Advancing Health Equity Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Within a National Health Nonprofit Organization.

OBJECTIVE: This study presents survey results assessing the impact of the American Cancer Society (ACS) health equity (HE) training on staff knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HE and social determinants of health (SDOH). DESIGN: This study is a quasi-experimental design examining survey responses over time and comparing responses from staff who participated in ACS HE training sessions and education opportunities and those who did not. SETTING: An electronic Web survey was distributed to all ACS and American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) staff in each of the 3 years that the training was held (2018-2020). PARTICIPANTS: ACS and ACS CAN staff who chose to take the survey were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Engagement with training hosted by the ACS HE team was examined. Training sessions were intended to introduce staff to HE and SDOH in the context of cancer outcomes and provide staff with the skills to become HE champions in the organization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This study examines whether participation in training sessions hosted by the HE team had an impact on knowledge of HE terms, attitudes, and beliefs about HE and engagement with HE. RESULTS: Trained respondents had a significantly higher HE knowledge summary score (98%) than those who were not trained (79%, SD = 0.26100, P < .001). Respondents who participated in training were more likely to believe that they could advance HE through their work at ACS and ACS CAN (88% compared with 66% of those who were not trained, SD = 0.47300, P < .001). Respondents who participated in training scored an average of 4.7 out of 6 on HE engagement compared with 3.8 among the untrained (SD = 1.425, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that participation in HE training is associated with higher levels of knowledge about HE and stronger personal attitudes and beliefs about the importance of addressing SDOH. This is a foundational step in staff taking action to integrate HE concepts into their day-to-day work toward reducing inequities in access to cancer treatment and health outcomes.

Cancer survivor worries about treatment disruption and detrimental health outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: We examined cancer survivor worries about treatment, infection, and finances early in the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Closed- and open-ended online survey questions were collected from adult cancer survivors (N = 972). METHODS: Logistic regression identified factors associated with treatment, infection, and financial worry. Thematic qualitative analysis generated information around participants' experiences and worries related to COVID-19 and healthcare. FINDINGS: Characteristics including marital status, race/ethnicity, cancer type, time since last treatment, education, and age were associated with health and healthcare worry outcomes. Survivors commonly expressed uncertainty about future care, fears about in-person appointments, rationed COVID-19 care, recurrence due to care delays, and distress about untreated symptoms, including mental health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Early in the pandemic, survivors worried about and experienced cancer care delays, COVID infection, and how the pandemic would affect their prognosis. IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare professionals need to be aware of cancer survivors' concerns and uncertainties to provide appropriate care.

Facilitators and Barriers to the Implementation of the HPV VACs (Vaccinate Adolescents Against Cancers) Program: A Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Analysis.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is an effective but underused method for preventing multiple cancers, particularly cervical cancer. Although interventions have successfully targeted barriers to HPV vaccine uptake in various clinical settings, few studies have explored their implementation. Our study examines the delivery of the HPV VACs (Vaccinate Adolescents Against Cancer) Program and elicits information on barriers and facilitators to implementation. INTERVENTION APPROACH: The VACs Program pilot was a multilevel, evidence-based intervention conducted by the American Cancer Society in 30 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in the United States. EVALUATION METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews (N = 32) by telephone with representatives of 9 FQHC partners. We structured the interview guides on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains. We asked about project start-up activities, implementation strategy selection, policy- and practice-level changes, staffing structure, challenges, and key factors leading to project success. At least 2 researchers coded each interview transcript verbatim. RESULTS: Participants most frequently identified the electronic health record system, training and education, concrete tools and resources, and provider champions as facilitators to implementing HPV VACs. Limited staff resources, challenges of electronic health records, issues with state immunization registries, patient misinformation about vaccines and vaccine stigma, cultural/language barriers, competing priorities, levels of funding, staff buy-in, training needs, and low health literacy were identified as barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Providing appropriate training for FQHC staff members and providers along with technical assistance and facilitation tools were critical for increasing provider confidence in recommending HPV vaccine. Addressing capacity-building and implementation barriers in FQHCs can increase effective implementation of evidence-based interventions to increase HPV vaccination uptake and reduce the burden of future cancers.

Paediatric shoulder injury: don't get sucked in!

CLINICAL INTRODUCTION: A healthy 8-year-old boy presented to the ED with acute left shoulder pain. He had been playing football and his left arm was pulled by an opposition team member. He fell to the ground and landed on his left shoulder causing pain. On examination after analgesia, active and passive movement of the shoulder joint was possible in all directions but range of motion was limited by pain. There was no visible swelling or bruising throughout the shoulder girdle. A radiograph of the shoulder was obtained (figure 1).emermed;36/2/77/F1F1F1Figure 1Plain radiograph of the left shoulder. QUESTION: What radiographic finding is seen for this patient?Glenohumeral lipohaemarthrosis.Acromioclavicular joint disruption.Intra-articular gas.Intra-articular loose body.

Successes and challenges of implementing a lung cancer screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

In recent years, studies have shown that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a safe and effective way to screen high-risk adults for lung cancer. Despite this, uptake remains low, especially in limited-resource settings. The American Cancer Society (ACS) partnered with two federally qualified health centers and accredited screening facilities on a 2 year pilot project to implement an LDCT screening program. Both sites attempted to develop a referral program and care coordination practices to move patients through the screening continuum and identify critical facilitators and barriers to implementation. Evaluators conducted key informant interviews (N = 46) with clinical and administrative staff, as well as regional ACS staff during annual site visits. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our analysis of factors associated with effective implementation and improved screening outcomes. One study site established a sustainable lung screening program, while the other struggled to overcome significant implementation barriers. Increased time spent with patients, disruption to normal workflows, and Medicaid reimbursement policies presented challenges at both sites. Supportive, engaged leaders and knowledgeable champions who provided clear implementation guidance improved staff engagement and were able to train, guide, and motivate staff throughout the intervention. A slow, stepwise implementation process allowed one site's project champions to pilot test new processes and resolve issues before scaling up. This pilot study provides critical insights into the necessary resources and steps for successful lung cancer screening program implementation in underserved settings. Future efforts can build upon these findings and identify and address possible facilitators and barriers to screening program implementation.

Implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer is associated with improved outcomes among eligible current and former smokers (ie, aged 55-77, at least 30-pack-year smoking history, current smoker or former smoker who quit within the past 15 years). However, the overall uptake of LDCT is low, especially in health care settings with limited personnel and financial resources. To increase access to lung cancer screening services, the American Cancer Society partnered with 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Tennessee and West Virginia to conduct a pilot project focused on developing and refining the LDCT screening referral processes and practices. Each FQHC was required to partner with an American College of Radiology-designated lung cancer screening center in its area to ensure high-quality patient care. The pilot project was conducted in 2 phases: 6 months of capacity building (January-June 2016) followed by 2 years of implementation (July 2016-June 2018). One site created a sustainable LDCT referral program, and the other site encountered numerous barriers and failed to overcome them. This case study highlights implementation barriers and factors associated with success and improved outcomes in LDCT screening.

A retrospective pilot study to assess the impact of strabismus surgery on the corneal endothelium in children.

PURPOSE: To investigate if strabismus surgery has an impact on the corneal endothelium in children. METHODS: Fourteen children who had undergone uncomplicated strabismus surgery an average of 41 months previously (range 24-73 months) were compared with a group of age-matched (range 5-12 years) and refractive error (RE)-matched (range -4.74 to +4.25 D) children. Following noncontact specular microscopy, areas of at least 100 cells were measured, the number of sides for each cell recorded, and endothelial cell density (ECD) calculated from the area measures. Corneal diameter was measured with a clinical rule, corneal curvature with a manual keratometer, central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasound pachometry, and IOP by non-contact tonometry. RESULTS: The average ECD (+/-S.D.) in the post-surgery group was 4467+/-627 cells mm(-2), which was significantly higher (p < 0.02) than in the control group (3781+/-452 cells mm(-2)). This was because the average endothelial cell area in the surgery group was significantly smaller than in the control group (p < 0.005; 252+/-25 microm2 vs 296+/-29 microm2). Differences in cell areas were slightly greater for smaller cells (-15.7% for five-sided cells, -15.6% for six-sided cells, -14.3% for seven-sided cells and -13.8% for eight-sided cells). The cell differences appear to be related to both a slightly smaller corneal diameter (11.00+/-0.52 mm vs. 11.21+/-0.58 mm) and a slightly higher CCT (0.528+/-0.033 mm vs. 0.515+/-0.032 mm) in the post-operative group. CONCLUSION: The endothelial mosaic in children after strabismus surgery can show a higher than expected ECD value and slight cell pleomorphism. These signs indicate that there might be differences in eye growth and endothelial inflammatory stress associated with uneventful strabismus surgery.