Recurrence of premalignant oral cavity and oropharynx lesions after pulsed diode laser treatment.

PURPOSE: Leukoplakia is common with a 1 % incidence in the population and may harbor preneoplastic changes. Diode lasers provide both precision and coagulation for excision of superficial lesions in clinical and operative settings with little damage to deeper tissue. We aim to determine the rate of oral and oropharyngeal hyperkeratosis and dysplasia recurrence after treatment with diode laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with oral or oropharyngeal hyperkeratotic or mild dysplastic lesions treated with pulsed diode laser between 2013 and 2020 at a tertiary academic institution were analyzed. The main outcome measure was recurrence of hyperkeratosis and dysplasia after treatment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received diode laser treatment for hyperkeratotic or mild dysplastic lesions of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Demographic features included 9 (64.3 %) females and mean age of 66.6 years. In these 14 patients, 18 distinct lesions were identified. Eleven (61.1 %) lesions were located on the oral tongue, 4 (22.2 %) on the buccal mucosa, 2 (11.1 %) on the hard palate, and 1 (5.6 %) on the soft palate. Average time from lesion clinical diagnosis to the first diode laser treatment was 8.3 months with an average number of 1.4 treatments per lesion. Three (16.7 %) lesions experienced recurrence after the most recent treatment. None of the lesions underwent malignant transformation. None of the patients experienced bleeding, tethering, or dysarthria after treatment. One patient developed pyogenic granuloma and reported chronic tongue pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed diode laser treatment of leukoplakia was well tolerated with low complication rates and reasonable control of precancerous lesions.

Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. METHODS: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: "facelift surgery," "facelift surgery what to expect," "facelift surgery patient education," and "what is facelift surgery." Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P < .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.

Nasopharyngectomy Without Maxillary Swing via a Combined Open Lateral and Endoscopic Approach.

Nasopharyngeal tumors in the proximity of the internal carotid artery are often difficult to dissect. Here, we describe a combined transcervical and endoscopic endonasal approach that provides improved internal carotid artery protection and confident tumor resection. Laryngoscope, 133:105-108, 2023.

Risk Factors for 30-day and 90-day Readmission After Lumbar Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess readmission rates and risk factors for 30-day and 90-day readmission after elective lumbar decompression at a single institution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Hospital readmission is an undesirable aspect of interventional treatment. Studies evaluating readmissions after elective lumbar decompression typically analyze national databases, and therefore have several drawbacks inherent to their macroscopic nature that limit their clinical utility. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary one- to four-level lumbar decompression surgery were retrospectively identified. Demographic, surgical, and readmission data within "30-days" (0-30 days) and "90-days" (31-90 days) postoperatively were extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) no readmission, (2) readmission during the 30-day or 90-day postoperative period, (3) complication related to surgery, and (4) Emergency Department (ED)/Observational (OBs)/Urgent (UC) care. RESULTS: A total of 2635 patients were included. Seventy-six (2.9%) were readmitted at some point within the 30- (2.3%) or 90-day (0.3%) postoperative periods. Patients in the pooled readmitted group were older (63.1 yr, P  < 0.001), had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (31.2% with ASA of 3, P = 0.03), and more often had liver disease (8.1%, P = 0.004) or rheumatoid arthritis (12.0%, P = 0.02) than other cohorts. A greater proportion of 90-day readmissions and complications had surgical-related diagnoses or a diagnosis of recurrent disc herniation than 30-day readmissions and complications (66.7% vs. 44.5%, P = 0.04 and 33.3% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001, respectively). Age (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, P = 0.01), current smoking status (OR: 2.38, P < 0.001), longer length of stay (OR: 1.14, P < 0.001), and a history of renal failure (OR: 2.59, P = 0.03) were independently associated with readmission or complication. CONCLUSION: Increased age, current smoking status, hospital length of stay, and a history of renal failure were found to be significant independent predictors of inpatient readmission or complication after lumbar decompression.