The design and methods of genetic studies on acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients after total knee replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Total knee replacement (TKR) is the treatment option of choice for the millions of individuals whose osteoarthritis pain can no longer be managed through non-invasive methods. Over 500,000 TKRs are performed annually in the United States. Although most patients report improvement in pain and functioning following TKR, up to 30% report persistent pain that interferes with daily function. However, the reasons for poor outcomes are not clear. To best determine which patients are at risk for pain post TKR, a detailed and comprehensive approach is needed. In this article, we present the methodology of a study designed to identify a set of genetic, proteomic, clinical, demographic, psychosocial, and psychophysical risk factors for severe acute and chronic pain post TKR. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study. SETTING: University Hospital System. SUBJECTS: Patients scheduled for unilateral TKR with a target number of 150. METHODS: Prior to surgery, we collect demographic, psychosocial, and pain data. Biological data, including blood samples for genetic analyses, and serum, urine, and joint fluid for cytokine assessment are collected intraoperatively. Pain assessments as well as medication use are collected during each of the three days postsurgery. Additionally, pain and psychosocial information is collected 6 and 12 months following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study, for the first time, captures the information on both genetic and "environmental" risk factors for acute and chronic pain post-TKR and has the potential to lead to the next step-multicenter large-scale studies on predictors and biomarkers of poor TKR outcomes as well as on tailored interventions and personalized medicine approaches for those at risk.

THA with a minimally invasive technique, multi-modal anesthesia, and home rehabilitation: factors associated with early discharge?

UNLABELLED: Multimodal anesthetic and pain regimens with minimally invasive surgical approaches and rapid rehabilitation protocols are thought to decrease length of stay after hip replacement. We asked whether a program including these three elements could achieve 23-hour discharge in a group of 665 patients and whether the length of hospital stay was influenced by patient age, gender, body mass index, change in hemoglobin or estimated blood loss, duration of surgery (< or = 90 or > 90 minutes), or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. Of the 665 patients, 259 (38.9%) were discharged home with indwelling peripheral nerve catheters. Hospital discharge in less than 24 hours was achieved in 295 (44.4%) of the 665 patients. After discharge, 73.5% of patients required no home or outpatient nursing care or physical therapy. Eighteen (2.7%) dislocations, eight (1.2%) femoral fractures requiring surgery, and thirteen (2.0%) revision procedures occurred within 90 days. Female gender, increasing age, increasing estimated blood loss, and American Association of Anesthesiologists classification 3 or 4 increased length of stay. Additional study is needed to confirm these factors and develop prospective prediction rules to allow for an outpatient approach to joint arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.