Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke.

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke, there is uncertainty regarding the benefit and risk of administering intravenous alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: We conducted a trial at 41 academic tertiary care centers in China to evaluate endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo endovascular thrombectomy alone (thrombectomy-alone group) or endovascular thrombectomy preceded by intravenous alteplase, at a dose of 0.9 mg per kilogram of body weight, administered within 4.5 hours after symptom onset (combination-therapy group). The primary analysis for noninferiority assessed the between-group difference in the distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days on the basis of a lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the adjusted common odds ratio equal to or larger than 0.8. We assessed various secondary outcomes, including death and reperfusion of the ischemic area. RESULTS: Of 1586 patients screened, 656 were enrolled, with 327 patients assigned to the thrombectomy-alone group and 329 assigned to the combination-therapy group. Endovascular thrombectomy alone was noninferior to combined intravenous alteplase and endovascular thrombectomy with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.40; P = 0.04 for noninferiority) but was associated with lower percentages of patients with successful reperfusion before thrombectomy (2.4% vs. 7.0%) and overall successful reperfusion (79.4% vs. 84.5%). Mortality at 90 days was 17.7% in the thrombectomy-alone group and 18.8% in the combination-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion, endovascular thrombectomy alone was noninferior with regard to functional outcome, within a 20% margin of confidence, to endovascular thrombectomy preceded by intravenous alteplase administered within 4.5 hours after symptom onset. (Funded by the Stroke Prevention Project of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China and the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation; DIRECT-MT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03469206.).

An open-label randomized multi-Centre study to evaluate anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion versus posterior Laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: study design and analysis plan (STAR).

BACKGROUND: In treating patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (COPLL), a novel surgery technique - anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) suggested promising clinical benefits in recent exploratory studies. METHODS: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active controlled trial that will compare the clinical benefits of ACAF versus conventional posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) in severe COPLL patients. A total of 164 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ACAF or LAMP group. The primary efficacy measure is cervical- Japanese Orthopaedic Association (C-JOA) recovery rate at 12 months post operation, which is to be derived by Hirabayashi's method from JOA data (range, 0 [worst] to 17 [normal condition]). Other important secondary efficacy endpoints include visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe]), 10-item neck disability index (NDI, a total range of 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst) and 6-level Nurick disability grade (range, 0 [mild] to 5 [severe]). Safety endpoints including adverse events, perioperative complications, and adverse events of special interest will also be assessed in this study. Full analysis set for baseline and efficacy data analyses according to the intention-to-treat principle will be established as the primary analysis population. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to analyze the C-JOA recovery rate, with random stratification factors (if appropriate) and the treatment group as fixed factors, and the baseline level of C-JOA score as covariate. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to demonstrate the clinical benefits of ACAF as compared to conventional LAMP in COPLL patients. It will provide clinical evidence that the novel surgery technique - ACAF might be more favorable in treating patients with severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. (Words: 290). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04968028 .

Re-evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Human Urinary Kallidinogenase (RESK): Protocol for an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase IV Trial for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major medical challenge in China. Thrombolytic drugs recommended for the treatment of AIS usually have a narrow time window. Human urinary kallidinogenase (HUK) was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in 2005 for the treatment of mild to moderate AIS, and it is thus widely used in China. However, large-scale clinical study data for a more complete understanding of various aspects of its safety and efficacy characteristics are still unavailable. The ongoing Reevaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Human Urinary Kallidinogenase (RESK) trial is designed to reevaluate the safety and efficacy of HUK in Chinese patients with AIS. RESK is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase IV trial. A total of 2186 Chinese patients with AIS will be enrolled. All patients receive HUK by intravenous drip once daily for 21 consecutive days. The study has registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02562183). On 8 September 2016, 202 patients have been enrolled. Primary outcome includes the frequency and severity of adverse events. Secondary outcomes include functional improvement measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Barthel index, and modified Rankin Scale, and recurrence rate of ischemic stroke. Data from large-scale clinical studies are still unavailable concerning the post-marketing use of HUK. The RESK study is designed to provide a comprehensive reevaluation of the safety and efficacy of HUK in Chinese patients with AIS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02562183).

Effects of three injectable antidiabetic agents on glycaemic control, weight change and drop-out in type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea: A network meta-analysis.

AIMS: The objective of this review was to assess glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), basal insulin, and premixed insulin among participants with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for a network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs involving 5874 adult individuals were included. Compared with placebo, all three therapies showed a significant effect on achieving target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (GLP-1 RAs: 31.7%, 95% CI, 24.7-38.6%; premixed insulin: 31.1%, 95% CI, 20.4-41.8%; basal insulin: 26.0%, 95% CI, 16.4-35.7%). However, there was no significant difference between the three therapies. A similar result was found in HbA1c reduction. The use of GLP-1 RAs resulted in significant body weight loss (-3.73 kg, 95% CI, -4.52 to -2.95 kg vs. basal insulin and -5.27 kg, 95% CI, -6.17 to -4.36 kg vs. premixed insulin) but there was a higher drop-out rate of participants. Premixed insulin seemed associated with more severe hypoglycemic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The three injectables had similar impact on glycemic control but other differentiating features relevant to the management of type 2 diabetes with GLP-1 RAs having the most favorable profile.