Lung cancer screening: a critical appraisal.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The recently published large-scale NELSON trial showed a reduction in lung cancer (LC) mortality with the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in high-risk patients. This is the first such European-based trial to mirror the results of the US National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). The NLST was responsible for nationwide implementation of LC screening protocols which has shown a decrease in LC mortality. However, the implementation of such screening in Europe has been challenging. With the findings from the NELSON trial, implementation of LC screening throughout Europe should once again be evaluated. RECENT FINDINGS: This review article further elaborates on the advantages of LDCT in LC screening. It also discusses promising future approaches that can supplement the current LC screening guidelines. SUMMARY: Implementation of LC screening with LDCT should again be evaluated throughout Europe as it could substantially decrease LC-related mortality.

Intravenous immunoglobulin efficacy on pembrolizumab induced severe toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor used in many different cancers. Several immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with pembrolizumab, including toxic epidermal necrolysis. Here, we are presenting a patient with non-small cell lung cancer that developed toxic epidermal necrolysis 3-days following initiation of pembrolizumab. Following high-dose steroid therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin 2 g/kg was initiated and resulted in complete resolution of all his irAEs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of total re-epithelialization and resolution of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis following the use of intravenous immunoglobulin.

Current management and emerging treatment strategies for multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell neoplasm that is incurable despite significant progress in treatment over the past several decades. The incorporation of novel agents and combinations into the MM treatment paradigm has resulted in improved survival and tolerability, as well as deeper responses including achieving a minimal residual disease negative state. The addition of new treatment options and combinations has added complexity in treatment selection for myeloma patients. The current strategy for newly diagnosed myeloma involves induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy. However, nearly all myeloma patients will develop refractory disease. This highlights the need for more effective therapies targeting the myeloma cells and their microenvironment. In this article, we summarize current management of transplant eligible and ineligible newly diagnosed patients in both the upfront and relapsed refractory setting, highlighting risk adapted strategies. We also summarize emerging therapies, such as immune and targeted approaches, as well as drugs with novel mechanisms of action. Emerging strategies offer individualized treatment options and may ultimately offer the possibility of a cure for myeloma patients.

Liquid First Is "Solid" in Naïve Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Faster Turnaround Time With High Concordance to Solid Next-Generation Sequencing.

Purpose: Molecular profiling is crucial in naïve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While tissue-based analysis is challenged by turnaround time and scarcity of tissue, there is increasing demand for liquid biopsy. We aimed to analyze the use of upfront liquid biopsy as a molecular profiling approach. Methods: This retrospective multicenter, non-interventional study compared findings and turnaround times of liquid vs. standard-of-care (SOC) tissue-biopsy molecular profiling. The study included naïve advanced NSCLC patients with available liquid biopsy (Guardant360 CDx). Results: A total of 42 consecutive patients (60% men; median age, 69.5 [39-87] years; 86% stage IV NSCLC) were identified between September 2017 and December 2020. Liquid-biopsy analysis provided results for all 42 patients, whereas the tissue-based analysis failed in 5 (12%) patients due to insufficient tumor samples. In 17 patients, 18 actionable driver mutations were identified. Eleven mutations were detected by both approaches (i.e., concordance of 61%), 4 only by liquid biopsy and 3 only by tissue biopsy. The median time from the molecular request to receiving the molecular solid report on the last biomarker was 21 (range: 5-66) days, whereas the median time from blood draw to the liquid-biopsy results was 10.5 (7-19) days. The median time between the availability of liquid-biopsy findings and that of the last biomarker was 5 days. Treatment changes following the liquid-biopsy results were observed in 3 (7%) patients. Conclusion: Performing liquid-biopsy upfront is feasible and accurate and allows a shorter time for treatment in NSCLC, especially when tumor tissue is scarce.

An Unusual Presentation of HCC in a Patient with No Underlying Liver Disease: A Case Study.

Pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma (P-HCC) is a rare subtype of HCC. P-HCC may occur in patients without underlying liver cirrhosis and can be present with negative serum tumor markers. With a growing worldwide incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, non-cirrhotic HCC will likely become more prevalent. We report a patient presenting to the hospital with nonspecific symptoms of weight loss, abdominal discomfort, and early satiety. Abdomen palpation found a large firm mass in the right middle abdomen. Computed tomography imaging showed a large right abdominal mass without evidence of liver attachment. The patient underwent a diagnostic laparotomy where a single 17 cm exophytic mass originating from the left liver lobe was found and resected. Clear margins were attained, and pathology demonstrated HCC. Early diagnosis of HCC is critical to achieving curative treatment, and physicians should keep P-HCC in mind when presented with a similar patient.

Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with asymptomatic brain metastases: an open-label, 3-arm, phase II pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is selective for both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitizing and Thr790Met mutations. While intracranial activity of osimertinib is documented in larger trials, a prospective study focusing exclusively on patients with asymptomatic brain metastases has not been reported. METHODS: In this nonrandomized, phase II, open-label, 3-arm prospective proof-of-concept pilot study, 48 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) received osimertinib 80 mg daily. Patients were either treatment naive (arm A = 20) or previously treated with an EGFR-TKI and Thr790Met positive (arm B = 18) or negative (arm C = 10). In cases of isolated intracranial progression, osimertinib dose was escalated (160 mg). The primary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR). The secondary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02736513. RESULTS: The iORRs were 84.2%, 66.7%, and 50% and the iDCRs were 94.7%, 94.4%, and 80% in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median iPFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.7 to NA), 7.6 months (95% CI 5.3 to NA), and 6.3 months (95% CI 3.9 to NA) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Following dose escalation, pooled iORR was 54% (arm A = 5, arm B = 4, arm C = 2). Adverse events were similar to those in previously published literature. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib demonstrated high efficacy on brain metastases. All trial arms displayed a significant decrease in the number and diameter of target lesions. These findings indicate that osimertinib is effective for Thr790Met-positive and -negative LUAD patients with asymptomatic brain metastases. Therefore, osimertinib should be considered a viable option for EGFR-mutant patients with brain involvement regardless of their Thr790Met mutation status.

Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in oncologic patients undergoing numerous cancer treatment options: A retrospective single-center study.

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus, has infected millions worldwide with cancer patients demonstrating a higher prevalence for severe disease and poorer outcomes. Recently, the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was released as the primary means to combat COVID-19. The currently reported incidence of local and systemic side effects was 27% in the general public. The safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine has not been studied in patients with an active cancer diagnosis who are either ongoing or plan to undergo oncologic therapy.This single center study reviewed the charts of 210 patients with active cancer diagnoses that received both doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The development of side effects from the vaccine, hospitalizations or exacerbations from various oncologic treatment were documented. Type of oncologic treatment (immunotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal, biologic, radiation or mixed) was documented to identify if side effects were related to treatment type. The time at which the vaccine was administered in relation to treatment onset (on long term therapy, within 1 month of therapy or prior to therapy) was also documented to identify any relationships.Sixty five (31%) participants experienced side effects from the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, however most were mild to moderate. Treatment protocol was not linked to the development of vaccine related side effects (P = .202), nor was immunotherapy (P = .942). The timing of vaccine administered in relation to treatment onset was also not related to vaccine related side effects (P = .653). Six (2.9%) participants were hospitalized and 4 (2%) died.The incidence of side effects in cancer patients is similar to what has been reported for the general public (31% vs 27%). Therefore, we believe that the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is safe in oncologic patients undergoing numerous cancer treatments.

Nivolumab-induced systemic capillary leak syndrome as an ultra rare life-threatening phenomenon of late toxicity and intravenous immunoglobulin efficacy.

Systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) is a life-threatening disease. It is characterized by severe capillary hyperpermeability to proteins resulting in hemoconcentration, hypoalbuminemia and hypovolemic shock. Its treatment remains supportive, and the prognosis is generally poor. We report on a 51-year old male with melanoma treated with nivolumab for 1 year. 1 month following the completion of the treatment, the patient presented with signs of hypovolemic shock, anasarca, hemoconcentration and hypoalbuminemia. After excluding other diseases, a diagnosis of nivolumab-induced systemic capillary leak syndrome was made. A high dose of intravenous steroid therapy was promptly initiated without any significant clinical improvement. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was then administered with normalization of blood pressure, hemoconcentration and complete resolution of anasarca. Intravenous immunoglobulin should be considered a first-line treatment option for this rare phenomenon.

Lay abstract Systemic capillary leak syndrome (SCLS) is a life-threatening disease with a high fatality rate. Patients present with low blood pressure, widespread edema and rapid weight gain. Labs show low albumin levels with highly concentrated blood, seen as high hematocrit and hemoglobin levels. Current treatments aim to support the acute crisis. We are presenting on a 51-year old patient with melanoma, treated with nivolumab for 1 year who developed signs of SCLS 1-month following medication discontinuation. He was first treated with high-dose steroids without symptom resolution. He was then administered immune proteins called intravenous immunoglobulins, resolving all his symptoms. Due to the patient's complete response, we suggest intravenous immunoglobulins as the initial treatment in patients taking nivolumab presenting with SCLS.