Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Crit Care ; 36: 8-12, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27546740

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hypoxia is one of the leading causes of anesthesia-related injury. In response to the limitations of conventional preoxygenation, Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) has been used as a method of providing both preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation during intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, THRIVE was introduced in a critical care unit (CCU), operating room (OR), and emergency department (ED) during emergency intubation of patients at high risk of hypoxia. Linear regression analysis tested for correlation between apnea time or body mass index and hemoglobin saturation (Spo2). RESULTS: Across 71 sequential patients, the interquartile range for apnea time and decrease in Spo2 were 60 to 125 seconds and 0% to 3%, respectively. Significant desaturation occurred in 5 (7%) patients. There was no evidence of correlation between apnea time or body mass index and Spo2 (R2=0.04 and 0.08 for CCU/ED and OR and 0.01 and 0.04 CCU/ED and OR, respectively). There were no complications reported from using THRIVE. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation using THRIVE were associated with a low incidence of desaturation during emergency intubation of patients at high risk of hypoxia in the CCU, OR, and ED. THRIVE has the potential to minimize the risk of hypoxia in these patient groups.


Asunto(s)
Apnea/terapia , Intubación Intratraqueal , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Crit Care ; 30(4): 863.e1-3, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937239

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers (HHs) may be used together inadvertently. Such an incident occurred at our institution resulting in airway occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A bench-top study was conducted to compare the incidence of airway occlusion when using (1) no airway humidification, (2) HME alone, (3) HH alone, and (4) both HME and HH in combination as part of a standard breathing circuit. RESULTS: The simultaneous use of a HME and a HH was associated with a reduction in tidal volume (no airway humidification, P ≤ .05; HME alone, P ≤ .01; and HH alone, P ≤ .01) and an increased incidence of airway occlusion (no airway humidification, 0/7; HME alone, 0/7; HH alone, 0/7; and HME and HH in combination, 7/7; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a HME and a HH in combination is likely to result in airway occlusion. Precautions should be taken to ensure that both systems are not used together in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , Calor/efectos adversos , Humidificadores , Humedad/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Respiración Artificial/instrumentación , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA