Cardiomyocyte progenitor cell-derived exosomes stimulate migration of endothelial cells.

Patients suffering from heart failure as a result of myocardial infarction are in need of heart transplantation. Unfortunately the number of donor hearts is very low and therefore new therapies are subject of investigation. Cell transplantation therapy upon myocardial infarction is a very promising strategy to replace the dead myocardium with viable cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, thereby reducing scarring and improving cardiac performance. Despite promising results, resulting in reduced infarct size and improved cardiac function on short term, only a few cells survive the ischemic milieu and are retained in the heart, thereby minimizing long-term effects. Although new capillaries and cardiomyocytes are formed around the infarcted area, only a small percentage of the transplanted cells can be detected months after myocardial infarction. This suggests the stimulation of an endogenous regenerative capacity of the heart upon cell transplantation, resulting from release of growth factor, cytokine and other paracrine molecules by the progenitor cells--the so-called paracrine hypothesis. Here, we focus on a relative new component of paracrine signalling, i.e. exosomes. We are interested in the release and function of exosomes derived from cardiac progenitor cells and studied their effects on the migratory capacity of endothelial cells.

Stem cell therapy for end-stage heart failure: indispensable role for the cell?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For heart failure patients, the urgent need for heart transplantation exceeds the availability of donor hearts. Therefore, cell transplantation has emerged as an interesting and potential solution. This review will focus on the capability of different types of stem cells to regenerate the heart. Moreover, the mechanism for success will be addressed, focusing on the specific (and indispensable?) role of the cells. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, many types of stem cells have been described as a possible source for cell transplantation in failing hearts, with mixed outcomes. Cell transplantation is hampered by suboptimal delivery techniques, limited survival of cells, and reduced proliferation and differentiation rates in vivo. Interestingly, the number of injected cells that engrafted the heart successfully cannot explain the observed beneficial effects and, therefore, paracrine effects are suggested for the success in cell therapy. SUMMARY: This review summarizes the current types of stem or progenitor cells used in cardiac cell therapy and beneficial effects on heart function and morphology in preclinical studies. Currently, the observed effects suggest that paracrine effects might be responsible, thereby triggering mobilization and activation of resident (stem) cells, which challenges the classical concept and true regenerative capacity of cell therapy at this point.

Cell therapy for ischaemic heart disease: focus on the role of resident cardiac stem cells.

Myocardial infarction results in loss of cardiomyocytes, scar formation, ventricular remodelling, and eventually heart failure. In recent years, cell therapy has emerged as a potential new strategy for patients with ischaemic heart disease. This includes embryonic and bone marrow derived stem cells. Recent clinical studies showed ostensibly conflicting results of intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow derived stem cells in patients with acute or chronic myocardial infarction. Anyway, these results have stimulated additional clinical and pre-clinical studies to further enhance the beneficial effects of stem cell therapy. Recently, the existence of cardiac stem cells that reside in the heart itself was demonstrated. Their discovery has sparked intense hope for myocardial regeneration with cells that are obtained from the heart itself and are thereby inherently programmed to reconstitute cardiac tissue. These cells can be detected by several surface markers (e.g. c-kit, Sca-1, MDR1, Isl-1). Both in vitro and in vivo differentiation into cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells has been demonstrated, and animal studies showed promising results on improvement of left ventricular function. This review will discuss current views regarding the feasibility of cardiac repair, and focus on the potential role of the resident cardiac stem and progenitor cells. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:199-207.).

Suppression of T cells by mesenchymal and cardiac progenitor cells is partly mediated via extracellular vesicles.

Adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) is strongly influenced by T cells. Stem cell therapy after MI, using mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) or cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPC), improved cardiac function, despite low cell retention and limited differentiation. As MSC secrete many factors affecting T cell proliferation and function, we hypothesized the immune response could be affected as one of the targets of stem cell therapy. Therefore, we studied the immunosuppressive properties of human BM-MSC and CMPC and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) in co-culture with activated T cells. Proliferation of T cells, measured by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester dilution, was significantly reduced in the presence of BM-MSC and CMPC. The inflammatory cytokine panel of the T cells in co-culture, measured by Luminex assay, changed, with strong downregulation of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. The effect on proliferation was observed in both direct cell contact and transwell co-culture systems. Transfer of conditioned medium to unrelated T cells abrogated proliferation in these cells. EVs isolated from the conditioned medium of BM-MSC and CMPC prevented T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. Progenitor cells presence induces up- and downregulation of multiple previously unreported pathways in T cells. In conclusion, both BM-MSC and CMPC have a strong capacity for in vitro immunosuppression. This effect is mediated by paracrine factors, such as extracellular vesicles. Besides proliferation, many additional pathways are influenced by both BM-MSC and CMPC.