PGE2 inhibits TIL expansion by disrupting IL-2 signalling and mitochondrial function.

Expansion of antigen-experienced CD8+ T cells is critical for the success of tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-adoptive cell therapy (ACT) in patients with cancer1. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) acts as a key regulator of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte functions by promoting expansion and cytotoxic capability2,3. Therefore, it is essential to comprehend mechanistic barriers to IL-2 sensing in the tumour microenvironment to implement strategies to reinvigorate IL-2 responsiveness and T cell antitumour responses. Here we report that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a known negative regulator of immune response in the tumour microenvironment4,5, is present at high concentrations in tumour tissue from patients and leads to impaired IL-2 sensing in human CD8+ TILs via the PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4. Mechanistically, PGE2 inhibits IL-2 sensing in TILs by downregulating the IL-2Rγc chain, resulting in defective assembly of IL-2Rß-IL2Rγc membrane dimers. This results in impaired IL-2-mTOR adaptation and PGC1α transcriptional repression, causing oxidative stress and ferroptotic cell death in tumour-reactive TILs. Inhibition of PGE2 signalling to EP2 and EP4 during TIL expansion for ACT resulted in increased IL-2 sensing, leading to enhanced proliferation of tumour-reactive TILs and enhanced tumour control once the cells were transferred in vivo. Our study reveals fundamental features that underlie impairment of human TILs mediated by PGE2 in the tumour microenvironment. These findings have therapeutic implications for cancer immunotherapy and cell therapy, and enable the development of targeted strategies to enhance IL-2 sensing and amplify the IL-2 response in TILs, thereby promoting the expansion of effector T cells with enhanced therapeutic potential.

Study design for DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe: T-DXd in patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Results on T-DXd treatment in HER2-low mBC have so far been limited to clinical trials. DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe (NCT05945732) is a multi-center, multi-country, observational, prospective, non-interventional study planning to enroll 1350 patients from 216 sites receiving T-DXd or conventional chemotherapy as their routine clinical care for advanced stage breast cancer in 12 European countries. This non-interventional study will provide real-world insight into T-DXd treatment for HER2-low mBC with data on effectiveness, safety and tolerability, patient-reported outcomes, treatment patterns, geriatric health status and HER2 testing. This will be beneficial for improving guidance to maximize patient treatment benefit.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; Enhertu^®) is a medicine approved to treat cancers that produce a protein called HER2 on the surface of cancer cells. T-DXd works by targeting the HER2 protein to deliver chemotherapy directly to cancer cells. Until recently, breast cancers were classified as HER2-positive (high level of HER2 protein on cancer cells) or HER2-negative (very low level/no HER2 protein on cancer cells). T-DXd was approved for treating patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in Europe in 2022. In 2023 the DESTINY-Breast04 clinical trial showed that T-DXd was more effective than current standard chemotherapies, when treating advanced breast cancer patients with low levels of the HER2 protein (historically classified as HER2-negative cancer). This trial led to the approval of T-DXd for treating advanced HER2-low breast cancer, providing a new treatment option for 50­60% of breast cancer patients. More information is needed about T-DXd treatment in the real world (for patients treated in the hospital, rather than in a clinical trial). This article describes the purpose and design of the DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe study, which will collect and report more information about how effective T-DXd treatment is in the real world. This is a large study aiming to include 1350 eligible patients from 12 countries across Europe. Patients will report their experience of side effects (such as nausea and vomiting) to improve management of T-DXd treatment and maximize patient benefit. The study will also examine how elderly patients respond to T-DXd treatment, and how HER2 levels are being tested.Clinical Trial Registration: ICH CGP: NCT05945732, registered on 6 July 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Oncology: what's new in 2023]. / Oncologie: ce qui a changé en 2023.

The oncology field continues its remarkable evolution over the years, with promising advances leading to innovative and individualized treatments. The development of new molecules, the identification of new therapeutic targets and the search for new sequences or combinations promise to revolutionize cancer treatments and contribute to improving survival rates, patients' quality of life and to open new perspective in oncology research. In this article, the newest data released in 2023 are reviewed.

Le domaine de l'oncologie poursuit son évolution remarquable au fil des années, avec des avancées prometteuses ouvrant la voie à des traitements novateurs et individualisés. L'élaboration de nouvelles molécules, l'identification de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques et la recherche de nouvelles séquences ou combinaisons de traitements promettent de révolutionner la prise en charge du cancer et de contribuer à améliorer les taux de survie, la qualité de vie des patients et à ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives dans la recherche en oncologie. Dans cet article, les nouveautés parues en 2023 sont passées en revue.

Lurbinectedin in patients with pretreated endometrial cancer: results from a phase 2 basket clinical trial and exploratory translational study.

Second-line treatment of endometrial cancer is an unmet medical need. Lurbinectedin showed promising antitumor activity in a phase I study in combination with doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer. This phase 2 Basket trial evaluated lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in a cohort of 73 patients with pretreated endometrial cancer. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and an exploratory translational study. Confirmed complete (CR) and partial response (PR) was reported in two and six patients, respectively (ORR = 11.3%; 95%CI, 5.0-21.0%). Median DoR was 9.2 months (95%CI, 3.4-18.0 months), median PFS was 2.6 months (95%CI, 1.4-4.0 months) and median OS was 9.3 months (95%CI, 6.1-12.8 months). Molecular subtypes showed differences in PFS rate at 6 months (p53abn 23.7% vs. "No Specific Molecular Profile" [NSMP] 42.9%) and median OS (p53abn 6.6 months vs. NSMP 16.1 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events (mostly grade 1/2) were fatigue (54.8% of patients), nausea (50.7%), vomiting (26.0%) decreased appetite (17.8%). and constipation, (19.2%). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (43.8%; grade 4, 19.2%; febrile neutropenia, 4.1%). In conclusion, considering the exploratory aim of this trial and the hints of antitumor activity observed together with a predictable and manageable safety profile, further biomarker-based development of lurbinectedin is recommended in this indication in combination with other agents. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02454972.

[Oncology: what's new in 2022]. / Oncologie : ce qui a changé en 2022.

The past year has brought several innovations in medical oncology, opening up promising new options for many solid tumors, both localized and metastatic. Immunotherapy, a real spearhead of emerging therapies in metastatic diseases, is seeing its use extend to adjuvant and neoadjuvant modalities, particularly in colon and lung cancers. 2022 also sees a great deal of focus on targeted therapies, as well as on antibody-drug conjugates, which creates new standards in both breast and lung cancers. Here we present the major advances in solid tumors.

L'année écoulée a apporté son lot d'innovations en oncologie médicale, ouvrant de nouvelles options prometteuses pour bon nombre de tumeurs solides, qu'elles soient localisées ou métastatiques. L'immunothérapie, véritable fer de lance des thérapies émergentes dans les maladies métastatiques, voit son usage s'étendre à des modalités adjuvantes et néoadjuvantes, notamment dans les cancers du côlon et du poumon. 2022 donne également la part belle aux thérapies ciblées mais aussi aux conjuguées anticorps-médicaments qui apportent de nouveaux standards tant pour les cancers du sein que du poumon. Nous vous présentons ici les avancées majeures concernant les tumeurs solides.

[Adverse effects of new breast cancer therapies : when to react ?] / Effets indésirables des nouvelles thérapies du cancer du sein : quand faut-il réagir ?

In last years, the therapeutic arsenal against breast cancer increased considerably with the arrival of signaling pathway inhibitors, immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. Consequently, the range of potential adverse events has also widened and differs from the usual chemotherapies and endocrine therapies. Depending on the administered therapy, the same symptoms can be harmless and treated symptomatically or the warning sign of a potential serious complication requiring a rapid action. We therefore discuss in this article the therapeutic role and some typical adverse events of these new therapies.

Ces dernières années, l'arsenal thérapeutique contre le cancer du sein s'est passablement enrichi avec les inhibiteurs des voies de signalisation, l'immunothérapie, les inhibiteurs de PARP (polyADP-ribose polymérase), les inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase et les chimiothérapies immunoconjuguées. De ce fait, la gamme d'effets indésirables potentiels s'est également élargie et diffère des habituelles chimiothérapies et hormonothérapies. En fonction de la substance administrée, les mêmes symptômes peuvent être anodins et traités symptomatiquement, ou alors être le signe d'alerte d'une potentielle complication sévère et nécessiter une réaction rapide. Nous discutons dans cet article du rôle thérapeutique et des quelques effets indésirables typiques de ces nouvelles thérapies.

[2021 Oncology update]. / Oncologie.

Despite COVID-19 pandemic, which is still deeply affecting world economy and global health, medical oncology specialists keep pursuing their effort for the identification of new therapeutic options to improve patients' life expectancy and quality of life. 2021 confirms the immunotherapy efficacy, alone or in combination with other modalities, across several indications. This year, we are summarizing the new approaches in the following sectors: lung, breast, melanoma, gynecological, digestive, urological and ENT areas.

En dépit de la pandémie de Covid-19 qui continue à grandement impacter l'économie mondiale et la santé, l'oncologie médicale poursuit sa quête d'identification de nouvelles options thérapeutiques ayant pour buts la prolongation de l'espérance de vie et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie de ses patients, en nombre croissant. L'année 2021 confirme également l'efficacité de l'immunothérapie, seule ou en combinaison à d'autres modalités, dans de nombreuses indications. Cette année, nous vous résumons les nouvelles approches dans les domaines suivants: poumon, sein, mélanome, sphères gynécologique, digestive, urologique et ORL.

70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age.

BACKGROUND: The MINDACT trial showed excellent 5-year distant metastasis-free survival of 94·7% (95% CI 92·5-96·2) in patients with breast cancer of high clinical and low genomic risk who did not receive chemotherapy. We present long-term follow-up results together with an exploratory analysis by age. METHODS: MINDACT was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 112 academic and community hospitals in nine European countries. Patients aged 18-70 years, with histologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (stage T1, T2, or operable T3) with up to three positive lymph nodes, no distant metastases, and a WHO performance status of 0-1 were enrolled and their genomic risk (using the MammaPrint 70-gene signature) and clinical risk (using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online) were determined. Patients with low clinical and low genomic risk results did not receive chemotherapy, and patients with high clinical and high genomic risk did receive chemotherapy (mostly anthracycline-based or taxane-based, or a combination thereof). Patients with discordant risk results (ie, patients with high clinical risk but low genomic risk, and those with low clinical risk but high genomic risk) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy or not based on either the clinical risk or the genomic risk. Randomisation was done centrally and used a minimisation technique that was stratified by institution, risk group, and clinical-pathological characteristics. Treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was to test whether the distant metastasis-free survival rate at 5 years in patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk not receiving chemotherapy had a lower boundary of the 95% CI above the predefined non-inferiority boundary of 92%. In the primary test population of patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk who adhered to the treatment allocation of no chemotherapy and had no change in risk post-enrolment. Here, we present updated follow-up as well as an exploratory analysis of a potential age effect (≤50 years vs >50 years) and an analysis by nodal status for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease. These analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00433589, and the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2005-002625-31. Recruitment is complete and further long-term follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2007, and July 11, 2011, 6693 patients were enrolled. On Feb 26, 2020, median follow-up was 8·7 years (IQR 7·8-9·7). The updated 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate for patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk receiving no chemotherapy (primary test population, n=644) was 95·1% (95% CI 93·1-96·6), which is above the predefined non-inferiority boundary of 92%, supporting the previous analysis and proving MINDACT as a positive de-escalation trial. Patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy (n=749) or not (n=748); this was the intention-to-treat population. The 8-year estimates for distant metastasis-free survival in the intention-to-treat population were 92·0% (95% CI 89·6-93·8) for chemotherapy versus 89·4% (86·8-91·5) for no chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0·66; 95% CI 0·48-0·92). An exploratory analysis confined to the subset of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease (1358 [90.7%] of 1497 randomly assigned patients, of whom 676 received chemotherapy and 682 did not) shows different effects of chemotherapy administration on 8-year distant metastasis-free survival according to age: 93·6% (95% CI 89·3-96·3) with chemotherapy versus 88·6% (83·5-92·3) without chemotherapy in 464 women aged 50 years or younger (absolute difference 5·0 percentage points [SE 2·8, 95% CI -0·5 to 10·4]) and 90·2% (86·8-92·7) versus 90·0% (86·6-92·6) in 894 women older than 50 years (absolute difference 0·2 percentage points [2·1, -4·0 to 4·4]). The 8-year distant metastasis-free survival in the exploratory analysis by nodal status in these patients was 91·7% (95% CI 88·1-94·3) with chemotherapy and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) without chemotherapy in 699 node-negative patients (absolute difference 2·5 percentage points [SE 2·3, 95% CI -2·1 to 7·2]) and 91·2% (87·2-94·0) versus 89·9% (85·8-92·8) for 658 patients with one to three positive nodes (absolute difference 1·3 percentage points [2·4, -3·5 to 6·1]). INTERPRETATION: With a more mature follow-up approaching 9 years, the 70-gene signature shows an intact ability of identifying among women with high clinical risk, a subgroup, namely patients with a low genomic risk, with an excellent distant metastasis-free survival when treated with endocrine therapy alone. For these women the magnitude of the benefit from adding chemotherapy to endocrine therapy remains small (2·6 percentage points) and is not enhanced by nodal positivity. However, in an underpowered exploratory analysis this benefit appears to be age-dependent, as it is only seen in women younger than 50 years where it reaches a clinically relevant threshold of 5 percentage points. Although, possibly due to chemotherapy-induced ovarian function suppression, it should be part of informed, shared decision making. Further study is needed in younger women, who might need reinforced endocrine therapy to forego chemotherapy. FUNDING: European Commission Sixth Framework Programme.

[New-onset diabetes and novel targeted therapies against cancer]. / Diabète secondaire aux nouvelles thérapies ciblées contre le cancer.

New systemic cancer therapies are increasingly oriented towards specific signaling pathways involved in carcinogenesis. However, these new treatments may lead to disorders of glycemic homeostasis ranging from glucose intolerance, diabetes or the occurrence of severe acute hyperglycemic syndrome due to blockade of certain pathways common to glucose metabolism. This article discusses the estimated frequency of new-onset diabetes, the pathophysiological mechanisms as well as the diagnostic, therapeutic, monitoring and prognostic management of glycemic dysfunction in patients treated with these novel systemic cancer therapies.

Les nouvelles thérapies du cancer sont de plus en plus orientées contre des voies de signalisation spécifiques à la carcinogenèse. Cependant, ces nouveaux traitements peuvent mener à des troubles de l'homéostasie glucidique, allant d'une intolérance au glucose au diabète insulinorequérant, avec une potentielle décompensation aiguë, en raison du blocage de certaines voies communes à l'homéostasie glucidique. Cet article discute de la fréquence estimée de la survenue du diabète, des mécanismes physiopathologiques ainsi que de la prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique, de la surveillance et du pronostic de la dysfonction glycémique chez les patients traités par ces nouvelles thérapies contre le cancer.

[Breast cancer during pregnancy]. / Cancer du sein chez la femme en.

The management of patients with breast cancer during their pregnancy is challenging. A good coordination is required between the oncology and obstetrics teams in order to ensure appropriate care, while providing a reassuring environment during this stressful period. Most often, the pregnancy can continue without delaying the initiation of oncological treatments, offering a prognosis similar to non-pregnant women. Surgery and chemotherapy can be done during pregnancy, unlike endocrine therapy, radiotherapy and antibody treatments which can only be given postpartum. While some imaging techniques are compatible, others require special measures or are contraindicated. We discuss these points in the context of a clinical situation.

La prise en charge des patientes présentant un cancer du sein durant leur grossesse est un challenge. Elle exige une bonne coordination entre les équipes oncologique et obstétricale afin d'assurer des soins appropriés tout en offrant un cadre rassurant en cette période de grand stress. Le plus souvent, la grossesse peut être poursuivie sans retarder l'initiation des traitements oncologiques, avec un pronostic similaire aux femmes non enceintes. La chirurgie et la chimiothérapie peuvent être entreprises en cours de grossesse, contrairement à l'hormonothérapie, la radiothérapie et les traitements par anticorps qui ne peuvent être administrés qu'en post-partum. Si certaines techniques d'imagerie sont compatibles, d'autres requièrent des mesures particulières ou sont contre-indiquées. Nous discutons de ces points dans le cadre d'une situation clinique.

[2020 oncology update]. / Oncologie.

The COVID-19 pandemic that has swept around the world in early 2020 has changed our daily practice and habits. Fortunately, however, 2020 also brings its share of new approaches and therapeutic combinations as well as new therapies. These advances are improving the outcomes and quality of life of our patients across the spectrum of oncological diseases. This article summarises the latest oncological advances and novelties for 2020 in the following tumor entities : lung, breast, digestive, gynecological, urological and ENT.

La pandémie de Covid-19 survenue début 2020 dans le monde entier aura bouleversé notre pratique quotidienne et nos habitudes. Heureusement, sur le plan thérapeutique, l'année 2020 apporte également son lot de nouvelles approches et combinaisons thérapeutiques ainsi que l'introduction de nouvelles molécules, permettant d'améliorer le pronostic vital et la qualité de vie de nos patients, dans de nombreux domaines. Cet article résume les dernières avancées et nouveautés oncologiques de l'année 2020 dans les domaines suivants : poumon, sein, sphère digestive, gynécologique, urologique et ORL.

Lurbinectedin as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial.

BACKGROUND: Few options exist for treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after failure of first-line therapy. Lurbinectedin is a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription. In this phase 2 study, we evaluated the acti and safety of lurbinectedin in patients with SCLC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial, we recruited patients from 26 hospitals in six European countries and the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, measurable disease as per Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, absence of brain metastasis, adequate organ function, and pre-treated with only one previous chemotherapy-containing line of treatment (minimum 3 weeks before study initiation) were eligible. Treatment consisted of 3·2 mg/m2 lurbinectedin administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an overall response (complete or partial response) as assessed by the investigators according to RECIST 1.1. All treated patients were analysed for activity and safety. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02454972. FINDINGS: Between Oct 16, 2015, and Jan 15, 2019, 105 patients were enrolled and treated with lurbinectedin. Median follow-up was 17·1 months (IQR 6·5-25·3). Overall response by investigator assessment was seen in 37 patients (35·2%; 95% CI 26·2-45·2). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (irrespective of causality) were haematological abnormalities-namely, anaemia (in nine [9%] patients), leucopenia (30 [29%]), neutropenia (48 [46%]), and thrombocytopenia (seven [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (10%) patients, of which neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were the most common (five [5%] patients for each). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Lurbinectedin was active as second-line therapy for SCLC in terms of overall response and had an acceptable and manageable safety profile. Lurbinectedin could represent a potential new treatment for patients with SCLC, who have few options especially in the event of a relapse, and is being investigated in combination with doxorubicin as second-line therapy in a randomised phase 3 trial. FUNDING: Pharma Mar.

