Fosamprenavir/ritonavir in patients with viral hepatitis coinfection: an observational multicohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Safety and tolerability evaluation of adapted dose regimens containing fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) in HIV-infected subjects with viral hepatitis co-infection. METHODS: A retrospective multicohort analysis was conducted. Subjects from three European cohorts who started FPV/r or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as a comparator contributed data to a centralized database. Subjects were divided into five groups by treatment regimen and level of hepatic impairment (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] platelet ratio index [APRI] score < or ≥2). Multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for demographic factors, baseline CD4 count, FIB-4 score, use of antiretroviral therapy, and laboratory markers (bilirubin and platelet count) were performed to identify factors independently associated with risk of developing adverse events or safety events (eg, drug discontinuation, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, hepatic decompensation/death). RESULTS: A total of 1096 patients contributed data to the study. Fosamprenavir/ritonavir (except in subjects with APRI ≥2 receiving standard dose) was associated with a higher two-year risk of drug discontinuation compared with LPV/r. Restricting the analysis to discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), only subjects who received the reduced dose were more likely to discontinue ≥1 drug in the FPV/r regimen. There were no statistical differences in ALT elevation between groups. Incidence of hepatic decompensation events was similar among groups except for subjects who received non standard doses of FPV, though the number of events was small. CONCLUSIONS: Fosamprenavir/ritonavir discontinuation rate due to AEs or ALT elevation was similar across all European-approved FPV/r doses and to that of LPV/r subjects.  Although liver tolerated antiretrovirals, such as integrase inhibitor and entry inhibitor, the use of FPV/r is acceptable in HIV infected patients with viral hepatitis.

Cannabis Use and Reduced Risk of Insulin Resistance in HIV-HCV Infected Patients: A Longitudinal Analysis (ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH).

BACKGROUND: Diabetes and insulin resistance (IR) is common in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV)-coinfected patients, a population also concerned with elevated cannabis use. Cannabis has been associated with reduced IR risk in some population-based surveys. We determined whether cannabis use was consistently associated with reduced IR risk in HEPAVIH, a French nationwide cohort of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: HEPAVIH medical and sociobehavioral data were collected (using annual self-administered questionnaires). We used 60 months of follow-up data for patients with at least 1 medical visit where IR (using homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and cannabis use were assessed. A mixed logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between IR risk (HOMA-IR > 2.77) and cannabis use (occasional, regular, daily). RESULTS: Among the 703 patients included in the study (1287 visits), 323 (46%) had HOMA-IR > 2.77 for at least 1 follow-up visit and 319 (45%) reported cannabis use in the 6 months before the first available visit. Cannabis users (irrespective of frequency) were less likely to have HOMA-IR > 2.77 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.4 [.2-.5]) after adjustment for known correlates/confounders. Two sensitivity analyses with HOMA-IR values as a continuous variable and a cutoff value of 3.8 confirmed the association between reduced IR risk and cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use is associated with a lower IR risk in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. The benefits of cannabis-based pharmacotherapies for patients concerned with increased risk of IR and diabetes need to be evaluated in clinical research and practice.

Triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir in a European cohort of cirrhotic HIV/HCV genotype 1-coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy and safety of triple therapy combining boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TVR) with pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) has rarely been investigated in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV) genotype 1-coinfected patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted a European (France, Italy, Germany, Netherlands) multicentre study of triple therapy in cirrhotic HIV/HCV GT1-coinfected patients. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (47 TVR, 12 BOC) were studied. Median CD4 cell count was 457 (293-578)/mm(3), and HIV viral load was <50 copies/ml in 93% of patients. The HCV genotype was GT1a (78%) or GT1b (13%). Previous PegIFN/RBV therapy had resulted in non-response (73%) or relapse (12%), and 15% of patients were treatment-naïve. The sustained virological response rate at week 12 (SVR12) was 53% overall (57% with TVR, 36% with BOC). A baseline HCV-RNA level <800 000 IU/ml tended to be associated with SVR12 (65 vs 42%, P = 0.11). In multivariate analysis, a virological response at week 4 after BOC or TVR initiation was significantly associated with SVR12 (P = 0.040). Early discontinuation of triple therapy was frequent (n = 26, 44%), because of non-response/breakthrough (65%) or adverse events (AEs) (35%). Three patients died. Severe anaemia (<9 g/dl) occurred in 14 patients (25%), leading to RBV dose reduction (22%), erythropoietin use (56%) or blood transfusion (14%). In multivariate analysis, lack of RBV dose reduction was significantly associated with severe AEs (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of HIV/HCV GT1-coinfected patients with cirrhosis achieved a SVR12. To avoid unnecessary adverse effects, therapy should be discontinued if no response is obtained at week 4.

