RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Drain fluid amylase (DFA) levels have been used to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and guide postoperative drain management. Optimal DFA cutoff thresholds vary between studies, thereby prompting investigation of an alternative assessment technique. As DFA measurements could, in theory, be distorted by variations in ascites fluid production, we hypothesized that adjusting DFA for volume corrected drain fluid amylase (vDFA) would improve CR-POPF predictive models. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) and distal pancreatectomies (DP) between 2013 and 2019, was performed. DFAs and vDFAs were measured on postoperative day (POD) 3. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between cohorts by univariable and multivariable analyses and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Patients developing a CR-POPF were more likely to be male and have elevated DFA, vDFA, and body mass index (BMI). vDFA use did not contribute to a superior CR-POPF predictive model compared to DFA-a finding consistent on subanalysis of surgery type PD versus DP. In CR-POPF predictive models, DFA, vDFA, and male sex significantly improved CR-POPF predictive models when considering both surgery subtypes, while only DFA and vDFA significantly improved models when cohorts were segregated by surgery type. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative DFA remains a preferred method of predicting CR-POPF as the proposed vDFA assessment technique only adds complexity without increased discriminability.
Asunto(s)
Amilasas , Fístula Pancreática , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Amilasas/análisis , Pancreatectomía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Increasing health-care costs in the United States have not translated to superior outcomes in comparison to other developed countries. The implementation of physician-targeted interventions to reduce costs may improve value-driven health outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of physician-targeted interventions to reduce surgical expenses and improve care for patients undergoing total thyroidectomies. METHODS: Two separate face-to-face interventions with individual surgeons focusing on surgical expenses associated with thyroidectomy were implemented in two surgical services (endocrine surgery and otolaryngology) by the surgical chair of each service in Jun 2016. The preintervention period was from Dec 2014 to Jun 2016 (19 mo, 352 operations). The postintervention period was from July 2016 to January 2018 (19 mo, 360 operations). Descriptive statistics were utilized, and differences-in-differences were conducted to compare the pre and postintervention outcomes including cost metrics (total costs, fixed costs, and variable costs per thyroidectomy) and clinical outcomes (30-d readmission rate, days to readmission, and total length of stay). RESULTS: Patient demographics and characteristics were comparable across pre- and post-intervention periods. Post-intervention, both costs and clinical outcomes demonstrated improvement or stability. Compared to otolaryngology, endocrine surgery achieved additional savings per surgery post-intervention: mean total costs by $607.84 (SD: 9.76; P < 0.0001), mean fixed costs by $220.21 (SD: 5.64; P < 0.0001), and mean variable costs by $387.82 (SD: 4.75; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Physician-targeted interventions can be an effective tool for reducing cost and improving health outcomes. The effectiveness of interventions may differ based on specialty training. Future implementations should standardize these interventions for a critical evaluation of their impact on hospital costs and patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cirujanos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Costos de Hospital , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Differentiated thyroid carcinomas is associated with an excellent prognosis. The treatment of choice for differentiated thyroid carcinoma is surgery, followed by radioactive iodine ablation (iodine-131) in select patients and thyroxine therapy in most patients. Surgery is also the main treatment for medullary thyroid carcinoma, and kinase inhibitors may be appropriate for select patients with recurrent or persistent disease that is not resectable. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is almost uniformly lethal, and iodine-131 imaging and radioactive iodine cannot be used. When systemic therapy is indicated, targeted therapy options are preferred. This article describes NCCN recommendations regarding management of medullary thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, and surgical management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary, follicular, Hürthle cell carcinoma).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Yodo , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Humanos , Yodo/uso terapéutico , Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapiaRESUMEN
The NCCN Guidelines for Thyroid Carcinoma provide recommendations for the management of different types of thyroid carcinoma, including papillary, follicular, Hürthle cell, medullary, and anaplastic carcinomas. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent updates to the guidelines, including the expanding role of molecular testing for differentiated thyroid carcinoma, implications of the new pathologic diagnosis of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features, and the addition of a new targeted therapy option for BRAF V600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/terapia , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/normas , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/normas , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Glándula Tiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Glándula Tiroides/patología , Glándula Tiroides/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Tiroidectomía/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many surgical departments in the United States lack endocrine surgery faculty. Although endocrine surgeons can provide worthwhile clinical services, it is unclear how they contribute to the overall academic mission of the department. The present study aims to evaluate the academic productivity of endocrine surgeons, as defined by the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) membership, when compared with other academic surgical faculty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An established database of 4081 surgical department faculty was used for this study. This database includes surgical faculty of the top 50 National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded universities and faculty from five outstanding hospital-based surgical departments. Academic metrics including publication, citations, H-index, and NIH funding were obtained using publically available data from websites. The AAES membership status was gathered from the online membership registry. RESULTS: A total of 110 AAES members were identified in this database, accounting for 2.7% of this population. Overall, the AAES members outperformed other academic surgical faculty with respect to publications (66 ± 94 versus 28 ± 91, P < 0.001), publication citations (1430 ± 3432 versus 495 ± 2955, P < 0.001), and H-index (19 ± 18 versus 10 ± 13, P < 0.001). In addition, the AAES members were more likely to have former/current NIH funding and hold divisional or departmental leadership positions than their non-AAES member colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the AAES members excelled with respect to publications, citations, and research funding compared with nonendocrine surgical faculty. These results demonstrate that endocrine surgeons can contribute enormously to the overall academic mission. Therefore, more surgical departments in the United States should consider establishing an endocrine surgery program.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Endocrinología/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Científicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Operating room efficiency can be compromised because of surgical instrument processing delays. We observed that many instruments in a standardized tray were not routinely used during thyroid and parathyroid surgery at our institution. Our objective was to create a streamlined instrument tray to optimize operative efficiency and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Head and neck surgical instrument trays were evaluated by operating room team leaders. Instruments were identified as either necessary or unnecessary based on use during thyroidectomies and parathyroidectomies. The operating room preparation time, tray weights, number of trays, and number of instruments were recorded for the original and new surgical trays. Cost savings were calculated using estimated reprocessing cost of $0.51 per instrument. RESULTS: Three of 13 head and neck trays were converted to thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy trays. The starting head and neck surgical set was reduced from two trays with 98 total instruments to one tray with 36 instruments. Tray weight decreased from 27 pounds to 10 pounds. Tray preparation time decreased from 8 min to 3 min. The new tray saved $31.62 ($49.98 to $18.36) per operation in reprocessing costs. Projected annual savings with hospitalwide implementation is over $28,000.00 for instrument processing alone. Unmeasured hospital savings include decreased instrument wear and replacement frequency, quicker operating room setup, and decreased decontamination costs. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing surgical trays can reduce cost, physical strain, preparation time, decontamination time, and processing times, and streamlining trays is an effective strategy for hospitals to reduce costs and increase operating room efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Utilización de Equipos y Suministros/organización & administración , Gastos en Salud , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Paratiroidectomía/instrumentación , Tiroidectomía/instrumentación , Ahorro de Costo , Descontaminación/economía , Descontaminación/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Equipos y Suministros/economía , Utilización de Equipos y Suministros/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Quirófanos/economía , Quirófanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Paratiroidectomía/economía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiroidectomía/economía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ideal adjuvant therapy for resected cholangiocarcinoma remains controversial. National guidelines stratify recommendations based on margin status, though few studies are currently available for reference. METHODS: Data was abstracted on all patients with definitive resections of cholangiocarcinoma at our institution between 2000 and 2013. Adjuvant chemoradiation consisted of 45 Gy delivered to elective nodal regions and 50.4-54 Gy to the surgical bed with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed delineated by margin status. RESULTS: Curative resection was performed on 95 patients followed by adjuvant chemoradiation in 23/95 (24%) and observation in 72/95 (76%) with a median follow-up of 21.7 months. For those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation the median overall survival was 30.2 months compared with 26.3 months for those observed (p = 0.0695). In a multivariable model controlling for other prognostic factors, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50, p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.37, p = 0.004). In multivariable models stratified by margin status, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved overall survival following both margin-negative (HR 0.34, p = 0.035) and margin-positive (HR 0.15, p = 0.003) resections. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival was improved with adjuvant chemoradiation following either margin-negative or margin-positive resections, which is not currently reflected in national guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Colecistectomía , Hepatectomía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alabama , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Thyroid Carcinoma focuses on anaplastic carcinoma because substantial changes were made to the systemic therapy recommendations for the 2015 update. Dosages and frequency of administration are now provided, docetaxel/doxorubicin regimens were added, and single-agent cisplatin was deleted because it is not recommended for patients with advanced or metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/terapia , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/secundario , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , TiroidectomíaRESUMEN
These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the major updates to the 2014 NCCN Guidelines for Thyroid Carcinoma. Kinase inhibitor therapy may be used to treat thyroid carcinoma that is symptomatic and/or progressive and not amenable to treatment with radioactive iodine. Sorafenib may be considered for select patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma, whereas vandetanib or cabozantinib may be recommended for select patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Other kinase inhibitors may be considered for select patients with either type of thyroid carcinoma. A new section on "Principles of Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Cancer" was added to the NCCN Guidelines to assist with using these novel targeted agents.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fistula Risk Score (FRS) models often lack adequate discrimination for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) on external validation. We tested four FRS models in the Deep South United States and sought to determine if CR-POPF discrimination was affected by racial disparities. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomies between 2013 and 2019 was performed. FRS discrimination for CR-POPF was assessed using ROC curves for both the entire patient population, and for Black vs White patients. RESULTS: The Alternative FRS maintains adequate CR-POPF discrimination when considering the patient population as a whole, but inadequately predicts CR-POPF when applied to the Black patient population. The Sun-FRS provides adequate CR-POPF discrimination for Black patients when considering risk grade. Only soft pancreatic gland texture and small duct size were significantly associated with CR-POPF in this patient population. DISCUSSION: Institutions should assess their preferred FRS model to determine if it provides adequate CR-POPF discrimination among a racially diverse patient population. Further studies are needed to determine how racial disparities influence CR-POPF prediction to better guide postoperative management.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer continues to be a major cause of cancer-related mortality. There has been a greater implementation of up-front chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Although there are many theoretical benefits to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, its clinical impact is uncertain. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients with resectable and borderline-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were collected in a secure database from September 2018 to May 2020. Patients were excluded if they presented with locally advanced or metastatic disease, inability to complete chemotherapy, or if they were not a surgical candidate. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with resectable disease underwent chemotherapy. Folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan/oxaliplatin was used in 41 patients (62.1%) and gemcitabine-based regimens in 28 patients (42.4%, greater than 100% as some patients underwent both regimens). After restaging, 47 patients (71.2%) were thought to have resectable disease. Of these patients, 36 have been successfully resected to date. Metastatic disease was found in 12 patients (18.2%) and 6 patients (9.1%) had locally advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with resectable pancreatic cancer are resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but a subset will develop local or distant progression. Further studies will be needed to determine which patients will progress locally and may benefit from an up-front surgical approach.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As healthcare systems are adapting due to COVID-19, there has been an increased need for telehealth in the outpatient setting. Not all patients have been comfortable with this transition. We sought to determine the relationship between health literacy and technological comfort in our cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a survey of patients that presented to the oncology clinics at a single-center over a 2-month period. Patients were given a voluntary, anonymous, survey during their visit containing questions regarding demographics, health literacy and technological comfort. RESULTS: 344 surveys were returned (response-rate 64.3%). The median patient age was 61 years, 70% of responders were female and the most common race was White (67.3%). Increasing patient age, male gender, Black and Native-American race, decreased health literacy and lack of home broadband were associated with lower technological comfort score. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patients with lower health literacy scores, older and male patients, or who have poor internet access showed a lower level of technological comfort. At risk patients can be identified and provided additional support in their use of telehealth services.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Alfabetización en Salud , Neoplasias , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of financial insolvency and cancer related deaths in the United States. The risk of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) was calculated for patients undergoing pancreatic resection at an academic institution. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2017 were identified through an institutional cancer registry. A CHE was an out-of-pocket payment (OOP) > 10% of the estimated median household income. RESULTS: 319 patients met inclusion criteria. Hospital median charge was $76,700. 99% of patients had insurance and hospital bill adjustments. As a result, 61% (n = 193) made no OOP. Only 3 patients risked CHE. For all tumors combined there were no differences in survival outcomes by OOP. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to use institutional financial data to calculate CHE risk for pancreatic resection patients. Insurance adjustments to hospital charges that accompany health insurance and voluntary hospital adjustments for the uninsured protect patients against CHE.
Asunto(s)
Estrés Financiero/epidemiología , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Estrés Financiero/prevención & control , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatectomía/economía , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/economía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Human evolutionary genetic divergence and distinctive environmental exposures have contributed to the development of clinicopathologic variations of esophageal cancer in Eastern and Western countries. Different treatment strategies have derived from the disparate regional experiences. Treatment strategy is more standardized in the West. Trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery is widely accepted as the standard treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Trimodality treatment has not been adopted in many Eastern countries, and standard treatment is neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several randomized trials are ongoing that may alter the standard management of esophageal cancer worldwide.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/epidemiología , Esofagectomía/métodos , Predicción , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the increased use of molecular testing of thyroid fine-needle biopsies, the frequency and extent of thyroid resection for thyroid nodules has changed. Although the role of frozen-section analysis of the thyroid has been reduced markedly in recent years, many surgeons still routinely use it intraoperatively. We sought to determine the utility of frozen section during thyroidectomy in the era of molecular testing. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed 236 consecutive patients who had thyroidectomy with intraoperative frozen-section analysis at our institution between November 2015 and October 2017. We re-reviewed the preoperative diagnosis, frozen-section diagnosis, final pathology, and whether operative management changed from the initial plan based on frozen section. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 55.6 ± 14.1 years, and 83% were female. Of the 236 patients, frozen section did not change the intraoperative management in 225 (95%). Of the 11 patients whose thyroid operation was modified, the operation was either too much or not enough in 6 patients. In only 5 (2.1%) patients, frozen-section analysis correctly changed the extent of thyroidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid frozen-section analysis adds cost and time to thyroid operations without notable benefit. In our cohort, only 2.1% of frozen sections accurately changed intraoperative management. We recommend against its routine use.
Asunto(s)
Secciones por Congelación , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Nódulo Tiroideo/cirugía , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/patologíaRESUMEN
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is classified according to the following subtypes: massforming (MF), periductal infiltrating (PI), and intraductal growth (IG). The aim of this study is to measure the association between ICC subtypes and patient survival after surgical resection. Data were abstracted on all patients treated with definitive resections of ICC at a single institution between 2000 and 2011 with at least three years follow-up. Survival estimates were quantified using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. There were 37 patients with ICC treated with definitive partial hepatectomies with a median survival of 33.5 months. Tumor stage (P < 0.0001), satellitosis (P < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (P = 0.003), and macroscopic subtype (P = 0.003) were predictive of postoperative survival. Disease-free survivals for MF, PI, and IG subtypes, respectively, were 30 per cent, 0 per cent, and 57 per cent (P = 0.017). Overall survivals among ICC macroscopic subtypes were as follows: MF 37 per cent, PI 0 per cent, and IG 71 per cent (P = 0.003). Although limited by the small sample size of this rare cancer, this study demonstrates significant differences among macroscopic subtypes of ICC in both disease-free survivals and overall survivals after definitive partial hepatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Periodo Posoperatorio , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current methods to predict patients' perioperative morbidity use complex algorithms with multiple clinical variables focusing primarily on organ-specific compromise. The aim of the current study was to determine the value of a timed stair climb in predicting perioperative complications for patients undergoing abdominal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: From March 2014 to July 2015, three hundred and sixty-two patients attempted stair climbing while being timed before undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Vital signs were measured before and after stair climb. Ninety-day postoperative complications were assessed by the Accordion Severity Grading System. The prognostic value of stair climb was compared with the American College of Surgeons NSQIP risk calculator. RESULTS: A total of 264 (97.4%) patients were able to complete the stair climb. Stair climb time directly correlated to changes in both mean arterial pressure and heart rate as an indicator of stress. An Accordion grade 2 or higher complication occurred in 84 (25%) patients. There were 8 mortalities (2.4%). Patients with slower stair climb times had increased complication rates (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, stair climb time was the single strongest predictor of complications (odds ratio = 1.029; p < 0.0001), and no other clinical comorbidity reached statistical significance. Receiver operative characteristic curves predicting postoperative morbidity by stair climb time was superior to that of the American College of Surgeons risk calculator (area under the curve = 0.81 vs 0.62; p < 0.0001). Additionally, slower patients had greater deviations from predicted length of hospital stay (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Stair climb provides measurable stress, accurately predicts postoperative complications, and is easy to administer in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Larger patient populations with a diverse group of operations will be needed to validate the use of stair climbing in risk-prediction models.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estrés Fisiológico/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The process of scientific discovery is rapidly evolving. The funding climate has influenced a favorable shift in scientific discovery toward the use of existing resources such as the electronic health record. The electronic health record enables long-term outlooks on human health and disease, in conjunction with multidimensional phenotypes that include laboratory data, images, vital signs, and other clinical information. Initial work has confirmed the utility of the electronic health record for understanding mechanisms and patterns of variability in disease susceptibility, disease evolution, and drug responses. The addition of biobanks and genomic data to the information contained in the electronic health record has been demonstrated. The purpose of this statement is to discuss the current challenges in and the potential for merging electronic health record data and genomics for cardiovascular research.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Genómica , Sociedades Médicas , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
Angiogenesis, the formation of blood vessels from preexisting ones, plays a crucial role in tumor progression. Activation of an "angiogenic switch" allows tumor cells to invade and metastasize. The growing interest in the use of antiangiogenic agents in the treatment and prevention of cancer lies in the theoretical advantages of this molecularly targeted modality of chemotherapy. Delivery of antiangiogenic agents are not complicated by having to penetrate large bulky masses but, instead, have easy access to tumoral endothelial cells. Antiangiogenic drugs may not cause cytopenias and thus will avoid many of the unwarranted toxicities of standard chemotherapeutic agents. Because they act directly on nascent endothelial cells, antiangiogenic agents may avoid tumor resistance mechanisms. If antiangiogenic agents are successful, they might be applicable to many tumor types and not be dependent on cell type or growth fraction of cells within a tumor. However, several important obstacles remain with regards to using antiangiogenic drugs in clinical trials with which we must contend in order to determine accurately the efficacy of these agents. In this article, we review the different classes of antiangiogenic agents available, ongoing clinical trials, as well as potential pitfalls and future directions in this exciting field.