Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Mov Disord ; 39(4): 738-745, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310362

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blepharospasm is treated with botulinum toxin, but obtaining satisfactory results is sometimes challenging. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to conduct an exploratory trial of oral dipraglurant for blepharospasm. METHODS: This study was an exploratory, phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 15 participants who were assigned to receive a placebo or dipraglurant (50 or 100 mg) and assessed over 2 days, 1 and 2 hours following dosing. Outcome measures included multiple scales rated by clinicians or participants, digital video, and a wearable sensor. RESULTS: Dipraglurant was well tolerated, with no obvious impact on any of the measurement outcomes. Power analyses suggested fewer subjects would be required for studies using a within-subject versus independent group design, especially for certain measures. Some outcome measures appeared more suitable than others. CONCLUSION: Although dipraglurant appeared well tolerated, it did not produce a trend for clinical benefit. The results provide valuable information for planning further trials in blepharospasm. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Blefaroespasmo , Humanos , Blefaroespasmo/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 20(12): 57, 2020 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33048274

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the incidence, treatment and genetics of psychosis in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). RECENT FINDINGS: Psychosis in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has an incidence of ~ 10% per year. There is limited evidence regarding psychological interventions. Pharmacological management has focused on atypical antipsychotics, balancing modest benefits with evidence of long-term harms. The 5HT2A inverse agonist pimavanserin appears to confer benefit in PD psychosis with initial evidence of benefit in AD. Cholinesterase inhibitors give modest benefits in DLB psychosis. The utility of muscarinic agonists, lithium, glutamatergic and noradrenergic modulators needs further study. Recent work has confirmed the importance of psychosis in MCI as well as AD. The lack of evidence regarding psychological therapies is an urgent knowledge gap, but there is encouraging evidence for emerging pharmacological treatments. Genetics will provide an opportunity for precision medicine and new treatment targets.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Antipsicóticos , Disfunción Cognitiva , Trastornos Psicóticos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Cognitiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Cognitiva/terapia , Humanos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología
3.
Lancet ; 383(9916): 533-40, 2014 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24183563

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease psychosis, which includes hallucinations and delusions, is frequent and debilitating in people with Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of pimavanserin, a selective serotonin 5-HT2A inverse agonist, in this population. METHODS: In our 6 week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we enrolled adults (aged ≥40 years) with Parkinson's disease psychosis. Antipsychotic treatments were not permitted during the study, but controlled antiparkinsonian medication or deep brain stimulation was allowed. Eligible participants entered a 2 week non-pharmacological lead-in phase to limit the placebo response, after which they were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive pimavanserin 40 mg per day or matched placebo. The primary outcome was antipsychotic benefit as assessed by central, independent raters with the Parkinson's disease-adapted scale for assessment of positive symptoms (SAPS-PD) in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had a SAPS assessment at baseline and at least one follow-up. We assessed safety and tolerability in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01174004. FINDINGS: Between Aug 11, 2010, and Aug 29, 2012, we randomly allocated 199 patients to treatment groups. For 90 recipients of placebo and 95 recipients of pimavanserin included in the primary analysis, pimavanserin was associated with a -5·79 decrease in SAPS-PD scores compared with -2·73 for placebo (difference -3·06, 95% CI -4·91 to -1·20; p=0·001; Cohen's d 0·50). Ten patients in the pimavanserin group discontinued because of an adverse event (four due to psychotic disorder or hallucination within 10 days of start of the study drug) compared with two in the placebo group. Overall, pimavanserin was well tolerated with no significant safety concerns or worsening of motor function. INTERPRETATION: Pimavanserin may benefit patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis for whom few other treatment options exist. The trial design used in this study to manage placebo response could have applicability to other studies in neuropsychiatric disease. FUNDING: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/uso terapéutico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/uso terapéutico
4.
Neurochem Res ; 39(10): 2008-17, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24682754

RESUMEN

Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) is a condition that may develop in up to 60 % of Parkinson's patients, and is a major reason for nursing home placement for those affected. There are no FDA approved drugs for PDP but low doses of atypical anti-psychotic drugs (APDs) are commonly prescribed off-label. Only low-dose clozapine has shown efficacy in randomized controlled trials, but all APDs have black box warnings related to the increased mortality and morbidity when used in elderly demented patients. Using molecular pharmacological profiling of a large collection of marketed drugs, we discovered that potent inverse agonist activity against 5-HT2A serotonin receptors was a common feature of atypical APDs, especially the atypical APDs used to treat PDP. Since low-dose clozapine therapy selectively blocks this receptor, it was hypothesized that a highly selective 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist might provide good symptom control in patients suffering from PDP, with a greatly improved safety and tolerability profile. A high throughput screening and subsequent chemical lead optimization campaign to develop potent, selective 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonists was launched, eventually resulting in the discovery of pimavanserin. Pimavanserin displays nanomolar potency as a 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist, selectivity for 5-HT2A over 5-HT2C receptors, and no meaningful activity at any other G-protein coupled receptor. It demonstrated robust activity in preclinical models of schizophrenia and PDP, and did not worsen motoric symptoms, in contrast to the APDs tested. In a Phase III clinical trial, pimavanserin showed highly significant benefits in the primary endpoint, the scale for assessment of positive symptoms-PD, a scale adapted for use in PDP. In addition, improvements in all other efficacy endpoints, including physician's clinical global impression, caregiver burden, night-time sleep quality and daytime wakefulness, were seen. Pimavanserin demonstrated good safety and tolerability and did not worsen motoric symptoms as assessed by the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale parts II and III. An open-label extension study has further demonstrated that pimavanserin is safe and well-tolerated with long-term use. Pimavanserin may therefore offer a viable treatment option for patients suffering from PDP.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Piperidinas/química , Urea/química , Urea/uso terapéutico
5.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 16(10): 898.e1-7, 2015 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26239690

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To establish the mortality risk and adverse events associated with the use of atypical antipsychotic medications in people with Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP) in a clinically defined trial cohort. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter, open-label extension study of pimavanserin comparing people taking and not taking current antipsychotics. SETTING: Primary and secondary care medical centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and India. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 459 people with PDP enrolled in the extension study. Participants were between ages 30 and 80 years, and had an established diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease and moderate to severe psychosis. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were categorized into 2 groups: those receiving concomitant antipsychotic medications ("concurrent APD") and those who did not take antipsychotic medications at any time during the study ("no APD"). Participants were receiving 40 mg pimavanserin daily in addition to concurrent antipsychotics and Parkinson disease medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety assessments at 2 weeks; 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; and every 6 months thereafter, including evaluation of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, weight, physical examinations, 12-lead electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests (serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts II and III (UPDRS-II+III, activities of daily living and motor impairment, respectively). Differences between participants taking and not taking current antipsychotics were evaluated using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was significant increase in the mortality rate for participants taking concurrent antipsychotics compared with the group not taking antipsychotic medications (IRR 4.20, 95% CI 2.13-7.96). Participants who received a concurrent antipsychotic were also significantly more likely to experience overall a serious AE (IRR 2.95, 95% CI 2.02-4.24), any antipsychotic-related event (IRR 1.66, 95% CI 1.18-2.29), cognition-related events (IRR 2.70, 95% CI 1.19-5.58), infections (IRR 1.97, 95% CI 1.17-3.16), and edema (IRR 2.61, 95% CI 1.09-5.59). The risk of falls, stroke, sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and thromboembolic events was also increased in these individuals but this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a significant risk of mortality, and severe AEs in patients with Parkinson disease receiving atypical antipsychotics. This is similar to or greater than the risks seen in people with Alzheimer disease, although with a less clear-cut risk of stroke and a longer delay to increased mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/mortalidad , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Edema/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión Ortostática/epidemiología , Infecciones/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Urea/análogos & derivados , Urea/uso terapéutico
6.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 19(3): 295-9, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23211417

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease psychosis is a frequent and serious complication of advanced disease, but few disease-specific outcome measures exist. METHODS: Using baseline scores from 4 clinical trials, we identified relevant items that assessed Parkinson's disease psychosis to create a shortened version of the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms. We then analyzed the validity and treatment sensitivity of the shortened scale. Principal component analyses evaluated the underlying structure. Scores were compared across age, gender, trial, cognition, and country of origin. Sensitivity to change was assessed by comparing change in psychosis scores to the clinical global impression of improvement score, and effect sizes were calculated to evaluate treatment response. RESULTS: Nine items were selected based on face-validity and symptom frequency. Principal component analysis yielded a 4-factor structure and identified delusions and visual, auditory, and somatic hallucinations as distinct constructs. Baseline total scores were similar across study, gender, region, and age group. The clinically meaningful change in the shortened scale, defined as a 1-unit change in clinical global impression, was 2.33 points, and the effect size was -0.722. The change in scores did not significantly differ between those with cognitive impairment and those without. CONCLUSIONS: The shortened Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson's disease retains the reliability, sensitivity to change, and effect size of the larger scale while reducing administration time and, more importantly, score variability. The scale is an effective outcome measure for use in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis de Componente Principal , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 35(4): 881-92, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19907417

RESUMEN

Psychotic symptoms occur in up to 40% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Clozapine and quetiapine, two atypical antipsychotic drugs, at doses markedly lower than those effective in schizophrenia, which, nevertheless, still cause sedation, hypotension, and other side effects, are widely used to treat psychotic symptoms in patients with PD psychosis (PDP), although quetiapine has never been shown to be effective in a placebo-controlled study. The demonstrated efficacy of clozapine in PDP has been attributed to serotonin (5-HT(2A)) receptor blockade. We postulated that pimavanserin (ACP-103), a highly selective 5-HT(2A) inverse agonist, would attenuate psychosis in patients with PDP, but avoid motoric worsening and non-motoric side effects. In this double-blind, randomized multicenter 28-day study, the tolerability and efficacy of pimavanserin was compared with placebo in 60 patients with L-DOPA or dopamine (DA) agonist-induced PDP. Motor function was evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II and III. Antipsychotic efficacy was evaluated using multiple measures from the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and a UPDRS Part I psychosis-relevant item. Pimavanserin did not differentiate from placebo with regard to motor impairment, sedation, hypotension, or other side effects. The principal measures of efficacy of antipsychotic response to pimavanserin, the SAPS total domain score, only showed a trend. However, the pimavanserin-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement in some but not all measures of psychosis, including SAPS global measures of hallucinations and delusions, persecutory delusions, and the UPDRS measure of delusions and hallucinations. Pimavanserin showed significantly greater improvement in psychosis in patients with PDP at a dose which did not impair motor function, or cause sedation or hypotension Thus, pimavanserin may represent a novel treatment for PDP. Furthermore, these results support the hypothesis that attenuation of psychosis secondary to DA receptor stimulation in PDP may be achieved through selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2 , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/farmacología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Urea/farmacología , Urea/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA