Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neuromodulation ; 14(6): 534-8; discussion 538, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854498

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain in patients with postlaminectomy syndrome (PLS) is challenging to treat, especially for patients who have undergone multilevel surgical procedures. Despite conservative therapy and available interventional pain procedures including spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and intrathecal therapies, patients may continue with intractable low back pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) may represent an effective alternative treatment option for these patients when conventional treatments do not provide adequate relief of intractable low back pain. METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent an uneventful PNFS trial with percutaneous placement of four temporary quadripolar leads (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) placed subcutaneously over the lumbar or thoraco-lumbar area. RESULTS: After experiencing excellent pain relief over the next two days, temporary leads were removed. The patients were implanted with permanent leads and rechargeable or non-rechargeable generator two to four weeks after temporary lead removal. All patients reported sustained pain relief 12 months after implantation. DISCUSSION: PNFS with use of four vertically orientated leads provides an effective treatment option for patients with PLS after multilevel surgical procedures with intractable low back pain who have failed conservative treatment. PNFS may provide pain relief with advantages over conservative treatments and interventional treatments including SCS and intrathecal therapy. CONCLUSION: PNFS may be more effective in treating intractable low back pain than SCS in patients with PLS after multilevel spinal surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Síndrome , Vértebras Torácicas , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neuromodulation ; 13(4): 288-90; discussion 291, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21992884

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for patients with intractable post-herniorrhaphy pain which conventional treatment failed to ameliorate. PROCEDURE: The patients underwent an uneventful spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial with percutaneous placement of two eight-electrode epidural leads (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to level T7-T8-T9. RESULTS: Upon experiencing excellent pain relief over the next two days during the trial, the patients were implanted with permanent leads and rechargeable or non-rechargeable generators two to four weeks later and reported sustained pain relief during following 12 months after implantation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that SCS offers an alternative treatment option for intractable post-herniorrhaphy pain. This type of treatment should be considered for use in a select group of patients when all conventional treatments failed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA