RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia gives superior outcomes for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of available data regarding contemporary general anesthesia (GA) approaches for revision TJA utilized at high-volume joint arthroplasty centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 850 consecutive revision TJAs (405 revision total hip arthroplasties and 445 revision total knee arthroplasties) performed over 4 years at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and reported on the lengths of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the revision arthroplasty patients, 74.4% (632 of 850) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 68.5% (582 of 850) of subjects were able to participate in physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.7%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 11.3% (n = 96), while the reoperation rate was 9.4% (n = 80). CONCLUSIONS: While neuraxial anesthesia is commonly preferred when performing revision TJA, we have demonstrated favorable safety and efficiency metrics utilizing GA in conjunction with contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that modern GA techniques can be successfully used in revision TJA.
RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Apoptosis detection in histological section is very important, but usual methods (TUNEL and morphologic changes) are controversial. Immunohistochemical stains of activated proteins during apoptosis improve detection of cell death in tissue sections. Activated caspase-3 and cleaved cytokeratin-18 are more and more used. OBJECTIVE: This study compared immunohistochemical markers (activated caspase-3, cleaved cytokeratin-18 and two antibodies not yet evaluated: activated caspase-7 and cleaved PARP-1), cellular morphology and TUNEL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tumour xenografts of the human colon cancer cell line HT29 were used, treated by photodynamic therapy, to obtain large numbers of cells undergoing apoptosis. Apoptotic cells were quantified and apoptotic indices were determined for each marker. RESULTS: Comparison of apoptosis index indicated statistically best sensibility with activated-caspase-3 and cleaved-cytokeratin-19. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry for activated caspase-3 and cleaved cytkeratin-18 appear to be an easy, sensitive, and reliable method for detecting and quantifying apoptosis in this model. There are therefore recommended for the detection and quantification of apoptosis in tissue sections. Other markers as cleaved PARP-1 and activated caspase-7 can be an interessant solution: advantages and inconvenience for each methods are exposed.