RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The appropriate duration of treatment with beta-blocker drugs after a myocardial infarction is unknown. Data are needed on the safety and efficacy of the interruption of long-term beta-blocker treatment to reduce side effects and improve quality of life in patients with a history of uncomplicated myocardial infarction. METHODS: In a multicenter, open label, randomized, noninferiority trial conducted at 49 sites in France, we randomly assigned patients with a history of myocardial infarction, in a 1:1 ratio, to interruption or continuation of beta-blocker treatment. All the patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40% while receiving long-term beta-blocker treatment and had no history of a cardiovascular event in the previous 6 months. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons at the longest follow-up (minimum, 1 year), according to an analysis of noninferiority (defined as a between-group difference of <3 percentage points for the upper boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval). The main secondary end point was the change in quality of life as measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 3698 patients underwent randomization: 1846 to the interruption group and 1852 to the continuation group. The median time between the last myocardial infarction and randomization was 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.2 to 6.4), and the median follow-up was 3.0 years (interquartile range, 2.0 to 4.0). A primary-outcome event occurred in 432 of 1812 patients (23.8%) in the interruption group and in 384 of 1821 patients (21.1%) in the continuation group (risk difference, 2.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], <0.1 to 5.5), for a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33; P = 0.44 for noninferiority). Beta-blocker interruption did not seem to improve the patients' quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a history of myocardial infarction, interruption of long-term beta-blocker treatment was not found to be noninferior to a strategy of beta-blocker continuation. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and ACTION Study Group; ABYSS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03498066; EudraCT number, 2017-003903-23.).
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Infarto del Miocardio , Calidad de Vida , Prevención Secundaria , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Infarto del Miocardio/psicología , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Privación de Tratamiento , Prevención Secundaria/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) is frequently administered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although no conclusive data support this practice. METHODS: The RIGHT trial (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted at 53 centers in China. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Before trial initiation, each center selected 1 of 3 PPA regimens (40 mg of enoxaparin once daily subcutaneously; 10 U·kg·h of unfractionated heparin intravenously, adjusted to maintain activated clotting time between 150 and 220 seconds; or 0.2 mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. The key secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of each specific anticoagulation regimen (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) on the primary efficacy end point. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2019, and September 18, 2021, a total of 2989 patients were randomized. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 37 patients (2.5%) in both the PPA and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57]). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding did not differ between the PPA and placebo groups (8 [0.5%] vs 11 [0.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Routine PPA after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03664180.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Enoxaparina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Heparina/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fragmentos de Péptidos/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The real incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and whether this complication can be prevented remain unknown. This study assessed if flecainide is effective to prevent AA during the first 3 months after PFO closure, and if 6 months treatment by flecainide is more effective than 3 months to prevent AA after PFO closure. METHODS: AFLOAT is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the endpoints (PROBE design). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio after PFO closure to receive flecainide (150 mg once a day in a sustained-release (SR) dose) for 3 months, flecainide (150 mg od SR dose) for 6 months, or no additional treatment (standard-of-care) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode AA (≥30s) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). The secondary endpoint was the percentage of patients with at least one episode of AA (≥30s) recorded with ICM during the 3-6 months period after PFO closure. RESULTS: 186 patients were included (mean age 54 years, male 68.8%) and AA (≥30s) occurred in 53 (28.5%) patients during the 6-month follow-up; 86.8% of these AA events occurred in the first month after PFO closure. The primary outcome occurred in 33/123 (26.8%) and 16/63 (25.4%) patients receiving flecainide for at least 3 months or standard of care, respectively [Risk Difference (RD) 1.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.9% to 13.8%, NS]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 3/60 (5.0%), 4/63 (6.3%), and 5/63 (7.9%) patients receiving flecainide 6 months, 3 months or standard of care, respectively [RD -2.9%; 95% CI -12.7% to 6.9%, and RD -1.6%; 95% CI -11.8% to 8.6%, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: In the first 6 months following successful PFO closure, AA (≥30s) occurred in 28.5% of cases, mostly in the first month after the procedure. Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.
RESUMEN
Non-invasive biomarkers are promising tools for improving kidney allograft rejection monitoring, but their clinical adoption requires more evidence in specifically designed studies. To address this unmet need, we designed the EU-TRAIN study, a large prospective multicentric unselected cohort funded by the European Commission. Here, we included consecutive adult patients who received a kidney allograft in nine European transplant centers between November 2018 and June 2020. We prospectively assessed gene expression levels of 19 blood messenger RNAs, four antibodies targeting non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) endothelial antigens, together with circulating anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The primary outcome was allograft rejection (antibody-mediated, T cell-mediated, or mixed) in the first year post-transplantation. Overall, 412 patients were included, with 812 biopsies paired with a blood sample. CD4 gene expression was significantly associated with rejection, while circulating anti-HLA DSA had a significant association with allograft rejection and a strong association with antibody-mediated rejection. All other tested biomarkers, including AKR1C3, CD3E, CD40, CD8A, CD9, CTLA4, ENTPD1, FOXP3, GZMB, ID3, IL7R, MS4A1, MZB1, POU2AF1, POU2F1, TCL1A, TLR4, and TRIB1, as well as antibodies against angiotensin II type 1 receptor, endothelin 1 type A receptor, C3a and C5a receptors, did not show significant associations with allograft rejection. The blood messenger RNAs and non-HLA antibodies did not show an additional value beyond standard of care monitoring parameters and circulating anti-HLA DSA to predict allograft rejection in the first year post-transplantation. Thus, our results open avenues for specifically designed studies to demonstrate the clinical relevance and implementation of other candidate non-invasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation practice.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Rechazo de Injerto , Antígenos HLA , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/sangre , Antígenos HLA/genética , Europa (Continente) , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Anciano , Aloinjertos/inmunología , BiopsiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Untreated gout is characterised by monosodium urate (MSU) crystal accumulation responsible for recurrent flares that are commonly separated by asymptomatic phases. Both phases are inflammatory conditions of variable intensity. Gout flares are self-limited inflammatory reactions involving multiple mediators. This study aimed to characterise the inflammatory profiles of gout at different phases. METHODS: Using the Olink targeted proteomics, levels of 92 inflammation-related proteins were measured in plasma samples of a prospective gout population (GOUTROS), collected at gout flare (T1), the intercritical phase (T2) and after reaching the target serum urate level under urate-lowering therapy (T3). Results were validated in an independent cohort (OLT1177-05) with plasmas collected at T1 and T2. Ex vivo and in vitro experiments were performed to assess the inflammatory properties of new biomarkers. RESULTS: In total, 21 inflammatory new biomarkers were differentially expressed during the three time-points of gout disease. The levels of four of these proteins (interleukin 6 (IL-6), colony-stimulating factor 1, vascular endothelial growth factor A and tumour necrosis factor superfamily 14 (TNFSF14)) were increased during gout flare in an independent cohort. IL-6 and TNFSF14 had the highest fold change in expression during T1 versus T2 or T3. TNFSF14 was produced at the inflamed joint and enhanced the inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide and MSU crystal stimulation. Conversely, TNFSF14 blockade reduced the inflammatory response. Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms of TNFSF14 affected the ability of myeloid cells to produce inflammatory cytokines. CONCLUSION: Gout flare involves multiple inflammatory mediators that may be used as potential therapeutic targets.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Gota , Miembro 14 de la Superfamilia de Ligandos de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral , Humanos , Gota/tratamiento farmacológico , Gota/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Miembro 14 de la Superfamilia de Ligandos de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/sangre , Brote de los Síntomas , Citocinas/sangre , Supresores de la Gota/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Ácido Úrico/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Adulto , Proteómica/métodos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/sangreRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Significant concerns remain regarding the long-term outcomes of AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implants in men. The objective was to assess the long-term AUS reintervention (replacement or removal) rates after a first-ever AUS implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study included all men aged ≥18 years in France who underwent a first-ever AUS implantation (identified using a unique device identifier) for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was reintervention-free survival rates (replacements and removals), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were replacement and removal. A multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was used to assess associations between patient and hospital factors and the hazard of reintervention. RESULTS: The study included 8,475 men with a median age of 69 years (IQR 65-74) and a median follow-up time of 6 years (IQR 3-9). Reintervention-free survival was 71% (95%CI, 70-72) at 2 years, 57% (95%CI, 55-58) at 5 years, and 40% (95%CI, 38-41) at 10 years. Reintervention-free survival was lower after BPH surgery, after radiotherapy combined with RP, and in centers performing fewer implantations. Removal-free survival was 83% (95% CI, 83%-84%) at 2 years, 75% (95% CI, 74%-76%) at 5 years, and 66% (95% CI, 65%-68%) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among men undergoing AUS implantation for SUI due to PCa or BPH treatment, the probability of reintervention was 29% within two years after implantation. The median time to reintervention was 6.6 years (IQR: 6.4-7.1), and the reintervention-free survival rate at 10 years was 40%. These insights can inform therapeutic decision-making for patients and surgeons during the management of male SUI.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A Tregs insufficiency is central to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases pathophysiology and low dose interleukin-2 (IL-2LD) can specifically activate Tregs. OBJECTIVE: To assess IL-2LD therapeutic potential and select diseases for further clinical development, we performed an open-label, phase 2a, disease-finding, "basket trial" involving patients with one of 13 different autoimmune diseases. METHODS: 81 patients treated with IL-2LD (1 million IU/day) for 5 days, followed by fortnightly injections. The first 48 patients received diluted Proleukin®, while the subsequent 33 received ready-to-use ILT-101®. The primary endpoint was the change in Tregs at day-8 compared to baseline. Key secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy assessments using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, disease-specific scores, and EuroQL-5D-5L. RESULTS: Our study unveiled a universal and significant expansion and activation of Tregs, without concomitant Teffs activation, across all 13 autoimmune diseases. Both Proleukin® and ready-to-use ILT-101® demonstrated identical effects on Tregs. CGI scores reflecting activity, severity, and efficacy were significantly reduced in the overall patient population. Disease-specific clinical scores improved in five of the six disease cohorts with at least six patients, namely ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Behçet's disease, Sjögren's syndrome, and systemic sclerosis. Urticaria was the only severe adverse event related to treatment. CONCLUSION: IL-2LD was well-tolerated, exhibiting specific Treg activation and clinical improvements across the 13 autoimmune diseases. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Tregs stimulation by IL-2LD is a promising therapeutic strategy and IL-2LD holds considerable promise for integration into combinatorial therapeutic approaches.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Interleucina-2 , Humanos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Behçet , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Sjögren , Linfocitos T ReguladoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders with diverse etiopathogenic mechanisms. This study explores the potential utility of family history, together with present and past comorbidities, in identifying distinct etiopathogenic subgroups. This approach may facilitate more accurate diagnosis, prognosis and personalized therapy. METHODS: We performed a multiple correspondence analysis on patients' comorbidities, followed by hierarchical principal component clustering of clinical data from 48 healthy volunteers and 327 patients with at least one of 19 selected AIDs included in the TRANSIMMUNOM cross-sectional study. RESULTS: We identified three distinct clusters characterized by: 1) the absence of comorbidities, 2) polyautoimmunity, and 3) polyinflammation. These clusters were further distinguished by specific comorbidities and biological parameters. Autoantibodies, allergies, and viral infections characterized the polyautoimmunity cluster, while older age, BMI, depression, cancer, hypertension, periodontal disease, and dyslipidemia characterized the polyinflammation cluster. Rheumatoid arthritis patients were distributed across all three clusters. They had higher DAS28 and prevalence of extra-articular manifestations when belonging to the polyinflammation and polyautoimmunity clusters, and also lower ACPA and RF seropositivity and higher pain scores within the polyinflammation cluster. We developed a model allowing to classify AID patients into comorbidity clusters. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have uncovered three distinct comorbidity profiles among AID patients. These profiles suggest the presence of distinct etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying these subgroups. Validation, longitudinal stability assessment, and exploration of their impact on therapy efficacy are needed for a comprehensive understanding of their potential role in personalized medicine.
RESUMEN
Immune abnormalities including an insufficiency of regulatory T cells (Treg) and increased blood-based inflammatory markers have been observed in bipolar disorders (BD), particularly during depression. As Tregs are pivotal to control inflammation, Treg stimulation by low-dose IL-2 (IL-2LD) could have a therapeutic impact on bipolar depression. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (2 active: 1 placebo) proof-of-concept trial of add-on IL-2LD in patients with bipolar depression. Patients received a placebo or IL-2LD (1MIU) once a day for 5 days, and then once a week for 4 weeks starting on week 2. The primary objective was to demonstrate a biological Treg response to IL-2LD assessed by fold increase in Treg percentage of CD4 + cells from baseline to day 5. Secondary objectives included safety assessment and mood improvement throughout the study period. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04133233. Fourteen patients with bipolar depression were included, with 4 receiving placebo and 10 IL-2LD. Baseline clinical and biological characteristics were balanced between groups. The primary evaluation criterion was met, with IL-2LD expanding 1.17 [95 % CI 1.01-1.34] vs 1.01 [95 % CI 0.90-1.12] (p = 0.0421) and activating Tregs. Secondary evaluation criteria were also met with significant improvements of depressive symptoms and global functioning from day-15 onwards in the IL-2LD treated patients. The treatment was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events related to treatment. This proof-of-concept trial shows that stimulating Tregs in patients with bipolar depression is safe and associated with clinical improvements. This supports a pathophysiological role of inflammation in BD and warrants pursuing the evaluation of IL-2LD as an adjunct treatment of major mood disorders.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock (HS) and rhabdomyolysis (RM) are two important risk factors for acute kidney injury after severe trauma; however, the effects of the combination of RM and HS on kidney function are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of RM and HS on renal function, oxygenation, perfusion, and morphology in a pig model. METHODS: Forty-seven female pigs were divided into five groups: sham, RM, HS, HS and moderate RM (RM4/HS), and HS and severe RM (RM8/HS). Rhabdomyolysis was induced by intramuscular injection of glycerol 50% with a moderate dose (4 ml/kg for the RM4/HS group) or a high dose (8 ml/kg for the RM and RM8/HS groups). Among animals with HS, after 90 min of hemorrhage, animals were resuscitated with fluid followed by transfusion of the withdrawn blood. Animals were followed for 48 h. Macro- and microcirculatory parameters measurements were performed. RESULTS: RM alone induced a decrease in creatinine clearance at 48 h (19 [0 to 41] vs. 102 [56 to 116] ml/min for RM and sham, respectively; P = 0.0006) without alteration in renal perfusion and oxygenation. Hemorrhagic shock alone impaired temporarily renal microcirculation, function, and oxygenation that were restored with fluid resuscitation. The RM4/HS and RM8/HS groups induced greater impairment of renal microcirculation and function than HS alone at the end of blood spoliation that was not improved by fluid resuscitation. Mortality was increased in the RM8/HS and RM4/HS groups in the first 48 h (73% vs. 56% vs. 9% for the RM8/HS, RM4/HS, and HS groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HS and RM induced an early deleterious effect on renal microcirculation, function, and oxygenation with decreased response to resuscitation and transfusion compared with HS or RM alone.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Riñón , Microcirculación , Rabdomiólisis , Choque Hemorrágico , Animales , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Femenino , Porcinos , Microcirculación/fisiología , Rabdomiólisis/fisiopatología , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Riñón/fisiopatología , Circulación Renal/fisiología , Oxígeno/sangre , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodosRESUMEN
There is an unmet need for robust and clinically validated biomarkers of kidney allograft rejection. Here we present the KTD-Innov study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436), an unselected deeply phenotyped cohort of kidney transplant recipients with a holistic approach to validate the clinical utility of precision diagnostic biomarkers. In 2018-2019, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients who received a kidney allograft at seven French centers and followed them for a year. We performed multimodal phenotyping at follow-up visits, by collecting clinical, biological, immunological, and histological parameters, and analyzing a panel of 147 blood, urinary and kidney tissue biomarkers. The primary outcome was allograft rejection, assessed at each visit according to the international Banff 2019 classification. We evaluated the representativeness of participants by comparing them with patients from French, European, and American transplant programs transplanted during the same period. A total of 733 kidney transplant recipients (64.1% male and 35.9% female) were included during the study. The median follow-up after transplantation was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 11.9-13.1 months). The cumulative incidence of rejection was 9.7% at one year post-transplant. We developed a distributed and secured data repository in compliance with the general data protection regulation. We established a multimodal biomarker biobank of 16,736 samples, including 9331 blood, 4425 urinary and 2980 kidney tissue samples, managed and secured in a collaborative network involving 7 clinical centers, 4 analytical platforms and 2 industrial partners. Patients' characteristics, immune profiles and treatments closely resembled those of 41,238 French, European and American kidney transplant recipients. The KTD-Innov study is a unique holistic and multidimensional biomarker validation cohort of kidney transplant recipients representative of the real-world transplant population. Future findings from this cohort are likely to be robust and generalizable.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores/orina , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Francia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) protocols remains low. Protocol compliance among anesthesiologists tends to be suboptimal owing to the high workload and the attention required for implementation. The assisted fluid management (AFM) system is a novel decision support tool designed to help clinicians apply GDFT protocols. This system predicts fluid responsiveness better than anesthesia practitioners do and achieves higher stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index values during surgery. We tested the hypothesis that an AFM-guided GDFT strategy would also be associated with better sublingual microvascular flow compared to a standard GDFT strategy. METHODS: This bicenter, parallel, 2-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, patient and assessor-blinded, superiority study considered for inclusion all consecutive patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery who required an arterial catheter and uncalibrated SV monitoring. Patients having standard GDFT received manual titration of fluid challenges to optimize SV while patients having an AFM-guided GDFT strategy received fluid challenges based on recommendations from the AFM software. In all patients, fluid challenges were standardized and titrated per 250 mL and vasopressors were administered to maintain a mean arterial pressure >70 mm Hg. The primary outcome (average of each patient's intraoperative microvascular flow index (MFI) across 4 intraoperative time points) was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and the treatment effect was estimated with a median difference between groups with a 95% confidence interval estimated using the bootstrap percentile method (with 1000 replications). Secondary outcomes included SV, cardiac index, total amount of fluid, other microcirculatory variables, and postoperative lactate. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was significantly higher in patients with AFM (median [Q1-Q3]: 2.89 [2.84-2.94]) versus those having standard GDFT (2.59 [2.38-2.78] points, median difference 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.49; P < .001). Cardiac index and SVI were higher (3.2 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.7 l.min-1.m-2; P = .001 and 42 [35-47] vs 36 [32-43] mL.m-2; P = .018) and arterial lactate concentration was lower at the end of the surgery in patients having AFM-guided GDFT (2.1 [1.5-3.1] vs 2.9 [2.1-3.9] mmol.L-1; P = .026) than patients having standard GDFT strategy. Patients having AFM received a higher fluid volume but 3 times less norepinephrine than those receiving standard GDFT (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an AFM-guided GDFT strategy resulted in higher sublingual microvascular flow during surgery compared to use of a standard GDFT strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nailfold capillaroscopy is recommended to diagnose primary or secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). Capillaroscopy is normal in primary RP, which is the most frequent. Screening for RP capillary anomalies with nailfold dermoscopy has been promising. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether normal nailfold dermoscopy-based on the absence of five criteria that define a sclerodermic pattern-is able to predict normal capillaroscopy with good positive-predictive value (PPV). METHODS: Prospective, 2-phase (monocentre and multicentre) study on patients at first consultation for RP undergoing nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC) and nailfold dermoscopy by two different 'blinded' trained observers, respectively, a vascular specialist and a dermatologist, not familiar with capillaroscopy. The five criteria noted were as follows: disorganization, megacapillaries, low capillary density, avascular areas and haemorrhages. RESULTS: Based on 105 patients, the dermoscopy PPV for a normal NVC was 100% (p = 0.015), with 37.9% sensitivity, when no criterion was observed. Excluding haemorrhages, the PPV remained 100% (p < 0.0001), with sensitivity rising to 73.7% and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Normal nailfold dermoscopy with the absence of four easy-to-observe criteria predicts normal NVC with an excellent PPV.