Sixty spontaneous vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation in 15 women with early-stage breast cancer under aromatase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: At denosumab discontinuation, bone turnover markers increase and the gained BMD is lost. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, there is an increased risk of spontaneous vertebral fractures (VFs) of about 1 to 10%, rarely described in women under denosumab for aromatase inhibitors (AI)-treated breast cancer. We aim to describe the characteristics of 15 patients under denosumab given for AI-treated early-stage breast cancer that presented VFs at its discontinuation. METHODS: Single-center retrospective case series of 15 patients. We report clinical data, dual X-ray absorptiometry values at denosumab initiation and discontinuation, and serum B-crosslaps dosage at the time of VF occurrence (before denosumab resumption). RESULTS: Fifteen women (66.4 ± 7.1 years at denosumab discontinuation) that received AI for 5.0 ± 0.6 years, denosumab 60 mg for 8.2 ± 2.0 doses, and developed 60 VFs at denosumab discontinuation, were followed for 24.4 ± 9.5 months. Patients suffered from 1 to 11 (mean 4.0 ± 1.9) clinical VFs within 7 to 16 months after last denosumab injection. VFs developed earlier in patients with longer denosumab treatment (R2 = 0.29, p = 0.04) and in patients without osteoporosis before denosumab (9.4 ± 2.0 vs. 13.0 ± 2.0 months; p = 0.005). Serum B-crosslaps at the time of VFs tended to be higher in patients with earlier VFs (R2 = 0.47; p = 0.06) or with longer denosumab treatment (R2 = 0.48; p = 0.06). Denosumab was resumed in all patients, then switched for a bisphosphonate in eight. No new VFs occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an apparently low fracture risk, women under denosumab for AI-treated early-stage breast cancer develop spontaneous VFs at denosumab discontinuation. This risk increases with treatment duration and may be prevented by a potent bisphosphonate.

Intraductal patient-derived xenografts of estrogen receptor α-positive breast cancer recapitulate the histopathological spectrum and metastatic potential of human lesions.

Estrogen receptor α-positive (ER-positive) or 'luminal' breast cancers were notoriously difficult to establish as patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). We and others recently demonstrated that the microenvironment is critical for ER-positive tumor cells; when grafted as single cells into milk ducts of NOD Scid gamma females, >90% of ER-positive tumors can be established as xenografts and recapitulate many features of the human disease in vivo. This intraductal approach holds promise for personalized medicine, yet human and murine stroma are organized differently and this and other species specificities may limit the value of this model. Here, we analyzed 21 ER-positive intraductal PDXs histopathologically. We found that intraductal PDXs vary in extent and define four histopathological patterns: flat, lobular, in situ and invasive, which occur in pure and combined forms. The intraductal PDXs replicate earlier stages of tumor development than their clinical counterparts. Micrometastases are already detected when lesions appear in situ. Tumor extent, histopathological patterns and micrometastatic load correlate with biological properties of their tumors of origin. Our findings add evidence to the validity of the intraductal model for in vivo studies of ER-positive breast cancer and raise the intriguing possibility that tumor cell dissemination may occur earlier than currently thought. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

[Risk communication in healthcare: literature review and recommendations for clinical practice]. / Communication des risques en santé†: revue de littérature et recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

Consistent with the principles of evidence-based medicine, communicating clinical risks to patients and their families is an essential part of informed consent and decision-making. Communication of clinical risks can take place during and after consultations, orally or in writing, based on the latest available scientific data, when available. Numerous studies show that there are different degrees of innumeracy in the general population, meaning more or less significant difficulties mastering numbers in everyday situations. It is therefore imperative to communicate risks in a way that is adapted to the patients' variable numeracy and health literacy levels. This article presents a synthesis of international research on risk communication, as well as recommendations for clinical practice.

En conformité avec les principes de médecine basée sur les preuves, communiquer les risques cliniques aux patients et à leurs proches est un préambule essentiel au consentement et à la prise de décision éclairée. La communication des risques cliniques peut s'effectuer pendant et après les consultations, verbalement ou par écrit, en s'appuyant sur les dernières données scientifiques disponibles. De nombreuses études démontrent que la population est confrontée à différents degrés d'innumérisme, soit des difficultés plus ou moins importantes dans la maîtrise des chiffres. Il est ainsi impératif de communiquer les risques de façon adaptée aux numératie et littératie en santé variables des patients. Cet article présente une synthèse des travaux internationaux sur la communication des risques, ainsi que des recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

[Breast cancer: perspectives from integrative medicine]. / Cancer du sein: perspectives de médecine intégrative.

Integrative medicine combines the virtues of conventional medicine and complementary medicine in order to improve the quality of life of patients suffering from cancer. Thanks to a multidisciplinary and multi-professional team, the Center for integrative and complementary medicine (CEMIC) allows since 2017 cancer patients at CHUV to have access to certain therapies, for which there are sufficient data suggesting a benefit in terms of quality of life. The concepts of tolerance, safety, risk of interactions and potential adverse biological effects remain central. In this article, we discuss acupuncture, art therapy, mindfulness and some natural therapies that are encountered regularly.

La médecine intégrative propose aux patients touchés par le cancer une combinaison des soins offerts par la médecine conventionnelle et la médecine complémentaire avec comme objectif l'amélioration de la qualité de vie des patients. Grâce à des équipes multidisciplinaires et multiprofessionnelles, le Centre de médecine intégrative et complémentaire (CEMIC) permet depuis 2017 aux patients oncologiques du CHUV d'avoir accès à certaines thérapies pour lesquelles il existe des données suggérant un bénéfice en termes de qualité de vie. Les notions de tolérance aux traitements, de sécurité, de risque d'interactions et d'éventuels effets biologiques non souhaités restent centrales. Dans cet article, nous discutons de l'acupuncture, de l'art-thérapie, de la méditation et de certaines substances et thérapies naturelles rencontrées régulièrement.

[Advances in Oncology 2019]. / Oncologie.

Driven by highly specialized medicine, research and the quest for personalization of treatments, oncology witnessed substantial advances in 2019. This year numerous treatments have consolidated their importance and broadened their indications. Multiple innovative treatments, currently under study, brought hope for future advances, while biomarkers, such as PD-L1, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), BRCA1/2 gene mutations, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) allowed better selection and customization of available treatments. This article provides an overview of this year's advances in oncology.

Sous l'égide de la médecine hautement spécialisée, de la personnalisation des traitements et secondée par une recherche énergique, l'oncologie a connu en 2019 des avancées considérables. Cette année, de nombreux traitements ont consolidé leur importance et élargi leurs indications. L'annonce d'une pléthore de traitements novateurs, en étude, est source d'espoir pour l'avenir. Des biomarqueurs simples ou composites, tels que l'expression PD-L1, l'instabilité de microsatellite (MSI), la charge mutationnelle tumorale (TMB), les mutations des gènes BRCA1/2 ou un déficit du mécanisme de la recombinaison homologue des bases (HRD) permettent une meilleure sélection et personnalisation des traitements disponibles. Le but du présent article est de rassembler les avancées oncologiques de l'année.

Long-term responders to trastuzumab monotherapy in first-line HER-2+ advanced breast cancer: characteristics and survival data.

