Assessing Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study Using an Exploratory Instrument.

BACKGROUND: The Delphi consensus identified 8 symptoms and 8 consequences as the highest priorities for defining low anterior resection syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To describe an exploratory scoring instrument correlating the Delphi consensus on low anterior resection syndrome with functional and quality-of-life scores following intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a prospective pilot study. In accordance with the Wexner incontinence score, 5 frequency responses ranging from never (score 0) to always (score 4) were used to measure the severity of symptom- and consequence-specific variables. SETTINGS: Colorectal surgery referral center. PATIENTS: Among 161 eligible patients, 137 participants (85%) completed an electronic self-assessment survey regarding function and quality of life at scheduled follow-up, including 3 to 6, 12, and ≥24 months after ileostomy reversal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included patient-reported severity of the identified priorities, and their correlation with condition-specific quality of life. RESULTS: The most frequent symptom and consequence were "emptying difficulties" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels," respectively. Aside from "emptying difficulties," the proportions of negative symptom domains increased after reversal. In particular, neither the frequency responses nor the severity scores of "emptying difficulties" differed between groups. The percentages of "always" selection for consequence domains improved at 12-month follow-up, whereas a higher rate was observed at 24 months, except for "toilet dependence" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels." We found significant improvements in the summary score of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scale ( p = 0.04) and our exploratory instrument ( p = 0.009) but not in functional scores measured by traditional questionnaires. Furthermore, the condition-specific quality of life strongly correlated with the Delphi consensus severity score ( rs = -0.73). LIMITATIONS: Single-institution data and limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: The important priorities identified by the Delphi consensus might enable a comprehensive overview and a better assessment of low anterior resection syndrome after intersphincteric resection. See Video Abstract . EVALE LA GRAVEDAD DEL SNDROME DE RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN INTERESFINTRICA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO ULTRABAJO UN ESTUDIO PILOTO QUE UTILIZA UN INSTRUMENTO EXPLORATORIO: ANTECEDENTES:El consenso Delphi identificó ocho síntomas y ocho consecuencias como las máximas prioridades para definir el síndrome de resección anterior baja.OBJETIVO:Describir un instrumento de puntuación exploratorio que correlaciona el consenso Delphi sobre el síndrome de resección anterior baja con puntuaciones funcionales y de calidad de vida después de la resección interesfinteriana para el cáncer de recto ultrabajo.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio piloto prospectivo. De acuerdo con la puntuación de incontinencia de Wexner, se utilizaron cinco respuestas de frecuencia que van desde nunca (puntuación 0) hasta siempre (puntuación 4) para medir la gravedad de las variables específicas de los síntomas y las consecuencias.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia de cirugía colorrectal.PACIENTES:Entre 161 pacientes elegibles, 137 (85%) participantes completaron una encuesta electrónica de autoevaluación sobre la función y la calidad de vida en el seguimiento programado, incluidos 3 a 6, 12 y ≥ 24 meses después de la reversión de la ileostomía.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADO:Las medidas de resultado incluyeron la gravedad de estas prioridades informada por los pacientes, así como su correlación con la calidad de vida específica de la afección.RESULTADOS:El síntoma y la consecuencia más frecuentes fueron "dificultades para vaciar" e "insatisfacción con las deposiciones", respectivamente. Aparte de las "dificultades de vaciado", las proporciones de dominios de síntomas negativos aumentaron después de la reversión. En particular, tanto las respuestas de frecuencia como las puntuaciones de gravedad de las "dificultades para vaciar" no difirieron entre los grupos. Los porcentajes de "opción siempre" para los dominios de consecuencias mejoraron a los 12 meses de seguimiento, mientras que se observó una tasa más alta a los 24 meses después, excepto para "dependencia del baño" e "insatisfacción con los intestinos". Encontramos mejoras significativas en la puntuación resumida de la Escala de calidad de vida de incontinencia fecal ( p = 0,04) y nuestro instrumento exploratorio ( p = 0,009), pero no en las puntuaciones funcionales medidas con los cuestionarios tradicionales. Además, la calidad de vida específica de la condición se correlacionó fuertemente con la puntuación de gravedad del consenso Delphi (rs = -0,73).LIMITACIONES:Datos de una sola institución y tamaño de muestra limitado.CONCLUSIONES:Las importantes prioridades identificadas por el consenso Delphi podrían permitir una visión global y una mejor evaluación del síndrome de resección anterior baja después de la resección interesfintérica. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Intersphincteric resection is the ultimate sphincter-preserving surgical technique for ultralow rectal cancer, but quality-of-life changes after surgery remain unclear. It is also unknown which questionnaire has better associations with functional results for capturing clinical variation in quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess change in the quality of life and its correlation with functional outcomes among patients undergoing intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational, single-center study. SETTINGS: Colorectal surgery referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with ultralow rectal cancer who underwent intersphincteric resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were quality-of-life and functional results at 3 to 6, 12, and 24 months after ileostomy closure using validated questionnaires. The secondary outcome was the relationship between quality of life and neorectal function. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (62.7% men) completed follow-up surveys. Wexner incontinence score and Kirwan's incontinence score significantly improved at 12 months after ileostomy reversal, but such improvement in low anterior resection syndrome score was proved until 24 months later ( p = 0.01). Condition-specific quality-of-life domains improved over time, with significant changes in lifestyle ( p = 0.02) and coping/behavior ( p = 0.01), as well as the summary score of Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life ( p = 0.02) and visual analog scale score ( p < 0.001). Among health-related quality-of-life domains, the subscale scores did not differ significantly. The functional systems scores were significantly correlated with all the domains of condition-specific quality-of-life but only a few health-related quality-of-life domains. Only weak to moderate associations with the functional outcomes were observed for both quality-of-life questionnaires. LIMITATIONS: Single-center data and limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Although low anterior resection syndrome persists for years after intersphincteric resection, condition-specific quality of life and functional outcomes improve over time. Compared to health-related quality-of-life questionnaires, condition-specific quality-of-life instruments might be preferable to evaluate changes in quality-of-life after surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C130 . CALIDAD DE VIDA Y RESULTADOS FUNCIONALES DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN INTERESFINTRICA EN CASO DE CNCER RECTAL ULTRABAJO ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO OBSERVACIONAL: ANTECEDENTES:La resección inter-esfintérica es la última técnica quirúrgica conservadora de esfínteres en casos de cáncer rectal ultrabajo, pero los cambios en la calidad de vida después de la cirugía siguen sin estar claros. Se desconoce también, qué tipo de cuestionario tiene mejor asociación con los resultados funcionales para así captar las variaciones clínicas en la calidad de vida.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el cambio en la calidad de vida y su correlación con los resultados funcionales durante el período postoperatorio en pacientes sometidos a resección interesfintérica por cáncer de recto ultrabajo.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo, observacional y de un solo centro.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia de cirugía colorrectal.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes con cáncer de recto ultra bajo que se sometieron a resección interesfintérica con el cierre de la ileostomía.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la calidad de vida y los resultados funcionales a los 3-6, 12 y 24 meses después del cierre de la ileostomía utilizando cuestionarios validados. El resultado secundario fue la relación entre la calidad de vida y la función del néorecto.RESULTADOS:Un total de 102 pacientes (62,7% hombres) completaron las encuestas de seguimiento. La puntuación de incontinencia de Wexner y la puntuación de incontinencia de Kirwan mejoraron significativamente a los 12 meses después del cierre de la ileostomía, pero dicha mejoría en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja se demostró solo hasta 24 meses después ( p = 0,01). Las condiciones en el dominio de la calidad de vida específicos mejoraron con el tiempo, con cambios significativos en el estilo de vida ( p = 0,02) y el afrontamiento/comportamiento ( p = 0,01), así como la puntuación general de la calidad de vida y de la incontinencia fecal ( p = 0,02), puntuación de la escala analógica visual ( p < 0,001). Entre los dominios de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, las puntuaciones de las sub-escalas no difirieron significativamente. Las puntuaciones de los sistemas funcionales se correlacionaron significativamente con todos los dominios de la calidad de vida específica de la nueva condición, pero solo con pocos dominios de calidad de vida relacionados con la salud. Solo se observaron asociaciones débiles a moderadas con los resultados funcionales para ambos cuestionarios de calidad de vida.LIMITACIONES:Datos de un solo centro y tamaño de muestra limitado.CONCLUSIONES:Aunque el síndrome de resección anterior baja persiste durante años después de la resección interesfintérica, la calidad de vida específica de la nueva condición y los resultados funcionales mejoran con el tiempo. En comparación con los cuestionarios de calidad de vida relacionados con la salud, los instrumentos de calidad de vida específicos de la nueva condición pueden ser preferibles para evaluar los cambios en la calidad de vida después de la cirugía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C130 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Does anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer influence long-term outcomes? A retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether anastomotic leakage (AL) following intersphincteric resection (ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer (uLRC) is associated with long-term negative outcomes. METHODS: Between June 2011 and January 2022, 236 consecutive patients who underwent ISR with diverting ileostomy for uLRC were included. The primary outcome was long-term clinical consequences of AL, including chronic stricture, stoma reversal, and oncological and functional results. RESULTS: Forty-one (17.4%) patients developed symptomatic AL, whereas only two (0.8%) required re-laparotomy due to severe leakage. Patients with leaks had a significantly increased incidence of chronic stricture (29.3% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.001) and stoma non-reversal (34.1% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.0001) than controls. The severe consequences were particularly common in patients with anastomotic separation, resulting in 60% of those presenting with chronic stricture and 50% ending up with stoma non-reversal. After a median follow-up of 59 (range, 7-139) months, AL did not compromise long-term oncological outcomes, including tumor recurrence (9.8% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.3), 5-year disease-free, and overall survival (73.4% vs. 74.8% and 85.1% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.56 and P = 0.55). A total of 149 patients with bowel continuity who completed self-assessment questionnaires were enrolled for functional evaluation. The median follow-up was 24 (range, 12-94) months after ileostomy reversal, and functional results were comparable between patients with and without leaks. CONCLUSION: AL is an unfortunate reality for patients who underwent ISR for uLRC, but the rate of severe leakage is limited. Leaks contribute to possible adverse impacts on chronic stricture and stoma non-reversal, especially for patients with anastomotic separation. However, long-term oncological and functional results may not be compromised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR-ONC-15007506 and ChiCTR2100051614.

Cumulative Incidence and Risk Factors of Permanent Stoma After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A permanent stoma is an unintended consequence that cannot be avoided completely after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. Unfortunately, its incidence and risk factors have been poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of permanent stoma after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a colorectal surgery referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 185 consecutive patients who underwent intersphincteric resection with diverting ileostomy from 2011 to 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of and risk factors for the permanent stoma. The secondary outcome included differences in stoma formation between patients with partial, subtotal, and total intersphincteric resection. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 6-107 months), 26 of 185 patients eventually required a permanent stoma, accounting for a 5-year cumulative incidence of 17.4%. The causes of permanent stoma were anastomotic morbidity (46.2%, 12/26), local recurrence (19.2%, 5/26), distant metastasis (19.2%, 5/26), fecal incontinence (3.8%, 1/26), perioperative mortality (3.8%, 1/26), patients' refusal (3.8%, 1/26), and poor general condition (3.8%, 1/26). Although the incidence of permanent stoma was significantly different between the intersphincteric resection groups (partial vs subtotal vs total: 8.3% vs 20% vs 25.8%, p = 0.02), it was not an independent predictor of stoma formation. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anastomotic leakage (OR = 5.29; p = 0.001) and anastomotic stricture (OR = 5.13; p = 0.002) were independently predictive of permanent stoma. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and single-center data. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of permanent stoma was 17.4%. Anastomotic complications were identified as risk factors. Patients should be informed of the risks and benefits when contemplating the ultimate sphincter-sparing surgery. It might be preferable to decrease the probability of permanent stoma by further minimizing anastomotic complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B704. INCIDENCIA ACUMULADA Y FACTORES DE RIESGO DE ESTOMA PERMANENTE DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN INTERESFNTRICA EN CNCER RECTAL ULTRA BAJO: ANTECEDENTES:La necesidad de efectuar un estoma permanente es la consecuencia no intencional e inevitable por completo después de una resección interesfintérica en presencia de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo. Desafortunadamente, la incidencia y los factores de riesgo se han definido en una forma limitada.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue determinar la incidencia acumulada y los factores de riesgo para la necesidad de efectuar un estoma permanente después de la resección intersfintérica de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo.DISEÑO:El presente estudio es un análisis retrospectivo de la información obtenida.ESCENARIO:Centro de referencia de cirugía colo-rectal.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 185 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a resección intersfintérica de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo con ileostomía de derivación de 2011 a 2019.MEDICION DE RESULTADOS:El resultado principal fue la identificación de la incidencia y los factores de riesgo para la presencia de un estoma permanente. En forma secundaria se describieron los resultados de las diferentes técnicas de la formación de un estoma entre los pacientes con resección interesfintérica parcial, subtotal o total.RESULTADOS:Posterior a una media de seguimiento de cuarenta meses (rango de 6 a 107), 26 de 185 pacientes requirieron en forma eventual un estoma permanente, lo que equivale a una incidencia acumulada a cinco años de 17.4 %. Las causas para dejar un estoma permanente fueron morbilidad de la anastomosis (46.2%, 12/26), recurrencia local (19.2%, 5/26), metástasis a distancia (19.2%, 5/26), incontinencia fecal (3.8%, 1/26), mortalidad perioperatoria (3.8%, 1/26), rechazo del paciente (3.8%, 1/26), y malas condiciones generales (3.8%, 1/26). Aunque la incidencia de un estoma permanente fue significativamente diferente entre los grupos de resección interesfintérica (parcial vs subtotal vs total: 8.3% vs 20% vs 25.8%, p = 0.02), no se consideró un factor predictor independiente para la formación de estoma. En el análisis multivariado se demostró que la fuga anatomótica (OR = 5.29; p = 0.001) y la estenosis anastomótica (OR = 5.13; p = 0.002) fueron factores independientes para predecir la necesidad de un estoma permanente.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y la información proveniente de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:La incidencia acumulada a cinco años de estoma permantente fue de 17.4%. Se consideran a las complicaciones anastomóticas como factores de riesgo. Los pacientes deberán ser informados de los riesgos y beneficios cuando se considere la posibilidad de efectuar una cirugía preservadora de esfínteres finalmente. Puede ser preferible disminuir la probabilidad de dejar un estoma permanente tratando de minimizar la posibilidad de complicaciones de la anastomosis. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B704.

Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer.

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer. METHOD: This was a retrospective study that included 56 patients who underwent Lap-ISR from a prospectively collected database. The RAIR was examined preoperatively and up to 12 months after ileostomy closure. The primary outcome included physiological variation in RAIR and its difference between partial, subtotal and total ISR. The secondary outcome was its correlation with functional outcome. RESULTS: The reflex was present in 95% (53/56) of patients preoperatively, in 36% (20/56) before ileostomy closure, in 48% (27/56) at 3-6 months and in 61% (34/56) at 12 months after ileostomy closure. The elicited volume of RAIR was significantly increased at 12 months after ileostomy closure than at baseline (P = 0.005), but its duration and amplitude did not differ significantly. There was no significant difference in the reflex recovery between the ISR groups (partial vs. subtotal vs. total: 65% vs. 63% vs. 44%, P = 0.61). At 12 months after ileostomy closure, the RAIR-present group had favourable functional results and patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Major faecal incontinence was found in 82% of patients in the RAIR-absent group. CONCLUSION: The RAIR is abolished in the majority of patients after Lap-ISR, but a time-dependent recovery could be observed in more than half of the patients. The reflex recovery is not influenced by the resection grade of the internal sphincter. However, persistent loss of the RAIR correlates with worse continence.

Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (CAA) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR) for patients with ultralow rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 79 consecutive patients treated by Lap-ISR for low-lying rectal cancer in an academic medical center from June 2011 to February 2016. According to the distal tumor margin and individualized anal length, the patients underwent three types of hand-sewn CAA including partial-ISR, subtotal-ISR, and total-ISR. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 35.4% required partial-ISR, 43% adopted subtotal-ISR, and 21.5% underwent total-ISR. R0 resection was achieved in 78 patients (98.7%). In addition to distal resection margin, there were no significant differences in clinicopathological parameters and postoperative complications between the three groups. The type of hand-sewn CAA did not influence the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) or local relapse-free survival (LFS). At 24-months follow-up, in spite of higher incontinence scores in total-ISR group, there were not statistically significant differences in functional outcomes including Wexner score or Kirwan grade between the groups. Nevertheless, patients with chronic anastomotic stricture showed worse anal function than those without the complication. CONCLUSION: The type of hand-sewn CAA after Lap-ISR may not influence oncological and functional outcomes, but chronic stricture deteriorates continence status.

High expression of CD39/ENTPD1 in malignant epithelial cells of human rectal adenocarcinoma.

The ectonucleotidase CD39 is pivotal in the conversion of immunostimulatory adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into immunosuppressive adenosine which potently inhibits host immune responses against cancer. This study investigated the expression level and prognostic significance of CD39 in human rectal adenocarcinoma. Our data demonstrated that CD39 staining strongly marked malignant epithelial cells where the protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of CD39 were significantly increased compared with paracancerous controls. In addition to primary tumors, CD39 was also abundantly expressed in liver metastases and tumor-draining lymph nodes from metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma. Although patients with higher CD39 density in tumor cells were more likely to have favorable characteristics (early TNM and N stages) and overall survival, the singular parameter cannot be used as an independent factor for predicting patients' prognosis. Intriguingly, combined analysis of CD39 and CD73 expression was more efficient to foretell patient's outcome where patients with increased CD73 but decreased CD39 levels displayed a worst prognosis. Taken together, the current study revealed that malignant epithelial cells of human rectal adenocarcinoma strongly express CD39 that may play a potential role in the tumor invasion and metastasis. Although high expression of CD39 in tumor cells is correlated with favorable clinical outcome, the combination of CD39 and CD73 expression may have a better prognostic value.

Twist and miR-34a are involved in the generation of tumor-educated myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Tumors can induce the generation and accumulation of immunosuppressive cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment, contributing to tumor immunological escapes. Many studies have demonstrated that multiple factors could induce myeloid precursor cells into myeloid-derived suppressor cells, not dendritic cells. In our study, we found that tumor supernatants could induce the generation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by disturbing the development of dendritic cells. Twist and miR-34a may regulate the effect of tumor cells inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells via TGF-ß and/or IL-10.

[Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the perioperative and postoperative complications follow laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LapISR) in the treatment of low rectal cancer and their management. METHODS: An observational study was conducted in 73 consecutive patients who underwent LapISR for low rectal cancer between June 2011 and February 2016 in our hospital. The clinicopathological parameters, perioperative and postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and postoperative complications were defined as any complication occurring within or more than 3 months after the primary operation, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-nine(67.1%) cases were male and 24(32.9%) were female with a median age of 61(25 to 79) years. The median distance from distal tumor margin to anal verge was 4.0(1.0 to 5.5) cm. The median operative time was 195 (120 to 360) min, median intra operative blood loss was 100 (20 to 300) ml, median number of harvested lymph nodes was 14(3 to 31) per case. All the patients underwent preventive terminal ileum loop stoma. No conversion or hospital mortality was presented. The R0 resection rate was 98.6% with totally negative distal resection margin. A total of 34 complication episodes were recorded in 21(28.8%) patients during perioperative period, and among which 20.6%(7/34) was grade III(-IIII( according to Dindo system. Anastomosis-associated morbidity (16.4%,12/73) was the most common after LapISR, including mucosa ischemia in 9 cases(12.3%), stricture in 7 cases (9.6%, 4 cases secondary to mucosa necrosis receiving anal dilation), grade A fistula in 3 cases (4.1%) receiving conservative treatment and necrosis in 1 case (1.4%) receiving permanent stoma. After a median follow up of 21(3 to 60) months, postoperative complications were recorded in 12 patients (16.4%) with 16 episodes, including anastomotic stenosis (8.2%), rectum segmental stricture (5.5%), ileus (2.7%), partial anastomotic dehiscence (1.4%), anastomotic fistula (1.4%), rectovaginal fistula (1.4%) and mucosal prolapse (1.4%). These patients received corresponding treatments, such as endoscopic transanal resection, anal dilation, enema, purgative, permanent stoma, etc. according to the lesions. Six patients (8.2%) required re-operation intervention due to postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Anastomosis-associated morbidity is the most common after LapISR in the treatment of low rectal cancer in perioperative and postoperative periods, which must be strictly managed with suitable methods.

[Long-term efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in treating obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS). METHODS: Clinical data of 95 female patients with ODS undergoing STARR at Department of Colorectal Surgery, Rocket Army General Hospital from February 2010 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The Cleveland constipation scoring system (CSS), Longo ODS scoring system and severe symptoms score(SSS) were used to evaluate the degree and intensity of clinical symptoms. Patient satisfaction was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinical symptoms at postoperative 12-month were defined as short-term efficacy, and at the end of follow up (≥48 months) were defined as long-term efficacy. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.5 (29 to 79) years and the median follow-up was 65 (48 to 78) months. Eighty (84.2%) and 44 (46.3%) patients completed the short-term and long-term efficacy evaluation respectively. At the end of follow up, compared with the baseline levels before operation, the CSS score (14.69 vs. 6.02), ODS score (16.51 vs. 5.73) and SSS score (14.64 vs. 5.14) were significantly decreased (all P<0.01), but the VAS score (3.96 vs. 7.20, P<0.01) was significantly increased. A total of 10 patients (22.7%) developed symptomatic recurrence. The self-reported definitive satisfaction was excellent in 10 (22.7%) patients, fairly good in 17(38.6%), good in 9(20.5%), and poor in 8(18.2%). The total effective rate was 81.8%(36/44). CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy of STARR in the treatment of ODS is good, but the rate of symptomatic recurrence is relatively high.

[Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection(ISR) for low rectal cancers. METHODS: From June 2011 to February 2016, a total of 79 consecutive patients with low rectal cancers underwent laparoscopic ISR with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis at our department. According to the distal tumor margin, partial ISR (internal sphincter resection at the dentate line) was used to treat tumors with distance <1 cm from the anal sphincter (n=28), subtotal ISR was adopted for the tumors locating between the dentate line and intersphincteric groove (n=34), and total ISR (resection at the dentate line) was applied in the treatment of intra-anal tumors (n=17). Anal function was evaluated by a standardized gastrointestinal questionnaire, Wexner incontinence score and Kirwan's classification. Metaphase oncological results and postoperative anal function were compared among three groups, and. RESULTS: Other than the distance of tumor low margin to dentate line (P=0.000) and serum CEA level (P=0.040), no significant differences were noted in baseline data among 3 groups (all P>0.05). The median follow up was 21(8-61) months. The 3-year disease-free survival rates in laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total ISR groups were 91.1%, 88.9%, 88.2% (P=0.901) and the 3-year local relapse-free survival rates were 91.1%, 72.9%, 80.2%(P=0.658), whose all differences were not significant. Thirty-eight patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent ileostomy closure for at least 24 months completed the evaluation of anal function, including 14 cases in partial group, 15 cases in subtotal group and 9 cases in total group. Of 38 patients, 73.7%(28/38) was classified as good function (Wexner incontinence score ≤10) and no patient adopted a colostomy because of severe fecal incontinence(Kirwan classification=grade 5). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in Wexner incontinence score and Kirwan classification among 3 groups (all P>0.05). However, patients with chronic anastomotic stoma stenosis showed worse anal function than those without stenosis [Wexner incontinence score: 18(9-20) vs 6(0-18), P=0.000; Kirwan grading: 3(2-4) vs. 2(1-4), P=0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: As the ultimate sphincter-saving technique, laparoscopic ISR can result in better oncologic outcomes and better anal function for patients with low rectal cancers. The different procedures of ISR may not affect the efficacy, but chronic anastomotic stoma stenosis deteriorates incontinence status.

Primary sarcomatoid carcinoma of the jejunum with massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage: A case report and review of the literature.

Primary sarcomatoid carcinoma of the jejunum is an extremely rare condition, with only 16 cases reported in the literature to date. We herein report an additional case of a giant sarcomatoid carcinoma of the jejunum in a 62-year-old male patient, presenting as massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage. During emergency laparotomy, ~5 litres of bloody ascites was found in the peritoneal cavity and the tumor was located in the proximal jejunum. The tumor involved the entire wall of the jejunum and had directly invaded the neighboring parietal peritoneum, omentum, transverse colon and mesentery, with metastatic lymph nodes. The patient underwent palliative resection of the tumor; however, the course was rapidly progressive and he succumbed to progression of abdominal and liver metastases 4 weeks after surgery. The tumor was found to be positive for epithelial and mesenchymal markers on immunohistochemical analysis. This case emphasizes the aggressive clinical course and metastatic nature of this malignant tumor, with a supplementary review of the previously published literature.

[Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treatment of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG) for the treatment of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). METHODS: Clinical data of 32 obesity patients with T2DM patients undergoing LSG from May 2010 to February 2012 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Their body weight indexes (body weight, waist circumference, BMI, EWL), blood glucose indexes [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR)], and blood lipid indexes [total cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C)] were measured 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation and compared with preoperative levels. Improvement in complications was observed. RESULTS: All the patients completed operation under laparoscopy except 1 case because of abdominal cavity adhesion. The average operative time was (115.0±19.6) min, and the average blood loss (69.0±29.7) ml. No operative death, anastomotic leakage, or surgical site infection were found. The body weight, waist circumference and BMI at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were significantly lower(all P<0.05) showing a decreasing trend over time. EWL showed significant increasing trend (P<0.05). During 12 months of follow-up, no over-low weight was observed. From 1 month after surgery, HbA1c, FPG and HOMA-IR decreased significantly (P<0.05). HbA1c and FPG maintained stable level at 12 and 6 months after operation respectively. FPG of 28 patients returned to normal 3 months after operation. Clinical complete remission rate of T2DM was 87.5%(28/32), and clinical partial remission rate was 12.5%(4/32) at the 12-month follow-up. Serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL-C decreased obviously after surgery(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: LSG procedure is a safe and effective surgical method in treatment of obesity with T2DM.

[Perioperative managment of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the surgical technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: A total of 57 morbid obesity patients undergoing LSG surgery from May 2010 to December 2012 were enrolled in the study, whose clinical data in perioperative period were analyzed retrospectively. These patients had more than 1 year of follow-up. All the patients received preoperative preparation and postoperative management, and postoperative excess weight loss(EWL%) and improvement of preoperative complications was evaluated. RESULTS: All the cases completed the operation under laparoscopy, except 1 case because of the abdominal extensive adhesion. The average operation time was(102.0±15.2) min and the mean intraoperative blood loss (132.3±45.6) ml. Of 2 postoperative hemorrhage patients, 1 case received conservative treatment, and another one underwent laparoscopic exploration. The EWL% at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after procedure was (54.9±13.8)%, (79.0±23.6)% and (106.9±25.1)% respectively. The preoperative complications were improved in some degree. There were no operative death, and anastomotic leak, anastomotic stenosis, or surgical site infection occurred. CONCLUSION: LSG is a safe and effective surgical technique, whose safety and efficacy may be increased by improving the perioperative management.

[Understanding of International Sleeve Gastroectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement and our experience].

An international symposium on the standard surgical treatment of morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus was held in Florida, USA in March 2011. An expert panel from all over the world attended the meeting. The expert panelists discussed and established International Sleeve Gastroectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement : best practice guidelines based on experience of more than 12,000 cases, which made a very commendable attempt in standardized surgical pathway of sleeve gastroectomy. Based on clinical experience over 10 years and the understanding of the consensus , this paper discusses the learning curve, preoperative preparation, indications/contraindications, surgical technique, management and prevention of complications, and post operative management.

[Efficacy comparison between 2 methods of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes after 2 methods of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). METHODS: From December 2009 to June 2011, 21 patients with T2DM underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, including laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB, n=11), and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB, n=10). Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The clinical complete remission rate of T2DM was 64%(7/11) in LRYGB group, and 60%(6/10) in LMGB group. The clinical partial remission rate of T2DM was 36%(4/11) in LRYGB group, and 40%(4/10) in the LMGB group. There was no significant difference between the two groups(both P>0.05). The levels of BMI, waist circumference, HOMA-IR and HbA1c within the postoperative 6 months were improved in each group (all P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups(all P>0.05). There were no conversion or perioperative deaths in both groups. Compared to LMGB, the LRYGB group had longer operative time[(147.0±35.9) min vs. (110.5±39.7) min, P=0.038] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.9±2.3) d vs. (7.1±1.4) d, P=0.046). One patient suffered from ileus in LRYGB group, one patient suffered from reflux esophagitis and one suffered chronic diarrhea in LMGB group. The incidence of postoperative complication was similar between the two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: LRYGB and LMGB may result in satisfactory and safe effects for the treatment of T2DM, while the LMGB is simpler and associates with quicker recovery.