Histopathological comparison of Sjögren-related features between paired labial and parotid salivary gland biopsies of sicca patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare focus score (FS) and other histopathological features between paired labial and parotid salivary gland biopsies in a diagnostic cohort of suspected Sjögren's disease (SjD) patients. METHODS: Labial and parotid salivary gland biopsies were simultaneously obtained from patients with sicca complaints, suspected of having SjD. Biopsies were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. Sections were stained with haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and for CD3, CD20, CD45, cytokeratin, CD21, Bcl6, activation induced deaminase (AID), and IgA/IgG. FS and other histopathological features characteristic for SjD were analysed. RESULTS: Based on the expert opinion of three experienced rheumatologists, 36 patients were diagnosed as SjD and 63 as non-SjD sicca patients. When taking all patients together, absolute agreement of various histopathological features between labial and parotid biopsies was high and varied between 80% (FS) and 93% ((pre-)lymphoepithelial lesions (LELs)). More labial gland biopsies had a FS ≥ 1 compared with their parotid counterpart. Accordingly, the area of infiltrate was larger in labial gland biopsies. When considering only SjD patients, labial glands contained significantly less B-lymphocytes, GCs/mm2 and less severe LELs compared with parotid glands. CONCLUSION: Labial and parotid glands from SjD patients contain similar histopathological key features, and thus both glands can be used for diagnosis and classification of SjD. However, parotid salivary glands reveal more evident B-lymphocyte related features, while labial glands exhibit more inflammation, which may be partially unrelated to SjD.

Cell Composition Analysis of Matched Salivary Organoid and Adherent Cultures: Choose Your Sjögren Disease Research Tool Carefully.

Sjögren disease (SjD) is widely recognized by the presence of B cell-dominated lymphocytic infiltration in the salivary glands (SGs). Contrary to what was originally presumed, however, SG hypofunction in SjD is not strongly correlated with the degree of SG lymphocytic infiltration in the SGs.

MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement: Clinical assessment of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is aimed at generating a concise tool for clinicians that concentrates practical information needed for the management of oral complications of cancer patients. This CPS is focused on the clinical assessment of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients. METHODS: This CPS was developed based on a critical evaluation of the literature followed by a structured discussion of a group of leading experts, members of the Oral Care Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The information is presented in the form of succinct bullets and tables to generate a short manual about the best standard of care. RESULTS: The objective assessment of saliva secretion involves an extra- and intra-oral clinical examination while the subjective assessment involves eliciting information on the patient's complaint of xerostomia and its impact on daily functioning. This CPS summarizes the common investigator- and patient-reported instruments used in clinical practice for assessing salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients. CONCLUSION: There is a range of tools to assess salivary gland function in patients undergoing cancer therapy, patients recovering from cancer therapy, or cancer survivors. Clinicians should ideally conduct both objective and subjective measurements to ensure a clear understanding about the status of the patients in order to provide the most appropriate treatment.

MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement: Management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is aimed at generating a concise tool for clinicians that concentrates practical information needed for the management of oral complications of cancer patients. This CPS is focused on the management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients. METHODS: This CPS was developed based on critical evaluation of the literature followed by a structured discussion of a group of leading experts, members of the Oral Care Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The information is presented in the form of succinct bullets and tables to generate a short manual about the best standard of care. RESULTS: Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in cancer patients are managed by (i) stimulating saliva production of salivary glands with residual secretory capacity or (ii) artificial wetting of the oral and lip surfaces which can be achieved by pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions. Pharmacological interventions encompass the use of sialagogues and sialolytics, while non-pharmacological interventions involve the use of moistening agents, mechanical, gustatory, or electrostimulation of the salivary glands. Additional treatment modalities may be incorporated in practice based on local availability and the clinician's experience. CONCLUSION: The information presented in this CPS offers clinicians convenient access to the dosages and regimens of different interventions for managing salivary gland hypofunction or xerostomia to facilitate clinical efficiency and conserve valuable time for clinicians.

Single immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone with and without connective tissue grafting: Results of a 5-year randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To assess the 5-year effects of grafting connective tissue while undertaking single immediate implant placement and provisionalization at the mid-buccal mucosa level (MBML). Secondary outcomes were buccal bone wall thickness (BBT), marginal bone level (MBL) and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with a single failing tooth in the maxillary anterior region were provided with an immediately placed and provisionalized implant. At implant placement, the patients randomly received either a connective tissue graft from the maxillary tuberosity (n = 30, test group) or no graft (n = 30, control group). The alveolar socket classification was mainly Type 2A. Data were collected before removing the failing tooth (T0 ), and at 1 (T1 ), 12 (T12 ) and 60 (T60 ) months after final crown placement. The primary outcome was the change in MBML compared with the pre-operative situation. Additionally, the change in BBT, MBL, aesthetics (using the Pink Aesthetic Score-White Aesthetic Score), soft-tissue peri-implant parameters and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, 27 patients could be analysed from each group. In each group, one implant was lost during the osseointegration period, within 3 months of placement, resulting in an implant survival rate of 96.7% in both groups. MBML change at T60 was -0.6 (-1.1 to -0.1) mm in the control group and 0.1 (-0.4 to 0.5) mm in the test group (p = .008). BBT and MBL, aesthetics, soft-tissue peri-implant parameters and patient satisfaction showed stable results and satisfied patients, without clinically relevant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This 5-year follow-up study shows that grafting connective tissue when replacing a single failing tooth with immediately placed and provisionalized implant results in favourable peri-implant tissues and fewer MBML changes.

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10-year randomized trial.

AIM: To compare the marginal bone level of immediately placed implants, with either immediate or delayed provisionalization (IP or DP), in the maxillary aesthetic zone after 10 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with a failing tooth in the maxillary aesthetic zone were randomly assigned to immediate implant placement with either IP (n = 20) or DP (n = 20) after primary wound closure with a free gingival graft. The final restoration was placed 3 months after provisionalization. The primary outcome was change in marginal bone level. In addition, implant survival, restoration survival and success, peri-implant tissue health, mucosa levels, aesthetic indices, buccal bone thickness and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: After 10 years, the mean mesial and distal changes in marginal bone level were -0.47 ± 0.45 mm and -0.49 ± 0.52 mm in the IP group and -0.58 ± 0.76 mm and -0.41 ± 0.72 mm in the DP group (p = .61; p = .71). The survival rate was 100% for the implants; for the restorations, it was 88.9% in the IP group and 87.5% in the DP group. Restoration success, according to modified USPHS criteria, was 77.8% in the IP group and 75.0% in the DP group. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was 38.9% and 35.7% and of peri-implantitis 0.0% and 6.3%, respectively, in the IP group and DP group (p = 1.0; p = .40). The Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score was 15.28 ± 2.32 in the IP group and 14.64 ± 2.74 in the DP group, both clinically acceptable (p = .48). The buccal bone thickness was lower in the DP group. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (p = .75). CONCLUSIONS: The mean marginal bone level changes after immediate implant placement with IP were similar to those after immediate placement with DP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the National Trial Register (NL9340).

Mechanical performance of patient-specific prefabricated temporary shell versus laboratory-fabricated CAD/CAM provisional implant-supported single-tooth restorations: A laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mechanical performance of patient-specific prefabricated temporary shell versus laboratory-fabricated CAD/CAM provisional restorations on titanium temporary abutments, with and without thermo-mechanical ageing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants with a conical connection were divided into four groups (n = 24) and restored with temporary shell or laboratory-fabricated central or lateral incisor PMMA restorations that were relined or bonded on titanium temporary abutments. The diameter of the central and lateral incisor groups' implants was regular (ϕ 4.3 mm) or narrow (ϕ 3.5 mm), respectively. Half of each group's specimens were subjected to ageing, simultaneous thermocycling (5-55°C) and chewing simulation (120,000 cycles, 50 N, 1.7 Hz) resulting in eight groups in total (n = 12). The aged specimens were evaluated with optical microscopy, and survival and complication rates were determined according to modified USPHS criteria. The non-aged specimens and those that had survived ageing were loaded until failure, whereupon bending moments were calculated. RESULTS: Survival rates after ageing were 100% for all groups. Apart from wear facets (ϕ 2-3 mm) on the palatal restoration surface, no complications were observed. The mean fracture load and bending moments ranged between 597.6-847.1 N and 433.3-550.6 Ncm, respectively, with no significant differences between the eight groups (p = .25; p = .20). CONCLUSIONS: As patient-specific temporary shell central and lateral incisor provisional implant-supported restorations are mechanically stable enough to withstand clinical bite forces, even after thermo-mechanical ageing, they may serve as an alternative to laboratory-fabricated provisional restorations.