Association between elevated coffee consumption and daily chocolate intake with normal liver enzymes in HIV-HCV infected individuals: results from the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We used longitudinal data from the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort study of HIV-HCV co-infected individuals to investigate whether polyphenol rich food intake through coffee and/or daily chocolate consumption could play a role in reducing liver enzymes levels. METHODS: Longitudinal data collection included self-administered questionnaires and medical data (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) liver enzymes). Two analyses were performed to assess the association between coffee (≥3 cups a day) and daily chocolate intake and abnormal values of AST and ALT (AST or ALT >2.5 × upper normal limit (UNL)) (N=990) over time, after adjustment for known correlates. Logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations were used to take into account the correlations between repeated measures and estimate adjusted odds ratio. RESULTS: After adjustment, patients reporting elevated coffee consumption and daily chocolate intake were less likely to present abnormal ALT (OR=0.65; p=0.04 and OR=0.57; p=0.04, for coffee and chocolate respectively), while only patients reporting elevated coffee consumption were less likely to have abnormal AST values (p=0.05). Nevertheless, the combined indicator of coffee and chocolate intake was most significantly associated with approximately 40% reduced risk of abnormal liver enzymes (p=0.003 for AST; p=0.002 for ALT). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated coffee consumption and daily chocolate intake appear to be associated with reduced levels of liver enzymes in HIV-HCV co-infected patients. Further experimental and observational research is needed to better understand the role that polyphenol intake or supplementation can play on liver disease and liver injury.

Insulin resistance is associated with a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic HIV/HCV-co-infected patients: results from ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Compared to HCV-mono-infected patients, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs at younger age in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients, is markedly more advanced at diagnosis, is less amenable to curative treatment, and has a more severe outcome. The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of HCC occurrence in a large cohort of HIV/HCV-co-infected patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: This study involved 244 HIV/HCV-co-infected patients included in the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort, who had HCV-related cirrhosis (clinically or histologically proven cirrhosis, or liver stiffness ≥12.5 kPa) and no signs of HCC at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with HCC occurrence. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 2.6 (IQR, 1.8-3.5) years, 21 patients (8.6%) developed HCC. Diagnosis of HCC was based on histology in 5 patients (24%) and non-invasive criteria in 16 patients (76%). In univariate analyses, the following factors were related to HCC occurrence: age, previous cirrhosis decompensation, a HOMA value >3.8 (patients with treated diabetes were excluded from the HOMA calculation), a lower platelet count, a lower prothrombin level, and higher alpha-fetoprotein levels. The HOMA value was >3.8 at baseline in 66.7% of patients who developed HCC and in 35.3% of the remaining patients (p=0.016). In multivariate analysis, age over 50 years (adjusted RR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-9.0; p=0.02) and a HOMA value >3.8 (adjusted RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1-10.3; p=0.03) remained significantly associated with HCC occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: As in HCV-mono-infected patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, insulin resistance appears to play a key role in HCC occurrence in HCV/HIV-co-infected patients with cirrhosis. This finding calls for specific screening strategies for patients with a particularly high risk of developing HCC.

Engaging HIV-HCV co-infected patients in HCV treatment: the roles played by the prescribing physician and patients' beliefs (ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort, France).

BACKGROUND: Treatment for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be delayed significantly in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Our study aims at identifying the correlates of access to HCV treatment in this population. METHODS: We used 3-year follow-up data from the HEPAVIH ANRS-CO13 nationwide French cohort which enrolled patients living with HIV and HCV. We included pegylated interferon and ribavirin-naive patients (N = 600) at enrolment. Clinical/biological data were retrieved from medical records. Self-administered questionnaires were used for both physicians and their patients to collect data about experience and behaviors, respectively. RESULTS: Median [IQR] follow-up was 12[12-24] months and 124 patients (20.7%) had started HCV treatment. After multiple adjustment including patients' negative beliefs about HCV treatment, those followed up by a general practitioner working in a hospital setting were more likely to receive HCV treatment (OR[95%CI]: 1.71 [1.06-2.75]). Patients followed by general practitioners also reported significantly higher levels of alcohol use, severe depressive symptoms and poor social conditions than those followed up by other physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-general practitioner networks can play a crucial role in engaging patients who are the most vulnerable and in reducing existing inequities in access to HCV care. Further operational research is needed to assess to what extent these models can be implemented in other settings and for patients who bear the burden of multiple co-morbidities.

The French national prospective cohort of patients co-infected with HIV and HCV (ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH): early findings, 2006-2010.

BACKGROUND: In France, it is estimated that 24% of HIV-infected patients are also infected with HCV. Longitudinal studies addressing clinical and public health questions related to HIV-HCV co-infection (HIV-HCV clinical progression and its determinants including genetic dimension, patients' experience with these two diseases and their treatments) are limited. The ANRS CO 13 HEPAVIH cohort was set up to explore these critical questions.To describe the cohort aims and organization, monitoring and data collection procedures, baseline characteristics, as well as follow-up findings to date. METHODS: Inclusion criteria in the cohort were: age > 18 years, HIV-1 infection, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection or sustained response to HCV treatment. A standardized medical questionnaire collecting socio-demographic, clinical, biological, therapeutic, histological, ultrasound and endoscopic data is administered at enrollment, then every six months for cirrhotic patients or yearly for non-cirrhotic patients. Also, a self-administered questionnaire documenting socio-behavioral data and adherence to HIV and/or HCV treatments is administered at enrollment and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 1,175 patients were included from January 2006 to December 2008. Their median age at enrollment was 45 years and 70.2% were male. The median CD4 cell count was 442 (IQR: 304-633) cells/µl and HIV RNA plasma viral load was undetectable in 68.8%. Most participants (71.6%) were on HAART. Among the 1,048 HIV-HCV chronically co-infected patients, HCV genotype 1 was predominant (56%) and cirrhosis was present in 25%. As of January, 2010, after a median follow-up of 16.7 months (IQR: 11.3-25.3), 13 new cases of decompensated cirrhosis, nine hepatocellular carcinomas and 20 HCV-related deaths were reported, resulting in a cumulative HCV-related severe event rate of 1.9/100 person-years (95% CI: 1.3-2.5). The rate of HCV-related severe events was higher in cirrhotic patients and those with a low CD4 cells count, but did not differ according to sex, age, alcohol consumption, CDC clinical stage or HCV status. CONCLUSION: The ANRS CO 13 HEPAVIH is a nation-wide cohort using a large network of HIV treatment, infectious diseases and internal medicine clinics in France, and thus is highly representative of the French population living with these two viruses and in care.

Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive indexes for predicting liver fibrosis in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients: ANRS CO3 Aquitaine cohort.

BACKGROUND: Although an increasing number of noninvasive fibrosis markers are available in HCV-monoinfected patients, data on the performance of these tests in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance for predicting hepatic fibrosis stage of four simple and inexpensive noninvasive indexes (FIB-4, APRI, Forns, and platelet count) in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive HIV-HCV-coinfected patients from the ANRS-CO3 Aquitaine cohort who underwent liver biopsy were studied. Fibrosis stage was assessed according to Metavir scoring system by a single pathologist unaware of the data of the patients. Diagnostic performances were assessed by measuring the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) and the percentage of patients correctly identified (PCI). RESULTS: For predicting significant fibrosis (F > or = 2), APRI, Forns index, and FIB-4 had AUROCS of 0.77, 0.75, and 0.79, with 39%, 25%, and 70% of PCI, respectively. For predicting severe fibrosis (F > or = 3), FIB-4 had AUROC of 0.77 with 56% of PCI. For predicting cirrhosis (F4), FIB-4, APRI, and platelet count had AUROCs of 0.80, 0.79, and 0.78, with 59%, 60%, and 76% of PCI, respectively. Overall, diagnostic performances of the different indexes did not differ significantly for both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The use of these noninvasive indexes could save liver biopsies in up to 56-76% of cases for the prediction of severe fibrosis-cirrhosis. However, given the high percentage of misclassified cases for significant fibrosis, such indexes do not appear currently suitable for use in clinical practice in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes: a retrospective survey in Southwestern France, 1999-2004.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of HBV genotypes in Southwestern France and the association between HBV genotypes and patients characteristics. METHODS: 194 HBsAg-positive patients (median age: 45 yrs, range: 7-77, male: 78%) followed in Bordeaux Hospital in 1999-2004 were included. HBV genotype, pre-core (PC) and core promoter (CP) mutations were determined by sequencing. RESULTS: Genotype distribution was A 51%, B 6.7%, C 5.7%, D 26.3%, E 7.7%, F 0.5%, G 2.1%. Among the 146 patients documented, 71.2% were Caucasians, 15.8% Africans, 13.0% Asians. Fifty-seven patients (36%) were HIV-infected. Eighty-two (42.3%) patients were HBeAg-positive. Genotype A was almost exclusively carried by Caucasians (96%), Africans were most frequent among genotype E (82%), and Asians were most prevalent among genotypes B and C (82% and 80%, respectively). Genotype A was associated with a higher prevalence of HBeAg than genotype D (53% versus 35.3%, P=0.03). PC variant was detected in 35% and CP variant in 43% of patients. PC variant was uncommon in genotype A patients (7.3%). CONCLUSION: Distribution of HBV genotypes differs according to ethnic origin, genotypes A and D being the most frequently found. Genotype A was more frequently associated with HBeAg-positivity and genotype D with HBeAg-negativity.

Impact of lamivudine on the risk of liver-related death in 2,041 HBsAg- and HIV-positive individuals: results from an inter-cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of lamivudine (3TC) as part of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on the risk of liver-related death (LRD) in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients has not been extensively studied. METHODS: We performed an analysis involving HIV/HBV-coinfected patients in 13 cohorts who initiated cART. The end-point was LRD--that is, death with concomitant decompensated liver disease (DLD) or hepatocellular carcinoma--as the main cause. Incidence rates of LRD after initiation of cART were expressed as number of events per 100 person-years of follow-up (PYFU). A Poisson regression model adjusted for cohort, gender, mode of HIV transmission, CD4+ T-cell count at cART initiation, liver disease pre-cART, duration of 3TC before cART, and hepatitis C virus was used to assess the association between use of 3TC and risk of LRD. RESULTS: We analysed 2,041 patients. Follow-up after starting cART was 7,648 PYFU (5,569 spent on 3TC-containing regimens) with a median per person of 48 months (range: 2-91). Of the total, 217 subjects died; 57 deaths were liver-related resulting in a rate of 7.5 per 1,000 PYFU [95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.6-9.7]. The relative risk of LRD per extra year of 3TC use was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59-0.90, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The use of 3TC was associated with a reduced risk of LRD over 4 years of follow-up. This study supports the current view that the use of 3TC as part of cART should be considered in patients who are tested positive for HBsAg.

Hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected patients: a survey of physicians and patients participating in the Aquitaine cohort.

UNLABELLED: In France, HIV-infected (HIV+) patients are frequently coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or at risk for this infection. Physicians and their patients should be more committed to HBV prevention than the average population. AIMS: To gain insight into the attitude towards HBV and its vaccination in HIV+ patients from the Aquitaine Cohort and their attending physicians in France. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey based on self-administered questionnaires was performed from November 2002 to June 2003. It targeted 198 physicians from the clinical group on AIDS epidemiology (Groupe d'Epidémiologie Clinique du SIDA en Aquitaine, GECSA) or participating in medical HIV networks in southwestern France; and 512 patients from the cohort. Questions concerned the following items for the physicians: HBV status, prescription of HBV serology and vaccination (frequency, type, schedule), risk factors assessed, reasons for non-vaccination; and for the patients: HBV status, information received, risk factors, attitude towards vaccination. RESULTS: 93% of physicians and 22% of patients stated they were vaccinated against HBV. HBV serological status was reported to be systematically ascertained by 75% of physicians, but post-vaccinal testing was only prescribed by 23% of them. The main reasons for not prescribing more often HBV vaccine were forgetting (79%), difficulty to identify subjects at risk (44%) and being afraid of post-vaccinal complications (32%). Thirty percent of patients reported not to have received any information on HBV vaccination. Overall, 44% considered not to be at risk of infection but 82% of them had been confronted with at least one risk. The main reasons for not having been vaccinated were mostly worry about AIDS (70%), not having been asked by physician (65%) or afraid of complications (58%); nonetheless, 42% of patients were willing to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this survey underline the need for specific health actions to be undertaken concerning hepatitis B vaccination in HIV+ patients as well as their health care providers.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in HIV-infected patients with isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen: Aquitaine cohort, 2002-2003.

We prospectively assessed the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by investigating HBV replication in 160 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. This prevalence was 0.6% (1 case/160 patients; 95% confidence interval, 0%-3.4%). A second serum sample was collected later from 52 of the patients. HBV DNA was once again undetectable in all patients, except for the sole patient who had previously been found to be HBV DNA positive.

Comparison of 2 regimens that include interferon-alpha-2a plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected patients.

An open-label, randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 regimens of interferon-alpha-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) plus ribavirin for management of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfected patients. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive IFN-alpha-2a at a dosage of either (1) 6 MU given 3 times per week for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU 3 times per week for an additional 24 weeks (group A; 31 patients); or (2) 9 MU per day for 2 weeks, followed by 3 MU per day for 22 weeks, followed by 3 MU 3 times per week for 24 weeks (group B; 37 patients). Ribavirin was added at week 16 of therapy if HCV RNA remained detectable at week 12. Sustained virological response was achieved in 10 patients (15%; 6 in group A and 4 in group B). HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and a decrease in the HCV load of >or=3 log(10) copies/mL between inclusion and week 4 were associated with virological response. In conclusion, the combination of conventional IFN-alpha-2a and ribavirin has poor virological efficacy in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients.

Fibrosis is worse in HIV-HCV patients with low-level immunodepression referred for HCV treatment than in HCV-matched patients.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is frequent in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. It is known to have an aggressive course in significantly immunosuppressed patients, and cirrhosis C has become one of the main causes of mortality in HIV-HCV coinfected patients since the improvement of antiretroviral therapy. The reasons for this severe fibrotic evolution are unclear. This prospective study compared chronic HCV lesions, liver immunocompetent cells, fibrosis and liver HCV loads in 2 cohorts of naive patients referred for HCV treatment: 33 HIV-HCV coinfected patients with CD4 >250/microL and 33 HCV-infected patients matched for the main risk factors of fibrosis. Fibrosis, particularly perisinusoidal fibrosis, was more marked in the coinfected patients. This occurred in the absence of a significant difference in disease activity. The number of CD3+ cells in the liver was higher in the HIV-HCV patients than in the HCV patients. Conversely, the number of liver CD4+ cells was lower in HIV-HCV patients than in HCV patients. The numbers of CD8+ and CD68+ cells were similar in the 2 groups. Finally, liver HCV load, assessed by immunostaining and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, was similar in the 2 groups. We conclude that in the population of HIV-HCV coinfected patients with low-level immunosuppression referred for HCV treatment, fibrosis is worse than in HCV patients and the proportion of CD4+ lymphocytes among CD3+ cells is markedly decreased in the liver, whereas intrahepatic viral load is similar. Our data confirm the need to treat such patients against HCV, and suggest that HIV infection could favor fibrosis via the modulation of the intrahepatic immune response.

Should a liver biopsy be done in patients with subclinical chronically elevated transaminases?

In 10% of the patients with chronic abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels no cause is found. The prognosis of this liver disease, the increased risk of liver fibrosis regardless of the types of histological lesions and the need for a liver biopsy are unknown. Nearly 50% of these cases are explained by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with accidentally detected chronically elevated ALT levels, the prevalence of fibrosis and NASH, and the clinical and biological factors associated with each entity. Retrospectively, 67 patients (mean age, 46.6 +/- 12.1 years; 45 males) were included. All patients had a liver biopsy and were hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus seronegative without alcohol, drug, autoimmune or genetically induced liver disease, with ALT > N (the upper limit of normal). NASH was evaluated according to necroinflammatory lesions and fibrosis. Fibrosis was evaluated according to the METAVIR score. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test and the chi-square test. Fibrosis scores were: F0, 37.3%; F1, 32.8%; F2, 26.9%; F3, 1.5%; and F4, 1.5%. NASH was absent in 59.7% and present in 40.3%. Significant differences were observed between F < 2 and F > or = 2 fibrosis patients for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and ALT and between patients with NASH or without for body mass index. Overall, the risk of F > or = 2 fibrosis was increased in patients with AST > N, ALT > 2N or AST > N and ALT > 2N. The prevalence of F > or = 2 fibrosis and NASH in patients with unexplained chronic abnormal ALT are 30% and 40%, respectively. Since the risk of F > or = 2 fibrosis is significantly increased in patients with AST > N and/or ALT > 2N, liver biopsy should be performed only in patients with AST > N or ALT > 2N.

Detection of nodules in liver cirrhosis: spiral computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging? A prospective study of 88 nodules in 34 patients.

Detection and characterization of all focal lesions in the liver are critical for screening patients with chronic liver disease. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients when compared with pathological findings of the explanted liver. From February 1997 to July 1999, 34 cirrhotic patients waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (mean age, 53.5 +/- 9.3 years; 24 males) were included. All patients had MRI and spiral computed tomography examinations, and findings were matched with the histological findings. Data analyses were made using the McNemar chi-square test. Mean time between radiological examination (MRI or spiral computed tomography) and OLT was 43.8 +/- 39 days. A total of 88 nodules were found in the 34 patients: 54 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (mean size, 18 +/- 10 mm) in 21 patients, 22 dysplastic nodules (mean size, 10.7 +/- 4.3 mm) in 11 patients, and 12 macroregenerative nodules in 13 patients. Lesion-by-lesion analyses showed that sensitivity of MRI and spiral computed tomography for nodule, HCC or dysplastic nodule diagnosis was 44.3 and 31.8% (P = 0.02), 61.1 and 51.9% (P = 0.2), and 27.3 and 0% (P = 0.04), respectively. Patient-by-patient analyses showed no statistical difference between spiral computed tomography and MRI for nodule diagnosis. In conclusion, in patients with liver cirrhosis, MRI is more accurate than spiral computed tomography for the detection of liver nodules and dysplastic nodules. However, tumour size is always a restricting factor for these two techniques, which are unable to detect small HCC in more than 60% of cases.

Using patient-reported outcomes to improve the management of co-infection with HIV and HCV: the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort.

The management of co-infection with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is complicated by viral and drug-drug interactions, treatment-related side effects, and the poor response to therapy of certain HCV genotypes. Current or past drug use may also have a negative impact. HEPAVIH (ANRS CO13) is an ongoing French cohort study of co-infected individuals which combines medical and socio-behavioral follow-up. This cohort study aims at analyzing the course of HCV infection and access to HCV treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients, using both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. This article documents the main lessons learned to date from the HEPAVIH data and published literature, while describing research prospects and needs requiring further investigation in the field of patient-reported outcomes.

Correlates of HIV sustained viral suppression in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients: possible role of the hepatitis C virus sustained viral response.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related characteristics such as genotype, viral load or liver fibrosis on the chances of achieving sustained HIV suppression in coinfected patients is not fully documented. METHOD: We examined the relationship between both HIV/HCV-related and sociobehavioural characteristics and HIV sustained viral suppression (SVS) in 897 patients included in the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort. RESULTS: The main outcome variable was HIV SVS, defined as at least two consecutive undetectable HIV viral loads. Among the 897 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, 419 (47%) had received HCV therapy at least once, and 103 patients (25%) had experienced an HCV sustained virologic response (SVR). In multivariate analysis, older age [odds ratio (OR) 1.23 for each period of 5 years of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.49; P = 0.03], a higher level of school education (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.56; P = 0.04), good adherence to HIV therapy (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.23-3.43; P = 0.006) and HCV SVR (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.26; P = 0.04) remained significantly associated with HIV SVS. In contrast, triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimens were associated with failure to achieve HIV SVS (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.94; P = 0.03). Our results show that HCV SVR is associated with a higher likelihood of achieving HIV SVS. CONCLUSION: With the advent of direct-acting anti-HCV drugs, a marked increase in the rate of virologic response is observed in coinfected patients. So, further research is needed to determine whether suppression of HCV replication could be associated with a higher efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.