Initial Experience With SARS-CoV-2-Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies in Kidney or Combined Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients.

Background: Antiviral drugs have shown little impact in patient infected with acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Especially for immunocompromised persons positive for SARS-CoV-2, novel treatments are warranted. Recently, the U.S. FDA has granted an emergency use authorization (EUA) to two monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the viral spike protein: bamlanivimab and casivirimab and imdevimab. As per the EUA, all SARS-CoV-2 positive organ transplant recipients can receive mAb treatment. Patients and methods: We queried our center's transplant registry to identify SARS-CoV-2 infected recipients treated with single doses of either Bamlanivimab or casivirimab/imdevimab up to May 31, 2021. We analyzed clinical outcomes, renal function and virus-specific antibodies. The co-primary endpoints were hospitalization due to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negativity. Results: Thirteen patients at a median interval of 55 (IQR, 26-110) months from transplant were treated: 8 with bamlanivimab and 5 with casivirimab/imdevimab. In all, 4/13 (31%) patients were hospitalized at some time, while 11/13 (85%) achieved PCR negativity. 2/4 hospitalized patients received mAb as rescue treatment. Overall mortality was 23%, with one death attributable to transplant-associated lymphoma. All six patients infected with the B 1.1.7 variant were alive at last contact. Conclusion: mAb treatment appears effective when administered early to SARS-CoV-2-infected transplant recipients.

Exploring the Complexity of Death-Censored Kidney Allograft Failure.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have thoroughly investigated the causes of kidney graft loss (GL), despite its importance. METHODS: A novel approach assigns each persistent and relevant decline in renal function over the lifetime of a renal allograft to a standardized category, hypothesizing that singular or multiple events finally lead to GL. An adjudication committee of three physicians retrospectively evaluated indication biopsies, laboratory testing, and medical history of all 303 GLs among all 1642 recipients of transplants between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2017 at a large university hospital to assign primary and/or secondary causes of GL. RESULTS: In 51.2% of the patients, more than one cause contributed to GL. The most frequent primary or secondary causes leading to graft failure were intercurrent medical events in 36.3% of graft failures followed by T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 34% and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in 30.7%. In 77.9%, a primary cause could be attributed to GL, of which ABMR was most frequent (21.5%). Many causes for GL were identified, and predominant causes for GL varied over time. CONCLUSIONS: GL is often multifactorial and more complex than previously thought.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Anti-IL-6 Antibody Clazakizumab in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of transplant failure. Blocking IL-6 has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy. METHODS: We performed a phase 2 randomized pilot trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint analysis) of the anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late ABMR. The trial included 20 kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific, antibody-positive ABMR ≥365 days post-transplantation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 25 mg clazakizumab or placebo (4-weekly subcutaneous injections) for 12 weeks (part A), followed by a 40-week open-label extension (part B), during which time all participants received clazakizumab. RESULTS: Five (25%) patients under active treatment developed serious infectious events, and two (10%) developed diverticular disease complications, leading to trial withdrawal. Those receiving clazakizumab displayed significantly decreased donor-specific antibodies and, on prolonged treatment, modulated rejection-related gene-expression patterns. In 18 patients, allograft biopsies after 51 weeks revealed a negative molecular ABMR score in seven (38.9%), disappearance of capillary C4d deposits in five (27.8%), and resolution of morphologic ABMR activity in four (22.2%). Although proteinuria remained stable, the mean eGFR decline during part A was slower with clazakizumab compared with placebo (-0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -1.96 to 0.03 versus -2.43; 95% CI, -3.40 to -1.46 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per month, respectively, P=0.04). During part B, the slope of eGFR decline for patients who were switched from placebo to clazakizumab improved and no longer differed significantly from patients initially allocated to clazakizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Although safety data indicate the need for careful patient selection and monitoring, our preliminary efficacy results suggest a potentially beneficial effect of clazakizumab on ABMR activity and progression.

