RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative periorbital edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty are mainly caused by the osteotomy with hammer and chisel. The introduction of piezoelectric surgery could lead to a better early postoperative outcome due to improved preservation of soft tissues. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the methods and results of studies comparing conventional osteotomy to piezoelectric osteotomy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases. In the primary selection, all studies on the comparison of conventional and piezoelectric osteotomies with regard to postoperative periorbital edema and/or ecchymosis were identified. Secondary selection included only study designs with a control group. RESULTS: Primary selection resulted in 15 thematically relevant publications with a notable increase in annual publications between 2007 and 2017. Six studies with control groups were selected secondarily. Qualitatively and methodologically, the studies were very heterogeneous. The results of five of the six studies indicated a significant advantage of piezo technology compared to conventional osteotomy. Only in one study was no significant difference found in the investigated postoperative outcome. CONCLUSION: Piezoelectric osteotomy resulted in a reduced propensity for postoperative edema and ecchymosis compared to the conventional osteotomy technique with a chisel. At this time, the results should be regarded as a trend. A definite recommendation favoring piezoelectric osteotomy cannot be made until more studies with higher patient numbers become available.
Asunto(s)
Osteotomía/métodos , Piezocirugía , Rinoplastia , Equimosis/etiología , Equimosis/prevención & control , Edema/etiología , Edema/prevención & control , Humanos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Rinoplastia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Subjective assessments of quality of life (QOL) as an important aspect of outcome research have gained in importance over the past few decades. The number of prospective studies on postoperative QOL in septorhinoplasty using disease-specific instruments is sparse. The aim was to assess and compare patient QOL after primary and revision septorhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon in an ENT center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients completed two disease-specific QOL instruments preoperatively and at least 1 year postoperatively: the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) scores. General demographic and clinical information (age, gender, medical and surgical history) were collected from all patients. All operations were performed by a single surgeon (F. R.). RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were included in the study, 208 (87.8%) female and 29 (12.2%) male. The average age was 30.3⯱ 8.9 years. The average observation period was 19.3⯱ 7.4 months. Using the measurement tool NOSE there was a significant improvement in obstruction in the overall collective (preoperative 49.8⯱ 26.2, postoperative 19.1⯱ 21.3; pâ¯< 0.001) with no significant difference in primary versus revision surgery. The ROE score showed a significant improvement and both collectives (primary and secondary surgery) showed a significant improvement after the intervention. The patients with a primary intervention had a significantly higher postoperative QOL (pâ¯< 0.001). CONCLUSION: The disease-specific QOL showed a significant increase after primary septorhinoplasty as well as after revision surgery. The NOSE score increased significantly in both intervention groups postoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Nasal , Calidad de Vida , Rinoplastia , Adulto , Estética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Tabique Nasal , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare soft tissue infection characterized by rapidly progressing necroses and a high mortality. Prompt diagnosis and immediate medical treatment including radical debridement and broad spectrum antibiotics are the key to successful management. We report on a 46-year-old diabetic female who developed extensive, deep necroses in the perineal area and proximal thighs within a few days. After initial gynaecological consultation, she was transferred directly to our department. Due to the suspicion of NF, an immediate radical debridement was performed. Two more debridements were necessary to control the infection. After stabilization, the extensive soft tissue defect was reconstructed using a combination of plastic reconstructive procedures. Due to early diagnosis, direct referral and immediate surgical treatment, the patient survived.
RESUMEN
Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) has been successfully tested as neuroprotectant in brain injury models. The first large clinical trial with stroke patients, however, revealed negative results. Reasons are manifold and may include side-effects such as thrombotic complications or interactions with other medication, EPO concentration, penetration of the blood-brain-barrier and/or route of application. The latter is restricted to systemic application. Here we hypothesize that EPO is neuroprotective in a rat model of acute subdural hemorrhage (ASDH) and that direct cortical application is a feasible route of application in this injury type. The subdural hematoma was surgically evacuated and EPO was applied directly onto the surface of the brain. We injected NaCl, 200, 2000 or 20,000IU EPO per rat i.v. at 15min post-ASDH (400µl autologous venous blood) or NaCl, 0.02, 0.2 or 2IU per rat onto the cortical surface after removal of the subdurally infused blood t at 70min post-ASDH. Arterial blood pressure (MAP), blood chemistry, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral blood flow (CBF) and brain tissue oxygen (ptiO2) were assessed during the first hour and lesion volume at 2days after ASDH. EPO 20,000IU/rat (i.v.) elevated ICP significantly. EPO at 200 and 2000IU reduced lesion volume from 38.2±0.6mm(3) (NaCl-treated group) to 28.5±0.9 and 22.2±1.3mm(3) (all p<0.05 vs. NaCl). Cortical application of 0.02IU EPO after ASDH evacuation reduced injury from 36.0±5.2 to 11.2±2.1mm(3) (p=0.007), whereas 0.2IU had no effect (38.0±9.0mm(3)). The highest dose of both application routes (i.v. 20,000IU; cortical 2IU) enlarged the ASDH-induced damage significantly to 46.5±1.7 and 67.9±10.4mm(3) (all p<0.05 vs. NaCl). In order to test whether Tween-20, a solvent of EPO formulation 'NeoRecomon®' was responsible for adverse effects two groups were treated with NaCl or Tween-20 after the evacuation of ASDH, but no difference in lesion volume was detected. In conclusion, EPO is neuroprotective in a model of ASDH in rats and was most efficacious at a very low dose in combination with subdural blood removal. High systemic and topically applied concentrations caused adverse effects on lesion size which were partially due to increased ICP. Thus, patients with traumatic ASDH could be treated with cortically applied EPO but with caution concerning concentration.