Longitudinal evaluation of major salivary gland functioning in Sjögren's disease patients in a prospective standard-of-care cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in major salivary gland functioning over time using salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS), salivary flow measurements (sialometry), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients diagnosed with primary Sjögren's disease (SjD). METHODS: Consecutive outpatients from the ongoing prospective REgistry of Sjögren Syndrome LongiTudinal (RESULT) cohort, all fulfilling the ACR-EULAR classification criteria for SjD, were included. SGUS images assessed with the Hocevar and OMERACT scoring system, unstimulated and stimulated whole saliva (UWS/SWS), unstimulated and stimulated submandibular/sublingual saliva (uSMSLS/sSMSLS) and parotid saliva, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) general dryness, oral dryness, and Xerostomia Inventory were assessed at baseline (BL), 2-year (Y2) and 5-year (Y5) follow-up. RESULTS: In total, BL and Y2 data were available for 253 patients and 75 patients had already reached Y5. At group level, SGUS Hocevar (i.e., mean±SD: 22±10 at BL, 22±10 at Y2 and 23±10 at Y5), OMERACT scores, UWS, SWS and PROMs remained stable over time (all p>0.05). Slightly decreased uSMSLS (p=0.025) and sSMSLS (p=0.004) were observed at Y5. At individual patient level, a similar proportion showed an increase or decrease of ≥25% for Hocevar, UWS and SWS. At baseline, poor associations were observed between SGUS and PROMs and fair associations between sialometry and PROMs. Over time, changes in objective assessments did not correlate with changes in PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, major salivary gland functioning assessed with SGUS, sialometry and PROMs did not change significantly up to 5 years of follow-up in a standard-of-care cohort of SjD patients from daily clinical practice.

The minimally important difference for the Xerostomia Inventory among Sjögren's disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: Until now, the clinically relevant improvement for the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) has not been defined. Therefore, our aim was to determine the Minimally Important Difference (MID) of the XI for improvement in dry-mouth symptoms in SjD patients. METHOD: The study recruited 34 SjD patients who underwent sialendoscopy of major salivary glands and 15 SjD patients in a nonintervention control group. XI scores were assessed at several time points. The MID was determined from the mean difference in XI scores between the groups with and without improvement. RESULTS: In the control group, no significant XI score changes were seen. In the sialendoscopy group, a clinically relevant XI score change of four scale points was identified after 1 week. For a prolonged duration (≥16 weeks), a minimum reduction of seven scale points in the XI score was required to indicate clinically relevant improvement. CONCLUSION: In SjD patients, a minimum change of four points in the XI score indicates a clinically relevant improvement for evaluating short-term effects. For prolonged effects, a clinically relevant improvement requires a MID of seven points. The determination of the MID in XI could assist in future studies that evaluate changes in xerostomia.

Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A 10-year prospective case series.

PURPOSE: To assess marginal bone level changes, implant and restoration survival, condition of the peri-implant mucosa, and the patient's satisfaction with the single restoration supported by a 6-mm long implant in the posterior mandible after 10 years in function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients missing premolars or molars in the posterior mandible, with a bone volume consisting of a width of at least 6 mm and an estimated height of 8 mm between the top of the ridge and alveolar nerve, were included. Each patient received one or more 6-mm implants. After 3 months, the implants were restored with custom-made titanium abutments and cemented zirconia-based porcelain crowns. The clinical examination and radiograph data were assessed at restoration placement and after 12, 60, and 120 months. The patients answered a questionnaire to score their satisfaction before treatment and after 12, 60, and 120 months with the restoration in function. RESULTS: A total of 31 implants were placed. Implant survival was 100%. The 10-year mean marginal bone loss was 0.18 mm (SE: 0.08). The plaque, calculus, gingiva, and bleeding indices scores were low as was the mean pocket probing depth. The patients' satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: The 10-year follow-up data of this limited case series study reveal that 6-mm dental implants inserted in the resorbed posterior mandible provide a solid basis for single tooth restorations.

Periodontal inflammation as a potential driver of HIV low level viremia.

HIV can be successfully suppressed to undetectable levels by antiretroviral therapy (ART) in most people with HIV (PWH). However, a small proportion continues to have persistent low-level viremia (LLV) during ART. A presumed source of LLV is production or replication from viral reservoirs, which are maintained in the presence of ART. It is unknown whether the oral cavity can be considered an HIV reservoir. As periodontal inflammation is a common problem in PWH, we hypothesize that periodontal inflammation in the oral cavity activates (latently) infected cells and thus might be associated with LLV. We included 11 individuals with HIV LLV, and compared HIV-RNA levels in saliva and plasma at baseline and at week 24 after switch of ART. We compared the LLV-group at baseline with 11 age-matched controls with suppressed viremia. To investigate the severity of periodontitis we used Periodontal Inflamed Surface Areas (PISA) by measuring probing depth, gingival recession, bleeding on probing and clinical attachment level. Severity of periodontitis was classified according to the CDC-AAP case definition. Additional insights in periodontal inflammation were obtained by comparing immune activation markers and the presence of periodontal pathogens. In four individuals of the LLV group, residual levels of HIV-RNA were detected in saliva at baseline (N = 1) or at week 24 (N = 2) or both (N = 1). Of the four individuals with LLV, three had residual levels of HIV-RNA in saliva. All 22 individuals had moderate to severe periodontitis. PISA was not significantly different between cases with LLV and controls. Similarly, periodontal pathogens were frequently observed in both groups. Total activated HLA-DR+CD38+ CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells were significantly higher in the LLV group than in the control group (p = <0.01). No immune markers were associated with LLV. In conclusion, periodontal inflammation is an unlikely driver of HIV LLV compared to HIV suppressed individuals.

Quality Assessment of Internet Information Regarding Periodontitis in Persons Living with HIV.

The Internet is the most used source of HIV information second to information received from healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of Internet information about periodontitis in people living with HIV (PLWH). An Internet search was performed on 18 April 2024 using the search terms "Periodontitis", "Periodontal disease", and "Gum disease" in combination with "HIV" in the most popular search engines (Google™, Bing™, and YAHOO!®). The first 20 results from each search term engine were pooled for analysis. Quality was assessed by JAMA benchmarks. Readability was assessed using the Flesch reading ease score (FRES). Origin of the site, type of author, and information details were also recorded. The quality of Internet information about periodontitis in PLWH varied. The mean JAMA score was 2.81 (SD = 1.0). The websites were generally fairly difficult to read (mean FRES = 57.1, SD = 15.0). Most websites provided some advice about self-treatment of oral problems, accompanied by a strong recommendation to seek professional dental care. In conclusion, advanced reading skills on periodontitis in PLWH were required and quality features were mostly not provided. Therefore, healthcare professionals should be actively involved in developing high-quality information resources and direct patients to evidence-based materials on the Internet.

Connecting salivary gland inflammation to specific symptoms in Sjögren's disease.

INTRODUCTION: The complex nature of Sjögren's Disease (SjD) necessitates a comprehensive and patient-centered approach in both diagnosis and management. This narrative review emphasizes the need for a holistic understanding of the connection between salivary gland inflammation and oral symptoms in SjD. AREAS COVERED: The intricate relationship between salivary gland inflammation and dry mouth is explored, highlighting the variability in associations reported in studies. The association of the severity of xerostomia and degree of inflammation is also discussed. The frequent presence of recurrent sialadenitis in SjD further accentuates the connection of compromised salivary gland function and inflammation. The review additionally discusses local inflammatory factors assessed through salivary gland biopsies, which could potentially serve as predictors for lymphoma development in SjD. Insights into compromised quality of life and hypercoagulable state and their association with salivary gland inflammations are provided. Advancements in noninvasive imaging techniques, particularly salivary gland ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasound, offer promising avenues for noninvasive assessment of inflammation. EXPERT OPINION: There is a need for longitudinal studies to unravel the connections between salivary gland inflammation and oral symptoms. This will enhance management strategies and optimize treatment outcomes for SjD patients.

Added value of the salivary gland ultrasonography OMERACT score in the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether addition of the salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) OMERACT score influences the performance of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's disease (SjD) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Patients visiting the Sjögren Expertise centre in the University Medical Center Groningen for a diagnostic trajectory because of a suspicion of SjD were included. SGUS was performed of both parotid and submandibular glands. ROC analysis was used to assess the accuracy to predict clinical diagnosis of SjD with the SGUS OMERACT score, and by adding the SGUS OMERACT score to the ACR/EULAR criteria. Furthermore, the performance of the SGUS OMERACT and total SGUS Hocevar score were compared. RESULTS: In total, 419 consecutive patients were included. ROC analysis of the highest SGUS OMERACT score out of all four salivary glands (range 0-3) showed good accuracy (AUC 0.849) to predict clinical diagnosis of SjD, comparable to the accuracy of the total SGUS OMERACT score (range 0-12; AUC 0.868) and total Hocevar score (range 0-48; AUC 0.864). When incorporating the highest SGUS OMERACT score (cut-off score of ≥2) as additional item in the ACR/EULAR criteria, accuracy remained excellent (AUC 0.974), and clinical diagnosis could be predicted with a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 86.5%. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for predicting the clinical diagnosis of SjD remained excellent after incorporating the SGUS OMERACT score and extends the diagnostic options in patients suspected with SjD.

Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether an intact buccal bony plate is a prerequisite for immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets. The aim of this 10-year randomized controlled trial was to compare peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, esthetic ratings of, and patient-reported satisfaction with immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm in the esthetic zone versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation. METHODS: Patients presenting a failing tooth in the esthetic region and a buccal bony defect ≥5 mm after an extraction were randomly assigned to immediate (Immediate Group, n = 20) or delayed (Delayed Group, n = 20) implant placement. The second-stage surgery and provisional restoration placement occurred 3 months after implant placement in both groups, followed by definitive restorations 3 months thereafter. During a 10-year follow-up period, marginal bone levels (primary outcome), buccal bone thickness, soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient-reported satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The mean marginal bone level change was -0.71 ± 0.59 mm and -0.36 ± 0.39 mm in the Immediate Group and the Delayed Group after 10 years (p = 0.063), respectively. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Marginal bone level changes, buccal bone thickness, clinical outcomes, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction following immediate implant placement, in combination with bone augmentation in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm, were not statistically different to those following delayed implant placement after ridge preservation in the esthetic zone. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Immediate implant placement in case of a failing tooth is a favorable treatment option for patients because it considerably shortens treatment time and the number of surgical treatments. The question is if an intact buccal bone wall is necessary for immediate implant placement. A 10-year study was performed in which 20 patients with a failing tooth in the frontal region of the upper jaw were treated with immediate implant placement and were compared with 20 patients in whom a more conventional treatment strategy was followed in which the failing tooth was first removed and the bone gap restored and the implant placed in a second step. After a 10-year follow-up period, it appeared that the bone around the implant was very stable, gums were healthy, and patients were very satisfied with the result. There was no difference between the two treatment procedures. Such results mean that professionals can discuss the procedure with the patient and apply the individual's preference.

Radiation-induced Xerostomia is Related to Stem Cell Dose-dependent Reduction of Saliva Production.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that the mean dose to the parotid gland stem cell rich regions (Dmean,SCR) is the strongest dosimetric predictor for the risk of patient-reported daytime xerostomia. This study aimed to test whether the relationship between patient-reported xerostomia and Dmean,SCR is explained by a dose-dependent reduction of saliva production. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 570 patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT), flow from the parotid (FLOWPAR) and submandibular/sublingual (FLOWSMSL) glands, and patient-reported daytime (XERDAY) and nighttime (XERNIGHT) xerostomia were prospectively measured before, at 6 months, and 12 months after RT. Using linear mixed effect models, the relationship of the mean dose to the parotid glands (Dmean,par), Dmean,SCR, non-SCR parotid gland tissue (Dmean,non-SCR), submandibular glands (Dmean,sub), and oral cavity (Dmean,oral) with salivary flow and xerostomia was analyzed while correcting for known confounders. RESULTS: Dmean,SCR proved to be responsible for the effect of Dmean,par on FLOWPAR (P ≤ .03), while Dmean,non-SCR did not affect FLOWPAR (P ≥ .11). To illustrate, increasing Dmean,SCR by 10 Gy at a fixed Dmean,non-SCR reduced FLOWPAR by 0.02 mL/min (25%) after RT. However, if the opposite happened, no change in FLOWPAR was observed (0.00 mL/min [4%]). As expected, Dmean,sub was significantly associated with FLOWSMSL (P < .001). For example, increasing Dmean,sub by 10 Gy reduced FLOWSMSL by 0.07 mL/min (26%) after RT. Xerostomia scores were also affected by dose to the salivary glands. Dmean,SCR and Dmean,oral were associated with higher XERDAY scores (P ≤ .05), while Dmean,sub increased XERNIGHT scores (P = .01). For example, an increase of 10 Gy in Dmean,SCR raised XERDAY scores by 2.13 points (5%) after RT, while an additional 10 Gy in Dmean,subs increased XERNIGHT scores by 2.20 points (6%) after RT. Salivary flow was not only associated with radiation dose, but also with xerostomia scores in line with the salivary glands' functions; ie, FLOWPAR only influenced XERDAY (P < .001, 10.92 points lower XERDAY per 1 mL/min saliva), while FLOWSMSL affected XERDAY and XERNIGHT (P ≤ .004, 6.69 and 5.74 points lower XERDAY and XERNIGHT, respectively, per 1 mL/min saliva). Therefore, the observed relationships between dose and xerostomia were corrected for salivary flow. As hypothesized, Dmean,SCR only increased XERDAY scores via reducing FLOWPAR, whereas the effects of Dmean,oral on XERDAY and Dmean,sub on XERNIGHT were independent of salivary flow. CONCLUSIONS: Higher SCR region dose reduced parotid gland saliva production, subsequently resulting in higher daytime xerostomia scores. Consequently, this study supports the clinical implementation of stem cell sparing RT to preserve salivary flow with the aim of reducing the risk of xerostomia.

The Peri-Implant Microbiome-A Possible Factor Determining the Success of Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment?

The objective was to assess the effect of peri-implantitis surgery on the peri-implant microbiome with a follow-up of one year. A total of 25 peri-implantitis patients in whom non-surgical treatment has failed to solve peri-implantitis underwent resective surgical treatment. Their peri-implant pockets were sampled prior to surgical treatment (T0) and one year post treatment (T12). The natural dentition was sampled to analyse similarities and differences with the peri-implantitis samples. Treatment success was recorded. The change in microbial relative abundance levels was evaluated. The microbiota was analysed by sequencing the amplified V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA genes. Sequence data were binned to amplicon sequence variants that were assigned to bacterial genera. Group differences were analysed using principal coordinate analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and t-tests. Beta diversity analyses reported a significant separation between peri-implantitis and natural dentition samples on T0 and T12, along with significant separations between successfully and non-successfully treated patients. Eubacterium was significantly lower on T12 compared to T0 for the peri-implantitis samples. Treponema and Eubacterium abundance levels were significantly lower in patients with treatment success on T0 and T12 versus no treatment success. Therefore, lower baseline levels of Treponema and Eubacterium seem to be associated with treatment success of peri-implantitis surgery. This study might aid clinicians in determining which peri-implantitis cases might be suitable for treatment and give a prognosis with regard to treatment success.

More severe parotid gland histopathology in paediatric-onset than in adult-onset Sjögren's disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the histopathological features of the parotid glands in patients with paediatric-onset Sjögren's disease (pedSjD) in comparison to patients with adult-onset Sjögren's disease (adSjD). METHODS: This study was performed in Groningen, the Netherlands. Patients with pedSjD from a diagnostic paediatric cohort (n=19), patients with adSjD from a diagnostic adult cohort (n=32) and patients with adSjD who participated in a clinical trial (n=42) with a baseline parotid gland biopsy were included. Parotid gland biopsies were analysed after (immuno)histological staining for SjD-related histopathological markers and compared between groups. RESULTS: All characteristic histopathological features of adSjD were also observed in pedSjD. There were no significant differences in lymphoepithelial lesions or immunoglobulin A (IgA)/IgG plasma cell shift between the pedSjD and the adSjD cohorts. However, compared with the diagnostic adSjD cohort (with comparable total EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) scores), pedSjD showed more severe lymphocytic infiltration as reflected by a higher focus score (p=0.003), a higher relative surface area of CD45+ infiltrate (p=0.041), higher numbers of B and T lymphocytes/mm2 (p=0.004 and p=0.029, respectively), a higher B/T lymphocyte ratio (p=0.013), higher numbers of CD21+ follicular dendritic cell networks/mm2 (p=0.029) and germinal centres (GC)/mm2 (p=0.002). Compared with the trial adSjD cohort, with significant higher total ESSDAI scores (p=0.001), only the B/T lymphocyte ratio and numbers of GC/mm2 were significantly higher in the pedSjD cohort (p=0.023 and p=0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with pedSjD exhibit more pronounced histopathological features compared with patients with adSjD at diagnosis. Notably, the histopathology of patients with pedSjD aligns more closely with that observed in an adSjD clinical trial cohort, with even stronger B lymphocyte involvement.