Predictors of graft survival at diagnosis of antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: a retrospective single-center cohort study.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. We assessed the predictive value of clinical, pathological, and immunological parameters at diagnosis for graft survival. We investigated 54 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven ABMR. Patients were treated according to our current standard regimen followed by triple maintenance immunosuppression. Patient characteristics, renal function, and HLA antibody status at diagnosis, baseline biopsy results, and immunosuppressive treatment were recorded. The risk of graft loss at 24 months after diagnosis and the eGFR slope were assessed. Multivariate analysis showed that eGFR at diagnosis and chronic glomerulopathy independently predict graft loss (HR 0.94; P = 0.018 and HR 1.57; P = 0.045) and eGFR slope (beta 0.46; P < 0.001 and beta -5.47; P < 0.001). Cyclophosphamide treatment (6× 15 mg/m2 ) plus high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (1.5 g/kg) was superior compared with single-dose rituximab (1× 500 mg) plus low-dose IVIG (30 g) (HR 0.10; P = 0.008 and beta 10.70; P = 0.017) and one cycle of bortezomib (4× 1.3 mg/m2 ) plus low-dose IVIG (HR 0.16; P = 0.049 and beta 11.21; P = 0.010) regarding the risk of graft loss and the eGFR slope. In conclusion, renal function at diagnosis and histopathological signs of chronic ABMR seem to predict graft survival independent of the applied treatment regimen. Stepwise modifications of the treatment regimen may help to improve outcome.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in renal transplantation: a single-center comparison between two regimens and a brief survey among the Eurotransplant renal transplantation centers.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is an integral part of kidney transplantation to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). In July 2015, we changed our standard from a multiple-dose to a single-dose (SD) prophylaxis. Here, we report on results with both regimens and a related survey among Eurotransplant renal transplantation centers. METHODS: From July 2015, all kidney graft recipients of our center were scheduled to receive SD i.v. cefazolin (group SD, n = 107). They were compared to patients, transplanted since January 2014, receiving our previous standard (i.v. piperacillin/flucloxacillin) until postoperative day (POD) 7, plus oral sultamicillin until POD 10 (group MD, n = 105). The primary endpoint was the number of SSIs during a 3-month observational period. RESULTS: The frequency of SSI episodes was generally low (group SD vs. MD: 2 vs. 4, p = 0.40). Of note, urinary tract infections occurred in 40 SD vs. 36 MD patients, respectively (p = 0.60). Urinary tract infections were caused by Escherichia coli in 36.8%. Female gender was the only independent risk factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.002). In addition, 12 episodes of urosepsis in both groups occurred. All-cause infection with multi-resistant bacteria occurred less frequently in SD vs. MD patients (3.7% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.16). A majority of Eurotransplant centers used i.v. single-dose cephalosporins (36.9%), although substances and duration varied remarkably. CONCLUSION: Single-dose cefazolin was equally effective and less expensive compared to our previous MD regimen. Based on these findings, we conclude that future prospective studies should be designed to confirm the non-inferiority of single-dose antibiotic regimens.

Bioavailability and costs of once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation.

The use of once-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation is increasingly common. Therefore, we were interested in bioavailability aspects of novel once-daily tacrolimus (LCPT, Envarsus) and once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (ER-Tac, Advagraf) compared with twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac, Prograf). Furthermore, we calculated the costs. Kidney allograft recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression within 2 clinical trials were included in a single-center analysis. The tacrolimus formulations were compared with respect to daily doses, doses per body weight, trough levels, and concentration-dose (C/D) ratio over 12 months. Intrapatient variability in trough levels and C/D ratios after 3 months was calculated. For the calculation of tacrolimus costs, German list prices were used. Eighty patients (21 with LCPT, 23 with IR-Tac, and 36 with ER-Tac) were analyzed. Pharmacokinetic comparisons revealed significantly higher bioavailability of LCPT at all visits. The variability of trough levels and C/D ratios in general was high and highest in LCPT patients. Different dose requirements translated into different costs. Median treatment costs during the first year were 7.825€ (IQR 6.195-8.892€) for LCPT, 9.813€ (IQR 7.630-16.832€) for IR-Tac, and 9.838€ (IQR 7.503- 13.541€) for ER-Tac (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .003). The 3 tacrolimus formulations exhibit different dose requirements, exposure, and costs in favor of LCPT.

Dynamics and epitope specificity of anti-human leukocyte antibodies following renal allograft nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of patients awaiting kidney transplantation is immunized by previous transplantation(s). We investigated how allograft nephrectomy (Nx) and withdrawal of maintenance immunosuppression (WD-MIS) in patients with a failed renal allograft contribute to allosensitization. METHODS: HLA antibodies (HLAabs) were analyzed before and after Nx and/or WD-MIS using a single antigen bead assay. Patients were grouped as follows: (A) Nx and concomitant WD-MIS (n = 28), (B) Nx (n = 14) and (C) WD-MIS (n = 12). In a subgroup of patients, the epitope specificity of HLAabs was determined by adsorption and elution of sera with recombinant single HLA allele-expressing cell lines. RESULTS: Following Nx and/or WD-MIS, HLAabs were detectable in 100, 100 and 92% of patients in Groups A, B and C, respectively. In patients of all groups, de novo donor-specific HLAabs (DSAs) were found. After Nx, an increase in the breadth [percent panel reactive antibody (%PRA)] and mean fluorescence intensity of class I HLAabs was predominant. In contrast, an increase of class II HLAabs prevailed following WD-MIS. Experimental analysis of the epitope specificities revealed that 64% of the class I HLAabs classically denoted as non-DSA were donor epitope-specific HLAabs (DESA). CONCLUSIONS: Both Nx and WD-MIS contribute to alloimmunization with differing patterns concerning class I and II HLAabs. Nx preferentially increased class I HLAabs and most of the observed class I HLAabs were DESA. Considering that class I, but not class II, HLA molecules are constitutively expressed, our results support the hypothesis that the increase of HLAabs following Nx might have been caused by removal of the adsorbing donor tissue (sponge hypothesis).

Immunologic outcome in elderly kidney transplant recipients: is it time for HLA-DR matching?

BACKGROUND: The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) neglects HLA matching for elderly (≥65 years) kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Few data regarding the influence of DR matching on clinical and immunologic outcome in elderly KTR exist. METHODS: This retrospective long-term observational study included 244 elderly out of n = 972 adult KTR between 2004 and 2014. Data analysis included patient and graft survival, biopsy-proven rejections [T-cell-mediated rejections (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejections] and development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). Outcome data were assessed over a maximum period of 10 years. RESULTS: Due to the nature of the ESP, elderly KTR showed significantly more HLA mismatches, shorter time on dialysis and shorter cold ischaemia time. Elderly KTR had significantly worse graft and patient survival, and after 7 years, the rate of de novo DSA (33 versus 25%, P = 0.034) and TCMR (39 versus 27%, P < 0.001) was significantly higher compared with younger KTR. Multivariate analysis identified donor age, delayed graft function and HLA-DR mismatches as independent risk factors for TCMR. Within the group of elderly KTR, HLA-DR mismatches were associated with a significantly higher incidence of TCMR and development of de novo DSA. Occurrence of TCMR and de novo DSA in elderly KTR resulted in significantly worse graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly KTR, HLA-DR mismatches are independent risk factors for TCMR and the development of all classes of de novo DSA, both of which significantly impair graft survival. Introduction of HLA-DR matching in elderly KTR might significantly improve immunologic and overall outcome.

Pretransplant virtual PRA and long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients.

Virtual panel-reactive antibodies (vPRA) have been implemented to gauge sensitization worldwide. It is unclear how it associates with long-term outcomes, and its correlation with peak (pPRA) or actual (aPRA) has not been studied. We retrospectively reviewed data from 18- to 65-year-old kidney-only transplant patients during 1.1.1996-31.7.2011 in our center. PRAs were calculated based on solid-phase techniques. Of the 726 qualified cases, regardless of the PRA type, sensitized patients (PRA > 5%) had more females and previous transplant. Highly sensitized (HS, PRA > 50%) had longer waiting time, lower transplant rate, less living donor, more delayed graft function, and acute rejection. The conformity between vPRA and pPRA in HS was 75%, 57% between pPRA and aPRA. Forty-three percent (61/142) patients whose pPRA was >5% had no detectable aPRA and maintained similar outcomes as sensitized patients. Multivariate analysis showed consistently lower death-censored graft survival in HS defined by vPRA [HR 2.086 (95% CI 1.078-4.037), P < 0.05] and pPRA [HR 2.139 (95% CI 1.024-4.487), P < 0.05]. Both vPRA and pPRA provided reliable way estimating sensitization and predicting long-term graft survival, while aPRA might underestimate true sensitization. vPRA might be the most objective parameter to gauge sensitization.

Midterm echocardiographic follow-up of cardiac function after living kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation (LKD) has become increasingly important as more patients reach end-stage renal disease. While safety of the donor is of utmost importance, recent data have suggested an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality after LKD. Therefore, we assessed the changes of cardiac structure and function after LKD by advanced echocardiographic methods. METHODS: 30 living kidney donors were evaluated by medical examination, laboratory testing, and echocardiography before and after LKD (median follow-up 19.5 months). Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function was assessed by echocardiographic standard indices. Longitudinal 2D strain of the LV and left atrium (LA) was determined by 2D speckle tracking. RESULTS: Serum creatinine increased significantly from 0.80 ± 0.12 mg/dL to 1.18 ± 0.21 mg/ dL (p < 0.001) after LKD. There was a trend to higher blood pressure after LKD, accompanied with significantly higher intake of antihypertensive drugs. Echocardiographic parameters of LV, LA, and RV function did not change significantly after LKD. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels remained within normal ranges after LKD. CONCLUSION: The rise in serum creatinine and blood pressure indicates that patients have a potentially higher cardiac risk after LKD. However, our pilot study found no evidence for detrimental effects of LKD on cardiac structure and function within a relatively short-term follow-up.

Outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two laparoscopic surgeons with different levels of expertise.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of surgeon experience on donor and recipient outcomes after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN). Results of a LLDN expert were compared with those of an LLDN novice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and October 2010 the last 20 cases of a series of 130 consecutive LLDNs, performed by an expert (EXP) were compared with the first 20 cases of an LLDN novice (NOV). Donor and recipient outcomes were evaluated. The novice was mentored by the expert during his initial four LLDN cases. RESULTS: Donor and recipient demographics were not different between the two surgeon groups. Total operating time and warm ischaemia time during LLDN was significantly longer in the NOV group compared with the EXP group (273 min vs 147 min and 213 s vs 162 s, respectively). The incidence of donor complications was low in both groups. Length of hospital stay among donors did not differ between groups. Although delayed graft function, rejection rates and postoperative serum creatinine levels indicated slightly poorer recipient outcomes in the NOV group, differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Mentoring by an experienced urological laparoscopist may help an LLDN novice to generate acceptable donor and recipient outcomes. Whether or not prolonged operating times and warm ischaemia times during the early phase of an LLDN experience are risk factors for impaired graft function needs further evaluation.

Volume matters: CT-based renal cortex volume measurement in the evaluation of living kidney donors.

Currently, no international standard for the pre-transplant evaluation of living donor renal function exists. Following a standardized questionnaire on current practice in all Eurotransplant (ET) centers, we compared a new CT-based technique to measure renal cortex volume with our standard of DTPA-clearance combined with MAG3-scintigraphy (DTPA × MAG3) and with creatinine-based methods in 167 consecutive living kidney donors. Most ET centers use creatinine-clearance (64%) to measure total renal function and radioistopic methods (82%) to assess split renal function. Before transplantation, CT-measured total cortex volume (r = 0.67; P < 0.001) and estimated GFR using the Cockcroft-Gault formula [eGFR(CG)] (r = 0.55; P < 0.001) showed the strongest correlation with DTPA-clearance. In contrast, the correlation between DTPA-clearance and creatinine clearance was weak (r = 0.21; P = 0.02). A strong correlation was observed between CT-measured split cortex volume and MAG3-measured split renal function (r = 0.93; P < 0.001). A strong correlation was also found between pre-transplant split renal function assessed by eGFR(CG) together with cortex volume measurement and post-transplant eGFR(CG) of both, the donor (r = 0.83; P < 0.001) and the recipient (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). In conclusion CT-based assessment of renal cortex volume bears the potential to substitute existing methods to assess pre-transplant living donor split renal function.

Risk Factors for Hepatitis E Virus Infection and Eating Habits in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

There is a significant risk for ongoing and treatment-resistant courses of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in patients after solid organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of hepatitis E, including the dietary habits of patients. We conducted a retrospective single-center study with 59 adult kidney and combined kidney transplant recipients who were diagnosed with HEV infection between 2013 and 2020. The outcomes of HEV infections were analyzed during a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Patients were compared with a control cohort of 251 transplant patients with elevated liver enzymes but without evidence of an HEV infection. Patients' alimentary exposures during the time before disease onset or diagnosis were assessed. Previous intense immunosuppression, especially treatment with high-dose steroids and rituximab, was a significant risk factor to acquire hepatitis E after solid organ transplantation. Only 11 out of 59 (18.6%) patients reached remission without further ribavirin (RBV) treatment. A total of 48 patients were treated with RBV, of which 19 patients (39.6%) had either viral rebounds after the end of treatment or did not reach viral clearance at all. Higher age (>60 years) and a BMI ≤ 20 kg/m2 were risk factors for RBV treatment failure. Deterioration in kidney function with a drop in eGFR (p = 0.046) and a rise in proteinuria was more common in patients with persistent hepatitis E viremia. HEV infection was associated with the consumption of undercooked pork or pork products prior to infection. Patients also reported processing raw meat with bare hands at home more frequently than the controls. Overall, we showed that the intensity of immunosuppression, higher age, a low BMI and the consumption of undercooked pork meat correlated with the development of hepatitis E.

COVID-19 Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a German Transplant Center.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show higher morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 than the general population and have an impaired response to vaccination. We analyzed COVID-19 incidence and clinical outcomes in a single-center cohort of approximately 2500 KTRs. Between 1 February 2020 and 1 July 2022, 578 KTRs were infected with SARS-CoV-2, with 25 (4%) recurrent infections. In total, 208 KTRs (36%) were hospitalized, and 39 (7%) died. Among vaccinated patients, infection with the Omicron variant had a mortality of 2%. Unvaccinated patients infected with the Omicron variant showed mortality (9% vs. 11%) and morbidity (hospitalization 52% vs. 54%, ICU admission 12% vs. 18%) comparable to the pre-Omicron era. Multivariable analysis revealed that being unvaccinated (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.38, 3.35]), infection in the pre-Omicron era (OR = 3.06, 95% CI [1.92, 4.87]), and higher patient age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.03, 1.06]) are independent risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization, whereas a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen was found to reduce the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33, 0.79]). This suggests that both virological changes in the Omicron variant and vaccination reduce the risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in KTRs. Our data extend the knowledge from the general population to KTRs and provide important insights into outcomes during the Omicron era.

Comparison between bortezomib and rituximab in the treatment of antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following kidney transplantation is associated with poor allograft survival. Conventional treatment based on plasmapheresis (PPH) and the administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) is not satisfactory. Two compounds, more specifically targeting B cells and plasma cells, may help to improve the prognosis: rituximab, a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, and bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor causing apoptosis of plasma cells. METHODS: Starting in February 2009, we treated 10 consecutive patients with ABMR according to current Banff criteria with one cycle of bortezomib [1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), Day 1, 4, 8, 11]. This group was compared to a historical control group of patients (n = 9) treated with a fixed single dose of rituximab (500 mg i.v.). All patients received PPH (6×) and IVIG (30 g). Patients with acute ABMR additionally received methylprednisolone (3 × 500 mg i.v.). RESULTS: Patient survival in both groups was 100%. At 18 months after treatment, graft survival was 6/10 in the bortezomib group as compared to 1/9 functioning grafts in the rituximab group (P = 0.071). Renal function was superior in patients treated with bortezomib as compared to rituximab-treated patients (serum creatinine at 9 months: 2.5 ± 0.6 versus 5.1 ± 2.1 mg/dL, P = 0.008). Proteinuria was not different between both groups (9 months: 1.3 ± 1.0 versus 1.6 ± 1.6 g/day, P = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ABMR with bortezomib in addition to standard therapy was partially effective, whereas treatment with a fixed dose of rituximab in addition to standard therapy with PPH and IVIG did not result in sufficient long-term graft survival. In the future, new strategies including the combination of both substances and the application of higher doses must be discussed.

Serological Response to Three, Four and Five Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Mortality from COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is high, and their response to three vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 is strongly impaired. We retrospectively analyzed the serological response of up to five doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in KTR from 27 December 2020 until 31 December 2021. Particularly, the influence of the different dose adjustment regimens for mycophenolic acid (MPA) on serological response to fourth vaccination was analyzed. In total, 4277 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 in 1478 patients were analyzed. Serological response was 19.5% after 1203 basic immunizations, and increased to 29.4%, 55.6%, and 57.5% in response to 603 third, 250 fourth, and 40 fifth vaccinations, resulting in a cumulative response rate of 88.7%. In patients with calcineurin inhibitor and MPA maintenance immunosuppression, pausing MPA and adding 5 mg prednisolone equivalent before the fourth vaccination increased the serological response rate to 75% in comparison to the no dose adjustment (52%) or dose reduction (46%). Belatacept-treated patients had a response rate of 8.7% (4/46) after three vaccinations and 12.5% (3/25) after four vaccinations. Except for belatacept-treated patients, repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of up to five times effectively induces serological response in kidney transplant recipients. It can be enhanced by pausing MPA at the time of vaccination.

Predictors of Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Patients: Baseline Characteristics, Immunosuppression, and the Role of IMPDH Monitoring.

Immunosuppression increases the risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Morbidity and mortality of this disease in kidney transplant patients are higher than in the general population. As the vaccination response of transplant patients is weak, serological monitoring was performed. In this cohort study, we analyzed the determinants of vaccination response. All patients had no history of COVID-19. With anti-spike IgG monitoring, 148 responders and 415 non-responders were identified. We compared both groups using multivariate analyses of the cohort and a sub-cohort of mycophenolic-acid-treated patients. We investigated the influence of patient characteristics, immunosuppression, and erythrocyte inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity. In responders, the time after transplantation was longer (13.5 vs. 8.5 years), the glomerular filtration rate was higher (56.9 vs. 47.8 mL/min/1.73 m2), and responders were younger (53.0 vs. 57.4 years). Heterologous vaccination was more effective than homologous vaccination. Calcineurin inhibitors plus mycophenolate reduced the seroconversion rate. No seroconversion was observed in belatacept patients. In mycophenolate-treated patients, IMPDH activity was a significantly better predictor of response than mycophenolate dose (AUC 0.84 vs. 0.62, p < 0.001). Immunosuppression strongly affects vaccine response. Modifications to immunosuppression should be considered in order to facilitate this response. Erythrocyte IMPDH activity can be used to guide mycophenolate treatment.

Inosine 5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity for the Longitudinal Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid Treatment in Kidney Allograft Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a standard immunosuppressant in organ transplantation. A simple monitoring biomarker for MPA treatment has not been established so far. Here, we describe inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) monitoring in erythrocytes and its application to kidney allograft recipients. METHODS: IMPDH activity measurements were performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Based on 4203 IMPDH measurements from 1021 patients, we retrospectively explored the dynamics early after treatment start. In addition, we analyzed the influence of clinically relevant variables on IMPDH activity in a multivariate model using data from 711 stable patients. Associations between IMPDH activity and clinical events were evaluated in hospitalized patients. RESULTS: We found that IMPDH activity reflects MPA exposure after 8 weeks of constant dosing. In addition to dosage, body mass index, renal function, and coimmunosuppression affected IMPDH activity. Significantly lower IMPDH activities were found in patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection as compared to patients without rejection (median [interquartile range]: 696 [358-1484] versus 1265 [867-1618] pmol xanthosine-5'-monophosphate/h/mg hemoglobin, P < 0.001). The highest IMPDH activities were observed in hospitalized patients with clinically evident MPA toxicity as compared to patients with hospitalization not related to MPA treatment (1548 [1021-2270] versus 1072 [707-1439] pmol xanthosine-5'-monophosphate/h/mg hemoglobin; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses underlined the usefulness of IMPDH to predict rejection episodes (area, 0.662; confidence interval, 0.584-0.740; P < 0.001) and MPA-associated adverse events (area, 0.632; confidence interval, 0.581-0.683; P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IMPDH measurement in erythrocytes is a novel and useful strategy for the longitudinal monitoring of MPA treatment.

Clazakizumab in late antibody-mediated rejection: study protocol of a randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) triggered by donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a cardinal cause of kidney allograft dysfunction and loss. Diagnostic criteria for this rejection type are well established, but effective treatment remains a major challenge. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of widely used therapies, such as rituximab plus intravenous immunoglobulin or proteasome inhibition (bortezomib), reinforcing a great need for new therapeutic concepts. One promising target in this context may be interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pleiotropic cytokine known to play an important role in inflammation and adaptive immunity. METHODS: This investigator-driven RCT was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of clazakizumab, a genetically engineered humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-6. The study will include 20 DSA-positive kidney allograft recipients diagnosed with ABMR ≥ 365 days after transplantation. Participants will be recruited at two study sites in Austria and Germany (Medical University of Vienna; Charité University Medicine Berlin). First, patients will enter a three-month double-blind RCT (1,1 randomization, stratification according to ABMR phenotype and study site) and will receive either clazakizumab (subcutaneous administration of 25 mg in monthly intervals) or placebo. In a second open-label part of the trial (months 4-12), all patients will receive clazakizumab at 25 mg every month. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints are the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clazakizumab, its effect on drug metabolism in the liver, DSA characteristics, morphological ABMR lesions and molecular gene expression patterns in three- and 12-month protocol biopsies, serum/urinary biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial activation/injury, Torque Teno viral load as a measure of overall immunosuppression, kidney function, urinary protein excretion, as well as transplant and patient survival. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is no treatment proven to be effective in halting the progression of late ABMR. Based on the hypothesis that antagonizing the effects of IL-6 improves the outcome of DSA-positive late ABMR by counteracting DSA-triggered inflammation and B cell/plasma cell-driven alloimmunity, we suggest that our trial has the potential to provide proof of concept of a novel treatment of this type of rejection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03444103 . Registered on 23 February 2018 (retrospective registration).

Pharmacodynamic effects of everolimus on anti-CD3 antibody-stimulated T-lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-10 synthesis in stable kidney-transplant patients.

Everolimus (rapamycin derivative, RAD) is a new immunosuppressive drug that prevents allograft rejection. Herein, the pharmacodynamics of everolimus in human renal-allograft recipients is evaluated. Single doses of everolimus (0.75-10mg), combined with a maintenance immunosuppressive therapy based on CyA, decreased lymphocyte proliferation. In addition, the effect of multiple doses of everolimus (0.75-10mg) given daily for 21 days, to stable renal-allograft patients (n=11), was investigated. Everolimus treatment resulted in immediate inhibition (25-55%) of lymphocyte proliferation in renal-allograft recipients; values returning to baseline by 14 days after cessation of everolimus treatment. Placebo-treated patients showed no decrease in lymphocyte proliferation. Interestingly, everolimus reduced IL-10 synthesis by 20-60% in renal-allograft recipients. Phagocytosis rates were not changed by everolimus. In vitro, everolimus inhibited lymphocyte proliferation and IL-10 synthesis dose dependently in anti-CD3 mAb and LPS stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures derived from human volunteers.