Isolation of the posterior left atrium for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior left atrial conduction improves long-term outcome.

AIMS: Catheter ablation to achieve posterior left atrial wall (PW) isolation may be performed as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to determine whether routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction improved long-term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 161 patients with persistent AF (mean age 59 ± 9 years, AF duration 6 ± 5 years) underwent catheter ablation involving circumferential PVI followed by PW isolation. Posterior left atrial wall isolation was performed with a roof and inferior wall line with the endpoint of bidirectional block. In 54 patients, adenosine 15 mg was sequentially administered to assess reconnection of the pulmonary veins and PW. Sites of transient reconnection were ablated and adenosine was repeated until no further reconnection was present. Holter monitoring was performed at 6 and 12 months to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Posterior left atrial wall isolation was successfully achieved in 91% of 161 patients (procedure duration 191 ± 49 min, mean RF time 40 ± 19 min). Adenosine-induced reconnection of the PW was demonstrated in 17%. The single procedure freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia was superior in the adenosine challenge group (65%) vs. no adenosine challenge (40%, P < 0.01) at a mean follow-up of 19 ± 8 months. After multiple procedures, there was significantly improved freedom from AF between patients with vs. without adenosine PW challenge (85 vs. 65%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Posterior left atrial wall isolation in addition to PVI is a readily achievable ablation strategy in patients with persistent AF. Routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction was associated with an improvement in the success of catheter ablation for persistent AF.

Diffuse Ventricular Fibrosis on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Associates With Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We aimed to assess whether diffuse ventricular fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could be a surrogate marker for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HCM. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with HCM (mean age 51 ± 13 years, septal wall thickness 20 ± 5 mm) underwent CMR with a 1.5 T scanner to determine the presence of ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for focal fibrosis, and post-contrast T1 mapping for diffuse ventricular fibrosis. The presence of NSVT was determined by Holter monitoring and a subset of high risk patients received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). RESULTS: NSVT was detected in 23 of 100 patients with HCM. Focal ventricular fibrosis (by LGE) was observed in 87%, with no significant difference between patients with (96%) or without NSVT (86%, P = 0.19). However, LGE mass was greater in patients with (16.5 ± 19.1 g) versus without NSVT (7.6 ± 10.2 g, P < 0.01). NSVT was associated with a significant reduction in ventricular T1 relaxation time (422 ± 54 milliseconds) versus patients without NSVT (512 ± 115 milliseconds; P < 0.001). There was significant reduction in ventricular T1 relaxation time in patients with (430 ± 48 milliseconds) versus without aborted SCD (495 ± 113 milliseconds; P = 0.01) over a mean follow-up of 40 ± 10 months. On multivariate analysis post-contrast ventricular T1 relaxation time and septal wall thickness were the only predictors of NSVT. CONCLUSION: Post-contrast T1 relaxation time on CMR is associated with ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HCM. Diffuse ventricular fibrosis may be an important marker of arrhythmic risk in patients with HCM.

The Impact of Known Heart Disease on Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Multicenter International Study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for AF is an effective treatment for patients with AF and systolic LV dysfunction; however, the clinical outcome is variable. We evaluated the impact of cardiomyopathy etiology on long-term outcomes post-catheter ablation. METHODS: Patients undergoing AF ablation across 3 centers (2 Australian, 1 UK) from 2002 to 2014, with LVEF<45% were evaluated. Patients were stratified into those with known heart disease as a cause of cardiomyopathy (KHD), and those with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). RESULTS: One hundred and one patients (IDCM = 77, KHD = 24) with AF and LVEF <45% underwent AF ablation. The KHD group (ischemic HD in 67%) were older (61 ± 7 vs. 55 ± 11 years, P = 0.005), with a higher CHADS2 score (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, P = 0.016), but otherwise well matched. After mean follow-up of 36 ± 23 months, AF control was greater in the IDCM group (82% vs. 50% in KHD, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis IDCM was associated with long-term AF control (P = 0.033). The IDCM group had less functional impairment at follow-up (NYHA class 1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 2.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.005) and improved LVEF (50 ± 11% vs. 38 ± 10%, P < 0.001). Super responders (EF improvement >15%) were overwhelmingly in the IDCM group (94% vs. 6%, P < 0.001) with greater AF control (89% vs. 61%, P < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the KHD group (17% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: IDCM was associated with greater AF control, and improvement in symptoms and LVEF compared to patients with KHD post-AF ablation. AF is an important reversible cause of HF in patients with an unexplained CM and catheter ablation an effective treatment option.

