Assessing shorebird mortalities due to razor clam aquaculture at key migratory stopover sites in southeastern China.

Aquaculture can provide foraging habitat for birds, but it can also result in intentional and accidental mortality. We examined an overlooked conflict between razor clam (Sinonovacula spp.) aquaculture and declining shorebirds in southeastern China's Fujian and Zhejiang provinces. We surveyed 6 out of 11 internationally important stopover sites for these shorebirds and monitored shorebird mortality in 2 sites (Xinghua Bay, Yueqing Bay) with razor clam aquaculture. We visited an additional 32 sites in these 2 provinces to determine if there was netting in other razor clam farms. Approximately 8-9 km2 of intertidal foraging habitat was covered by horizontal nets to prevent birds from feeding on young razor clams at Xinghua Bay and Yueqing Bay. We conservatively estimated that 13,676 (2.5th-97.5th percentile 8,330-21,285) individual shorebirds were entangled in the nets at the 2 monitored sites in April and May 2021, including 2 endangered and 7 near-threatened species. Mortality of 5 species for which we had sufficient data accounted for 0.76% (black-tailed godwit [Limosa limosa]) to 4.27% (terek sandpiper [Xenus cinereus]) of their total flyway populations. This level of mortality could strongly affect their populations. We found netting at 17 additional razor clam farms, indicating a widespread threat to shorebirds. Although razor clams are typically harvested in late March to early April, nets are left on the mudflats throughout the spring and summer, including when the bulk of shorebird migration takes place. Immediately removing these nets after the clam harvest could prevent most of the spring mortality of shorebirds, although this is unlikely to happen without government regulations or economic incentives. To better assess and mitigate the impacts of this conflict, future research should quantify shorebird mortality at other razor clam farms, including during winter, explore less harmful deterrence methods, and assess the socioeconomic factors driving the conflict.

Evaluación de la mortalidad de aves costeras causada por la acuacultura de almejas navaja en sitios importantes de descanso migratorio en el sureste de China Resumen La acuacultura puede proporcionar hábitats de forrajeo para las aves, pero también puede derivar en muertes accidentales o intencionales. Analizamos un conflicto ignorado entre la acuacultura de almeja navaja (Sinonovacula spp.) y la declinación de aves costeras en las provincias de Fujian y Zhejiang del sureste de China. Censamos seis de los once sitios de descanso con importancia internacional para estas aves y monitoreamos su mortalidad en dos sitios en donde se cría la almeja navaja: la bahía de Xinghua y la de Yueqing. Además, visitamos 32 sitios en estas dos provincias para determinar si existían redes en otras granjas de almeja navaja. Unos 8 ­ 9 km2 del hábitat intermareal de forrajeo estaban cubiertos por redes horizontales para evitar que las aves se alimentaran de las almejas juveniles en ambas bahías. Estimamos moderadamente que 13,676 (2.5° ­ 97.5° percentil 8,330 ­ 21,285) individuos de aves costeras se enredaron en las redes en los dos sitios monitoreados durante abril y mayo de 2021, incluyendo a dos especies en peligro y siete casi amenazadas. La mortalidad de las cinco especies para las cuales tuvimos suficientes datos representó del 0.76% (Limosa limosa) al 4.27% (Xenus cinereus) del total de las poblaciones migratorias. Este nivel de mortalidad podría tener un gran efecto sobre las poblaciones de estas especies. Encontramos redes en 17 granjas más, lo que indica una amenaza extendida para las aves costeras. Aunque es típico que se colecte la almeja navaja a finales de marzo y principios de abril, las redes permanecen durante toda la primavera y el verano, incluso cuando ocurre la mayoría de los vuelos migratorios. La eliminación inmediata de estas redes después de la colecta de almejas podría prevenir la mayoría de las muertes primaverales de las aves costeras, aunque no es probable que esto suceda sin regulaciones gubernamentales o incentivos económicos. Para tener mejores evaluaciones y mitigaciones del impacto de este conflicto, una investigación más profunda debería cuantificar la mortalidad de las aves costeras en otras granjas, incluso durante el invierno, explorar métodos de disuasión menos dañinos y evaluar los factores socioeconómicos que causan el conflicto.

LncRP11-675F6.3 responds to rapamycin treatment and reduces triglyceride accumulation via interacting with HK1 in hepatocytes by regulating autophagy and VLDL-related proteins.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been widely proven to be involved in liver lipid homeostasis. Herein, we identify an upregulated lncRNA named lncRP11-675F6.3 in response to rapamycin treatment using a microarray in HepG2 cells. Knockdown of lncRP11-675F6. 3 leads to a significant reduction in apolipoprotein 100 (ApoB100), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP), ApoE and ApoC3 with increased cellular triglyceride level and autophagy. Furthermore, we find that ApoB100 is obviously colocalized with GFP-LC3 in autophagosomes when lncRP11-675F6. 3 is knocked down, indicating that elevated triglyceride accumulation likely related to autophagy induces the degradation of ApoB100 and impairs very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembly. We then identify and validate that hexokinase 1 (HK1) acts as the binding protein of lncRP11-675F6.3 and mediates triglyceride regulation and cell autophagy. More importantly, we find that lncRP11-675F6.3 and HK1 attenuate high fat diet induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by regulating VLDL-related proteins and autophagy. In conclusion, this study reveals that lncRP11-675F6.3 is potentially involved in the downstream of mTOR signaling pathway and the regulatory network of hepatic triglyceride metabolism in cooperation with its interacting protein HK1, which may provide a new target for fatty liver disorder treatment.

Multiple habitat use by declining migratory birds necessitates joined-up conservation.

Many species depend on multiple habitats at different points in space and time. Their effective conservation requires an understanding of how and when each habitat is used, coupled with adequate protection. Migratory shorebirds use intertidal and supratidal wetlands, both of which are affected by coastal landscape change. Yet the extent to which shorebirds use artificial supratidal habitats, particularly at highly developed stopover sites, remains poorly understood leading to potential deficiencies in habitat management. We surveyed shorebirds on their southward migration in southern Jiangsu, a critical stopover region in the East Asian Australasian Flyway (EAAF), to measure their use of artificial supratidal habitats and assess linkages between intertidal and supratidal habitat use. To inform management, we examined how biophysical features influenced occupancy of supratidal habitats, and whether these habitats were used for roosting or foraging. We found that shorebirds at four of five sites were limited to artificial supratidal habitats at high tide for ~11-25 days per month because natural intertidal flats were completely covered by seawater. Within the supratidal landscape, at least 37 shorebird species aggregated on artificial wetlands, and shorebirds were more abundant on larger ponds with less water cover, less vegetation, at least one unvegetated bund, and fewer built structures nearby. Artificial supratidal habitats were rarely used for foraging and rarely occupied when intertidal flats were available, underscoring the complementarity between supratidal roosting habitat and intertidal foraging habitat. Joined-up artificial supratidal management and natural intertidal habitat conservation are clearly required at our study site given the simultaneous dependence by over 35,000 migrating shorebirds on both habitats. Guided by observed patterns of habitat use, there is a clear opportunity to improve habitat condition by working with local land custodians to consider shorebird habitat requirements when managing supratidal ponds. This approach is likely applicable to shorebird sites throughout the EAAF.