Efficacy of oral amantadine among patients hospitalised with COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Amantadine has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 because it shows anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro. However, to date, no controlled study has assessed the safety and efficacy of amantadine in COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Whether amantadine is effective and safe among patients with different COVID-19 severity classifications. STUDY DESIGN: and Methods: This was multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled study.Patients with oxygen saturation ≤94% and no need for high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support were randomly allocated to receive oral amantadine or placebo (1:1) for 10 days in addition to standard care. The primary endpoint was time to recovery assessed over 28 days since randomisation, defined as discharge from hospital or no need for supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: The study was terminated early due to a lack of efficacy after an interim analysis. Final data from 95 patients who received amantadine (mean age, 60.2 years; 65% male; 66% with comorbidities) and 91 patients who received placebo (mean age, 55.8 years; 60% male; 68% with comorbidities) were obtained. The median (95% CI) time to recovery was 10 days both in the amantadine (9-11) and placebo arms (8-11; subhazard ratio = 0.94 [95%CI 0.7-1.3]). The percentage of deaths and percentage of patients who required intensive care at 14 and 28 days did not significantly differ between the amantadine and placebo groups. INTERPRETATION: Adding amantadine to standard care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 did not increase the likelihood of recovery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04952519; www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Cisplatin-based three drugs combination (NIP) as induction and adjuvant treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: final results.

INTRODUCTION: This phase III trial was conducted in non-small cell lung cancer patients with locally advanced stage II B (only T3N0) III A and III B (only T4 N0). Primary endpoint was 2-year survival; secondary were toxicity, disease-free survival, and overall survival. METHODS: After three cycles of vinorelbine (N) 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 5, ifosfamide/mesna (I) 3 g/m2 on day 1, cisplatin (P) (NIP), patients were treated by surgery and within 45 days were randomized to two additional cycles of NIP versus observation. RESULTS: Median tumor diameter was 5.5 cm (1.2-10.6). Overall, 155 of 156 patients received chemotherapy: 133 (85%) men, median age: 59 years (35-75). Sixty-five percentage of patients were stage III A, 28% II B, and 7% III B. The study has been closed prematurely because of the low inclusion rate. After three cycles of induction in 143 assessable patients, 82 reported an objective response (57.3%) (95% CI: 48.8-65.6), with 3.5% complete response and 53.8% partial response. Relative dose intensity during neoadjuvant NIP (%) was 97, 98, and 98.5 for vinorelbine, ifosfamide/mesna, and cisplatin, respectively. Tolerance: G3 to 4 neutropenia in 3% of patients and G3 to 4 anemia in 4%; nonhematological toxicities included G3 nausea/vomiting in 11%, G3 anorexia and G3 to 4 infection in 6.5%, G3 asthenia in 10% and G3 to 4 alopecia in 25.5%. After a median of 32 days after NIP, 107 patients (69%) underwent operation with complete resection (R0) in 74% (79 of 107 patients). Downstaging (N2 to N0) after surgery was 29%. Operative mortality rate was 2.8%. Twenty-one days (median) after surgery, 79 patients were randomized to adjuvant NIP (47%) or control (53%). Tolerance of adjuvant NIP: 12.5% G3 to 4 nausea/vomiting, 19% G3 alopecia, 6% G3 infection, and G3 asthenia. Overall median survival 32.3 versus 31.8 months in the observation and NIP arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NIP allows 74% of R0 with no surgery delay. The few number of randomized patients did not allow to conclude on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy.