Posterior ankle and hind foot arthroscopy - how do you responsibly learn this new technique?

Posterior ankle and hind foot arthroscopy has become an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool when dealing with ankle pathology. Although not yet widely adopted it is gaining popularity and there have been various descriptions of the technique [1] and its outcomes [2,3]. With posterior arthroscopy there are well-documented risks of injury to the sural nerve and medial neurovascular bundle in particular [7-9]. These risks need to be carefully considered, particularly by surgeons early in the learning curve of what is undoubtedly a challenging technique. In an ideal world there should be scope for regular simulation to be integrated into a consultant's working week and this would allow them to be prepared for untoward incidences and also learn new techniques such as hind-foot arthroscopy in a safe environment prior to introduction into clinical practice.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Review of Novel Diagnostic and Monitoring Technologies.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease of childhood and is characterized by an often insidious onset and a chronic relapsing-remitting course, once diagnosed. With successive flares of joint inflammation, joint damage accrues, often associated with pain and functional disability. The progressive nature and potential for chronic damage and disability caused by JIA emphasizes the critical need for a prompt and accurate diagnosis. This article provides a review of recent studies related to diagnosis, monitoring and management of JIA and outlines recent novel tools and techniques (infrared thermal imaging, three-dimensional imaging, accelerometry, artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic) which have demonstrated potential value in assessment and monitoring of JIA. The emergence of novel techniques to assist clinicians' assessments for diagnosis and monitoring of JIA has demonstrated promise; however, further research is required to confirm their clinical utility.

Inadequate Preoperative Team Briefings Lead to More Intraoperative Adverse Events.

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of the World Health Organization checklists has reduced major surgical complications and errors; however, the impact of preoperative briefings on intraoperative adverse events has not been assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective case-control study assessing the association between preoperative briefings and minor, potentially major, and major adverse intraoperative events was performed in 2 phases. Phase 1 involved prospective data collection for all trauma and orthopedic lists during a 2-week period. Changes were implemented as a result of the findings, and after this, the study was repeated (phase 2) to assess for the effect of the changes made to the practice. RESULTS: Forty-one lists were audited during phase 1 and 47 lists were audited during phase 2 of the study. Adequate preoperative briefings were performed in 10 (24%) of 41 lists in phase 1. There was a significant association between the occurrences of intraoperative adverse events (n = 37) when a briefing was not performed (P = < 0.01) and when a briefing was performed incompletely (P = 0.01). In phase 2, after staff reeducation and policy change, briefings were found to be adequate in 38 (81%) of 47 lists with the occurrence of only 3 adverse events. Team familiarity also improved significantly as a result of better preoperative briefings (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate preoperative briefings are associated with an increase in minor adverse events and are detrimental to team familiarity. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that all surgical units perform preoperative briefings thoroughly to minimize these factors.

The history, evolution and basic science of osteotomy techniques.

Osteotomy techniques date back to Hippocrates circa 415 BC (Jones Hippocrates collected works I, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006; Brorson in Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1907-1914, 2009). There is debate about the best way to divide the bone surgically and which technique yields the best bone regenerate in lengthening; ensuring predictable new bone formation and healing of the osteotomy are the primary goals. We review the history and techniques of the osteotomy and consider the evidence for optimum bone formation. Methods discussed include variants of the 'drill and osteotome' technique, use of the Gigli saw and use of a power saw. Differences in bone formation through the different techniques are covered.