncologists need to inform them about disease stage and discuss prognosis, treatment options and possible advantages of specialized palliative care (SPC). They often find this a complex and emotionally difficult task. As a result, they may refer their patients to SPC too late in the disease course or even not at all. This study reports findings from interviews with Belgian medical oncologists identifying the barriers they experience to introduce palliative care to their patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: The interviews were semi-structured with open-ended questions and were supported by a topic list. The transcripts were analysed during an iterative process using the grounded theory principles of open and axial coding until a final coding framework was reached. RESULTS: The study identified seven heterogeneous categories of barriers which discourage oncologists from discussing palliative care: oncologist-related barriers, patient-related barriers, family-related barriers, barriers relating to the physician referring the patient to the medical oncologist, barriers relating to disease or treatment, institutional/organizational barriers and societal/policy barriers. These categories are further refined into subcategories. DISCUSSION: These findings provide an explanation for the possible reasons why medical oncologists feel hampered in initiating palliative care and consequently discuss it rather late in the disease trajectory. The exploration and description of these barriers may serve as a starting point for revising the medical education of oncologists. They are also a reminder to hospital management and policy makers to be aware of the impact of these barriers on the daily practice of oncology.

Incidence and outcomes of respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipients: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and outcomes of respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipients (LTR) are not well defined. The objective of this prospective study conducted from June 2008 to March 2011 was to characterise the incidence and outcomes of viral respiratory infections in LTR. METHODS: Patients were seen in three contexts: study-specific screenings covering all seasons; routine post-transplantation follow-up; and emergency visits. Nasopharyngeal specimens were collected systematically and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed when clinically indicated. All specimens underwent testing with a wide panel of molecular assays targeting respiratory viruses. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve LTR had 903 encounters: 570 (63%) were screening visits, 124 (14%) were routine post-transplantation follow-up and 209 (23%) were emergency visits. Respiratory viruses were identified in 174 encounters, 34 of these via BAL. The incidence of infection was 0.83 per patient-year (95% CI 0.45 to 1.52). The viral infection rates upon screening, routine and emergency visits were 14%, 15% and 34%, respectively (p<0.001). Picornavirus was identified most frequently in nasopharyngeal (85/140; 60.7%) and BAL specimens (20/34; 59%). Asymptomatic viral carriage, mainly of picornaviruses, was found at 10% of screening visits. Infections were associated with transient lung function loss and high calcineurin inhibitor blood levels. The hospitalisation rate was 50% (95% CI 30% to 70.9%) for influenza and parainfluenza and 16.9% (95% CI 11.2% to 23.9%) for other viruses. Acute rejection was not associated with viral infection (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of viral infection in LTR; asymptomatic carriage is rare. Viral infections contribute significantly to this population's respiratory symptomatology. No temporal association was observed between infection and acute rejection.

Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy in the palliative treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical syndrome characterized by mucinous peritoneal disease arising from disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis. Primary treatment involves a combination of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). There is no consensus on the proper treatment of recurrent PMP. In selected patients, repeated cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC might improve outcome. However, every repeated debulking procedure becomes less effective with increased morbidity. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a patient with intestinal obstruction caused by recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei. We treated the patient with whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) to a total dose of 33 Gy, delivered in 22 daily fractions. The treatment was well tolerated and resulted in resolution of the obstruction for a period of 24 months. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case report showing the possibility of resolving intestinal obstruction with WAPRT in a patient with recurrent PMP. It is our opinion that WAPRT delivered by IMAT, in analogy with ovarian cancer, should be considered as a palliative treatment option in managing patients with recurrent PMP especially in case of obstruction.

Sunitinib for metastatic renal cell cancer patients: observational study highlighting the risk of important drug-drug interactions.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib, a CYP3A4 substrate, is standard of care treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and is administered orally as a single dose of 50 mg, in a 4 weeks on/2 weeks off regimen. Frequently, dose reduction is necessary because of toxicity, as is the association of comedication to treat side effects. In addition, existing comorbidities in these patients necessitate the intake of various classes of chronic medication. Only limited data are available on the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI). The objective of our paper was to evaluate prescribed dose, comedication, risk of drug-drug interactions and outcome among patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective analysis was performed for patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. The drug interaction databases 'Clinical Pharmacology' and 'Lexicomp' were used to screen for possible interactions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The hospital files of 36 patients with mRCC were evaluated. Twenty-two patients received sunitinib as first-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) in this first-line group was longer for patients that started with full-dose sunitinib (21·1 months; n = 12) than for patients started on reduced dose (3·5 months; n = 10). In the whole group of 36 patients, an average of 6·8 comedications was taken. Possible pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions were most frequently found (47%) and reported as major interactions (QT prolongation). Risk of pharmacokinetic interactions due to co-administration of CYP inhibitors, CYP inducers, CYP substrates and PgP substrates was reported for 8%, 11%, 53% and 19%, respectively. These interactions were reported as major or moderate. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Patients with mRCC under treatment with sunitinib at a reduced starting dose had a decreased PFS compared with patients started with full-dose sunitinib. Due to adverse drug reactions and comorbidity, patients under sunitinib, a CYP3A4 substrate, took an average of 6·8 comedications provoking an important risk of major-to-moderate drug-drug interactions. With the help of a multidisciplinary team, avoidance of drug-drug interactions could be obtained. Moreover, serial ECG monitoring is recommended for patients at high risk of QT prolongation.

Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures. DESIGN: To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.

Social and hormonal mechanisms underlying male reproductive strategies in black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra).

We investigated the social and hormonal mechanisms underlying male reproductive strategies in two multimale-multifemale groups of black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) during a 14-month study in Palenque National Park, Mexico. Fecal glucocorticoid (fGC) and androgen (fA) levels were analyzed for 343 fecal samples collected from 14 males during their presence in the study groups. Neither immigrating males nor resident males that remained in the group had elevated fGC and fA levels during 11 observed male migration events, suggesting that competition over group membership was not associated with variation in the fecal hormonal levels of males. Instead, fGC and fA levels were significantly higher in males who maintained a central position in the group and had almost exclusive access to fertile females than in other resident males. These "central" males were responsible for maintaining close spatial associations and cultivating strong affiliative relationships with cycling, sexually active females but not with noncycling, sexually inactive females. "Noncentral" males did not form strong social relationships with either cycling or noncycling females and had no or very few mating opportunities. Our findings suggest that male black howler monkeys compete nonaggressively by fostering relationships with cycling females and that the elevated fGC levels of central males may be indicative of the social challenges involved in their indirect competition.

Are future medical oncologists sufficiently trained to communicate about palliative care? The medical oncology curriculum in Flanders, Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care is considered an integral part of oncology and communicating this with patients is an unavoidable task for oncologists. This contribution investigated to what extent communication skills for communicating palliative care with patients are trained in the formal academic training program in medical oncology in Flanders, Belgium. The programme is based on the recommendations for a Global Core Curriculum in Medical Oncology, developed by The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) together with the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). METHODS: For this qualitative study, data were collected using document analysis from the ESMO/ASCO recommendations and the documents of the Flanders' medical oncology programme complemented with interviews with Flemish medical oncology trainees. RESULTS: Few recommendations for training communication skills to communicate about palliative care were found in the ASMO/ASCO recommendations and even less in the Flanders' programme documents. Trainees are mainly exposed to palliative care communication during the clinical practice of their training. Only very few lectures or seminars are devoted to palliative care and even less on communication about palliative care. They reported several barriers to communicate about palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed promising developments for the training of Flemish medical oncologists to discuss palliative care. However, there is still a need for more theoretical training on palliative care complemented with communication skills trainings. Communication training in general needs to be fully integrated as a core skill within the medical curriculum at large and should be promoted as lifelong learning and competency development.

Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS: Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

Topotecan, an active drug in the second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a large European phase II study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with preclinical activity against various tumor types. We conducted a large multicenter phase II study with topotecan in ovarian cancer in patients who had failed to respond to one prior cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d was administered intravenously by 30-minute infusion for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. As the cisplatin-free interval relates to response in subsequent treatment, patients were stratified in subgroups, ie, cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive. RESULTS: One-hundred eleven patients entered the study. Nineteen patients were considered to be ineligible; 92 patients were assessable for response. A total of 552 courses were given (median, four per patient; range, one to 17). The major toxicities were leukocytopenia and neutropenia, which were grade 3 to 4 in 54.2% and 69.1% of courses, respectively, but with only 4.3% of these being grade 4 neutropenia plus fever or infectious complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given in 20.5% of courses to maintain dose-intensity. Other relatively frequent side effects were alopecia (82%), nausea (36.4%), and vomiting (17.5%). The overall response rate was 16.3%, with one complete response (CR) and 14 partial responses (PRs). In the cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive strata, the response rates were 5.9%, 17.8%, and 26.7%, respectively. The median duration of time of documented response was 21.7 weeks (range, 4.6 to 41.9). CONCLUSION: Topotecan in a daily-times-five schedule is an effective regimen as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Further investigations of topotecan in ovarian cancer, including first-line use and combination with other active agents, are indicated.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Is adjuvant treatment with vinblastine effective in reducing the occurrence of distant metastasis in limited squamous cell lung cancer? A randomized study.

In order to study the usefulness of treatment with vinblastine (VLB) in the prevention of cancer metastasis in squamous cell lung cancer, 50 patients with locoregional disease were randomized to receive either locoregional RT alone (group A) or a weekly intravenous bolus injection of VLB (6 mg/m2) concurrently with and after locoregional radiotherapy (RT) (55 Gy in 6 weeks) until the appearance of metastases (group B). Neither the incidence of death with metastases, metastasis-free survival (MFS) nor overall survival (S) were significantly affected by treatment with the drug. However, due to the limited number of patients in each group, the power of the statistical test was such to allow only the detection of differences in MFS and S to or more than 80 per cent at the P = 0.05 level. Local tumor response was significantly superior in group B (P less than 0.05). Acute toxicity (dysphagia, myelosuppression) during RT was significantly worse in group B. During long-term therapy with VLB, mild polyneuropathy developed in the majority of patients in group B. Furthermore, seven patients discontinued treatment with VLB during maintenance due to compliance (4) and excessive neurotoxicity (3). This treatment schedule with VLB is not recommended for patients with locoregional squamous cell lung cancer as significant toxicity is present during and after RT and significant increase in MFS and S is lacking. Because of an apparent increase in local response, the combination of VLB and RT merits further investigation in those tumors where local tumor control is crucial.

Differential involvement of neurotransmitters through the time course of cisplatin-induced emesis as revealed by therapy with specific receptor antagonists.

Advances in antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced emesis have resulted in improved protection against symptoms occurring within 24 h of chemotherapy. However, the vomiting which tends to occur beyond 24 h after chemotherapy (delayed-phase vomiting) is still relatively poorly controlled by the currently available drugs, suggesting that more than one mechanism may mediate these symptoms. The standard antiemetic regimen currently recommended for prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis includes a serotonin (5-HT(3)) antagonist and a corticosteroid. The neurokinin-1 (NK(1)) antagonist aprepitant represents a new class of antiemetic currently in clinical development. Using data obtained in 2 Phase II clinical trials of aprepitant in patients receiving chemotherapy based on the highly emetogenic chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin, we compared the time course of antiemetic effect of aprepitant, a 5-HT(3) antagonist, or a combination of both. Over the entire observation period (up to 7 days post-cisplatin), patients who received the NK(1) antagonist had a superior prevention of emesis. However, in the first 24 h after cisplatin, emesis occurred in fewer patients who received the 5-HT(3) antagonist than in patients who did not receive this class of drug. Furthermore, the majority of treatment failures in patients who received the NK(1) antagonist occurred within the first 8-12 h of chemotherapy, whereas the treatment failures in patients who received a 5-HT(3) antagonist were more evenly distributed over time. Patients who received both drugs had superior control of symptoms compared with patients who received one or the other. The difference in the time course of emesis blockade observed with two different classes of receptor antagonists provides substantial evidence for involvement of separate pathophysiological mechanisms in chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Serotonin mediates the early vomiting process that occurs within 8-12 h following cisplatin-based chemotherapy, after which time substance P acting at NK(1) receptors becomes the dominant mediator of vomiting

Comparison of L-758,298, a prodrug for the selective neurokinin-1 antagonist, L-754,030, with ondansetron for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Substance P is localised in brainstem regions associated with emesis. Based on studies in the ferret, it was postulated that a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist would have antiemetic activity as monotherapy in humans receiving chemotherapy. L-758,298 is a water-soluble, intravenous (i.v.) prodrug for L-754,030, a potent and selective NK1 receptor antagonist. This double-blind, randomised, active-agent (ondansetron)-controlled study enrolled 53 cisplatin-naïve patients and evaluated the prevention of both acute (0-24 h) and delayed (days 2-7) emesis after cisplatin treatment (50-100 mg/m(2)). All patients received i.v. L-758,298 (60 or 100 mg) (n=30) or ondansetron (32 mg) (n=23) before cisplatin and efficacy was evaluated up to day 7 post-cisplatin. Nausea was assessed by means of a four-point ordinal scale at intervals over the 7 day period. In the acute period, the proportion of patients without emesis in the L-758,298 and ondansetron groups was 37 and 52%, respectively (no significant difference between the groups). Comparing the distribution of average nausea scores over the entire first 24 h revealed no significant difference between the groups. In the delayed period, the proportion of patients without emesis in the L-758,298 and ondansetron treatment groups was 72 and 30%, respectively (P=0.005). The distribution of average nausea scores in the delayed period was lower in the L-758,298 group compared with the ondansetron group (P=0.15 for the entire delayed period and P=0.043 for day 2 only). No serious adverse events were attributed to L-758,298. A single dose of L-758,298 substantially suppressed the delayed nausea and vomiting characteristic of high dose cisplatin and also appeared to reduce acute emesis post-cisplatin. The data also support the proposition that the underlying mechanism(s) of acute and delayed emesis are different.

Influence of preoperative combined radiochemotherapy on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing: experimental study in the rat.

PURPOSE: To study the influence of combined preoperative hyperfractionated irradiation with intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing in a rat model. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were given 41.6 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or sham irradiation, with intraperitoneal 5-FU at low dose (10 mg/kg) or high dose (20 mg/kg). Animals were arranged in 6 groups: RT + low-dose 5-FU (RCT-L), RT + high-dose 5-FU (RCT-H), sham RT + low-dose 5-FU (CT-L), sham RT + high-dose 5-FU (CT-H), RT alone (R), and a control group (sham RT + intraperitoneal saline). Side-to-side colonic anastomoses were constructed from one irradiated and one nonirradiated limb 4 days after radiochemotherapy. Animals were sacrificed 10 days after surgery. RESULTS: Compared to controls, more complications occurred in group RCT-H (50% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Adhesion formation was more intense in groups RCT-H and CT-H (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). After therapy, white blood cell counts dropped significantly in all irradiated animals (p < 0.01), and platelet counts decreased significantly in group RCT-H (p = 0.01). No significant differences were noticed in anastomotic bursting pressure when the treated groups were compared to each other or to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no adverse effect on the strength of colonic anastomosis in this rat model. However, the combined RT with high-dose 5-FU does increase operative morbidity and adhesion formation.

Iodine-labeled tamoxifen uptake in primary human breast carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Assessing tumor uptake and retention of (123)I-labeled tamoxifen (TX) could increase our understanding of TX's action and the mechanisms involved in resistance to the drug. METHODS: Nine untreated primary breast carcinoma patients underwent whole-body planar and tomographic (SPECT) imaging 30 min and 4-5 h after injection of 185 MBq (123)I-TX. Tumor-to-normal tissue uptake ratios (T/N) derived from SPECT images were related to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. RESULTS: In 4 of 9 patients, all of whom were ER+/PR+, (123)I-TX tumor uptake was clearly depicted. In 2 of them, involved axillary lymph nodes were also visualized. T/N consistently increased over time. All ER+/PR- and ER-/PR- tumors as well as 2 ER+/PR+ tumors were (123)I-TX-. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that (123)I-TX is preferentially taken up in alpha-ER+/PR+ breast tumors known to be more likely to respond to endocrine treatment.

Compassionate use of a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, tropisetron, in patients refractory to standard antiemetic treatment.

The efficacy of tropisetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy of varying emetogenic potential was evaluated in 545 patients with a variety of malignancies who had either proved refractory to antiemetic treatment during previous chemotherapy courses or who were considered to be at high risk of nausea and vomiting. Tropisetron 5 or 10mg was administered intravenously just before chemotherapy, with the possibility of additional oral or intravenous doses on the day before chemotherapy and on 1 or more subsequent days. On day 1 of the first course of chemotherapy, a complete response (no nausea and no vomiting) was achieved in 62% of patients and a partial response (1 to 4 vomits and/or episodes of nausea) in 29%. Among the 325 patients who received a second course of chemotherapy, more than 80% of those with a complete response on day 1 of course 1 also had a complete response on day 1 of course 2; 37% and 26%, respectively, of patients with a partial response or failure (1 or more vomits and/or episodes of nausea) on day 1 of course 1 then had a complete response on day 1 of course 2.

Do radiosensitizers enhance the treatment of patients with NSCLC? The need for better models and alternative methods of treatment.

Radiotherapy as a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can potentially be optimized by the use of radiosensitizers, substances that enhance the effect of radiation on tumor tissue without an equal increase in the effect on normal tissue. Radiosensitizers may act by increasing the level of lethal damage caused by radiation or by causing a decrease in the repair of such lethal damage. While cell and animal models have been used in an attempt to establish the efficacy of radiosensitizers, trials in man have so far been inconclusive. The need to improve existing models and methods for combining modalities to best effect is clear. Radiotherapy/chemotherapy combinations are a logical alternative to radiosensitizers for managing NSCLC, and despite variability in the extent of local and metastatic control, evidence for improved survival exists.