Asunto(s)
Dermoscopía , Angioscopía Microscópica , Uñas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Angioscopía Microscópica/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermoscopía/métodos , Uñas/irrigación sanguínea , Uñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Enfermedad de Raynaud/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Raynaud/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Capilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Capilares/patologíaRESUMEN
Importance: Before surgery, the best strategy for managing patients who are taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) is unknown. The lack of evidence leads to conflicting guidelines. Objective: To evaluate whether a continuation strategy vs a discontinuation strategy of RASIs before major noncardiac surgery results in decreased complications at 28 days after surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial that included patients who were being treated with a RASI for at least 3 months and were scheduled to undergo a major noncardiac surgery between January 2018 and April 2023 at 40 hospitals in France. Intervention: Patients were randomized to continue use of RASIs (n = 1107) until the day of surgery or to discontinue use of RASIs 48 hours prior to surgery (ie, they would take the last dose 3 days before surgery) (n = 1115). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major postoperative complications within 28 days after surgery. The key secondary outcomes were episodes of hypotension during surgery, acute kidney injury, postoperative organ failure, and length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit during the 28 days after surgery. Results: Of the 2222 patients (mean age, 67 years [SD, 10 years]; 65% were male), 46% were being treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at baseline and 54% were being treated with angiotensin receptor blockers. The rate of all-cause mortality and major postoperative complications was 22% (245 of 1115 patients) in the RASI discontinuation group and 22% (247 of 1107 patients) in the RASI continuation group (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.87-1.19]; P = .85). Episodes of hypotension during surgery occurred in 41% of the patients in the RASI discontinuation group and in 54% of the patients in the RASI continuation group (risk ratio, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.19-1.44]). There were no other differences in the trial outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery, a continuation strategy of RASIs before surgery was not associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications than a discontinuation strategy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03374449.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Brain injury patients require precise blood pressure (BP) management to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and avoid intracranial hypertension. Nurses have many tasks and norepinephrine titration has been shown to be suboptimal. This can lead to limited BP control in patients that are in critical need of cerebral perfusion optimization. We have designed a closed-loop vasopressor (CLV) system capable of maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) in a narrow range and we aimed to assess its performance when treating severe brain injury patients. Within the first 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 18 patients with a severe brain injury underwent either CLV or manual norepinephrine titration. In both groups, the objective was to maintain MAP in target (within ± 5 mmHg of a predefined target MAP) to achieve optimal CPP. Fluid administration was standardized in the two groups. The primary objective was the percentage of time patients were in target. Secondary outcomes included time spent over and under target. Over the four-hour study period, the mean percentage of time with MAP in target was greater in the CLV group than in the control group (95.8 ± 2.2% vs. 42.5 ± 27.0%, p < 0.001). Severe undershooting, defined as MAP < 10 mmHg of target value was lower in the CLV group (0.2 ± 0.3% vs. 7.4 ± 14.2%, p < 0.001) as was severe overshooting defined as MAP > 10 mmHg of target (0.0 ± 0.0% vs. 22.0 ± 29.0%, p < 0.001). The CLV system can maintain MAP in target better than nurses caring for severe brain injury patients.