Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of ABI-H2158, a hepatitis B virus core inhibitor: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 study.

Treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) is mostly indefinite, with new finite-duration therapies needed. We report safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of the investigational HBV core inhibitor ABI-H2158. This Phase 1a/b study (NCT03714152) had three parts: Part A, participants received a single ascending oral dose of ABI-H2158 (5-500 mg) or placebo; Part B, participants received multiple doses of ABI-H2158 300 mg once (QD) or twice (BID) daily or placebo, for 10 days; Part C, cHBV patients received ABI-H2158 (100, 300, or 500 mg QD or 300 mg BID) or placebo, for 14 days. Ninety-three participants enrolled. In Parts A/B, there were no serious adverse events (SAEs) or deaths, and all treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were Grade 1. In Part C, two patients had Grade 3 TEAEs unrelated to ABI-H2158; there were no deaths, SAEs or Grade 4 TEAEs. In Part A, median time to maximum ABI-H2158 plasma concentration (Tmax ) and mean terminal elimination half-life (t½ ) were 1-4 and 9.8-20.7 h, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased dose proportionally. In Part B, Day 10 Tmax was 2 h, mean t½ was 15.5-18.4 h, and exposure accumulated 1.7- to 3.1-fold. In Part C, Day 14 Tmax was 1 h, exposure accumulated 1.4- to 1.8-fold, and ABI-H2158 was associated with >2 log10 declines in HBV nucleic acids. In conclusion, ABI-H2158 in cHBV patients following 14 days of dosing was well tolerated and demonstrated potent antiviral activity. Safety and pharmacokinetics supported future QD dosing.

Solriamfetol for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson's Disease: Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Trial.

BACKGROUND: Solriamfetol is approved (US and EU) for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate solriamfetol safety/efficacy for EDS in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Phase 2, double-blind, 4-week, crossover trial: adults with PD and EDS were randomized to sequence A (placebo, solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d), B (solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d, placebo), or C (placebo). Outcomes (safety/tolerability [primary]; Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]; Maintenance of Wakefulness Test [MWT]) were assessed weekly. P values are nominal. RESULTS: Common adverse events (n = 66): nausea (10.7%), dizziness (7.1%), dry mouth (7.1%), headache (7.1%), anxiety (5.4%), constipation (5.4%), dyspepsia (5.4%). ESS decreased both placebo (-4.78) and solriamfetol (-4.82 to -5.72; P > 0.05). MWT improved dose-dependently with solriamfetol, increasing by 5.05 minutes with 300 mg relative to placebo (P = 0.0098). CONCLUSIONS: Safety/tolerability was consistent with solriamfetol's known profile. There were no significant improvements on ESS; MWT results suggest possible benefit with solriamfetol in PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Double-blind study of the actively transported levodopa prodrug XP21279 in Parkinson's disease.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of XP21279-carbidopa in patients with Parkinson's disease who experience motor fluctuations compared with immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa tablets. XP21279 is a levodopa prodrug that is actively absorbed by high-capacity nutrient transporters expressed throughout the gastrointestinal tract and then rapidly converted to levodopa by carboxylesterases. XP21279-carbidopa sustained-release bilayer tablets were developed to overcome pharmacokinetic limitations of levodopa by providing more continuous exposure. Patients with motor fluctuations who required carbidopa-levodopa four or five times daily were optimized for 2 weeks each on carbidopa-levodopa four or five times daily and XP21279-carbidopa three times daily in a randomized sequence. Next, they received each optimized treatment for 2 weeks in a double-blind/double-dummy, randomized sequence. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in daily off time at the end of each double-blind treatment period. All patients at 2 sites underwent pharmacokinetic analyses. Twenty-eight of 35 enrolled patients completed both double-blind treatments. The mean total daily off time was reduced from baseline by a mean (± standard error) of 2.7 hours (± 0.48 hours) for immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa and 3.0 hours (± 0.57 hours) for XP21279-carbidopa (P = 0.49). Among 11 patients who completed pharmacokinetic sampling on each optimized treatment, the percentage deviation from the mean levodopa concentration was lower (P < 0.05) for XP21279-carbidopa than carbidopa-levodopa. Both treatments had a similar incidence of new or worsening dyskinesias. XP21279-carbidopa administered three times daily produced a reduction in off time similar to that of carbidopa-levodopa administered four or five times daily, and the difference was not statistically significant. XP21279-carbidopa significantly reduced variability in levodopa concentrations compared with carbidopa-levodopa.

