Prospective audit on fasting status of elective ambulatory surgery patients, correlated to gastric ultrasound.

INTRODUCTION: Recent guidelines advocate a preoperative fasting interval of 6 h for solid food, 4 h for breast milk and 2 h for clear fluids. Long nil per mouth intervals give rise to complications and discomfort in the perioperative period. Gastric ultrasound is easily accessible and generates reliable information about gastric content. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were offered a questionnaire regarding preoperative fasting. Important outcome measures were hour of last meal, last clear fluids intake, the source of preoperative information. Gastric ultrasound was performed in prone position and lateral decubitus. RESULTS: The mean duration of fasting for solid food was 13h29 and 9h51 for clear fluids. 48% of patients were well aware of the correct fasting guidelines. The most frequent source of information was the preoperative phone call. Gastric ultrasound only found insignificant amounts of gastric content. DISCUSSION: Too few patients are aware of the correct guidelines or fear complications and therefore adhere to the nil per mouth from midnight as most conservative measure. A phone call informing patients about the hour of surgery and allowing clear fluid intake until 2 h before surgery, is still not convincing enough. Some health care providers advise their patients the nil per mouth from midnight rule, due to risk of interfering with the operating room schedule. CONCLUSION: It is still difficult to implement liberal intake of clear fluids according to current guidelines. Ambulatory surgery patients have long fasting intervals with decrease of subjective well-being and increased incidence of hunger and thirst.

Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery in the pediatric population: a single-center retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of adverse events in day surgery is an important quality indicator. This retrospective study investigated factors independently associated with unanticipated admission of pediatric patients after ambulatory surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ambulatory pediatric patients requiring unanticipated admission between January 2016 and December 2018 were compared to ambulatory pediatric patients who were discharged home after a planned surgery. Demographic data, organizational data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, type of anesthesia, length of surgery, time of completion of the surgery, campus site, and season were collected in both groups. The reason for unexpected admission was classified according to four subtypes: anesthetic, medical, social/organizational and surgical reason, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with unanticipated admission. RESULTS: From a total of 4235 pediatric patients, 78 children (1.9%) required unanticipated admission. The reasons for admission were anesthetic n = 29 (37.3%), surgical n = 20 (25.6%), medical n = 16 (20.5%) and social/organizational n = 13 (16.6%). Age <2 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.005, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.500-6.018; ASA class 2 (OR 2.144; 95% CI 1.193-3.852); ASA class 3 (OR 11.617; CI 5.698-23.685); length of surgery >2 h (OR 3.056; CI 1.829-5.107); completion of surgery > 2:30 PM (OR 3.507; CI 1.854-6.633) and campus site (OR 3.628; CI 1.991-6.610) were factors significantly associated with unanticipated admission. CONCLUSION: Children are less likely to be admitted after ambulatory surgery when preoperatively carefully selected and when prioritized considering age, general health condition and invasiveness of the surgery.

Encouraging Digital Patient Portal Use in Ambulatory Surgery: A Mixed Method Research of Patients and Health Care Professionals Experiences and Perceptions.

PURPOSE: As more complex surgery is performed in 1-day admissions there is a growing demand for appropriate postoperative follow-up. A digital patient portal (DPP) is a promising tool to support this and increase patients' quality of recovery. However, both patients and health care professionals have not fully embraced this eHealth technology. This study investigates the extent to which a patient portal is used in a tertiary ambulatory surgical care unit and assesses usability, applicability and user-friendliness both for the patient and health care worker. DESIGN: Mixed method research design combining qualitative and quantitative methods. METHODS: Four hundred and fifteen patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgery or endonasal sinus surgery were included. Quantitative log data from the patient platform, clinical outcome measures and a patient questionnaire were used. Additionally, qualitative data was collected through interviews (with patients, n = 13; involved caregivers and physicians, n = 7) and observations (first introduction to patient with platform and team meetings, n = 15). FINDINGS: Forty percent of the included patients effectively used the patient platform (≥1 login). The patients mainly used the platform for gathering information; 62% of the active patients on the platform registered questionnaires initiated from the surgery center (eg, preoperative questionnaire) or diaries (e.g, daily follow-up using the Quality of Recovery Scale). Different barriers and facilitators toward DPP implementation were noted. Attention should be paid to the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for using the portal and to the added value of the portal for the patient and health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of the DPP were positive and an increase in DPP use was observed during the study due to adjustments (eg, technical adjustments). However, a decline over time was noticed. The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of all included parties needs to be further corroborated.

Postoperative innovative technology for ambulatory anesthesia and surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To give an overview of the impact of different forms of telehealth that are currently used in ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Telehealth is applicable during the early recovery and intermediate recovery period (e.g. monitoring of quality of recovery), and as a tool for postoperative check-up during the late recovery phase. RECENT FINDINGS: Postoperative follow-up after ambulatory surgery is still crucial to maintain quality of care as pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting remain common adverse events. There is a surge of telehealth applications from procedure-specific commercial smartphone apps (mHealth) to complete digital patient platforms instituted by the government. However, patient and healthcare provider engagement is not universal. Usability of these applications is mandatory as well as identifying and overcoming the barriers to its use. SUMMARY: Telehealth gives many opportunities for postoperative follow-up of ambulatory surgery patients. Clear evidence on the benefits of telehealth in ambulatory surgery is however still sparse. Future research should focus on telehealth for improving quality and safety of postoperative recovery, convincing policymakers for reimbursement encouraging healthcare providers and patients to engage in telehealth.

Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Protector™ is one of the latest introduced supraglottic airway devices. It provides access and functional separation of the respiratory and digestive tracts. Compared to the LMA Supreme™, it has two digestive ports, one to provide suction in the pharyngeal region and one for gastric tube insertion. High oropharyngeal leak pressure is a marker for safe ventilation when using LMA devices. We hypothesized that oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ is 5 cm H2O higher than the oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Supreme™ at various cuff volumes. Secondary outcome measures were ease of insertion of both masks, fiberoptic confirmation of correct positioning, failures of insertion, presence of blood staining, sore throat, presence of air leak and insertion time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients aged >18 years, scheduled for elective minor ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia with a LMA were included. Patients were randomized in the LMA Protector™ or LMA Supreme™ group based on a computer-generated random sequence table. After general anesthesia induction, oropharyngeal leak pressures were measured. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal leak pressures were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for LMA Protector™ compared to LMA Supreme™ at different cuff volumes and a cuff pressure of 65 cm H2O. Insertion time was significantly higher for the LMA Protector™ (29 sec) [interquartile range (IQR) 23, 35] compared to the LMA Supreme™ (19 sec) (IQR 16, 22) (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in ease of insertion (number of attempts for succesful positioning), failures of insertion, presence of blood staining, sore throat or presence of air leak. CONCLUSION: Oropharyngeal leak pressures were consistently higher (>5 cm H2O) for LMA Protector™ compared to LMA Supreme™. LMA Protector™, therefore, allows effective ventilation at higher airway pressures than LMA Supreme™. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov.NCT03462550.

Analysis of failed discharge after ambulatory surgery: unanticipated admission.

BACKGROUND: Advantages of ambulatory surgery are lost when patients need an unplanned admission. This retrospective cohort study investigated reasons for failed discharge and unanticipated admission of adult patients after day surgery. METHODS: Ambulatory patients (n = 145) requiring unanticipated admission were compared to patients (n = 4980) not requiring admission and timely discharged from a total of 5156 ambulatory surgical procedures. Demographic data, organisational data, reason for admission, type of anesthesia, surgical discipline, length of procedure, ASA classification, surgical completion time and severity of illness score were collected from both groups. Reason for admission was classified according to four subtypes. Logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Incidence of unanticipated admission following day care surgery was 2.89%. The reasons for admission were mainly organisational issues (45.52%), time of completion surgery in the afternoon between 12 pm and 3 pm (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.05-2.86) and surgery that ends after 3 pm (OR 6.52; 95% CI 4.11-10.34). Surgical factors associated with unanticipated admission (38.62%) were length of surgery of one to three hours (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.27-3.29), length of surgery more than three hours (OR 8.31; 95% CI 3.56-19.40). Additionally, anaesthetic (10.34%) and medical (5.52%) reasons were found, e.g. ASA class II (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.06-2.44), ASA class III (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.10-4.34); moderate severity of illness score (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.03-2.88) and major of severity of illness score (OR 7.85; 95% CI 2.31-26.62). CONCLUSIONS: Unanticipated admissions following day surgery occur mainly due to social/organisational and surgical reasons. However, medical and anaesthetic reasons also explain 15.86% of the unanticipated admissions.

Prolonging deep inspiration breath-hold time to 3 min during radiotherapy, a simple solution.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath-hold is an established technique to reduce heart dose during breast cancer radiotherapy. However, modern breast cancer radiotherapy techniques with lymph node irradiation often require long beam-on times of up to 5 min. Therefore, the combination with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) becomes challenging. A simple support technique for longer duration deep inspiration breath-hold (L-DIBH), feasible for daily use at the radiotherapy department, is required to maximize heart sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our department, a new protocol for multiple L-DIBH of at least 2 min and 30 s was developed on 32 healthy volunteers and validated on 8 breast cancer patients during radiotherapy treatment, using a pragmatic process of iterative development, including all major stakeholders. Each participant performed 12 L-DIBHs, on 4 different days. Different methods of pre-oxygenation and voluntary hyperventilation were tested, and scored on L-DIBH duration, ease of use, and comfort. RESULTS: Based on 384 L-DIBHs from 32 healthy volunteers, voluntary hyperventilation for 3 min whilst receiving high-flow nasal oxygen at 40 L/min was the most promising technique. During validation, the median L-DIBH duration in prone position of 8 breast cancer patients improved from 59 s without support to 3 min and 9 s using the technique (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A new and simple L-DIBH protocol was developed feasible for daily use at the radiotherapy center.