BACKGROUND: The impact of HER2-targeted therapy alone followed by the addition of chemotherapy at disease progression (PD) versus upfront combination was investigated by the SAKK 22/99 trial. The aim of this exploratory analysis of the SAKK 22/99 trial was to characterize the specific subset of patients deriving long-term benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy alone and to identify potential predictive factors of long-term response. METHODS: This is an unplanned post-hoc analysis of patients randomized to Arm A (trastuzumab monotherapy). Patients were divided in two groups: patients with durable clinical benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy and short-term responders without durable clinical benefit from trastuzumab monotherapy Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical characteristics correlating with response duration was performed. RESULTS: Eighty six patients were randomized in arm A, 24 patients (28%) were long-term responders and 62 (72%) were short-term responders with a 5y-overall survival (OS) of 54% (95% CI 31-72) and of 18% (95%CI 10-30), respectively. Absence of ER expression, absence of PgR expression and presence of visceral disease emerged as possible negative predictive factors for durable clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Durable clinical benefit can be achieved with trastuzumab monotherapy in a subgroup of HER2-positive patients with advanced disease and it is predictive for longer OS. Further investigations of predictive biomarkers are necessary to better characterize this subgroup of patients and develop further de-escalating strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00004935 ; first posted 27.01.2003, retrospectively registered.

[New therapeutic strategies in advanced stage breast and tubo-ovarian cancers]. / Nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques dans les cancers mammaire et tubo-ovarien de stade avancé.

New targeted therapies modify therapeutic strategies for advanced stage breast and tubo-ovarian cancers. Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy remain the cornerstones of breast cancer treatment. Inhibitors of CDK4/6, mTOR and PI3K are associated with endocrine therapy to increase its effectiveness. PARP inhibitors outperform chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Immunotherapy integrates into the treatment of triple-negative cancers with very promising results. For tubo-ovarian cancers, the concept of « platinum-sensitive ¼ has been tempered since the arrival of antiangiogenic treatment and PARP inhibitors that prolong the disease control not only in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation, but also in others.

Les nouvelles thérapies ciblées modifient les stratégies thérapeutiques des cancers du sein et tubo-ovarien de stade avancé. La chimiothérapie et l'hormonothérapie restent les pierres angulaires du traitement du cancer du sein. Les inhibiteurs de CDK4/6, de mTOR et de PI3K sont associés à l'hormonothérapie pour augmenter son efficacité. Les inhibiteurs de la PARP (poly(ADP-ribose) polymérase) surpassent la chimiothérapie chez les porteuses de mutation BRCA1/2. L'immunothérapie arrive dans le traitement des cancers triple négatifs avec des résultats très prometteurs. Pour le cancer tubo-ovarien, le concept « platine-sensible ¼ est relativisé depuis l'arrivée du traitement anti-angiogénique et des inhibiteurs de la PARP qui prolongent la durée de contrôle de la maladie non seulement chez les patientes avec mutation de BRCA1/2, mais également chez les autres.

[Oncology, what's new in 2018]. / Oncologie.

The year 2018 has been incredibly prolific regarding novelties. Several studies have given impressive results and offer new anticancer perspectives. Immunotherapy is gaining more and more place defining a new standard of care for different types of cancer. In parallel with a new approach combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy that is emerging, new forms of adoptive immunotherapy are on the path of approval by regulatory authorities. At the decision-making level, a large somatic genetic analysis is becoming dominant, whereas the addition of more specific biomarkers is still needed regarding immunotherapy. This article aims to summarize the significant new developments in oncology for 2018 concerning the five most common cancers and adoptive cellular immunotherapy.

L'année 2018 a été extrêmement prolifique en termes de nouveautés. Plusieurs études ont amené des résultats intéressants et offrent de nouvelles perspectives anticancéreuses. L'immunothérapie prend de plus en plus de place définissant un nouveau standard pour le traitement des différents types de cancer. En parallèle d'une nouvelle approche combinant l'immunothérapie et la chimiothérapie qui voit le jour, des nouvelles formes d'immunothérapie adoptive se situent sur la voie d'approbation par les autorités réglementaires. Sur le plan décisionnel, l'analyse génétique somatique large des tumeurs devient prépondérante, alors que l'addition de biomarqueurs plus spécifiques est encore nécessaire concernant l'immunothérapie. Cet article a pour but de résumer les nouveautés majeures survenues en oncologie pour 2018 concernant les cinq cancers les plus fréquents et l'immunothérapie cellulaire adoptive.