Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Heparin Coated Versus Standard Graft for Bypass Surgery in Peripheral Artery Disease Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Heparin coating has recently been shown to reduce the risk of graft failure in arterial revascularisation, at least transiently. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of heparin coated versus standard polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for bypass surgery in peripheral artery disease from a long-term healthcare system perspective. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted alongside the Danish part of the Scandinavian Propaten trial in which 431 patients planned for femoro-femoral or femoro-popliteal bypass surgery were randomised to either type of graft and followed for 5 years. Based on the intention to treat principle, the differences in healthcare costs (general practice, prescription medication, hospital admission, rehabilitation, and long-term care in 2015 Euros), life years (LYs), and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were analysed as arithmetic means with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were used to illustrate the probability of cost-effectiveness for a range of threshold values of willingness to pay (WTP). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the randomisation groups were observed for costs or gains of LYs or QALYs. The average cost per QALY was estimated at €10,792. For a WTP threshold of €40,000 per QALY, the overall probability of cost-effectiveness was estimated at 62%, but owing to cost savings in patients with critical ischaemia (cost per QALY <€0), it increased to 89% for this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Until further evidence, heparin coated grafts appear overall, to be cost-effective over standard grafts, but important heterogeneity between claudication and critical ischaemia should be noted. While the optimal choice for claudication remains uncertain, heparin coated grafts should be used for critical ischaemia.

Otosclerosis and stapedotomy: hearing improvement, complications, and analysis of potential prognostic factors in a series of 93 cases.

BACKGROUND: Stapedotomy is a common treatment for conductive hearing loss in otosclerosis patients. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: Results of stapedotomy were assessed in terms of hearing improvement and risk of complications. Potential prognostic factors affecting outcomes were identified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 93 stapedotomies were evaluated. The primary outcome was hearing improvement based on postoperative ABG ≤10 dB, Belfast rule of thumb, and AC gain ≥20 dB. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Additionally, prognostic factors potentially affecting outcomes were analyzed (age, gender, comorbidity, preoperative audiometry, tinnitus, or vertigo). RESULTS: A mean ABG of ≤10 dB was achieved in 59%. According to the Belfast rule of thumb, 75% achieved interaural symmetry within ≤15 dB and/or a mean AC4 of ≤30 dB. A gain in AC4 of ≥20 dB was achieved in 57% of primary surgeries. The larger the preoperative ABG, the better hearing after surgery. There was no significant difference in hearing improvement at early and late follow-ups. Transient vertigo was the most common complaint (37%). Taste disturbances were the most frequent permanent complication (14%). CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Stapedotomy gave good audible improvement with a low risk of complications. Preoperative ABG was the only prognostic factor affecting the hearing outcome. Only one follow-up 6-12 months seems relevant.

背景：镫骨切开术是耳硬化症患者传导性听力损失的常见治疗方法。目的：根据听力改善和并发症风险评估镫骨切开术的结果。 确定影响结果的潜在预后因素。材料和方法：回顾性评估了 93 例镫骨切除术。 主要结果是听力改善, 基于术后 ABG ≤10dB、贝尔法斯特经验法则和 AC 增益 ≥20dB。次要结果是术后并发症。 此外, 分析了可能影响结果的预后因素（年龄、性别、合并症、术前听力检查、耳鸣或眩晕）。结果：59% 的患者取得平均 ABG ≤10dB。 根据贝尔法斯特经验法则, 75% 的患者实现 ≤15dB 以内的耳间对称性和/或平均 AC4≤30dB。 57% 的初次手术实现AC4 的增益≥20dB 。 术前ABG越大, 术后听力越好。早期和晚期随访时的听力改善没有显著差异。 短暂的眩晕是最常见的主诉（37%）。 味觉障碍是最常见的永久性并发症（14%）。结论和意义：镫骨切开术带来了良好的听觉改善, 且并发症风险较低。 术前 ABG 是影响听力结果的唯一预后因素。 仅一次6-12 个月的随访似乎是相关的。.

Red blood cell transfusion associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this analysis was to examine the association between RBC transfusions and long-term survival for patients undergoing elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with up to 15 years of follow-up. METHODS: Prospective cohort study using data from The Danish Vascular Registry from 2000-2015. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital complications. Transfused patients were divided into subgroups based on received RBC transfusions (1, 2-3, 4-5 or > 5). Using Cox regression multi-adjusted analysis, non-transfused patients were compared to transfused patients (1, 2-3, 4-5, >5 transfusions) for both primary and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: There were 3 876 patients included with a mean survival of 9.1 years. There were 801 patients who did not receive transfusions. Overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (121 patients) and 3.6% (112) for all transfused patients. For the five subgroups 30-day mortality was: No transfusions 1.1% (9 patients), 1 RBC 1.2% (4 patients), 2-3 RBC 2.2% (26 patients), 4-5 RBC 1.9% (14 patients) and > 5 RBC 7.9% (68 patients). After receiving RBCs, the hazard ratio for death was 1.54 (95% CI 1.27-1.85) compared to non-transfused patients. There was a significant increase in mortality when receiving 2-3 RBC: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.07-1.62), 4-5 RBC: 1.64 (1.32-2.03) and >5 RBC: 1.96 (1.27-1.85) in a multi-adjusted model. CONCLUSION: There is a dose-dependent association between RBC transfusions received during elective AAA repair and an increase in short- and long-term mortality. Approximately 25% of included patients had preoperative anemia. These findings should raise awareness regarding potentially unnecessary and harmful RBC transfusions.