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas , Norepinefrina , Humanos , Presión Arterial , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Presión IntracranealRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether a strategy to target an LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol <70 mg/dL is more effective when LDL is reduced >50% from baseline rather than <50% from baseline has not been investigated. METHODS: The Treat Stroke to Target trial was conducted in France and South Korea in 61 sites between March 2010 and December 2018. Patients with ischemic stroke in the previous 3 months or transient ischemic attack within the previous 15 days and evidence of cerebrovascular or coronary artery atherosclerosis were randomly assigned to a target LDL cholesterol of <70 mg/dL or 100±10 mg/dL, using statin and/or ezetimibe as needed. We used the results of repeated LDL measurements (median, 5 [2-6] per patient) during 3.9 years (interquartile range, 2.1-6.8) of follow-up. The primary outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, new symptoms requiring urgent coronary or carotid revascularization, and vascular death. Cox regression model including lipid-lowering therapy as a time-varying variable, after adjustment for randomization strategy, age, sex, index event (stroke or transient ischemic attack), and time since the index event. RESULTS: Among 2860 patients enrolled, patients in the lower target group who had >50% LDL cholesterol reduction from baseline during the trial had a higher baseline LDL cholesterol and a lower LDL cholesterol achieved as compared to patients who had <50% LDL cholesterol reduction (155±32 and 62 mg/dL versus 121±34 and 74 mg/dL, respectively, P<0.001 for both). In the <70 mg/dL target group, patients with >50% LDL reduction had a significant reduction in the primary outcome as compared to the higher target group (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.88]; P=0.007) and patients with <50% LDL reduction from baseline had little reduction (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.73-1.26]; P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the TST trial, targeting an LDL cholesterol of <70 mg/dL reduced the risk of primary outcome compared with 100±10 mg/dL provided LDL cholesterol reduction from baseline was superior to 50%, thereby suggesting that the magnitude of LDL cholesterol reduction was as important to consider as the target level to achieve. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01252875. URL: https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: EUDRACT2009-A01280-57.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , LDL-Colesterol , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy by means of statin medications is recommended after transient ischemic attack (TIA) and ischemic stroke of atherosclerotic origin. The target level for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular events after stroke has not been well studied. METHODS: In this parallel-group trial conducted in France and South Korea, we randomly assigned patients with ischemic stroke in the previous 3 months or a TIA within the previous 15 days to a target LDL cholesterol level of less than 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) (lower-target group) or to a target range of 90 mg to 110 mg per deciliter (2.3 to 2.8 mmol per liter) (higher-target group). All the patients had evidence of cerebrovascular or coronary-artery atherosclerosis and received a statin, ezetimibe, or both. The composite primary end point of major cardiovascular events included ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, new symptoms leading to urgent coronary or carotid revascularization, or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: A total of 2860 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 3.5 years; 1430 were assigned to each LDL cholesterol target group. The mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline was 135 mg per deciliter (3.5 mmol per liter), and the mean achieved LDL cholesterol level was 65 mg per deciliter (1.7 mmol per liter) in the lower-target group and 96 mg per deciliter (2.5 mmol per liter) in the higher-target group. The trial was stopped for administrative reasons after 277 of an anticipated 385 end-point events had occurred. The composite primary end point occurred in 121 patients (8.5%) in the lower-target group and in 156 (10.9%) in the higher-target group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.98; P = 0.04). The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and newly diagnosed diabetes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: After an ischemic stroke or TIA with evidence of atherosclerosis, patients who had a target LDL cholesterol level of less than 70 mg per deciliter had a lower risk of subsequent cardiovascular events than those who had a target range of 90 mg to 110 mg per deciliter. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and others; Treat Stroke to Target ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252875.).
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Ezetimiba/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/complicaciones , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long-term use of ß-blocker after myocardial infarction (MI) when global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved has not been studied in the era of modern myocardial reperfusion and secondary prevention therapies. It is unknown whether ß-blockers are useful in stable post-MI patients without reduced LVEF and without heart failure. METHODS: The Assessment of ß-blocker interruption 1 Year after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction on Safety and Symptomatic cardiac events requiring hospitalization (ABYSS) Trial enrolled in 49 centers in France, 3,700 patients with a prior (>6 months) history of MI and a LVEF >40%, chronically treated with a ß-blocker and without any major cardiovascular event (MACE) in the past 6 months. These patients were randomized to interruption or continuation of their ß-blocker therapy. The primary objective is to demonstrate the noninferiority of interruption vs continuation of the ß-blocker therapy on the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, MI, hospitalization for any cardiovascular reason at the end of follow-up (accrual follow-up) with a one-year minimum follow-up for the last randomized patient. Secondary objectives will focus on patient reported outcomes with the evaluation of the quality of life before and after randomization with the EQ5D-5L questionnaire. Enrolment has been completed. CONCLUSION: The ABYSS trial evaluates the cardiovascular safety of ß-blocker interruption in stabilized post-MI patients without heart failure nor reduced LVEF. ABYSS trial is a reappraisal of ß-blockers life-long therapy in stable post-MI patients without reduced LVEF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03498066 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Calidad de Vida , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Rationale: Norepinephrine (NE) is commonly used in combination with fluid during resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock, but its impact on kidney microcirculation, oxygenation, and function is still unknown in this setting. Objectives: During hemorrhagic shock resuscitation, does a combination of fluid and NE affect kidney oxygenation tension, kidney microcirculatory perfusion, and 48-hour kidney function, as compared with fluid alone? Methods: Hemorrhagic shock was induced in 24 pigs, and 8 pigs were included as a sham group. Resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock was performed, using a closed-loop device, either by fluid alone (0.9% NaCl; fluid group) or associated with the administration of NE at two doses (moderate dose: mean rate of 0.64 µg â kg-1 â min-1; high dose: mean rate of 1.57 µg â kg-1 â min-1) to obtain a target systolic arterial pressure of 80 to 90 mm Hg. Resuscitation was followed by transfusion of the withdrawn blood. Measurements and Main Results: The amount of fluid required to reach the target systolic arterial pressure was lower in the NE groups than in the fluid group, with subsequently less hemodilution. NE restored kidney microcirculation, oxygenation, and function in a manner comparable to that achieved with fluid resuscitation alone. There were no histologic differences between animals resuscitated with fluid and those resuscitated with NE. Conclusions: In pigs with hemorrhagic shock, resuscitation with a combination of NE and fluid restored kidney microcirculation and oxygenation, as well as renal function, in a manner comparable to fluid resuscitation alone and without differences between the two NE doses. NE administration led to a fluid volume-sparing effect with subsequently less hemodilution.
Asunto(s)
Choque Hemorrágico , Animales , Fluidoterapia , Riñón/fisiología , Microcirculación , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Resucitación , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , PorcinosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Chest CT is the reference test for assessing pulmonary injury in suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 with signs of clinical severity. This study aimed to evaluate the association of a lung ultrasonography score and unfavorable clinical evolution at 28 days. METHODS: The eChoVid is a multicentric study based on routinely collected data that was conducted in 8 emergency units in France; patients were included between March 19, 2020 and April 28, 2020 and underwent lung ultrasonography, a short clinical assessment by 2 emergency physicians blinded to each other's assessment, and chest CT. Lung ultrasonography consisted of scoring lesions from 0 to 3 in 8 chest zones, thus defining a global score (GS) of severity from 0 to 24. The primary outcome was the association of lung damage severity as assessed by the GS at day 0 and patient status at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were comparing the performance between GS and CT scan and the performance between a new trainee physician and an ultrasonography expert in scores. RESULTS: For the 328 patients analyzed, the GS showed good performance in predicting clinical worsening at 28 days (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.83, sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 76.4%). The GS showed good performance in predicting the CT severity assessment (AUC 0.84, sensitivity 77.2%, specificity 83.7%). CONCLUSION: A lung ultrasonography GS is a simple tool that can be used in the emergency department to predict unfavorable assessment at 28 days in patients with COVID-19.