Long-term open-label vebicorvir for chronic HBV infection: Safety and off-treatment responses.

Background & Aims: The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs). Methods: Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment. Results: Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug-drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed. Conclusions: Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure. Clinical trial number: NCT03780543. Impact and implications: Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir.

Development of a lower-sodium oxybate formulation for the treatment of patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium oxybate (SXB) is a standard of care for cataplexy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and disrupted nighttime sleep in narcolepsy. At recommended dosages in adults (6-9 g/night), SXB increases daily dietary intake of sodium by 1100-1640 mg. Because excess sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure and cardiovascular risk, an oxybate formulation containing 92% less sodium than SXB (lower-sodium oxybate; LXB) was developed to provide an alternative oxybate treatment option. In 2020, LXB was approved for treatment of cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in patients 7 years of age and older with narcolepsy, and in 2021, for treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. AREAS COVERED: Development of LXB from initial concept to regulatory approval is described, including formulation development and preclinical and clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic parameters and bioequivalence evaluations from phase 1 clinical trials are detailed. Efficacy and safety results from phase 3 clinical trials of LXB in patients with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia are presented and discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Reducing sodium from high sodium‒containing medications is an important step to offset cardiovascular risks associated with high sodium consumption. The development of LXB exemplifies the importance of a collaborative approach to drug development, with patient needs paramount. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®) is a medication for people with narcolepsy aged 7 years and older. Xyrem treats symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy (attacks of muscle weakness caused by emotion) in narcolepsy. At the recommended dosages in adults, Xyrem adds a large amount of sodium to daily dietary intake. Too much sodium in the diet is associated with increased blood pressure and risks of damage to the heart and blood vessels. Researchers used calcium, magnesium, and potassium ions in addition to a small amount of sodium to make a new oxybate medication, called Xywav®, that has 92% less sodium than Xyrem. Xywav and Xyrem were similar in laboratory and animal studies. In people, the body absorbs and processes Xywav slightly differently than Xyrem, but Xywav treatment has been shown to work the same to reduce symptoms of cataplexy and EDS in people with narcolepsy and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Another neurological disorder with EDS is called idiopathic hypersomnia. Based on a clinical study, Xywav also reduced EDS and other symptoms in people with idiopathic hypersomnia. Side effects with Xywav are similar to those seen in previous studies with Xyrem.

Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and bioequivalence of lower-sodium oxybate in healthy participants in two open-label, randomized, crossover studies.

American Academy of Sleep Medicine practice parameters designate sodium oxybate (SXB) as a standard of care for cataplexy, excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), and disrupted night-time sleep in narcolepsy. Recently, a lower-sodium oxybate (LXB) with 92% less sodium than SXB was approved in the United States for the treatment of cataplexy or EDS in patients 7 years of age and older with narcolepsy. Two phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose crossover pharmacokinetic studies in healthy adults were conducted. Single 4.5-g oral doses of LXB and SXB were administered in a fasted or fed state. In the fasted state at equivalent oxybate doses, LXB, compared with SXB, had a lower maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ; study 1 [total aqueous volume, 240 ml]: 101.8 vs. 135.7 µg/ml; study 2 [60 ml]: 94.6 vs. 123.0 µg/ml), delayed time to Cmax (Tmax ; study 1: 0.75 vs. 0.5 h; study 2: 1.0 vs. 0.5 h), but similar area under the curve (AUC; study 1: AUC0-t , 235.4 vs. 263.9 µg∙h/ml; AUC0-∞ , 236.5 vs. 265.2 µg∙h/ml; study 2: AUC0-t , 241.5 vs. 254.7 µg∙h/ml; AUC0-∞ , 243.1 vs. 256.3 µg∙h/ml). Bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC but not Cmax (both studies). Cmax and AUC were lower under fed than fasted conditions (LXB and SXB); differences between fed versus fasted were smaller for LXB than SXB. These pharmacokinetic differences between LXB and SXB are likely due to the lower sodium content in LXB. Pooled analyses demonstrated that a higher Cmax is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled, 4-Period Crossover Study of the Effects of Solriamfetol on QTcF Intervals in Healthy Participants.

Solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (United States and European Union; Sunosi) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (37.5-150 mg/day). A thorough QT/QTc study assessed solriamfetol effects on QT interval (Fridericia correction for heart rate; QTcF). This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-period crossover study compared single doses of 300 and 900 mg solriamfetol, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and placebo in healthy adults. Placebo- and predose-adjusted mean differences in QTcF (ddQTcF; primary end point) were analyzed, and solriamfetol pharmacokinetics were characterized. Fifty-five participants completed all periods. Upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ddQTcF for both solriamfetol doses were <10 milliseconds at all postdose time points. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin; lower bounds of 2-sided 90%CIs for ddQTcF > 5 milliseconds at 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose. There were no QTcF increases > 60 milliseconds or QTcF values > 480 milliseconds at either solriamfetol dose. Solriamfetol median tmax was 2-3 hours; exposure was dose-proportional. More participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after solriamfetol 900 versus 300 mg (70% vs 29%); none were serious (all mild/moderate), and there were no deaths. Common AEs were nausea, dizziness, and palpitations. Neither solriamfetol dose resulted in QTcF prolongation > 10 milliseconds.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model Development and Simulation for Recombinant Erwinia Asparaginase Produced in Pseudomonas fluorescens (JZP-458).

JZP-458 is a recombinant Erwinia asparaginase produced using a novel Pseudomonas fluorescens expression platform that yields an enzyme expected to lack immunologic cross-reactivity to Escherichia coli-derived asparaginases. It is being developed as part of a multiagent chemotherapeutic regimen to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma patients who develop E coli-derived asparaginase hypersensitivity. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed for JZP-458 using serum asparaginase activity (SAA) data from a phase 1, single-dose study (JZP458-101) in healthy adults. Effects of intrinsic covariates (body weight, body surface area, age, sex, and race) on JZP-458 PK were evaluated. The model included SAA data from 24 healthy adult participants from the phase 1 study who received JZP-458: intramuscular (IM) data at 12.5 mg/m2 (N = 6) and 25 mg/m2 (N = 6), and intravenous (IV) data at 25 mg/m2 (N = 6) and 37.5 mg/m2 (N = 6). Model simulations of adult and pediatric SAA profiles were performed to explore the likelihood of achieving a therapeutic target nadir SAA (NSAA) level ≥0.1 IU/mL based on different administration strategies. PopPK modeling and simulation suggest JZP-458 is expected to achieve 72-hour NSAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in 100% of adult or pediatric populations receiving IM administration at 25 mg/m2 , and in 80.9% of adult and 94.5% of pediatric populations receiving IV administration at 37.5 mg/m2 on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday (M/W/F) dosing schedule. Based on these results, the recommended starting dose for the phase 2/3 pivotal study is 25 mg/m2 IM or 37.5 mg/m2 IV on a M/W/F dosing schedule in pediatric and adult patients.

Population and Noncompartmental Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate Support Weight-Based Dosing in Children and Adolescents With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy.

The pharmacokinetics (PKs) of sodium oxybate (SXB) was evaluated in a subset of participants from a study of SXB treatment in children (aged 7-11 years; n = 11) and adolescents (aged 12-17 years; n = 18) with narcolepsy with cataplexy. PK evaluation was conducted over 2 nights during the period when participants received a stable nightly SXB dose. The SXB dose on night 1 was half of night 2 and was administered in two equally divided doses: dose 1 was administered > 2 hours after the evening meal, and dose 2 was administered ≥ 4 hours after dose 1. Noncompartmental PK analysis demonstrated higher plasma concentrations post-dose 2 vs. post-dose 1, higher than dose-proportional increases in area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4h ) after dose 1, indicating nonlinear clearance, and better correlation between exposure and mg/kg than exposure and gram dose. To confirm the noncompartmental findings, identify factors affecting SXB PK, and compare with prior results in adults, a population PK (PopPK) model was established combining PK data from the current study with prior data from adults (132 healthy volunteers and 13 with narcolepsy). A two-compartment PopPK model with first-order absorption and nonlinear clearance from the central compartment described the data well. PopPK identified weight as the main intrinsic factor and food as the main extrinsic factor affecting SXB PK, and predicts similar PK profiles on a mg/kg basis across ages. These results, along with previously reported efficacy and safety outcomes, support weight-based SXB dose initiation in pediatric patients.

A Phase I, Randomized, Crossover, Open-label Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Solriamfetol (JZP-110) in Healthy Adult Subjects With and Without Food.

PURPOSE: Solriamfetol (JZP-110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with robust wake-promoting effects, is currently being evaluated for the reduction of sleepiness and improvement of wakefulness in patients with narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and bioavailability of solriamfetol at the highest intended therapeutic dose in healthy adults and to characterize its renal excretion under fasting conditions. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, crossover study, healthy adult subjects received a single 300-mg dose of solriamfetol in a fasted condition (10 h) and in a fed condition (30 min after the start of a standardized high-fat, high-calorie breakfast), with at least a 7-day washout period between doses. Blood samples for PK analyses were collected during both conditions at prespecified time points. Urine samples were collected up to 48 h postdose in the fasted condition. Samples were analyzed for solriamfetol (plasma and urine) and N-acetyl solriamfetol (urine) by using validated LC-MS/MS bioanalytical methods. The effect of food on solriamfetol relative bioavailability was examined by comparing the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the fed/fasted ratios of natural log-transformed PK parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ with the prespecified range of 80%-125%. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 32 subjects were enrolled (50% female; 53.1% black, 46.9% white; mean age, 35.6 years), and 31 were included in the PK analyses. Solriamfetol was rapidly absorbed in both conditions. The 90% CIs for the fed/fasted geometric mean ratios were 89.2-98.8 for Cmax (ratio of 93.9%) and 93.8-101.5 for AUC0-∞ (ratio of 97.6%), indicating the absence of a food effect. In the fasted condition, 89.8% of solriamfetol was recovered in urine as unchanged drug over 48 h; 1.1% was excreted as a minor metabolite, N-acetyl solriamfetol. A total of 55 adverse events (AEs), all mild, were reported by 18 subjects (56.3%). The frequency and type of AEs were similar in the 2 conditions; the most common AEs (insomnia, headache, hypervigilance, decreased appetite, and nausea) were all mild in severity and resolved without treatment. IMPLICATIONS: Solriamfetol relative bioavailability was bioequivalent in the fed and fasted conditions, showing that solriamfetol can be taken without regard to meals; furthermore, tolerability was similar in both conditions. Renal excretion of unchanged drug is the primary route of elimination.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Solriamfetol in Participants With Normal or Impaired Renal Function and With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis.

Solriamfetol (JZP-110), a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with wake-promoting effects, is renally excreted ∼90% unchanged within 48 hours. Effects of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics and safety of 75-mg single-dose solriamfetol were evaluated in adults with normal renal function (n = 6); mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6), or severe (n = 6) renal impairment; and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with and without hemodialysis (n = 7). Relative to normal renal function, geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity increased 53%, 129%, and 339%, and mean half-life was 1.2-, 1.9-, and 3.9-fold higher with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Renal excretion of unchanged solriamfetol over 48 hours was 85.8%, 80.0%, 66.4%, and 57.1% in normal, mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment groups, respectively; mean maximum concentration and time to maximum concentration did not vary substantially. Decreases in solriamfetol clearance were proportional to decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration increased 357% and 518% vs normal in ESRD with and without hemodialysis, respectively, with half-life >100 hours in both groups. Over the 4-hour hemodialysis period, ∼21% of solriamfetol dose was removed. Adverse events included headache (n = 1) and nausea (n = 1). Six days after dosing, 1 participant had increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, leading to study discontinuation. While these adverse events were deemed study-drug related, they were mild and resolved. Results from this study combined with population pharmacokinetic modeling/simulation suggest that solriamfetol dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with moderate or severe but not with mild renal impairment. Due to significant exposure increase/prolonged half-life, dosing is not recommended in patients with ESRD.

