Risk factors, physical and mental health burden of male and female pathological gamblers in the German general population aged 40-80.

BACKGROUND: Gambling Disorder (GD) has been associated with considerable mental and physical health risks in clinical samples. The paper determines risk factors, mental and physical health burden of probable GD for both men and women in the general population. METHODS: In the Gutenberg Health Study, a population-based sample of N = 11,875 aged 40-80 years was analyzed regarding lifetime probable GD prevalence (measured with the Lie/ Bet Questionnaire) and a wide array of health variables including standardized measures of depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms. RESULTS: Probable GD lifetime prevalence was 2.1%, with higher rates among 1st generation migrants (5.5%; vs. non-migrants 1.6%), men (3.0%; vs. women 1.2%), and the sample's youngest age decade (40-49 y., 3.1%). Lifetime probable GD was associated with current work-related, family and financial stressors as well as unhealthy behavior (smoking, extended screen time), and lifetime legal offenses. In men, but not in women, increased rates of imprisonment, mental and somatic symptoms were found. CONCLUSIONS: GD is a major public health problem with serious social, mental and physical health burden. Epidemiological findings underscore the preponderance of GD among 1st generation migrants and men. Findings are consistent with a vicious cycle of family, work related and financial stress factors, and mental and physical burden, particularly in men. Demographic risk factors may help to target specific prevention and treatment efforts.

[Telephone Counseling for Pathological Gamblers as Immediate Access to the Health Care System: Acceptance and Use of The Mainzer Behavioral Addiction Helpline]. / Telefonische Beratung für Glücksspielsüchtige ­ der heiße Draht ins Hilfesystem? Akzeptanz und Nutzung der Mainzer Hotline Verhaltenssucht.

OBJECTIVE: Despite extensive psychosocial consequences, just a small number of pathological gamblers participates in counseling or treatment. Telephone helplines should facilitate pathological gamblers' access to the health care system. There is a lack of research on the use and the effects of such facilities in Germany. The present research focuses on the question whether telephone helplines facilitate pathological gamblers' access to the health care system. METHOD: All first time calls due to a gambling problem received by the behavioral addiction helpline of the University Medical Center Mainz between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed by SPSS. RESULTS: Of the 773 calls analyzed, 89% were from male gamblers. 79.7% reported gambling in slot machine arcades as the primary problem. 66.6% received a referral for a diagnostic in-person assessment at the outpatient clinic for behavioral addiction of the University Medical Center Mainz. 80.4% made an appointment, of which 81.3% were kept. Men were more likely to keep the appointment. Only a few callers had found out about the behavioral addiction helpline by gambling providers. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone helplines facilitate pathological gamblers' access to the health care system.There is a deficit in the propagation of such an offer by gambling providers. Telephone helplines should be communicated more actively to problem gamblers in all gambling venues.

The Berlin Inventory of Gambling behavior - Screening (BIG-S): Validation using a clinical sample.

BACKGROUND: Published diagnostic questionnaires for gambling disorder in German are either based on DSM-III criteria or focus on aspects other than life time prevalence. This study was designed to assess the usability of the DSM-IV criteria based Berlin Inventory of Gambling Behavior Screening tool in a clinical sample and adapt it to DSM-5 criteria. METHODS: In a sample of 432 patients presenting for behavioral addiction assessment at the University Medical Center Mainz, we checked the screening tool's results against clinical diagnosis and compared a subsample of n=300 clinically diagnosed gambling disorder patients with a comparison group of n=132. RESULTS: The BIG-S produced a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 96.2%. The instrument's unidimensionality and the diagnostic improvements of DSM-5 criteria were verified by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis as well as receiver operating characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The BIG-S is a reliable and valid screening tool for gambling disorder and demonstrated its concise and comprehensible operationalization of current DSM-5 criteria in a clinical setting.