A Novel Approach to Analyze Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Reducing disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates and mortality remains a priority. Mitigation strategies to reduce these disparities have largely been unsuccessful. The primary aim is to determine variables in models of healthcare utilization and their association with CRC screening and mortality in North Carolina. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of publicly available data across North Carolina using variable reduction techniques with clustering to evaluate association of CRC screening rates and mortality was performed. RESULTS: Three million sixty-five thousand five hundred thirty-seven residents (32.1%) were aged 50 y or more. More than two-thirds (68.8%) were White, while 20.5% were Black. Approximately 61% aged 50 y or more underwent CRC screening (range: 44.0%-80.5%) and had a CRC mortality of 44.8 per 100,000 (range 22.8 to 76.6 per 100,000). Cluster analysis identified two factors, designated social economic education index (factor 1) and rural provider index (factor 2) for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. CRC screening rates were associated with factor 1, consisting of socioeconomic and education variables, and factor 2, comprised of the number of providers per 10,000 individuals aged 50 y or more and rurality. An increase in both factors 1 and 2 by one point would result in an increase in CRC screening rated by 6.8%. CRC mortality was associated with factor 2. An increase in one point in factor 1 results in a decrease in mortality risk by 10.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In North Carolina, using variable reduction with clustering, CRC screening rates were associated with the inter-relationship of the number of providers and rurality, while CRC mortality was associated with the inter-relationship of social, economic, and education variables.

A population health assessment of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality in North Carolina.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of screening mammography use and the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality in North Carolina. METHODS: This cross-sectional study integrated publicly available data from government and private data repositories to model predictors of screening mammography and breast cancer mortality in North Carolina. RESULTS: In North Carolina during 2008-2010, on average, 68.1% of women aged 40-74 years underwent a screening mammogram in the previous two years (range: 38.7%-82.1). The ordinary least squares (OLS) regression demonstrated counties experiencing persistent poverty have mammography screening rates that are 4.3% less, on average, than counties without persistent poverty (estimate (SE) = - 4.283 (2.105), p = 0.045). As the percentage of women with a college education increases, the mammography screening rates increase by approximately 0.3% (estimate (SE) = 0.319 (0.078), P < .001) and as the health literacy score increases, the mammography screening rate decreases by 0.3% (estimate (SE) = - 0.318 (0.104), p = 0.003). These variables explain 7.0% of the variability in mammographic screening rates. The OLS regression analysis demonstrated that age-adjusted breast cancer incidence (Estimate (SE) = 0.074 (0.024), p = 0.003) and health literacy score (estimate (SE) = - 0.175 (0.083), p = 0.039) are significantly related to breast cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic, socioeconomic, and environmental variables explain only a small percentage of the variability in the rates of screening mammography and breast cancer mortality in North Carolina. Advances in the available treatments are likely the major contributor to improving breast cancer mortality.

Disparate Access to Surgery for Operable Carcinoma of the Lung in North Carolina.

PURPOSE: Disparities in access to surgical care are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with cancer. We sought to determine whether vulnerable populations undergo an expected rate of surgery for Stage I-IIIA lung cancer in North Carolina (NC). METHODS: We calculated the proportional surgical ratio (PSR) to identify a potential disparity in surgery rates for early stage (I-IIIA) lung cancer, first in the five counties with the worst health outcomes (LRC) and subsequently the entire state. The reference was the five healthiest counties (HRC), initially, and then the single county with the best health outcomes. RESULTS: In 2016, 3,452 individuals with Stage I-IIIA lung cancer were diagnosed in NC of which 246,854 resided in LRC, whereas 1,865,588 resided in HRC. A total of 453 operable lung cancers were diagnosed in the HRC and 107 in the LRC. The observed lobectomy rate in HRC was 40.1% (range 20.2-58.3%) of early-stage lung cancer and 19% (range 12-36%) for LRC. The PSR was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35, 0.90). For all 99 counties across NC, the PSR ranged from 0.33 to 0.96 (mean = 0.49, standard deviation [SD] = 0.10). In a multivariable model, only other primary care provider ratio (relative rate per 100 increase = 0.997; 95% CI = 0.994, 0.999) was significantly associated with PSR. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals residing in LRC in NC are 42% less likely to undergo surgery for operable lung cancer than patients living in HRC. Understanding how factors impact access is key to designing informed interventions.

Refining breast cancer prognosis by incorporating age at diagnosis into clinical prognostic staging: introduction of a novel online calculator.

PURPOSE: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical staging is used to estimate breast cancer prognosis, but individual patient survival within each stage varies considerably by age at diagnosis. We hypothesized that the addition of age at diagnosis to the staging schema will enable more refined risk stratification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective population analysis of adult women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 registered in SEER. Multivariable Cox hazards models were used to evaluate the association of AJCC 8th edition clinical prognostic stage (CPS) and age with risk of overall mortality. Separate hierarchical models were fit to the data: Model 1: CPS alone; Model 2: CPS + age + age2; and Model 3: CPS + age + age2 + CPS x age + CPS x age2. Models were compared by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the c-statistic for time-dependent receiver operator characteristic curves, and category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI). Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping samples. RESULTS: Among 86,637 women, the median follow-up was 36 months and 3-year overall survival was 91.9% ± 0.1%. Age significantly modified the effect of CPS on survival (p < 0.0001). Model 3 was the most precise, with the lowest AIC (126,619.63), the highest c-statistic (0.8212, standard error 0.0187), and superior NRI indices. CONCLUSION: Age at diagnosis is a highly prognostic variable that warrants consideration for inclusion in future editions of the AJCC Breast Cancer Staging Manual.

The effect of local therapy on breast cancer-specific mortality of women with occult breast cancer and advanced nodal disease (N2/N3): a population analysis.

PURPOSE: Current NCCN guidelines for occult breast cancer (OBC) recommend modified radical mastectomy, with the option for breast preservation with radiation instead of mastectomy for N1 patients. Our aim was to compare the effect of local therapy-mastectomy versus breast radiation-on breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) in a contemporary cohort of OBC patients of all nodal stages. METHODS: Competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of local therapy, nodal stage, and other demographic and clinical prognostic variables on risk of BCSM for women registered in the SEER database with T0N+M0 breast cancer from 2004 to 2015. RESULTS: Of the 353 women with OBC who underwent axillary nodal dissection, 152 received breast radiation and 201 underwent mastectomy. Overall, 57.5% had N1 disease, 54.4% had estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors, 80.7% were white, and 88.1% received chemotherapy. Women treated with radiation were older (p < 0.001). The two groups were comparable with respect to all other variables analyzed. During a median follow-up of 66 months, 32 women died from breast cancer (radiation: 11, mastectomy: 21). Five-year cumulative incidence of BCSM was 8.0% ± 2.6% with radiation versus 10.9% ± 2.6% with mastectomy (p = 0.309). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BCSM included older age, higher N stage, and ER negativity, but the type of local therapy was not significantly associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that breast preservation is a reasonable alternative to mastectomy for OBC patients, regardless of nodal stage.

Quantifying the relationship between age at diagnosis and breast cancer-specific mortality.

PURPOSE: The relationship between age at diagnosis and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the nature of this relationship using rigorous statistical methodology. METHODS: A historical cohort study of adult women with invasive breast cancer in the SEER database from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. Multivariable Cox's cause-specific hazards model was used to evaluate the association of age at diagnosis with risk of BCSM. Functional relationship of age was assessed using cumulative sums of Martingale residuals and the Kolmogorov-type supremum test. RESULTS: A total of 206,332 women were eligible for study. Mean age at diagnosis was 59.7 ± 13.8 years. Median follow-up was 80 months. During the study period, 21,771 women (10.6%) died from breast cancer and 18,566 (9.0%) died from other causes. Cumulative incidence of BCSM at 120 months post-diagnosis was 14.4% (95% CI 14.2-14.6%). Age was found to be quadratically related to the risk of BCSM (p < 0.001), with a nadir at 45 years of age. The final Cox model suggests that a 30-year-old woman has approximately the same adjusted BCSM risk (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.187-1.188) as a 60-year-old woman (HR 1.174, 95% CI 1.174-1.175). CONCLUSIONS: Women diagnosed with breast cancer at the extremes of age suffer disproportionate rates of cancer-specific mortality. The relationship between age at diagnosis and adjusted risk of BCSM is complex, consistent with a quadratic function. With the growing appreciation for breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease, it is essential to accurately address age as a prognostic risk factor in predictive models.

Patterns of node mapping differ for axial and extremity primary cutaneous melanoma: A case for a more selective use of pre-operative imaging.

PURPOSE: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node mapping in melanoma improves the ability to locate nodes. However, it still remains unclear whether this step is required for all patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma from 1996 to 2012 were identified. Exclusion criteria were in situ disease, metastatic disease, or no SLN biopsy. RESULTS: 214 patients were evaluated. Median age was 57 years, the majority were male (59.8%), white (97.2%), and stage I (60.7%). SLN revealed metastatic disease in 14.5% of patients. The most common primary site was the trunk (43.4%) followed by head and neck (21%), upper extremity (19.2%), and lower extremity (16.4%). Multiple lymphatic basins were most common for head and neck lesions (66.7%) followed by those on the trunk (28.8%), with fewer identified when lower (11.4%), and upper extremities were involved (4.2%). When comparison was restricted to extremity vs. axial, a single basin was noted in 94.5% vs. 59.9% of patients, p < 0.0001. For all extremity lesions the SLN was located in the primary basin. Additional sites included in-transit (popliteal) and second tier basins. The only melanomas with bilateral or contralateral SLN were axial melanomas. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with axial melanomas benefit most from lymphoscintigraphy. This step may not be required for extremity melanoma.

Radiotherapy associated with improved survival for high-grade sarcoma of the extremity.

BACKGROUND: The impact of radiotherapy on local control in limb-preserving surgery for high-risk sarcoma has been well studied. However, the impact of the use and timing of radiation therapy on survival is unclear. METHODS: From 1988 to 2010, patients with Stage III extremity sarcoma were identified within the SEER registry and cohorts were created using propensity score matching between irradiated and non-irradiated groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,606 patients were identified, with a median age of 59 years a majority were white (81%), male (54%), received radiotherapy (78%), and had lower extremity (80%) sarcomas. The most common subtype was fibrohistiocytic (29.8%). Patients treated with radiotherapy were younger (57.2 vs. 60.3 years) and differed in subtype compared to those untreated. The matched cohorts were better balanced for all factors. Radiation therapy was associated with a 5% 5-year survival advantage on univariate analysis for both the unmatched (P = 0.002) and matched cohorts (P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis radiotherapy was associated with a 20% and 30% survival advantage for the matched and unmatched cohorts, respectively (P ≤ 0.02). The timing of radiotherapy did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy, regardless of the timing, is associated with improved survival in high-risk sarcoma.

The influence of sentinel lymph node biopsy on survival for intermediate-thickness melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-1 (MSLT-1) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) in melanoma. This may have been secondary to inadequate statistical power. This study was designed to determine the impact of SNB on melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in a larger patient cohort. METHODS: From 2003-2008, patients with tumors 1-4 mm in thickness and clinically negative nodes were identified within the SEER registry. Propensity score was used to create two matched cohorts: those who underwent a wide excision with SNB or wide excision alone. RESULT: A total of 15,274 met inclusion criteria and 7,910 comprised the match cohort. Average age was 67.4 years. The majority were male (62.3 %) and white (97.2 %). Primary tumors were most frequently nonulcerated (77.1 %), located on the extremity (42.3 %), and T2 (64.1 %). There were 3,955 patients in both the SNB and observation groups. There was no significant difference in gender, ethnicity, ulceration status, primary site, or T-classification between the groups. Improved 5-year MSS was associated with SNB (85.7 vs. 84.0 %), female gender (88.3 vs. 82.7 %), absence of ulceration (87.5 vs. 75.7 %), extremity location (87.4 %), T2 disease (88.6 vs. 77.9 %), and a negative SNB (88.9 vs. 64.8 %). The relationships between observation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18], male gender (HR 1.33), ulceration (HR 1.77), head-and-neck location (HR 1.34), and T3 disease (HR 1.82) persisted on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Status of the sentinel node is the strongest predictor of survival in patients with intermediate thickness melanoma. SNB compared with observation was associated with a modest survival advantage.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved survival in Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) has become a standard for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the impact on survival is unclear. To better define the staging and therapeutic value of SNB, we compared SNB with nodal observation. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage I and II MCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry undergoing surgery between 2003 and 2009 were identified and divided into two groups-SNB and observation. RESULTS: A total of 1,193 patients met the inclusion criteria (SNB 474 and Observation 719). The median age was 78 years, and the majority were White (95.3 %), male (58.8 %), received radiation therapy (52.9 %) and had T1 tumors (65.3 %). Twenty-four percent had a positive SNB. SNB patients were younger (73 vs. 81 years; p < 0.0001), had T1 tumors (69.6 vs. 62.5 %; p = 0.04) and received radiotherapy (57.8 vs. 40 %; p < 0.0001). Among biopsy patients, a negative SNB was associated with improved 5-year MCC-specific survival (84.5 vs. 64.6 %; p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated an increased 5-year MCC-specific survival for the SNB group versus the Observation group (79.2 vs. 73.8 %; p = 0.004), female gender (83.2 vs. 70.4 %; p = 0.0004), and lower T stage (p < 0.0001). On Cox regression, diminished survival was noted for the Observation group (risk ratio [RR] 1.43; p = 0.04), male gender (RR 2.06; p < 0.0001), and a higher T stage. CONCLUSION: SNB for MCC provides prognostic information and is associated with a significant survival advantage.

Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in North Carolina.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to identify factors that contribute to disparities in access to bariatric surgery in North Carolina (NC). METHODS: Using the rate of bariatric surgery in the county with the best health outcome as the reference, we calculated the Surgical Equity Index (SEI) in the remaining counties in NC. RESULTS: Approximately 2.95 million individuals (29%) were obese in NC. There were 992 (.5%) bariatric procedures performed on a population of 194 209 individuals with obesity in the Reference County (RC). The mean SEI for bariatric surgery in NC was .47 (SD .17, range .15-.95). A statistically significant difference was observed in 89 counties. Univariable analyses identified the following variables to be significantly associated with the SEI: percent of population living in rural areas (% rural) (relative rate change in SEI [RR] = .994, 95% CI .92-.997; <.0001), median household income (RR = 1.0, 95% CI = 1.0-1.0; P = .0002), prevalence of diabetes (RR = .947, 95% CI .917-.977; .0006), the primary care physician ratio (RR = .995, 95% CI .991-.998; P = .006), and percent uninsured adults (RR = .955, 95% CI .927-.985; P = .003). By multivariable hierarchical regression analysis, only the % rural remained statistically associated with a low SEI (RR = .995 per 1% increase in % rural, 95% CI = .992, .998; P = .0002). DISCUSSION: The percent rural is the most significant predictor of disparities in access to bariatric surgery. For every 1% increase in % rural, the rate of surgery decreased by .5%. Understanding the characteristics of rurality that are barriers to access is crucial to mitigate disparities in bariatric surgical access in NC.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: adherence to evidence-based guidelines in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of evidence-based standards is problematic. Level 1 evidence, largely predicated on the German Rectal Cancer Study, supports neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent this evidence has affected clinical practice. METHODS: Stage II/III rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery from 1998 to 2007 were identified in the SEER tumor registry. Variables were analyzed with SPSS software. Trends were evaluated with regression models. Survivals were compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 22,136 patients were identified and 15,021 (67.8%) were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. A large percentage were >60 years old (64.4%), white (83.0%), male (58.8%), at stage III (55.1%), and treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (35.5%). A significant increase in the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy occurred: from 17% in 1998 to 51% in 2007 (p < 0.001). Scatter-plot best-fit lines for neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy intersected at approximately year 2002. Significant increases in preoperative radiotherapy were observed for all races and cancer stages (p < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, race (p = 0.018), sex (p < 0.001), year of diagnosis (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), and stage (p < 0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. On logistic regression analysis, male sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.14, p < 0.001), year (OR 1.223, p < 0.001), and stage II (OR 1.39, p < 0.001) were predictors of neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: When adjuvant radiotherapy was utilized, there was rapid adoption of a neoadjuvant approach. This trend predated publication of prospective randomized data.

Race-Related Differences in the Clinical Presentation and Histopathologic Features of Phyllodes Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumor (PT) is a rare fibroepithelial lesion of the breast with variable malignant potential. Black women have a higher incidence of a related benign tumor, fibroadenoma, but there are limited epidemiological data on PT. The aim of our study was to evaluate race-related differences in the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of PT. METHODS: Our institutional pathology database was queried for breast specimen reports from 01/2009 to 10/2019 to identify patients with a pathologic diagnosis of PT. Chart review and detailed slide review were performed to obtain clinical and histopathologic variables, respectively. RESULTS: Among twelve patients, two had malignant PT, three had borderline PT, and seven had benign PT. All patients with malignant and borderline PT were black, compared with 29% of those with benign PT. There were no apparent race-related differences in specific histopathologic features among black vs. non-black women with benign PT. Malignant and borderline PT were relatively larger than benign PT, with mean tumor sizes of 9.0 cm (standard deviation [SD] 4.7 cm), 12.2 cm (SD 9.4 cm), and 5.4 cm (SD 5.8 cm), respectively. Two women had a local recurrence, both of whom were black. DISCUSSION: In this single-institution retrospective study, we observed disproportionate rates of aggressive histopathologic features and disparate outcomes among black women with PT. A multi-institutional PT registry would facilitate improved knowledge about race-related differences in the presentation and outcomes of this rare tumor.

Patient navigation and the quality of breast cancer care: an analysis of the breast cancer care quality indicators.

PURPOSE: Patient navigation programs are initiated to help guide patients through barriers in a complex cancer care system. We sought to analyze the impact of our patient navigator program on the adherence to specific Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators (BCCQI). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with stage I-III breast cancer seen the calendar year prior to the initiation of the patient navigation program were compared with patients treated in the ensuing two calendar years. Quality indicators deemed appropriate for analysis were those associated with overcoming barriers to treatment and those associated with providing health education and improving patient decision-making. RESULTS: A total of 134 consecutive patients between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 and 234 consecutive patients between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 were evaluated for compliance with the BCCQI. There was no significant difference in the mean age or race/ethnic distribution of the study population. In all ten BCCQI evaluated, there was improvement in the percentage of patients in compliance from pre and post implementation of a patient navigator program (range 2.5-27.0 %). Overall, compliance with BCCQI improved from 74.1 to 95.5 % (p < 0.0001). Indicators associated with informed decision-making and patient preference achieved statistical significance, while only completion axillary node dissection in sentinel node-positive biopsies in the process of treatment achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a patient navigator program improved breast cancer care as measured by BCCQI. The impact on disease-free and overall survival remains to be determined.

Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend against routine screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years. However, diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer relies on mammographic screening for detection. We hypothesized that screening at younger age may be important for detecting earlier and more treatable cancers for women in different demographic groups. METHODS: All women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or T1N0 breast cancer between 2004 and 2008 in the California Cancer Registry were evaluated. Patients were divided into: (1) women aged 40-49 years, who would be excluded from USPSTF recommendations for screening, and (2) women aged 50-74 years, who are recommended for screening. Patients in the two age groups were compared by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and hormone receptor (HR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and triple-negative (TN) status. RESULTS: Of 46,691 patients identified, 22.6% were aged 40-49 years, and 77.4% were aged 50-74 years. Younger women with DCIS had statistically higher odds of being HR positive and having higher SES, and Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) race/ethnicity, while younger women diagnosed with T1N0 breast cancer had higher odds of being HR positive, HER-2 positive, and triple negative and of having higher SES and non-white race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Young Hispanic, Asian/PI, and non-Hispanic (NH) Black women in California have greater odds of being diagnosed with early breast cancer than their older counterparts. Excluding 40-49-year-old women from screening could impact early diagnosis of HR-positive, HER-2-positive, and TN tumors. Implementation of USPSTF recommendations could disproportionately impact non-white women and potentially lead to more advanced presentation at diagnosis.

Development and Assessment of a Systematic Approach for Detecting Disparities in Surgical Access.

Importance: Although optimal access is accepted as the key to quality care, an accepted methodology to ascertain potential disparities in surgical access has not been defined. Objective: To develop a systematic approach to detect surgical access disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Health Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database from 2016. Using the surgical rate observed in the 5 highest-ranked counties (HRCs), the expected surgical rate in the 5 lowest-ranked counties (LRCs) in North Carolina were calculated. Patients 18 years and older who underwent an inpatient general surgery procedure and patients who underwent emergency inpatient cholecystectomy, herniorrhaphy, or bariatric surgery in 2016 were included. Data were collected from January to December 2016, and data were analyzed from March to July 2020. Exposures: Health outcome county rank as defined by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportional surgical ratio (PSR), which was the disparity in surgical access defined as the observed number of surgical procedures in the 5 LRCs relative to the expected number of procedures using the 5 HRCs as the standardized reference population. Results: In 2016, approximately 1.9 million adults lived in the 5 HRCs, while approximately 246 854 lived in the 5 LRCs. A total of 28 924 inpatient general surgical procedures were performed, with 4521 being performed in those living in the 5 LRCs and 24 403 in those living in the 5 HRCs. The rate of general surgery in the 5 HRCs was 13.09 procedures per 1000 population. Using the 5 HRCs as the reference, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.35-1.44). For emergent/urgent cholecystectomy, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 2.26 (95% CI, 2.02-2.51), and the PSR for emergent/urgent herniorrhaphy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.33-2.45). Age-adjusted rate of obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] greater than 30), on average, was 36.6% (SD, 3.4) in the 5 LRCs vs 25.4% (SD, 4.6) in the 5 HRCs (P = .002). The rate of bariatric surgery in the 5 HRCs was 33.07 per 10 000 population with obesity. For the 5 LRCs, the PSR was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.51-0.69). Conclusions and Relevance: The PSR is a systematic approach to define potential disparities in surgical access and should be useful for identifying, investigating, and monitoring interventions intended to mitigate disparities in surgical access that effects the health of vulnerable populations.

The use of pelvic radiation in stage II rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines recommend the use of pelvic radiation in T3N0 rectal cancer. We sought to determine the rate of compliance with NIH radiation guidelines for patients with T3N0 rectal cancer. We performed a retrospective cohort study of T3NO rectal cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2003, in Region 5 of the California Cancer Registry (R5 CCR). Three hundred twenty-nine patients with T3N0 rectal cancer were identified. The mean age of the study population was 68 years (range, 28 to 93 years). Only 54.1 per cent of patients with T3N0 cancer received pelvic radiation. There was no difference in gender (P = 0.13) or the number of nodes examined (P = 0.19) between patients who had treatment with pelvic radiation and those who did not. However, patients receiving radiation were significantly younger (mean 64 years with radiation therapy [XRT] vs. 72 years without XRT, P < 0.001) and significantly more likely to be treated with systemic chemotherapy (75% with XRT vs. 8.6% without XRT, P < 0.001). Significant numbers of patients with T3N0 rectal cancer are not receiving pelvic radiation in R5 CRR. NIH guidelines are not being translated into clinical practice. The reasons for this warrant continued investigation.

Time from diagnosis to surgical treatment of breast cancer: factors influencing delays in initiating treatment.

No clear guidelines exist defining the appropriate time frame from diagnosis to definitive surgical treatment of breast cancer. Studies have suggested that treatment delays greater than 90 days may be associated with stage migration. We sought to evaluate demographic factors that influence 30-day and 90-day benchmarks for time from diagnosis to definitive surgical treatment of breast cancer. Between 2004 and 2007, 19,896 women with stage I to III invasive breast cancer were treated with primary surgical therapy and did not receive preoperative systemic therapy in the California Cancer Registry. Overall, 75.7 per cent of patients were treated within 30 days of diagnosis, and 95.5 per cent of patients were treated within 90 days of diagnosis. Multivariate analyses revealed that treatment delays were associated with smaller tumor size, use of total mastectomy, lower socioeconomic status, and Hispanic and nonHispanic black race/ethnicity. Furthermore, disparities in those that did not meet 30-day benchmark timeframes were exaggerated with 90-day treatment delays. These benchmarks can be used to measure disparities in health care delivery.