Improved outcomes of conduction system pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Conduction system pacing (CSP)-His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)-are emerging alternatives to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure. However, evidence is largely limited to small and observational studies. We conducted a meta-analysis including a total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compare CSP (HBP and LBBAP) with BVP in patients with CRT indications. We assessed the mean differences in QRS duration (QRSd), pacing threshold, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class score. CSP resulted in a pooled mean QRSd improvement of -20.3 ms (95% confidence interval [CI] -26.1 to -14.5 ms; P < .05; I2= 87.1%) vs BVP. For LVEF, a weighted mean increase of 5.2% (95% CI 3.5%-6.9%; P < .05; I2 = 55.6) was observed after CSP vs BVP. The mean NYHA score was reduced by -0.40 (95% CI -0.6 to -0.2; P < .05; I2 = 61.7) after CSP vs BVP. A subgroup analysis of outcomes stratified by LBBAP and HBP demonstrated statistically significant weighted mean improvements of QRSd and LVEF with both CSP modalities compared with BVP. LBBAP resulted in NYHA improvement compared with BVP, without differences between CSP subgroups. LBBAP is associated with a significantly lowered mean pacing threshold of -0.51 V (95% CI -0.68 to -0.38 V) while HBP had increased the mean threshold (0.62 V; 95% CI -0.03 to 1.26 V) compared with BVP; however, this was associated with significant heterogeneity. Overall, both CSP techniques are feasible and effective CRT alternatives for heart failure. Further RCTs are needed to establish long-term efficacy and safety.

A Randomized Trial of High vs Standard Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: SHORT-AF.

BACKGROUND: High-power, short duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a commonly used strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare HPSD with standard power, standard duration (SPSD) RFA in patients undergoing PVI. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal or persistent (<1 year) atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomized to HPSD (50 W) or SPSD (25-30 W) RFA to achieve PVI. Outcomes assessed included time to achieve PVI (primary), left atrial dwell time, total procedure time, first-pass isolation, PV reconnection with adenosine, procedure complications including asymptomatic cerebral emboli (ACE), and freedom from atrial arrhythmias. RESULTS: Sixty patients (median age 66 years; 75% male) with paroxysmal (57%) or persistent (43%) AF were randomized to HPSD (n = 29) or SPSD (n = 31). Median time to achieve PVI was shorter with HPSD vs SPSD (87 minutes vs 126 minutes; P = 0.003), as was left atrial dwell time (157 minutes vs 180 minutes; P = 0.04). There were no differences in first-pass isolation (79% vs 76%; P = 0.65) or PV reconnection with adenosine (12% vs 20%; P = 0.26) between groups. At 12 months, recurrent atrial arrhythmias occurred less in the HPSD group compared with the SPSD group (n = 3 of 29 [10%] vs n = 11 of 31 [35%]; HR: 0.26; P = 0.027). There was a trend toward more ACE with HPSD RFA (40% HPSD vs 17% SPSD; P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing AF ablation, HPSD compared with SPSD RFA results in shorter time to achieve PVI, greater freedom from AF at 12 months, and a trend toward increased ACE.

Cardiac rhythm management devices

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen ongoing evolution and use of cardiac rhythm management devices, including pacemakers, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and loop recorders. General practitioners are increasingly involved in follow-up and management of patients with these devices. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of different cardiac rhythm management devices, including their role, implant procedure, post-procedural care, potential complications and follow­up. We also include practical advice for patients regarding driving, exercise, sexual intimacy and precautions with regards to electromagnetic interference. DISCUSSION: Cardiac rhythm management devices perform many functions, including bradycardia pacing, monitoring for arrhythmias, cardiac resynchronisation for heart failure, defibrillation and anti-tachycardia pacing for tachyarrhythmias. Concerns regarding potential device-related complications should be discussed with the implanting physician. In the post-implant period, patients with cardiac rhythm management devices can expect to lead normal, active lives. However, caution must occasionally be exercised in certain situations, such as near appliances with electromagnetic interference. Future innovations will move away from transvenous leads to leadless designs with combinations of different components on a 'modular' basis according to the function required.

Atrial structure and function and its implications for current and emerging treatments for atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial (LA) structure and function are intimately related to the clinical phenotypes of atrial fibrillation (AF), and have direct implications for the success or otherwise of various therapeutic strategies. In conjunction with intrinsic structural characteristics of the LA, pathological remodelling to a large extent dictates the clinical course of AF. Remodelling is a product of the physiological and structural plasticity of the LA in disease states (including AF itself), and manifests as electrical, physical and structural changes that promote the substrate necessary for AF maintenance. The degree of remodelling impacts upon the efficacy of pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interventional treatments for AF. Evolving therapies seek to specifically target these processes although presently, several remain in the development phase. Catheter ablation (CA) is now firmly established as a highly effective treatment for AF, although increasing its efficacy in the remodelled LA of more severe AF phenotypes remains an ongoing challenge.

Novel uses of imaging in AF ablation.

AF represents a significant burden for patients, clinicians and health policy makers alike. Catheter based AF ablation is gaining an increasing role as an effective treatment for AF, capable of reducing or even eliminating the disease. AF ablation relies on isolation of arrhthymogenic triggers and alteration of the atrial substrate by carefully targeted atrial ablation, using a minimally invasive approach. Pre-procedural CT, MRI and echocardiography are crucial in evaluating the degree of atrial remodelling which may impact of procedural success, as well as identification of crucial cardiac and non-cardiac adjacent structures, and LAA thrombus. Electro-anatomical mapping is the cornerstone of intra-procedural imaging, which can be optimised by integration with pre-procedural imaging. Other technologies such as 3D rotational angiograpy, intracardiac echocardiography and real-time MRI are improving the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Post-procedural MRI and CT can effectively monitor and evaluate procedural complications and atrial structure and remodelling. Recent patents demonstrate the wealth of technological advancements in AF ablation and are evident in multiple aspects of the procedure.