Pharmacokinetic profile of defibrotide in patients with renal impairment.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is an unpredictable, potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Severe VOD/SOS, generally associated with multiorgan dysfunction (pulmonary or renal dysfunction), may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide, recently approved in the US, has demonstrated efficacy treating hepatic VOD/SOS with multiorgan dysfunction. Because renal impairment is prevalent in patients with VOD/SOS, this Phase I, open-label, two-part study in adults examined the effects of hemodialysis and severe or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on defibrotide pharmacokinetics (PK). Part 1 compared defibrotide PK during single 6.25 mg/kg doses infused with and without dialysis. Part 2 assessed defibrotide plasma PK after multiple 6.25 mg/kg doses in nondialysis-dependent subjects with severe/ESRD versus healthy matching subjects. Among six subjects enrolled in Part 1, percent ratios of least-squares mean and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) on dialysis and nondialysis days were 109.71 (CI: 97.23, 123.78) for maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax); 108.39 (CI: 97.85, 120.07) for area under the concentration-time curve to the time of the last quantifiable plasma concentration (AUC0-t); and 109.98 (CI: 99.39, 121.70) for AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). These ranges were within 80%-125%, indicating no significant effect of dialysis on defibrotide exposure/clearance. In Part 2, defibrotide exposure parameters in six subjects with severe/ESRD after multiple doses (AUC0-t, 113 µg·h/mL; AUC over dosing interval, 113 µg·h/mL; Cmax, 53.8 µg/mL) were within 5%-8% of parameters after the first dose (AUC0-t, 117 µg·h/mL; AUC0-∞, 118 µg·h/mL; Cmax, 54.9 µg/mL), indicating no accumulation. Defibrotide peak and extent of exposures in those with severe/ESRD were ~35%-37% and 50%-60% higher, respectively, versus controls, following single and multiple doses. One adverse event (vomiting, possibly drug-related) was reported. These findings support defibrotide prescribing guidance stating no dose adjustment is necessary for hemodialysis or severe/ESRD.

Dose escalation and pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in children with solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of Doxil in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. Doxil is pegylated doxorubicin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients were children with refractory tumors who had received cumulative anthracycline doses <300 mg/m(2). Cohorts of at least three patients each received escalating doses of Doxil starting at 40 mg/m(2) at 4-week intervals. If no dose-limiting toxicity occurred, dosages were escalated by increments of 10 mg/m(2) in subsequent cohorts. Originally, Doxil was administered over 60 min, but significant infusion reactions prompted longer infusion times of 4 h. Patients also received premedication with dexamethasone, ranitidine, and diphenhydramine 24 h before infusion, with ranitidine continued 24 h after infusion. Periodic blood samples were collected and plasma doxorubicin concentrations were quantified to characterize the pharmacokinetics of Doxil. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and June 2000, 22 children ages 4-21 years with refractory tumors were treated with Doxil. Most patients had received one to five prior chemotherapy regimens, and all but five had prior radiotherapy (two had no prior therapy). Doxil was escalated to a dosage of 70 mg/m(2). At that level, dose-limiting mucositis was seen during the first cycle in two of six patients, thus defining dose-limiting toxicity, and in one additional patient during a subsequent cycle. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting less than 7 days was documented in two of six patients. The dose-limiting toxicity among two of six patients at 70 mg/m(2) was grade 3 mucositis during the first cycle of therapy. Painful desquamating dermatitis of the hands and feet, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, occurred in six patients. In two of those patients, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia started as grade 1 and progressed to grade 2 during subsequent courses. Mean estimates of central volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were 1.45 liters/m(2), 0.03 liter/h/m(2), and 36.4 h, respectively. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dose of Doxil administered every 4 weeks to pediatric patients was 60 mg/m(2). The effect of Doxil on pediatric patients with malignancies remains to be determined and should be studied in pediatric Phase II trials.

Actively transported levodopa prodrug XP21279: a study in patients with Parkinson disease who experience motor fluctuations.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and safety of XP21279 administered with carbidopa (CD) in subjects with Parkinson disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations and explore dose correspondence between CD-levodopa (LD) and XP21279 administered with CD. METHODS: Subjects received CD-LD 3 or 4 times daily for 2 weeks, followed by XP21279 plus CD 3 times daily for 2 weeks at fixed dosing times, allowing dose adjustment to optimize clinical response, in this multiple-dose, multicenter, open-label, 2-period, sequential-treatment study. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including LD exposure, were assessed over 16 hours on the last day of each treatment period. Levodopa exposure variability was assessed for each treatment using the absolute % deviation from average concentration (Cavg) in each subject. Efficacy assessments included daily self-ratings of OFF time, ON time, and dyskinesias. RESULTS: XP21279 provided significantly less variability in LD concentration compared with CD-LD (P < 0.05) in 10 PD subjects with motor fluctuations, consistent with lower peak-to-trough fluctuation for XP21279. Patterns of percentage of subjects OFF were consistent with the LD concentration-time profiles for each respective treatment. Compared with CD-LD treatment, 6 of 10 study completers experienced reduction of 30% or greater in average daily OFF time during the last 4 days in the XP21279 treatment period. XP21279 resulted in an increase in the time spent ON without troublesome dyskinesias, and the mean time to ON after the first morning XP21279 dose was not delayed, as compared with CD-LD. CONCLUSIONS: XP21279 provided improved pharmacokinetic performance (highlighted by reduction in variability of LD concentration) compared with CD-LD and therefore may provide better control of PD motor fluctuations.

Evaluation of gabapentin enacarbil on cardiac repolarization: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, crossover thorough QT/QTc study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin enacarbil, a transported prodrug of gabapentin, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate to severe restless legs syndrome. OBJECTIVE: As part of the overall safety evaluation of gabapentin enacarbil, the present definitive QT/QTc study was conducted to assess the effects of gabapentin enacarbil on cardiac repolarization in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization E14 guidance. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, crossover study enrolled 54 healthy adults. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of gabapentin enacarbil 1200, 6000 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control), and placebo in a randomized sequence, with treatment periods separated by a 7-day washout. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis, and continuous ECG measurements were recorded using a Holter monitor. The primary end point was the time-matched difference in individualized baseline-adjusted QTc (ddQTcIb) between gabapentin enacarbil and placebo. General tolerability was also monitored. RESULTS: Of the 54 subjects enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 29.2 [10.1]; 42.6% female; mean body mass index, 25.8 [3.0]), 48 (88.9%) completed the study, and 6 were discontinued prematurely after having received ≥ 1 dose of study medication. Thus, the numbers of patients in the safety population were: gabapentin enacarbil 1200 mg, 50; gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg, 50; moxifloxacin, 50; and placebo, 51. The maximum ddQTcIb values were 0.7 msec (upper 95% confidence limit [CL], 3.0) with gabapentin enacarbil 1200 mg; 1.3 msec (upper CL, 3.6) with gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg; and 7.4 msec (lower CL, 5.1) with moxifloxacin. A QT-concentration relationship was reported with moxifloxacin. Gabapentin exposures were dose-proportional with gabapentin enacarbil doses of 1200 and 6000 mg. The most commonly reported adverse events with gabapentin enacarbil 6000 mg were dizziness and somnolence (60.0% and 54.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this population of healthy adults, gabapentin enacarbil at doses of 1200 and 6000 mg was not associated with QT prolongation and was generally well-tolerated.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine steady-state gabapentin exposures and corresponding relief of symptoms and safety profile produced by 4 dose levels of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) in subjects with restless legs syndrome (RLS). METHODS: Subjects with RLS (n = 217) were randomized to receive once-daily, orally administered GEn 600 (n = 48), 1200 (n = 45), 1800 (n = 38), or 2400 mg (n = 45) or placebo (n = 41) in this 12-week, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT01332305). Clinic visits were at screening, baseline, and weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12; plasma gabapentin concentrations were measured by a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method at weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: Exposure to gabapentin was proportional to GEn dose. Time to maximum plasma concentration was 7 to 9 hours, and elimination half-life was ~6 hours. The mean reduction from baseline to week 12 in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale total score and proportions of subjects with "much improved"/"very much improved" Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores (investigator and patient ratings) ranged from -12.9 to -13.9 for GEn treatment groups versus -9.3 for placebo. The 2 most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin exposure was approximately proportional to GEn dose. Efficacy data showed that a once-daily dose of GEn 600 to 2400 mg provides greater relief of RLS symptoms than placebo; GEn was generally well tolerated with an adverse event profile consistent with gabapentin.