Sexual-orientation disparities in cigarette smoking in a longitudinal cohort study of adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Youths with a minority sexual orientation (i.e., gay, lesbian, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual) are at high risk for cigarette smoking. We examined sexual-orientation disparities in smoking during adolescence and emerging adulthood and investigated the role of age at first smoking in contributing to smoking disparities. METHODS: We used data from the Growing Up Today Study, a large longitudinal cohort of adolescents followed from ages 12 to 24 years (N = 13,913). Self-administered questionnaires filled out annually or biennially assessed age at first smoking, current smoking, frequency of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked daily, and nicotine dependence. Proportional hazards survival analysis and repeated measures regression estimated sexual-orientation differences in smoking. RESULTS: Compared with completely heterosexuals, lesbian/gay, bisexual, and mostly heterosexual youths smoked their first cigarette at younger ages, were more likely to be current smokers, and had higher frequency of smoking. Among past-year smokers, sexual-minority females smoked more cigarettes daily and scored higher on nicotine dependence than completely heterosexual females. In some instances, gender and age modified relationships between sexual orientation and smoking, with relative risk accentuated in female sexual minorities and in sexual minorities during younger ages. Younger age of smoking onset contributed to elevated smoking in mostly heterosexuals and bisexuals, and to a lesser extent in lesbians, but not in gay males. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual-orientation minorities are at greater risk for smoking during adolescence and emerging adulthood than heterosexuals. Disparities are larger in females and evident in early adolescence. Prevention and cessation efforts should target this population, preferably beginning in early adolescence.

Second-hand smoke exposure and mitigation strategies among home visitation workers.

OBJECTIVES: Protection of workers from second-hand smoke (SHS) in occupational settings is an important policy priority, yet little attention has been given to SHS protection for home visitation health workers, who number almost 2 million in the USA. Self-reported SHS exposure, SHS mitigation strategies and suggestions for further SHS exposure reduction approaches were obtained from home visitation health workers in Massachusetts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Massachusetts Early Intervention workers (N=316) at their state-wide conference in April 2010. RESULTS: Eighty-three per cent of respondents reported at least 1 hour per month of SHS exposure, and 16% reported at least 11 hours per month. Nevertheless, only 22% of workers counselled clients on maintaining a smoke-free home. Fewer than 30% of workers had ever voiced concerns to their employing agency, and just 12% had raised their concerns directly with clients. Only 14% stated that their agency had rules designed to protect workers from SHS. CONCLUSIONS: SHS exposure occurs frequently among home visitation health workers. The data point to a substantial population who are not protected from SHS exposure by formal policies.

Front-loaded versus weekly counseling for treatment of tobacco addiction.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 60%-70% of cigarette smokers who try to quit relapse by 2 weeks postcessation. We tested the efficacy of a front-loaded (FL) counseling intervention whose goal was to increase the likelihood of successful early abstinence and subsequent long-term abstinence. METHODS: We randomized 278 adult smokers to an FL or weekly behavioral smoking cessation counseling schedule. The total number of sessions across treatment was the same for both groups. However, those assigned to the FL schedule received 6 counseling sessions in the first 2 weeks postcessation, while those in the weekly condition received 2 sessions. Participants in both groups also received standard nicotine patch treatment. RESULTS: At 1 year postcessation, FL participants were significantly less likely to have relapsed when continuous abstinence was used as the definition of abstinence/relapse (11.7% abstinent vs. 6.3%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, p = .007); and there were nonsignificant trends for FL subjects to have better outcomes when abstinence was defined as never smoking for 7 or more consecutive days nor for 7 or more consecutive episodes (18.4% abstinent vs. 14.8%, HR = 0.83, p = .20) and as point prevalence abstinence (15.6% abstinent vs. 12.9%, p = .11). The relationship between FL counseling treatment and continuous abstinence was partially mediated by higher postcessation levels of social support perceived from counseling and greater use of cessation-related coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that FL counseling is a promising treatment model that should be evaluated further, perhaps using modifications of the FL schedule used in this study.

Improving Breast Cancer Control via the Use of Community Health Workers in South Africa: A Critical Review.

Breast cancer is a growing concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMCs). We explore community health worker (CHW) programs and describe their potential use in LMCs. We use South Africa as an example of how CHWs could improve access to breast health care because of its middle-income status, existing cancer centers, and history of CHW programs. CHWs could assume three main roles along the cancer control continuum: health education, screening, and patient navigation. By raising awareness about breast cancer through education, women are more likely to undergo screening. Many more women can be screened resulting in earlier-stage disease if CHWs are trained to perform clinical breast exams. As patient navigators, CHWs can guide women through the screening and treatment process. It is suggested that these roles be combined within existing CHW programs to maximize resources and improve breast cancer outcomes in LMCs.