RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the ability of an interactive screening tool to identify cognitive delay in children aged 18 to 24 months. DESIGN: Children were assessed using the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition (BSID-III) and a touchscreen measure of problem-solving (Babyscreen V.1.5). We examined the internal consistency and concurrent validity between the two measures. A BSID-III cognitive composite score (BSID-IIIcc) ≤1 SD below population mean was used to indicate a low average cognitive ability. RESULTS: 87 children with a mean (SD) age of 20.4 (1.3) months who experienced complications at delivery (n=53) and healthy age-matched controls (n=34) were included in the study. A moderate positive correlation between the BSID-IIIcc and the total number of tasks completed on the Babyscreen suggested reasonable concurrent validity (r=0.414, p<0.001). Children with a BSID-IIIcc ≤90 had lower median (IQR) Babyscreen score (7 (6, 8.5) vs 11 (8.5, 13); p=0.003) and a lower median (IQR) age-adjusted z-score (BST z-score) for number of items completed compared with those >90 (-1.08 (-1.5 to -0.46) vs 0.31 (-0.46 to 0.76); p=0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the prediction of a low normal BSID-IIIcc was 0.787 (CI 0.64 to 0.93). A BST z-score of <-0.44 yielded 82.4% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity in identifying children with cognitive delay. CONCLUSIONS: A touchscreen-based application has concurrent validity with the BSID-IIIcc and could be used to screen for cognitive delay at 18-24 months of age.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treating severe emotional dysregulation and co-occurring substance misuse is challenging. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is a comprehensive and evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). It has been hypothesised that the skills training, which is a facet of the full DBT programme, might be effective for people with severe emotional dysregulation and other co-occurring conditions, but who do not meet the criteria for BPD. However, there is limited research on standalone DBT skills training for people with substance misuse and emotional dysregulation. METHODS: A mixed methods study employing an explanatory sequential design was conducted where participants with a dual diagnosis (n = 64) were recruited from a community-based public addiction treatment service in Ireland between March 2015 and January 2018. DBT therapists screened potential participants against the study eligibility criteria. Quantitative self-report measures examining emotion regulation, mindfulness, adaptive and maladaptive coping responses including substance misuse, and qualitative feedback from participants were collected. Quantitative data were summarised by their mean and standard deviation and multilevel linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the mean change from baseline to post-intervention and the 6-month follow-up period. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS: Quantitative results indicated reductions in binge drinking and use of Class A, B and C drug use from pre-intervention (T1) to the 6-month follow-up (T3). Additionally, significant improvements were noted for mindfulness practice and DBT skills use from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001). There were also significant reductions in dysfunctional coping and emotional dysregulation from T1 to T3 (p < 0.001). Significant differences were identified from pre to post intervention in reported substance use, p = 0.002. However, there were no significant differences between pre-intervention and 6-month follow up reports of substance use or at post-intervention to 6 month follow up. Qualitative findings indicated three superordinate themes in relation to participants' experiences of a DBT skills training programme, adapted from standard DBT: (1) new lease of life; (2) need for continued formal aftercare and (3) programme improvements. Participants described reductions in substance misuse, while having increased confidence to use the DBT skills they had learned in the programme to deal with difficult emotions and life stressors. CONCLUSIONS: This DBT skills training programme, adapted from standard DBT, showed positive results for participants and appears effective in treating people with co-occurring disorders. Qualitative results of this mixed methods study corroborate the quantitative results indicating that the experiences of participants have been positive. The study indicates that a DBT skills programme may provide a useful therapeutic approach to managing co-occurring symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención PlenaRESUMEN
This paper aims to present best practice in risk management within mental health services. Its purpose is to explore the prevalence of violence within mental health services, to examine the nature of risk, highlight lessons learned and guidance published on safer services, and to identify ways to enhance risk management in mental health care. We reflect on current health care practices in the UK, England and Wales, and Ireland and refer to research and practice from other jurisdictions internationally where it exists.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using a touch screen assessment tool to measure cognitive capacity in toddlers. DESIGN: 112 typically developing children with a median age of 31 months (IQR: 26-34) interacted with a touch screen cognitive assessment tool. We examined the sensitivity of the tool to age-related changes in cognition by comparing the number of items completed, speed of task completion and accuracy in two age groups; 24-29 months versus 30-36 months. RESULTS: Children aged 30-36 months completed more tasks (median: 18, IQR: 18-18) than those aged 24-29 months (median: 17, IQR: 15-18). Older children also completed two of the three working memory tasks and an object permanence task faster than their younger peers. Children became faster at completing the working memory items with each exposure and registered similar completion times on the hidden object retrieval items, despite task demands being twofold on the second exposure. A novel item required children to integrate what they had learnt on preceding items. The older group was more likely to complete this item and to do so faster than the younger group. CONCLUSIONS: Children as young as 24 months can complete items requiring cognitive engagement on a touch screen device, with no verbal instruction and minimal child-administrator interaction. This paves the way for using touch screen technology for language and administrator independent developmental assessment in toddlers.