RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that elevated central thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) is associated with the blunted thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) response to TRH in patients with depression. Few studies have directly evaluated this relationship between central nervous system and peripheral endocrine systems in the same patient population. METHODS: 15 depressed patients (4 male, 11 female, 12 bipolar, and 3 unipolar) during a double-blind, medication-free period of at least 2 weeks duration, underwent a baseline lumbar puncture followed by a TRH stimulation test. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TRH and serial serum TSH, free thyroxine, triiodothyronine, prolactin, and cortisol were measured. A blunted response to TRH was defined as a delta TSH less than 7 microU/mL. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean CSF TRH between "blunters" (2.82 +/- 1.36 pg/mL) and "non-blunters" (3.97 +/- 0.62 pg/mL, p = .40). There was no evidence of an inverse relationship between CSF TRH and baseline or delta TSH. There was no correlation between CSF TRH and the severity of depression or any other endocrine measure. CONCLUSIONS: These data are not consistent with the prediction of hypothalamic TRH hypersecretion and subsequent pituitary down-regulation in depression; however, CSF TRH may be from a nonparaventricular nucleus-hypothalamic source (i.e., limbic area, suprachiasmatic nucleus, brain stem-dorsal raphe) and thus, not necessarily related to peripheral neuroendocrine indices.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Trastorno Depresivo/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Hormona Liberadora de Tirotropina/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Hormona Liberadora de Tirotropina/farmacología , Tirotropina/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Tirotropina/metabolismo , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Masculino , Prolactina/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Tiroxina/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Triyodotironina/líquido cefalorraquídeoRESUMEN
Lithium (Li) and gabapentin are both exclusively eliminated by renal excretion. When used in combination, a competitive drug-drug interaction could possibly alter Li renal excretion with important clinical implications considering the rather narrow therapeutic index of Li. This study examined the single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles of Li in 13 patients receiving placebo and then steady-state gabapentin (mean daily dose: 3,646.15 mg). During both phases, a single 600-mg dose of Li was orally administered with serial Li levels obtained at time zero and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were the following: area under the concentration time curve (AUC) for Li, maximal concentration of Li (Li Cmax), and time to reach peak Li concentration (Li Tmax). For patients receiving gabapentin, the mean Li AUC at 72 hours was 9.91+/-3.54 mmol x hr/mL and did not differ significantly from the mean Li AUC of 10.19+/-2.89 mmol x hr/mL for patients receiving placebo. The mean Li Cmax was 0.69+/-0.13 mmol/L for gabapentin patients and did not differ from the mean Li Cmax of 0.72+/-0.15 mmol/L for placebo patients. The mean serum Li Tmax was 1.38+/-0.62 hours for gabapentin patients and did not differ significantly from the mean serum Li Tmax of 1.5+/-0.91 hours for placebo patients. These data indicate that gabapentin treatment at this high therapeutic dose does not cause clinically significant alterations in short-term Li pharmacokinetics in patients with normal renal function. These preliminary data warrant further controlled study in a larger, more heterogenous patient sample and a longer duration of assessment, but they do suggest that these two medications may be administered in combination for the management of bipolar disorder.